Avelumab in Combination With Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: Phase 1b/2 Results From the JAVELIN Lung 101 Trial.

Introduction: The JAVELIN Lung 101 phase 1b/2 trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combined with lorlatinib or crizotinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in ALK-positive or ALK-negative advanced NSCLC, respectively. Methods: Starting doses of lorlatinib 100 mg once daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily were administered with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were assessment of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 and objective response rate in phase 2. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and confirmed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results: In the avelumab plus lorlatinib group (ALK-positive; n = 31; 28 in phase 1b; three in phase 2), two of 28 assessable patients (7%) had DLT, and the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. In the avelumab plus crizotinib group (ALK-negative; n = 12; all phase 1b), five of 12 assessable patients (42%) had DLT, and the MTD was exceeded with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus crizotinib 250 mg twice daily; alternative crizotinib doses were not assessed. Objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval, 33%-70%) with avelumab plus lorlatinib (complete response, 3%; partial response, 48%) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6%-57%) with avelumab plus crizotinib (all partial responses). Conclusions: Avelumab plus lorlatinib treatment in ALK-positive NSCLC was feasible, but avelumab plus crizotinib treatment in ALK-negative NSCLC could not be administered at the doses tested. No evidence of increased antitumor activity was observed in either group. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT02584634.

A rare case report of a primary lung cancer comprising adenocarcinoma and atypical carcinoid tumor, with the carcinoid component harboring EML4-ALK rearrangement.

Background: The occurrence of pulmonary adenocarcinoma coexisting with atypical carcinoid tumors is a rare phenomenon. The presence of EML4-ALK fusion in an atypical carcinoid component of a histologically mixed tumor is even more uncommon. Due to their infrequency, the origin and pathogenesis of these mixed tumors remain largely unknown. The advances of therapy development in such patients are still limited and there is no standard treatment. We present a case of collision tumor in the lung consisting of atypical carcinoid and adenocarcinoma to better understand the clinical characteristics of this disease. Case Description: We report an extremely rare case of EML4-ALK rearrangement in a pulmonary atypical carcinoid tumor that coexisting with adenocarcinoma. A 58-year-old woman, who was asymptomatic, underwent pulmonary lobectomy due to the detection of a gradually enlarging solitary pulmonary nodule in the right upper lung. Histological examination of the resected tumor revealed the presence of both atypical carcinoid (approximately 80%) and adenocarcinoma (approximately 20%) components. Metastases by the carcinoid component were observed in mediastinal lymph nodes (station 2R and 4R) and in the primary tumor. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was detected in both the primary and metastatic lesions of the carcinoid tumor. Four cycles of chemotherapy with etoposide and carboplatin were dispensed after surgery. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of coexisting pulmonary adenocarcinoma and atypical carcinoid tumor with an ALK fusion only detected in the carcinoid component. The presence of ALK rearrangement in pulmonary carcinoid tumor is very uncommon, and there is currently no standard treatment for advanced stages. Therefore, comprehensive molecular testing, including ALK rearrangement analysis, should be recommended for mixed tumors exhibiting features of atypical carcinoid. ALK inhibitors could represent a potential treatment strategy for selected patients.

PD-1-induced encephalopathy: a report of 2 cases on neurological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: Immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) often occur during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. In the nervous system, the incidence of irAEs ranges from 0.1-12%, with 80% occurring within the first 4 months of ICI application. For complications of the nervous system, adequate diagnosis is made by signs, symptoms, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid. If severe irAEs occur, ICIs should be discontinued and patients should be treated with high-dose glucocorticoids, immunoglobulins, or immunosorbent therapy with systemic support. Patients who develop severe neurologic irAEs have a poorer prognosis. Case Description: In this article, we report 2 cases of encephalopathy induced by anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies at the initial diagnoses. Our findings may help clinicians to differentiate between encephalopathy caused by immunotherapy and other neurological disorders. Case 1 was a 24-year-old male patient who had undergone PD-1 immunotherapy to treat olfactory neuroblastoma. After the 6th course of therapy, he began to develop persistent epilepsy, which decreased significantly after high doses of glucocorticoid and immunosorbent therapy were administered. Based on his medical history and laboratory examination results, PD-1-induced encephalopathy was the most likely diagnosis. Case 2 was a 67-year-old female patient who had been treated with PD-1/programmed death ligand-1 therapy for lung adenocarcinoma. She began to have headaches after 1 cycle of treatment, and her cognitive function gradually decreased with the continuation of immunotherapy. Conclusions: These case reports show the difficulty in distinguishing PD-1-induced encephalopathy from other neurological disorders, especially paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. If not treated properly, patients' lives may be endangered. Thus, early identification and early treatment are very important.

Downregulation of homeobox B8 in attenuating non-small cell lung cancer cell migration and invasion though the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway.

Background: Homeobox (HOX) family genes have been identified as regulators of cancer development. No research exists concerning the mechanisms underlying homeobox B8 (HOXB8) activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we investigated expression and biological function in NSCLC to determine whether it is an important marker of patient prognosis. Methods: HOXB8 expression in NSCLC tissues was investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot assays. In addition, HOXB8 was knocked down in NSCLC cells to assess its biological functions in this context. The invasive and migratory potential of cells was evaluated by using Transwell (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) inserts with 8-µm pores. Furthermore, Western blotting was used to explore whether HOXB8 can influence epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Results: HOXB8 was expressed at high levels in NSCLC tissues and cell lines compared with adjacent normal tissues. Patients with high HOXB8 expression had shorter survival time and worse prognosis. HOXB8 expression was associated with pathological grading, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis. HOXB8 was prognostic in patients with NSCLC. After knockdown of HOXB8 via small interfering RNA, the proliferation, migration and invasion ability of the cells were significantly reduced compared with the control group. Moreover, EMT was inhibited by the downregulation of HOXB8 expression, as the expressions of E-cadherin was upregulated and that of the N-cadherin, vimentin, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), and twist were downregulated. HOXB8 is a member of the ANTP homeobox family and encodes a nuclear protein with a homeobox DNA-binding domain. It is included in a cluster of homeobox B genes located on chromosome 17. The encoded protein functions as a sequence-specific transcription factor that is involved in development. Conclusions: HOXB8 is highly expressed in NSCLC and may predict prognosis of patients with this type of cancer. Furthermore, HOXB8 may promote NSCLC progression through the regulation of the EMT process.

First-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated survival analysis of the ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 was performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan to determine the oncological effectiveness and safety of combining nivolumab or placebo with bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy for the initial (first-line) treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). At the interim analysis (minimum follow-up, 7.4 months), the independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. METHODS: Here, we present the updated OS data. Patients with treatment-naïve stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1, were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab or placebo. Patients in both arms received paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab, administered 3-weekly for a maximum of 6 cycles. Nivolumab/placebo and bevacizumab were subsequently continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Overall, 550 patients were randomized. At the time of the analysis (minimum follow-up: 19.4 months), the median OS was longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (30.8 vs. 24.7 months; hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94). The 12-month OS rates were 81.3% vs. 76.3% in the nivolumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The respective 18-month OS rates were 69.0% vs. 61.9%. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab demonstrated longer OS vs. the placebo combination. We believe this regimen is viable as a standard, first-line treatment for patients with advanced nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1.

Biomarker analysis of the phase II JO25567 study comparing erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in first-line advanced EGFR+non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib, are standard-of-care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients progress within 1 year. Previously, we demonstrated that erlotinib plus bevacizumab (EB) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC in the randomized JO25567 study. To understand this effect, we conducted comprehensive exploratory biomarker analyses. Methods: Using blood and tissue specimens from patients enrolled in the JO25567 study, angiogenesis-related serum factors, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (pVEGFA), angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms, and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in tumor tissue were analyzed. Interactions between potential predictors and treatment effect on PFS were analyzed in a Cox model. Continuous variable predictors were evaluated by multivariate fractional polynomial interaction methodology and subpopulation treatment effect pattern plotting (STEPP). Results: Overall, 152 patients treated with EB or erlotinib alone (E) were included in the analysis. Among 26 factors analyzed in 134 baseline serum samples, high follistatin and low leptin were identified as potential biomarkers for worse and better outcomes with EB, with interaction P values of 0.0168 and 0.0049, respectively. Serum concentrations of 12 angiogenic factors were significantly higher in patients with high follistatin. Low pVEGFA levels related to better outcomes with EB, interaction P=0.033. VEGF-A165a was the only predictive tissue mRNA, showing a similar trend to pVEGFA. No valid results were obtained in 13 polymorphisms of eight genes. Conclusions: EB treatment showed better treatment outcomes in patients with low pVEGFA and serum leptin, and limited efficacy in patients with high serum follistatin.

Management of Peripheral Edema in Patients with MET Exon 14-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Small Molecule MET Inhibitors.

Small molecule mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitors, such as crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib, are treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adult patients whose tumors have a mutation that leads to MET exon 14 skipping. In clinical trials, these MET inhibitors were associated with a high incidence of peripheral edema, although this was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. There is limited information about the mechanism involved in MET inhibitor-induced peripheral edema. Perturbation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET signaling may disrupt the permeability balance in the vascular endothelium and thus promote edema development. Another potential mechanism is through effects on renal function, although this is unlikely to be the primary mechanism. Because edema is common in cancer patients and may not necessarily be caused by the cancer treatment, or other conditions that have similar symptoms to peripheral edema, a thorough assessment is required to ascertain the underlying cause. Before starting MET-inhibitor therapy, patients should be educated about the possibility of developing peripheral edema. Patient limb volume should be measured before initiating treatment, to aid assessment if symptoms develop. Since the exact mechanism of MET inhibitor-induced edema is unknown, management is empiric, with common approaches including compression stockings, specific exercises, massage, limb elevation, and/or diuretic treatment. Although not usually required, discontinuation of MET inhibitor treatment generally resolves peripheral edema. Early diagnosis and management, as well as patient information and education, are vital to decrease the clinical burden associated with edema, and to reinforce capmatinib treatment adherence.

Nazartinib for treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2, single-arm, open-label study.

INTRODUCTION: Nazartinib, a novel third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, previously demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≤ 3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Herein, we report phase 2 efficacy and safety of first-line nazartinib. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, global study enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations (eg, L858R and/or ex19del). Patients with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastases were also eligible. Patients received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received ≥ 1 dose of nazartinib. The median follow-up time from enrollment to data cutoff (November 1, 2019) was 30 months (range: 25-34). The BIRC-assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 53-82). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months (95% CI, 15-not estimable [NE]). The median overall survival was NE. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n = 18), the ORR and median PFS (95% CIs) were 67% (41-87) and 17 months (11-21). Seventeen of 18 patients had brain metastases as non-target lesions; the CNS lesions were absent/normalized in 9 of 17 (53%). Only 2 of 27 patients without baseline brain metastases developed new brain metastases postbaseline. Most frequent adverse events (≥ 25%, any grade, all-causality) were diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough, and stomatitis (27% each). CONCLUSIONS: First-line nazartinib demonstrated promising efficacy, including clinically meaningful antitumor activity in the brain, and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02108964.

A nomogram for predicting hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in lung cancer.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an emerging type of treatment for lung cancer (LC). However, hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has been observed in patients treated with ICIs that lacks a prognostic prediction model. There is an urgent need for a simple and easily implementable predictive model to predict the occurrence of HPD. This study aimed to establish a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for the occurrence of HPD. Methods: We retrospectively identified 1473 patients with stage III-IV LC or inoperable stage I-II LC (1147 in training set, and 326 in testing set), who had undergone ICI therapy at the Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2017 and March 2022. Available computed tomography (CT) data from the previous treatment, before ICI administration, and at least 2 months after the first the course of ICI administration is collected to confirm HPD. Data from these patients' common blood laboratory test results before ICI administration were analyzed by the univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, then used to develop nomogram predictive model, and made validation in testing set. Results: A total of 1,055 patients were included in this study (844 in the training set, and 211 in the testing set). In the training set, 93 were HPD and 751were non-HPD. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that lactate dehydrogenase [LDH, P<0.001; odds ratio (OR) =0.987; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.980-0.995], mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, P=0.038; OR =1.021; 95% CI: 1.003-1.033), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, P=0.012; OR =0.989; 95% CI: 0.977-0.997) were significantly different. The prediction model was established and validated based on these 3 variables. The concordance index were 0.899 (95% CI: 0.859-0.918) and 0.924 (95% CI: 0.866-0.983) in training set and testing set, and the calibration curve was acceptable. Conclusions: This model, which was developed from a laboratory examination of LC patients undergoing ICI treatment, is the first nomogram model to be developed to predict HPD occurrence and exhibited good sensitivity and specificity.

Sensitivity to dabrafenib and trametinib treatments in patients with non-small-cell cancer harboring BRAF compound mutations: A pooled analysis of BRAF p.V600E-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The present study clarified the sensitivity of the BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitor mechanism in patients with BRAF compound mutation and predicted the sensitivity using molecular dynamics simulation. METHODS: We examined 16 BRAF tumors with p.V600E-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. RESULTS: One patient (6.2%) had a BRAF p.V600E and p.K601_W604 compound mutation with a good clinical response to dabrafenib and trametinib. Molecular dynamics simulation also complemented the effect. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a genetic analysis and computational simulation model may help predict the sensitivity for dabrafenib in cases with a rare BRAF compound mutation. The construction of a genomic and simulation fused database is important for the development of personalized medicine in this field.

Comprehensive biomarker analysis from phase II study of nivolumab in patients with thymic carcinoma.

In a phase II trial of nivolumab in advanced thymic carcinoma (UMIN000022007), long SD (SD for more than 24 weeks) was seen in three patients and irAE (Gr2 or higher) was seen in four patients among 15 patients. Here, we report preplanned comprehensive biomarker analyses. We obtained tumor samples for immunohistochemistry, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), plasma and serum for pharmacokinetic analysis of nivolumab and cytokine evaluations, and whole blood for immuno pharmacogenomic (PGx) analysis. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells were not associated with therapeutic efficacy, but FOXP3 expression in tumor area and stroma, CD204 expression in stroma, and MHC class I in tumor area were all low among long SD patients. PBMC of long SD patients presented with larger number of naïve/memory cells prior to treatment, suggesting priming after nivolumab administration. Immuno-PGx analysis showed non-synonymous SNVs in ITGAX and PDCD1 had some correlation with PFS. Concentration of nivolumab in blood during the treatment was not related to PFS, with their overall trend towards decreased nivolumab concentration in patients with irAEs. Low immunogenicity of thymic carcinoma demonstrated in our study may require the activation of immune systems via a combination of immune checkpoint blockades.

Smoking signature is superior to programmed death-ligand 1 expression in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of biomarkers that can predict the degree of pathological response [e.g., pathological complete response (pCR) or major response (pMR)] to immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy provides an ideal setting for exploring responsive biomarkers because the pathological responses can be directly and accurately evaluated. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy followed by surgery between 2018 and 2020 at a large academic thoracic cancer center. Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological response were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (35 males and 4 females) were included. The most common histological subtype was lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (n=28, 71.8%), followed by lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (n=11, 28.2%). After neoadjuvant treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan-based evaluation showed poor agreement with the postoperatively pathological examination (weighted kappa =0.0225; P=0.795), suggesting the poor performance of CT scans in evaluating the response to immunotherapy. Importantly, we found that the smoking signature displayed a better performance than programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in predicting the pathological response (area under the curve: 0.690 vs. 0.456; P=0.0259), which might have resulted from increased tumor mutational burden (TMB) and/or microsatellite instability (MSI) relating to smoking exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CT scan-based evaluation is not able to accurately reflect the pathological response to immunotherapy and that smoking signature is a superior marker to PD-L1 expression in predicting the benefit of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines for Stage IV NSCLC With EGFR Mutations.

Patients with NSCLC in East Asia, including Japan, frequently contain EGFR mutations. In 2018, we published the latest full clinical practice guidelines on the basis of those provided by the Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines Committee. The purpose of this study was to update those recommendations, especially for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We conducted a literature search of systematic reviews of randomized controlled and nonrandomized trials published between 2018 and 2019 that multiple physicians had reviewed independently. On the basis of those studies and the advice from the Japanese Society of Lung Cancer Expert Panel, we developed updated guidelines according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. We also evaluated the benefits of overall and progression-free survival, end points, toxicities, and patients' reported outcomes. For patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations, the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs), especially osimertinib, had the best recommendation as to first-line treatment. We also recommended the combination of EGFR TKI with other agents (platinum-based chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents); however, it can lead to toxicity. In the presence of EGFR uncommon mutations, except for an exon 20 insertion, we also recommended the EGFR TKI treatment. However, we could not provide recommendations for the treatment of EGFR mutations with immune checkpoint inhibitors, including monotherapy, and its combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, because of the limited evidence present in the literature. The 2020 Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines can help community-based physicians to determine the most appropriate treatments and adequately provide medical care to their patients.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab in Japanese Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: 3-Year Results of the MERIT Study.

INTRODUCTION: We examined the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits interactions between the programmed cell death protein-1 receptor and its ligands (programmed death-ligand 1 and programmed death-ligand 2), in Japanese patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). METHODS: Japanese patients with previously treated MPM (one or two regimens) were enrolled in a single-arm, phase 2 study and received nivolumab intravenously 240 mg every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the centrally assessed objective response rate. Other end points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes (Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for mesothelioma and EuroQOL visual analog scale). Patient enrollment started on June 16, 2016. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data (cutoff date: November 12, 2019). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The centrally assessed objective response rate was previously reported (29.4%). The 2- and 3-year OS rates were 35.3% and 23.5%, respectively, and the corresponding PFS rates were 17.0% and 12.7%. Median OS and PFS were 17.3 and 5.9 months, respectively. Eight patients were alive at 3 years of follow-up. Nivolumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were found. The patient-reported outcomes were maintained without marked deteriorations during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal clinically relevant long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab for the treatment of MPM.

Phase 2 Study of YS110, a Recombinant Humanized Anti-CD26 Monoclonal Antibody, in Japanese Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: YS110, a humanized monoclonal antibody with a high affinity to CD26, exhibited promising antitumor activity and was generally well-tolerated in the phase 1 part of a phase 1 and 2 Japanese trial in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Here we report the results of the phase 2 part of the study. METHODS: The patients included were aged 20 years and older, had histologically confirmed MPM, were refractory to or intolerant of existing antineoplastic agents, and were not candidates for standard therapy. YS110 6 mg/kg, determined in the phase 1 dose-determination part, was given in 6-weekly cycles (5 × once-weekly infusions, followed by a 1-wk rest). RESULTS: The study included 31 patients (median age = 68 y, 90.3% men); 64.5% had stage IV MPM, 90.3% had greater than or equal to 20% CD26 expression in tumor tissue, and 38.7% (12 patients) had previously received nivolumab. The 6-month disease control rate was 3.2%. The best overall response was partial response in one patient and stable disease in 14 patients. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (both in patients who had and had not previously received nivolumab-groups A and B, respectively). Respective progression-free survival rates at 6 months were 9.1% and 31.6% in groups A and B. The median overall survival was 9.7 months. A total of 30 patients (96.8%) had at least one adverse event. Common treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reaction (16.1%), hiccups (9.7%), and interstitial lung disease (9.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month disease control rate did not exceed the predefined threshold, but YS110 revealed modest efficacy in response rate as salvage therapy in difficult-to-treat patients with MPM. YS110 was generally well tolerated.

First-line pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-024 Japan subset.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE-024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or greater evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end-point was progression-free survival; secondary end-points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE-024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival by independent central review (data cut-off date, 10 July 2017) was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.64; one-sided, nominal P = .001). The HR for overall survival (data cut-off date, 15 February 2019) was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17-0.91; one-sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab-treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy-treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 patients (52%) and four patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE-024 overall, first-line pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02142738.

Pre-existing interstitial lung disease is associated with onset of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in patients with solid tumors: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, has shown survival benefit in clinical trials of various malignant tumors. Nivolumab-induced pneumonitis is major immune-related adverse event (irAE) that is occasionally serious and life-threatening. The aim of this study was to examine the association between pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) on chest computed tomography (CT) and nivolumab-induced pneumonitis among different types of solid tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 311 patients who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck cancer (HNC), or gastric cancer (GC), and treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Patients who underwent chest CT immediately before starting nivolumab without previous thoracic radiotherapy or other immune checkpoint inhibitors were eligible. We collected baseline patient characteristics and assessed pre-existing ILD on baseline chest CT. RESULTS: Finally, 188 patients were included in the analysis: 96 patients with NSCLC, 43 patients with HNC, and 49 patients with GC. NSCLC patients had a significantly higher rate of pre-existing ILD compared with HNC/GC patients (P = 0.047). Nivolumab-induced pneumonitis occurred in 11.7% (22 of 188), including 14.6% (14 of 96) of NSCLC, and 8.7% (8 of 92) of HNC/GC. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that pre-existing ILD (odds ratio, 5.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.07-18.54, P = 0.0008) and male sex (odds ratio, 5.58; 95% CI, 1.01-104.40, P = 0.049) significantly increased the risk of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that pre-existing ILD and male sex are risk factors for nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in solid tumors.

A narrative review of primary research endpoints of neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer: past, present and future.

OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the current status of neoadjuvant therapy and discusses the choice of new clinical research endpoints for non-small cell lung cancer. BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a recognized practice in patients with resectable and locally advanced lung cancer. With the introduction of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer has been significantly improved, and the original traditional clinical research endpoints are no longer suitable for existing clinical research. In order to accelerate the process of clinical trials and the development and approval of drugs, it is necessary to find suitable alternative indicators as the main indicators of clinical research. METHODS: Therefore, this article focuses on clinical trials using disease-free survival (DFS), progression free survival, and pathological evaluation indicators, pathologic complete response and major pathologic response, as surrogate endpoints. We search related literature through PubMed database and clinical trials through clinicaltrials.gov. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response are recommended as surrogate endpoints in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and secondary endpoints are listed for the prediction of pathological results. In addition, the definitions of major pathological response (MPR) and PCR should be standardized, and a new pathological evaluation standard should be developed, which is applicable to all current treatment methods. KEYWORDS: Neoadjuvant therapy; resectable lung cancer; clinical research endpoint; pathological response.