Objective Fluoroscopic Outcomes After Endoscopic Staple Versus Laser Zenker's Diverticulotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy (EZD) is typically performed via stapling (endoscopic staple diverticulotomy; ESD) or CO2 laser (endoscopic laser diverticulotomy; ELD). Conflicting reports exist on which approach provides optimal outcomes. This investigation compared objective fluoroscopic data between ESD and ELD. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary EZD at a tertiary center between January 1, 2014 and January 10, 2022 was performed. Patients undergoing ESD and ELD were matched by preoperative diverticulum size. Primary outcome measures were postoperative diverticulum size and change in diverticulum size from pre- to postoperative swallowing fluoroscopy. Secondary outcome measures were the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score, penetration aspiration scale (PAS), pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR), and pharyngoesophageal segment opening (PESo). RESULTS: Thirteen matched pairs with complete fluoroscopic data were identified. The mean (±SD) age of the cohort was 74.0 (±8.5) years. There were no age or gender differences between groups (p > 0.05). The mean pre-operative ZD size was 1.98 (±0.69) cm for ESD and 1.97 (±0.72) cm for ELD; the mean postoperative size was 0.84 (±0.62) cm for ESD and 0.34 (±0.27) cm for ELD (p < 0.05). Mean diverticulum size improved by 1.14 (±0.59) cm after ESD and 1.62 (±0.59) cm after ELD (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative EAT-10, PAS, PCR, or PESo between groups. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that endoscopic laser Zenker's diverticulotomy results in a greater improvement in diverticulum size than endoscopic staple diverticulotomy. The data did not suggest a difference in postoperative dysphagia symptom scores or other objective fluoroscopic parameters between staple and laser diverticulotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCES: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3057-3060, 2023.

Hemodynamic Changes Associated With Transcervical Laryngeal Injection of Botulinum Toxin.

PURPOSE: Laryngeal dystonia is a chronic neurologic disorder characterized by intention-induced spasms of the vocal folds driven by aberrant central motor processing. The use of in-office transcervical botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of laryngeal disorders, such as laryngeal dystonia, has been deemed safe and efficacious. There is, however, no available data outlining the hemodynamic changes experienced by patients undergoing this frequently performed procedure. METHODS: One hundred and one patients diagnosed with laryngeal dystonia were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients underwent transcervical laryngeal botulinum toxin injection to address their dysphonia. Vital signs where acquired prior to, and at the time of injection. Alterations in these parameters were then evaluated for statistical significance. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in mean heart rate (5.8 ± 10.8 bpm, P < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (7.0 ± 9.5 mm Hg, P < 0.0001; 8.7 ± 14.7 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) were discovered. No statistically significant difference in oxygen saturation was noted and no patients in the study faced major adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Though these findings may not have related to clinically significant complication, our study demonstrates the importance of understanding potential stressors in a procedure routinely performed by laryngologists. This may result in more careful patient selection, alterations in procedure, and improved safety by acting in a timely fashion if alarming changes in hemodynamic parameters are noted.

Normative Value for the Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation (LUMP) is a recently validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) aimed at evaluating the symptom severity of patients with globus pharyngeus (GP). The objective of this study was to define the normative values for the LUMP questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively collected, descriptive research/scale development. METHODS: The LUMP questionnaire was completed by 88 subjects. Individuals without throat-related symptoms such as dysphagia, dysphonia, or cough were provided LUMP. The results of the eight-item questionnaire were analyzed for standard error of the mean (SEM), mean, and standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Review of the 88 LUMP questionnaires elucidated a mean of 0.42 (SEM = 0.10, SD = 0.96) in the normative population. By gender, the female (n = 50) mean was 0.24, SD = 0.66, SEM = 0.09; for males (n = 38), the mean was 0.66, SD = 1.21, SEM = 0.20. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative data for the LUMP, a recently established PROM useful in patients with GP. A LUMP score greater than or equal to 3 should be considered abnormal and warrants additional attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:398-400, 2022.

The Demographics of Patients Presenting for Laryngological Care at an Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Few studies address the demographics/epidemiology/socioeconomic status of patients presenting to a laryngologist at a tertiary care center for treatment. To identify any possible disparities in voice, airway, and swallowing care, we sought to analyze the aforementioned data for new patients presenting to the voice center at an academic medical center. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from an institutional database of 4,623 new adult patients presenting for laryngological care at a tertiary care, academic medical center from 2015 to 2020. Demographic data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 4,623 patients, 62.8% were female and 37.2% were male with ages ranging from 19 to 99 years (Avg 59.51, standard deviation 15.83). Patients were 81.8% white, 13% black, and 5.2% other, compared with 56.3% white, 34.8% black, 20% other in the local municipality from US Census Data. Payer mix included 46.98% Medicare, 42.59% commercial insurance, 3.22% Medicaid, 5.19% other, and 2.01% uninsured/self-insured. Patient demographics based on primary diagnosis codes were also examined. A majority of patients presented with voice-related complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the demographics of those with laryngological disorders will help to develop targeted interventions and effective outreach programs for underrepresented patient populations. Future multicenter studies could provide further insight into the distribution of healthcare disparities in laryngology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:626-632, 2022.