Safety and immunogenicity of a highly attenuated rVSVN4CT1-EBOVGP1 Ebola virus vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of a highly attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) expressing HIV-1 gag (rVSVN4CT1-HIV-1gag1) was shown in previous phase 1 clinical studies. An rVSV vector expressing Ebola virus glycoprotein (EBOV-GP) in place of HIV-1 gag (rVSVN4CT1-EBOVGP1) showed single-dose protection from lethal challenge with low passage Ebola virus in non-human primates. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the rVSVN4CT1-EBOVGP1 vaccine in healthy adults. METHODS: We did a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 dose-escalation study at a single clinical site (Optimal Research) in Melbourne, FL, USA. Eligible participants were healthy men and non-pregnant women aged 18-60 years, with a body-mass index (BMI) of less than 40 kg/m2, no history of filovirus infection, VSV infection, or receipt of rVSV in previous studies, and who had not visited regions where Ebola virus outbreaks have occurred. Three cohorts were enrolled to assess a low (2·5 × 104 plaque forming units [PFU]), intermediate (2 × 105 PFU), or high dose (1·8 × 106 PFU) of the vaccine. Participants within each cohort were randomly allocated (10:3) to receive vaccine or placebo by intramuscular injection in a homologous prime and boost regimen, with 4 weeks between doses. All syringes were masked with syringe sleeves; participants and study site staff were not blinded to dose level but were blinded to active vaccine and placebo. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability; immunogenicity, assessed as GP-specific humoral immune response (at 2 weeks after each dose) and cellular immune response (at 1 and 2 weeks after each dose), was a secondary outcome. All randomised participants were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02718469. FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2015, and Sept 15, 2016, 39 individuals (18 [46%] men and 21 [54%] women, mean age 51 years [SD 10]) were enrolled, with ten participants receiving the vaccine and three participants receiving placebo in each of three cohorts. One participant in the intermediate dose cohort was withdrawn from the study because of a diagnosis of invasive ductal breast carcinoma 24 days after the first vaccination, which was considered unrelated to the vaccine. No severe adverse events were observed. Solicited local adverse events occurred in ten (26%) of 39 participants after the first dose and nine (24%) of 38 participants after the second dose; the events lasted 3 days or less, were predominantly injection site tenderness (17 events) and injection site pain (ten events), and were either mild (19 events) or moderate (ten events) in intensity. Systemic adverse events occurred in 13 (33%) of 39 participants after the first dose and eight (21%) of 38 participants after the second dose; the events were mild (45 events) or moderate (11 events) in severity, and the most common events were malaise or fatigue (13 events) and headache (12 events). Arthritis and maculopapular, vesicular, or purpuric rash distal to the vaccination site(s) were not reported. A GP-specific IgG response was detected in all vaccine recipients after two doses (and IgG response frequency was 100% after a single high dose), and an Ebola virus neutralising response was detected in 100% of participants in the high-dose cohort. INTERPRETATION: The rVSVN4CT1-EBOVGP1 vaccine was well tolerated at all dose levels tested and was immunogenic despite a high degree of attenuation. The combined safety and immunogenicity profile of the rVSVN4CT1-EBOVGP1 vaccine vector support phase 1-2 clinical evaluation. FUNDING: US Department of Defense Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense: Joint Project Manager for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Medical.

First-in-Human Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 gag Vaccine (HVTN 090).

Background. We report the first-in-human safety and immunogenicity evaluation of a highly attenuated, replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 vaccine. Methods. Sixty healthy, HIV-1-uninfected adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study. Groups of 12 participants received rVSV HIV-1 gag vaccine at 5 dose levels (4.6 × 10(3) to 3.4 × 10(7) particle forming units) (N = 10/group) or placebo (N = 2/group), delivered intramuscularly as bilateral injections at 0 and 2 months. Safety monitoring included VSV cultures from blood, urine, saliva, and swabs of oral lesions. Vesicular stomatitis virus-neutralizing antibodies, T-cell immunogenicity, and HIV-1 specific binding antibodies were assessed. Results. Local and systemic reactogenicity symptoms were mild to moderate and increased with dose. No severe reactogenicity or product-related serious adverse events were reported, and all rVSV cultures were negative. All vaccine recipients became seropositive for VSV after 2 vaccinations. gag-specific T-cell responses were detected in 63% of participants by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot at the highest dose post boost. Conclusions. An attenuated replication-competent rVSV gag vaccine has an acceptable safety profile in healthy adults. This rVSV vector is a promising new vaccine platform for the development of vaccines to combat HIV-1 and other serious human diseases.

Phase I study of a herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) DNA vaccine administered to healthy, HSV-2-seronegative adults by a needle-free injection system.

We conducted a double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose escalation safety and immunogenicity trial of a candidate herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) surface glycoprotein D2 (gD2) DNA vaccine administered by use of a needle-free device. Sixty-two healthy adults were randomized using a 4:1 vaccine-to-placebo ratio. Half of the participants were HSV-1 seronegative, and all were HSV-2 seronegative. Vaccine doses included 100 microg, 300 microg, 1,000 microg or 3,000 microg of a plasmid expressing the gD2 protein. Subjects received vaccine at 0, 4, 8, and 24 weeks. Some subjects received an additional 1,000-microg boost at 52 weeks. We found that the vaccine was safe and well tolerated, with most adverse events being local site reactions. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. gD2-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and lymphoproliferation responses were detected 2 weeks after the third vaccine injection in one of four HSV-1-seronegative, HSV-2-seronegative participants who received 3,000 microg of vaccine. A DNA-based vaccination strategy against HSV-2 appears to be safe and may generate a vaccine-specific cellular immune response, but high vaccine doses are likely needed to elicit an immune response in most vaccinees.

Plasmid vaccination of stable HIV-positive subjects on antiviral treatment results in enhanced CD8 T-cell immunity and increased control of viral "blips".

Antiviral therapy prolongs suppression of viral replication and allows for significant immune reconstitution but has not been effective in eradicating reservoirs of virus, which produce resurgent viremia when highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is discontinued. Immune-based therapy may provide an additional antiviral effect. We vaccinated stable HIV-positive patients on HAART with an HIV plasmid vaccine to determine safety, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential. Volunteers received a combination of two HIV DNA plasmid constructs, which drive expression of env/rev and gag/pol genes. The vaccine was well tolerated with no toxicity. CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte counts did not change significantly among volunteers. CD8 MHC class I-restricted responses to HIV antigens were assayed. Eight of 13 vaccinees responded after vaccination with detectable ELISpot result. Importantly, we observed a difference in viral detection events in vaccinated compared to control patients. Three out of the five placebo recipients had "viral blips" (transient elevations of HIV RNA) during follow-up (10/49 assays) while these were only present in one of 13 vaccinees on one occasion (1/130 assays; p<0.04). The decrease in the frequency of transient viremia and failure suggests that DNA immunization with CD8-generating vaccines in HAART-controlled HIV-positive subjects may have therapeutic potential.

T-cell responses induced in normal volunteers immunized with a DNA-based vaccine containing HIV-1 env and rev.

OBJECTIVE: An effective HIV-1 vaccine will likely need to induce strong cell-mediated immunity in humans. Therefore, we examined the ability of a DNA HIV-1 vaccine to induce a T-cell response in HIV-1 seronegative humans. DESIGN: Individuals were enrolled in a phase I clinical trial of safety and immune responses to an env/rev-containing plasmid at doses of 100, 300 or 1000 microg. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples were analyzed by standard lymphocyte proliferation, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and ELISPOT techniques. RESULTS: PBMCs from subjects immunized with doses as low as 300 microg proliferated in vitro to env (four of six) or (three of six) proteins. Importantly, when the dose of vaccine was increased to 1000 microg of DNA, lymphocytes secreted IFN-gamma in an ELISPOT assay following in vitro stimulation with env (three of six) or rev (four of six) proteins. CONCLUSION: We observed HIV-1 DNA plasmid vaccines induce CD4 T-helper cell responses in humans. We observed a discrepancy in the CD4 versus CD8 response suggesting the importance of analyzing both compartments in clinical evaluation. Furthermore, this report demonstrates the high level of immunogenicity of and its importance as a component of a prophylactic vaccine for HIV-1.