Patterns of progression after immune checkpoint inhibitors for Hodgkin lymphoma: implications for radiation therapy.

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable response rates in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Still, most patients eventually progress. Patterns of progression after ICIs are not well described and are essential to defining the role of local therapies in combination with ICIs. We identified patients who received ICIs for HL between 2013 and 2022. Fludeoxyglucose-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before initiating ICI and at progression on/after ICI were reviewed, and areas of active HL were recorded. An exploratory analysis of treatable progression included patients with ≤5 sites of disease on pre-ICI FDG-PET and progression only at pre-ICI sites. Ninety patients were identified; 69 had complete records, and of these, 32 (52%) had relapsed at ICI initiation, 17 (25%) were refractory, and 16 (23%) received ICI as first-line therapy. Forty-five of 69 patients had ≤5 sites of disease (limited) on pre-ICI FDG-PET. Patients with >5 sites of disease had a higher risk of progression, and every site of disease >5 sites conferred an additional 1.2x higher chance of progression. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 41 of 69 patients had progressed on/after ICIs (cumulative incidence 66.4%), and of these, 22 of 41 patients progressed only at pre-ICI sites (cumulative incidence 39.4%). In an exploratory analysis, the cumulative incidence of a treatable progression among 45 patients with limited disease was 34%. The cumulative incidence of any progression among this cohort was 58.9%. More than one-third of patients with limited disease before ICIs experienced progression only at pre-ICI sites of disease. These patients could be candidates for radiation during or after ICIs.

Marked Hypoleptinemia Precedes Overt Fat Loss in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Acquired Generalized Lipodystrophy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cancer cells that evade immune T-cell regulation have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic carcinomas. Unfortunately, secondary endocrinopathies associated with ICI, including adrenal insufficiency, primary hypothyroidism, autoimmune diabetes, and rarely hypoparathyroidism, are increasing. Lipodystrophy, presumably due to the autoimmune destruction of adipocytes, leading to metabolic complications, is a less recognized adverse effect of ICI therapy. We present a case of a 66-year-old Caucasian woman treated with pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death 1 inhibitor, for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Fifteen months after the treatment initiation, she was found to have hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hepatic steatosis but without any evidence of autoimmune diabetes. She was also noted to have isolated buccal fat pad loss, raising suspicion of acquired lipodystrophy. Despite well-preserved subcutaneous fat over the trunk and limbs, she had undetectable serum leptin levels. Whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography scan showed diffuse mild FDG activity throughout the subcutaneous tissue, suggesting underlying inflammation. Over the next 3 months, she developed progressive fat loss leading to generalized lipodystrophy. Adipose tissue dysfunction, secondary to ICI-induced subclinical panniculitis, precedes overt fat loss and is characterized by hypoleptinemia and metabolic abnormalities.

Cardiovascular Health during and after Cancer Therapy.

Certain cancer treatments have been linked to specific cardiovascular toxicities, including (but not limited to) cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension, and myocarditis. Radiation, anthracyclines, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2)-directed therapies, fluoropyrimidines, platinums, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen-presenting (CAR)-T cell therapy can all cause cardiovascular side effects. Management of cardiovascular dysfunction that occurs during cancer therapy often requires temporary or permanent cessation of the risk-potentiating anti-neoplastic drug as well as optimization of medical management from a cardiovascular standpoint. Stem cell or bone marrow transplant recipients face unique cardiovascular challenges, as do patients at extremes of age.