Preoperative Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Utilization and Postoperative Complications in ACDF, PCDF, and Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Identify factors associated with cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI) receipt before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), or decompression; evaluate the association between CESI receipt and 90-day postoperative complications; and determine characteristics of CESI associated with complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous literature has suggested that a preoperative CESI may increase the risk of postoperative complications. However, these studies were limited in the procedures and complications they evaluated. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan database was queried for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent ACDF, PCDF, or cervical decompression for disc herniation, stenosis, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or spondylosis without myelopathy between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2020. CESI receipt within 12 months preoperatively, injection characteristics, and postoperative complications were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of CESI, receipt of a CESI and each 90-day postoperative complication, and CESI characteristics and each 90-day complication. RESULTS: Among the unique patients who underwent each procedure, 20,371 ACDF patients (30.93%), 1259 (22.24%) PCDF patients, and 3349 (36.30%) decompression patients received a preoperative CESI. In all 3 cohorts, increasing age, increasing comorbidity burden, smoker status, and diagnosis of myelopathy were associated with decreased odds of preoperative CESI receipt, while female sex and diagnosis of radiculopathy and spondylosis without myelopathy were associated with increased odds. There were no meaningful between-group comparisons or significant associations between preoperative CESI receipt and any 90-day postoperative complications in multivariable models (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidated the main determinants of CESI receipt and found no differences in the odds of developing 90-day postoperative complications, but did identify differential outcomes with regard to some injection characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Does Medicare Insurance Mitigate Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access to Lumbar Spinal Surgery When Compared to Commercial Insurance?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Compare disparities in lumbar surgical care utilization in Commercially insured versus Medicare patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While disparities in spinal surgery have been previously described, less evidence exists on effective strategies to mitigate them. Theoretically, universal health care coverage under Medicare should improve health care access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing National Inpatient Sample data (2003-2018), we included inpatient lumbar discectomy or laminectomy/fusion cases in black, white, or Hispanic patients aged 18-74 years, with Commercial or Medicare insurance. A multivariable Poisson distribution model determined race/ethnicity subgroup-specific rate ratios (RRs) of patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to their respective population distribution (using US Census data) based on race/ethnicity, region, gender, primary payor, and age (Commercially insured age subgroups: 18-39, 40-54, and 55-64 y; Medicare age subgroup: 65-74 y). RESULTS: Of the 2,310,956 lumbar spine procedures included, 88.9%, 6.1%, and 5.0% represented white, black, and Hispanic patients, respectively. Among Commercially insured patients, black and Hispanic (compared to white) patients had lower rates of surgical care utilization; however, these disparities decreased with increasing age: black (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.37-0.38) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.52-0.54) aged 18-39 years versus black (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.63-0.65) aged 55-64 years. Racial/ethnic disparities persisted in Medicare patients, especially when compared to the neighboring age subgroup that was Commercially insured: black (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.61) under Medicare. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in surgical care utilization among black and Hispanic patients persist regardless of health care coverage, and an expansion of Medicare eligibility alone may not comprehensively address health care disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Synthesis of 'joint class' curricula at high volume joint replacement centres and a preliminary model for development and evaluation.

RATIONALE: Preoperative patient education through 'joint class' has potential to improve quality of care for total joint replacement (TJR). However, no formal guidance exists regarding curriculum content, potentially resulting in inter-institutional variation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to (a) synthesize curriculum components of 'joint classes' across high-volume institutions and (b) develop a preliminary theory of change model for development and evaluation guided by the existing curricula and related literature. METHODS: We reviewed 'joint class' curricula from the websites of the 10 highest-volume TJR centres (by average annual 2017-2019 volume) that publicly disclosed this information. Two reviewers qualitatively compared available content and noted common categories, which were synthesized into key domains across institutions. We then reviewed the PubMed database for literature on pre-TJR patient education and education needs in the past 10 years. Drawing on our curriculum synthesis and related literature, we proposed a theory of change model: hypothesized mechanisms through which 'joint class' confers benefits to patients and health systems. RESULTS: We identified 30 categories in our review of existing class content, which we synthesized into seven key domains: (I) Practical Elements, (II) Logistics, (III) Medical Information, (IV) Modifiable Risk Factors, (V) Expected Outcomes, (VI) Patient Role in Recovery and (VII) Enhanced Education. Variation across institutions was noted. Our preliminary model based on the curriculum synthesis and related literature on the impact of 'joint class' includes three levels: (1) Practical Elements ('joint class' accessibility and information quality), (2) Class Goals (increased health literacy, increased adherence, risk mitigation, realistic expectations, and reduced anxiety) and (3) Target Outcomes (improved clinical outcomes, positive patient experience and increased patient satisfaction). CONCLUSION: Our synthesis identified core common topics included in pre-TJR education but also highlighted variation across institutions, supporting opportunities for standardization. Clinicians and researchers can use our preliminary model to systematically develop and evaluate 'joint classes,' with the goal of establishing a standard of care for TJR preoperative education.

Sleep Disturbance Trends in the Short-Term Postoperative Period for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) often experience preoperative/postoperative sleep disturbances. Although sleep quality generally improves > 6 months after surgery, patterns of sleep in the short-term postoperative period are poorly understood. This study sought to (1) characterize sleep disturbance patterns over the 3-month postoperative period and (2) investigate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with 3-month changes in sleep. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 104 primary elective TJA patients. Patients were administered the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance questionnaire preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. Median sleep scores were compared between time points using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, stratified by preoperative sleep impairment. A multivariable logistic regression model identified factors associated with 3-month clinically improved sleep. RESULTS: The percentage of patients reporting sleep within normal limits increased over time: 54.8% preoperatively and 58.0%, 62.5%, and 71.8% at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-TJA, respectively. Patients with normal preoperative sleep experienced a transient 4.7-point worsening of sleep at 2 weeks ( P = 0.003). For patients with moderate/severe preoperative sleep impairment, sleep significantly improved by 5.4 points at 2 weeks ( P = 0.002), with improvement sustained at 3 months. In multivariable analysis, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (versus knee; OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.06 to 11.32, P = 0.039) and those with worse preoperative sleep scores (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.23, P = 0.003) were more likely to achieve clinically improved sleep from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Patients experience differing patterns in postoperative sleep changes based on preoperative sleep disturbance. Hip arthroplasty patients are also more likely to experience clinically improved sleep by 3 months compared with knee arthroplasty patients. These results may be used to counsel patients on postoperative expectations and identify patients at greater risk of impaired postoperative sleep. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.