Borg's exertion scale did not coincide with ventilatory anaerobic threshold in atrial fibrillation patients with restored sinus rhythm after ablation.

The determination of precise exercise intensity is essential for effective exercise rehabilitation. The Borg rating of perceived exertion category ratio (CR) scale is utilized to prescribe an appropriate level of exertion intensity. A Borg CR of approximately 13 coincides with the ventilatory aerobic threshold (VAT). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) exhibit various symptoms. We hypothesized that the workload at Borg CR13 (Borg CR13-Watt) differs from the workload at the VAT level (VAT-Watt) in AF patients with restored sinus rhythm (SR) following ablation. Accordingly, the relationship between Borg CR13-Watt and VAT-Watt was studied in patients with restored SR. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed at 101±88 days after ablation in 150 patients using a bicycle ergometer. No adverse events were observed during CPET. Borg CR13-Watt was significantly higher than VAT-Watt (67.2±27.8 Watt vs. 54.7±17.6 Watt, P<0.0001). Borg CR13-Watt showed significant linear regression with VAT-Watt (regression coefficient, 0.49, P<0.01; correlation coefficient, 0.80, P<0.01). Higher Borg CR13-Watt was associated with greater differences between Borg CR13-Watt and VAT-Watt (ΔWatt). The Bland-Altman plot showed nonconcordance between the two. Male sex, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and smoking had contributed to the increased ΔWatt. Duration from ablation to time of CPET did not correlate with ΔWatt. Therefore, Borg CR13-Watt did not coincide with VAT-Watt in patients with restored SR. Higher Borg CR13-Watt was associated with greater ΔWatt. Prescribing exertion intensity as determined solely by perceived exertion is inadequate. CPET is required to determine the precise exercise intensity in AF patients with restored SR after ablation.

Incidence of nausea/vomiting following propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can cause considerable distress. Aim: Continuous intravenous propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) with or without an analgesic, pentazocine, during AF ablation was studied in 272 consecutive patients with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF. The study objectives were to determine the incidence of PONV after AF ablation and to assess the predictive value of factors for PONV using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The present sedation maneuver was successfully accomplished with a low incidence of hypotension and without discontinuation of ablation or switching to general anesthesia, while maintaining an acceptable procedural time (102 ± 32 min). The incidence of PONV was 5.5% (15/272). Nausea occurred in nine patients after an average of 4.6 ± 3.5 h (range: 2-12 h) postablation, and vomiting with nausea occurred in six patients after an average of 4.5 ± 3.1 h (range: 1-9 h) postablation. The postablation interval did not differ significantly between the occurrence of nausea and nausea accompanied by vomiting. AUCs based on various factors, including the Apfel score, ranged from 0.55 to 0.67, indicating low accuracy in predicting PONV occurrence. Conclusions: The incidence of PONV after propofol sedation with ASV was the lowest (5.5%) reported to date. Scoring systems, which included the Apfel score, were ineffective in predicting PONV. The low PONV incidence in addition to the efficacy of propofol sedation with ASV revealed the adequacy of this regimen for AF ablation.

Usefulness of three-dimensional pulmonary vein-left atrium image reconstructed from non-enhanced computed tomography for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Enhanced computed tomography (CT) is unsuitable for patients with reduced renal function and/or allergy for contrast medium (CM). CT image registration into an electroanatomic system (EAMS) is essential to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) safely and smoothly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). To create three-dimensional pulmonary vein-left atrium (3D PV-LA) images from non-enhanced CT images to register them into EAMS for AF ablation. Using a non-enhanced ECG-gated image, 3D PV-LA images were generated by our developed techniques with an EnSite image analyzing tool for patients unfit for CM use (n = 100). Segmentation between tissues was performed as follows: tissues distal from or close to PV-LA were segmented in transverse slices to clearly show the whole LA. Tissues bordering PV-LA, including the pulmonary artery, left ventricle, and right atrium, were segmented manually with great care. Practical ablation parameters were compared with those obtained from enhanced CT (n = 100). 3D PV-LA image reconstruction from non-enhanced CT imaging required a longer time than that from enhanced CT (42 ± 6 vs 14 ± 3 min). All 100 PV-LA non-enhanced CT images were successfully reconstructed and registered into the EAM system without the need for re-segmentation. Practical ablation parameters, including procedural time and AF recurrence rate, did not differ between imaging methods. This study provides clinically useful information on a detailed methodology for 3D PV-LA image reconstruction using non-enhanced CT. Non-enhanced CT 3D PV-LA images were successfully registered into the EAM system and useful for patients unsuitable for CM use.

Small solitary atrial fractionated electrogram zone as a novel ablation target for persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Various adjunctive approaches to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been attempted for persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF) and longstanding persistent AF (ls-perAF). We aimed to identify the novel zones responsible for perpetuation of AF. METHODS: To identify novel zones acting as a source of perAF and ls-perAF after PVI/re-PVI, we performed fractionation mapping in 258 consecutive patients with perAF (n = 207) and ls-perAF (n = 51) in whom PVI/re-PVI failed to restore sinus rhythm. RESULTS: In 15 patients with perAF (5.8%: 15/258), fractionation mapping identified a small solitary zone (<1 cm2 ) with high-frequency and irregular waves, showing fractionated electrograms (EGM). We defined this zone as the small solitary atrial fractionated EGM (SAFE) zone. The small SAFE zone was surrounded characteristically by a homogeneous area showing relatively organized activation with nonrapid and nonfractionated waves. Only one small SAFE zone was detected in each patient. This characteristic electrical phenomenon was observed stably during the procedure until ablation. AF duration, (defined as the duration between initial detection of AF and the current ablation) was longer in patients with the small SAFE zone than in those without (median, [25 and 75 percentiles]; 5.0 [3.5, 7.0] vs. 1.1 [1.0, 4.0] years, p = .0008). Longer AF cycle length was observed in patients with the small SAFE zone than in those without. The ablation of the small SAFE zone terminated AF in all 15 patients without any need for other ablations. AF/atrial tachycardia-free rate at follow-up was 93% (14/15) at 6 months, 87% (13/15) at 1 year, and 60% (9/15) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using fractionation mapping, this study identified a small SAFE zone surrounded characteristically by a homogeneous, relatively organized, low-excitability EGM lesion. The ablation of the small SAFE zone terminated AF in all patients, demonstrating it as a substrate for perpetuated AF. Our findings provide novel ablation targets in perAF patients with prolonged AF duration. Further studies to confirm the present results are warranted.

Optimal prevention method of phrenic nerve injury in superior vena cava isolation: efficacy of high-power, short-duration radiofrequency energy application on the risk points.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: Superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) is widely performed adjunctively to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Right phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is a complication of this procedure. The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal PNI prevention method in SVCI. METHODS: A total of 1656 patients who underwent SVCI between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively examined. PNI was diagnosed based on the diaphragm position and movement in the upright position on chest radiographs before and after SVCI. RESULTS: With the introduction of various PN monitoring systems over the years, the incidence of SVCI-associated PNI has decreased. However, complete PNI avoidance has not been achieved. PNI incidence according to fluoroscopy-guided PN monitoring, high-output pace-guided, compound motor action potential-guided, and 3-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) systems was 8.1% (38/467), 2.7% (13/476), 2.4% (4/130), and 2.8% (11/389), respectively. However, a high-power, short-duration (50 W/7 s) radiofrequency (RF) energy application only on PNI risk points tagged by a 3-dimensional EAM system completely avoids PNI (0%; 0 /160 since April 2021). PNI showed no symptoms and recovered within an average of 188 days post-SVCI, except for a few patients who required > 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Although PNI incidence decreased annually with the introduction of various monitoring systems, these monitoring systems did not prevent PNI completely. Most notably, the delivery of a high-power, short-duration RF energy only on risk points tagged by EAM prevented PNI completely. PNI recovered in all patients. The application of higher-power, shorter-duration RF energy on risk points tagged by EAM appears to be an optimal PNI prevention maneuver.

Rates of atrial flutter occurrence and cavotricuspid isthmus reconduction after prophylactic isthmus ablation performed during atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical study, review, and comparison with previous findings.

PURPOSE: Based on the high rate of coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) adjunctive to AF ablation has recently been attempted in patients with AF and without AFL. The present study aimed to determine the rates of AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction after performing CTI ablation adjunctive to AF ablation. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 3833 consecutive patients with AF, who underwent prophylactic CTIA with AF ablation between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS: In all patients, CTIA and AF ablations were successful. Clinical AFL occurred in seven patients (0.18%, 7/3,833), and the observed rate was lower than those reported for cases of AF ablation without CTIA and for those of CTIA for pure AFL. A second ablation was needed in 745 patients at a median of 253 days (25 and 75 percentiles, 116 and 775 days) after the first ablation. In 12.1% (90/745) of the patients, CTI reconduction was observed. The reconduction rate was lower than that previously reported for CTIA for pure AFL. CONCLUSIONS: The present retrospective study found acceptably low rates of clinical AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction following prophylactic CTIA performed with AF ablation, which was supported by the findings obtained after performing a comparison of the rates with those of other ablations (AF ablation only and CTIA for pure AFL). Considering the high correlation between AF and AFL, the present study provided information regarding the efficacy of adjunctive CTIA.

Efficacy of an Adjunctive Electrophysiological Test-Guided Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Without a Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area.

BACKGROUND: Electrical remodeling precedes structural remodeling. In adjunctive left atrial (LA) low-voltage area (LVA) ablation to pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation (AF), LA areas without LVA have not been targeted for ablation. We studied the effect of adjunctive LA posterior wall isolation (PWI) on persistent AF without LA-LVA according to electrophysiological testing (EP test). METHODS: We examined consecutive patients with persistent AF with (n=33) and without (n=111) LA-LVA. Patients without LA-LVA were randomly assigned to EP test-guided (n=57) and control (n=54) groups. In the EP test-guided group, an adjunctive PWI was performed in those with positive results (PWI subgroup; n=24), but not in those with negative results (n=33). The criteria for positive EP tests were an effective refractory period ≤180 ms, effective refractory period>20 ms shorter than the other sites, and/or induction of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) during measurements. LVA ablation was performed in the patients with LA-LVA. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (62±33 weeks), the EP test-guided group had significantly lower recurrence rates (19%,11/57 versus 41%, 22/54, P=0.012) and higher Kaplan-Meier AF/AT-free survival curve rates than the control group (P=0.01). No significant differences in the recurrence and AF/AT-free survival curve rates between the PWI (positive EP test) and non-PWI (negative EP test) subgroups were observed. Therefore, PWI for positive EP tests reduced the AF/AT recurrence in the EP test-guided group. A stepwise Cox proportional hazard analyses identified EP test-guided ablation as a factor reducing the recurrence rate. The recurrence rates in the LA-LVA ablation group and EP test-guided group were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study proposed that an EP test-guided adjunctive PWI of persistent AF without LA-LVA potentially reduced AF/AT recurrences. The results suggest that there is an AF substrate in the LA with altered electrophysiological function even when there is no LA-LVA. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Effects of Oral Anticoagulants on Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Aged 90 Years and Older: Comparison Among Direct Oral Anticoagulant, Warfarin Anticoagulant, and Nonanticoagulation.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of anticoagulants on ultra-aged patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We retrospectively studied 320 consecutive patients with AF (median age, 91 years; range 90-100.1 years). Patients were categorized as follows: patients taking direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC group, n = 93), those taking warfarin (warfarin group, n = 147), and those not taking oral anticoagulants (non-OAC group, n = 80). During the follow-up periods (median 3.00 years; first and fourth quantiles, 1.13 and 4.56 years, respectively), in thromboembolic events, the DOAC, warfarin, and non-OAC groups showed the lowest (0%, 0/93; 0%/year), intermediate (4.7%, 7/149; 1.43%/year), and highest (5%, 4/80; 2.65%/year) incidence rates, respectively. In major bleeding events, the DOAC, warfarin, and non-OAC groups showed the highest (9.67%, 9/96; 5.00%/year), intermediate (8.1%, 12/149; 2.46%/year), and lowest (0%, 0/80; 0%/year) incidence rates, respectively. These differences in the relationships of the 3 groups were statistically significant. Confounding factors did not affect these results. Bruises associated with impairment of motor function with aging caused major bleeding in approximately 60% of major bleeding cases. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that warfarin decreased mortality, whereas antiplatelet drugs increased mortality. In conclusion, DOACs had considerably high incidence of major bleeding events, whereas absence of OAC treatment was associated with substantially high thromboembolic events. Warfarin showed acceptable incidence ratios of both events. At present, warfarin is thus believed to be adequate for ultra-aged (≥90 years) patients with nonvalvular AF. Avoidance of bruises was important to prevent major bleeding events. Antiplatelet drugs were suggested not to be adequate for these patients.

Adjunctive left anterior line ablation induced left atrial dysfunction and dyssynchrony in atrial fibrillation ablation.

We evaluated the effects of adjunctive left anterior line (LAL) ablation on LA dyssynchrony and function using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) in connection with thromboembolic complications and tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We randomly and prospectively assigned consecutive persistent AF patients to the LAL (n = 52, 65 ± 7 years) and control groups (n = 50, 64 ± 10 years). In the LAL group, extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EEPVI), roof line ablation, and LAL ablation regardless of the extent of the low-voltage area (LVA) were performed. The control group underwent EEPVI and roof line ablation. After ablation, 3DE demonstrated LA dyssynchrony in 23 (46%) and 4 patients (8%, P < 0.001) of the LAL and control groups, respectively. Baseline LA LVAs were relatively small in most patients and there were no significant differences in extent of LVA between control and LAL groups or between patients with and without dyssynchrony. During the follow-up periods (771 ± 121 days), patients with LA dyssynchrony in the LAL group did not show significant differences in symptomatic thromboembolic events (0%) and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (39%) from patients without LA dyssynchrony in the LAL (0% and 30%) and control groups (0% and 32%, respectively). LA ejection fraction and active emptying fraction were lower by 9% on average in the LAL group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). Similarly, in the LAL group, LA ejection fraction, active emptying fraction, and expansion index were significantly lower by approximately 7%, 8%, and 15%, respectively, in LA with dyssynchrony than those in LA without dyssynchrony. In conclusion, LA dyssynchrony and LA hypofunction were induced by LAL ablation in patients with persistent AF and relatively mild LVA. LAL ablation with or without LA dyssynchrony is thought not to affect thromboembolic complications or atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

Differences in activated clotting time and initial heparin dosage during atrial fibrillation ablation for patients with edoxaban compared with warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Different target activated clotting times (ACTs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been proposed. Moreover, relationships between initial bolus dose of heparin at the start of AF ablation in patients receiving edoxaban anticoagulation therapy and ACT are unclear. METHODS: Patients who received anticoagulation with uninterrupted warfarin (control; n = 120) or interrupted edoxaban (n = 120) on the morning of day of ablation were studied. An initial dose of 100 U/kg heparin was administered as a reliable control for warfarin. Initial heparin doses of 120, 130, 140, or 150 U/kg were randomly administered to the edoxaban group. RESULTS: Edoxaban group showed shorter baseline ACT before the procedure (130 ± 16 seconds) than the warfarin group (152 ± 26 seconds, P < 0.0001). In the warfarin group, 100 U/kg heparin showed 361 ± 48 seconds 15-minute ACT. In the edoxaban group, an increase in initial dose induced prolongation of 15-minute ACT (i.e., 15-minute ACTs of 293 ± 56, 306 ± 39, 311 ± 45, and 319 ± 45 seconds for 120, 130, 140, and 150 U/kg initial doses, respectively). The total heparin required during the procedure was higher in the edoxaban group than in the warfarin group (109 ± 37 vs. 77 ± 21 U/kg/h, P < 0.0001). The 120-150 U/kg dose of heparin in edoxaban group did not cause thromboembolic or major bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: Edoxaban interrupted on the day of ablation showed a shorter baseline ACT than uninterrupted warfarin. Edoxaban required a higher initial heparin dose to achieve a similar 15-minute ACT to warfarin. These results are useful for determining the initial heparin dose required to achieve variable target ACTs.

Adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation has no added effects on atrial fibrillation recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the efficacy of adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation following completion of extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EEPVI) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence have still been insufficient. We aimed to compare the AF recurrence between EEPVI with and without adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation. METHODS: We enrolled 200 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (first session) who underwent EEPVI with double-Lasso technique. Patients were prospectively randomised into two groups: EEPVI with (group 1) and without (group 2) adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation. RESULTS: No differences were found in patients' clinical and echocardiographic backgrounds, including arrhythmia status, between the two groups. No differences were also observed in complications (two groin haematoma in both groups). All patients in both groups reached the EEPVI endpoint. The AF recurrence rate between groups 1 (32/100, 32%) and 2 (33/100, 33%; p=1.0) was quite similar during the follow-up period (45±5 months; 36-54 months). The two groups showed identical Kaplan-Meier AF-free curves (p=0.460; NS). Similar pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection incidence was observed in both groups during the second session. Durable isolation between the superior and inferior PVs was confirmed in 88% (21/27) of patients in group 1, indicating that interpulmonary isthmus ablation maintained a non-conducting state in a considerable number of patients. Nevertheless, AF recurrence was identical between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed similar AF recurrence rates between the two groups, indicating that adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation with EEPVI has no obvious effects on AF recurrence.

Safety and Efficacy of Underdosing Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) received underdoses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the real world. Underdosing is defined as administration of a dose lower than the manufacturer recommended dose. OBJECTIVES: To identify the efficacy and safety of underdosing NOACs as perioperative anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation ablation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received rivaroxaban or dabigatran etexilate according to dosage: adjusted low dosage (reduced by disturbed renal function; n = 30), underdosage (n = 307), or standard dosage (n = 683). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and dosing decisions were at the discretion of treating cardiologists. RESULTS: Patients who received underdosed NOACs were older, more often female, and had lower body weight and lower renal function than those who received standard dosages. Activated clotting time at baseline in patients who received adjusted low dosage or underdosages was slightly longer than that in patients receiving standard dosages (156 ± 23, 151 ± 224, and 147 ± 24 seconds, respectively). Meaningful differences were not observed in other coagulation parameters. Adjusted low-, under-, and standard-dosing regimens did not differ in perioperative thromboembolic complications (0/30, 0.0%; 1/307, 0.3%; and 0/683, 0%, respectively) or major (0/30, 0.0%; 2/307, 0.6%; 3/683, 0.4%) and minor (1/30, 3.3%; 13/307, 4.2%; 25/683, 3.6%) bleeding episodes. When comparisons were performed for each NOAC, similar results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: With consideration of patient condition, age, sex, body weight, body mass index, and renal function, underdosing NOACs was effective and safe as a perioperative anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation. The therapeutic range of NOACs is potentially wider than manufacturer recommendations.

Usefulness of dabigatran etexilate as periprocedural anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported. OBJECTIVES: In this study the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for anticoagulation for AF ablation were examined. METHOD: Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, interrupted warfarin bridged by heparin between pre- and post-ablation; Group 2, continuous warfarin therapy; and Group 3, dabigatran etexilate therapy. Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or dabigatran etexilate was performed from 30 days before to at least 90 days after AF ablation. Dabigatran etexilate was administered at 110 or 150 mg twice daily, depending on renal function and age. RESULTS: Patients' clinical characteristics, associated disorders, echocardiographic parameters and arrhythmia status were not different among the three groups. Procedural parameters such as procedural time and radiofrequency energy supply were also not different among the three groups. The dabigatran etexilate group and the warfarin groups had no embolic complications (stroke, cerebral transient ischaemic attack, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). No pericardial tamponade was observed in the dabigatran etexilate group, while two patients in each of Group 1 (2/194, 1.0 %) and Group 2 (2/203, 0.98 %) developed cardiac tamponade, though the differences were not significant. Pericardial effusion and groin haematoma were observed in one patient each (1/105, 0.9 %) in the dabigatran etexilate group, and the incidences were not different from the warfarin group (Group 1: 4/194, 2.1 % and 2/194, 1.0 %; Group 2: 3/203, 1.5 % and 2/203, 1.0 %, respectively). As a whole, the safety outcomes did not differ among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran etexilate is an effective and safe anticoagulation therapy for AF ablation. Thus, dabigatran etexilate appears to be useful as an alternative anticoagulant therapy to warfarin for AF ablation.

Adaptive-servo ventilation combined with deep sedation is an effective strategy during pulmonary vein isolation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires suppression of patient restlessness by sufficient sedation in addition to maintaining stable respiration. We applied adaptive-servo ventilation (ASV) and examined the effects of ASV combined with deep propofol sedation on PVI using a NavX. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 75 paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients (62 ± 11 years; 53 men and 22 women) who underwent PVI for treatment of PAF using an ASV system combined with deep sedation (ASV group). Control patients included 75 consecutive PAF patients (62 ± 11 years; 51 men and 24 women) who underwent PVI just before introduction of the ASV system. Deep sedation was defined as a Ramsay sedation score of 6. The ASV group had a lower frequency of restless body movements compared with the control group during PVI (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4 times, P < 0.01). The frequency of respiratory compensation and EnGuide alignment of catheter position by the NavX was lower in the ASV (4.2 ± 3.3 and 8.8 ± 7.1 times) than control group (7.1 ± 5.1 and 15.2 ± 10.0 times, P < 0.05 and <0.01, respectively). Consequently, significantly lower total electrical energy supply (48.7 ± 6.0 KJ) was required in the ASV than control group (64.5 ± 24.9 KJ, P < 0.01). Further, significantly shorter fluoroscopy and procedural times were observed in the ASV (28 ± 5 and 109 ± 25 min) than the control group (33 ± 6 and 141 ± 38 min, respectively, P < 0.01) and the AF recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ASV than the control group (12 vs. 25%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ASV combined with deep sedation is an effective strategy during PVI using the NavX in patients with PAF.