Randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effects of intravenous GSK3858279 (anti-CCL17) on a battery of evoked pain tests in healthy participants.

C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 17 (CCL17) is a chemokine that binds and signals through the G-protein coupled CC-chemokine receptor 4 and has been implicated in the development of inflammatory and arthritic pain. GSK3858279 is a high-affinity, first-in-class, monoclonal antibody, binding specifically to CCL17 and inhibiting downstream signaling. In this phase I, randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, incomplete-block crossover study (NCT04114656), the analgesic effects and safety of intravenous GSK3858279 were assessed in a battery of evoked acute pain assessments on healthy, adult (aged ≥18 years), male participants. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either one placebo (0.9% w/v NaCl) dose followed by two GSK3858279 doses (PAA treatment sequence), or one GSK3858279 dose followed by two placebo doses (APP treatment sequence). The co-primary end points were ultraviolet B heat pain detection threshold (°C), cold pressor time to pain tolerance threshold (PTT, sec), and electrical PTT (mA, single stimulus). Twenty-one participants were enrolled (PAA = 11; APP = 10). Mean age (standard deviation) was 29.3 (7.9) years for PAA, 31.1 (7.7) years for APP. No significant differences were observed in the analgesic effect between GSK3858279 and placebo for any end point. Exposure to GSK3858279 was similar between Period 1 (APP sequence), and Periods 2 and 3 (PAA sequence), with some GSK3858279 carry-over. Changes in serum CCL17 levels were consistent with the expected GSK3858279 activity. All drug-related adverse events were mild in intensity and caused no discontinuations. The absence of an efficacy signal in this acute pain model does not preclude efficacy in chronic pain states.

Open-Label Interventional Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate NO-Mediated Vasodilation by Dermal Allyl Isothiocyanate Challenge and Whole-Body Heat Stress.

Dermal allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) administration and whole-body heat stress (WBHS) are two challenge models that are used to evaluate physiological mechanisms of vasodilation and pharmacological activity in humans. Their exact vasodilatory mechanisms in humans are not fully elucidated but are likely to be nitric oxide (NO)-mediated. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is overlap in the vasodilatory pathways of dermal AITC application and WBHS by combining the challenges. In this open-label interventional study, healthy volunteers underwent dermal administration of AITC twice: under basal conditions and during WBHS. Dermal blood flow (DBF) was non-invasively measured using laser speckle contrast imaging four times, once in each of the following situations: baseline, WBHS only, AITC only, and WBHS combined with AITC. A total of 12 male volunteers, aged 18-61 years, participated in the study. Compared to baseline, following AITC application, their DBF increased by 63.43 AU (baseline: 32.55, 95% CI [17.78, 47.31] AU, AITC only: 95.97, 95% CI [81.21, 110.7] AU, p < 0.0001). During WBHS, the increase in DBF after AITC was 42.76 AU (WBHS only: 87.25, 95% CI [72.49, 102.0] AU, WBHS+AITC: 130.0, 95% CI [115.2, 144.8] AU, p < 0.0001). The combination of WBHS and AITC resulted in a lower DBF than the sum of the DBF responses to AITC and WBHS when applied separately (ED 20.67, 95% CI [-3.532, 44.88], p = 0.0916). This might point towards the presence of an interaction in the vasodilatory mechanism of AITC application and WBHS, possibly indicating overlap in their NOS-driven vasodilatory pathways.

Simultaneous measurement of intra-epidermal electric detection thresholds and evoked potentials for observation of nociceptive processing following sleep deprivation.

Sleep deprivation has been shown to increase pain intensity and decrease pain thresholds in healthy subjects. In chronic pain patients, sleep impairment often worsens the perceived pain intensity. This increased pain perception is the result of altered nociceptive processing. We recently developed a method to quantify and monitor altered nociceptive processing by simultaneous tracking of psychophysical detection thresholds and recording of evoked cortical potentials during intra-epidermal electric stimulation. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity of nociceptive detection thresholds and evoked potentials to altered nociceptive processing after sleep deprivation in an exploratory study with 24 healthy male and 24 healthy female subjects. In each subject, we tracked nociceptive detection thresholds and recorded central evoked potentials in response to 180 single- and 180 double-pulse intra-epidermal electric stimuli. Results showed that the detection thresholds for single- and double-pulse stimuli and the average central evoked potential for single-pulse stimuli were significantly decreased after sleep deprivation. When analyzed separated by sex, these effects were only significant in the male population. Multivariate analysis showed that the decrease of central evoked potential was associated with a decrease of task-related evoked activity. Measurement repetition led to a decrease of the detection threshold to double-pulse stimuli in the mixed and the female population, but did not significantly affect any other outcome measures. These results suggest that simultaneous tracking of psychophysical detection thresholds and evoked potentials is a useful method to observe altered nociceptive processing after sleep deprivation, but is also sensitive to sex differences and measurement repetition.

A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple dose escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VX-128, a highly selective Nav 1.8 inhibitor, in healthy adults.

Selective inhibition of certain voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav s), such as Nav 1.8, is of primary interest for pharmacological pain research and widely studied as a pharmacological target due to its contribution to repetitive firing, neuronal excitability, and pain chronification. VX-128 is a highly potent and selective Nav 1.8 inhibitor that was being developed as a treatment for pain. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of VX-128 in healthy subjects in a single- and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) first-in-human study. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated in the MAD part using a battery of evoked pain tests. Overall, single doses of VX-128 up to 300 mg were well-tolerated, although adverse effect (AE) incidence was higher in subjects receiving VX-128 (41.7%) compared with placebo (25.0%). After multiple dosing of up to 10 days, skin rash events were observed at all dose levels (up to 100 mg once daily [q.d.]), in five of 26 (19.2%) subjects, including one subject receiving VX-128 (100 mg q.d.) who had a serious AE of angioedema. A trend in pain tolerance were observed for cold pressor- and pressure pain, which was dose-dependent for the latter. VX-128 was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration between 1 and 2 h) with a half-life of ~80 h at 10 mg q.d., and approximately two-fold accumulation ratio after 10 and 30 mg q.d. Although VX-128, when given in a multiple dose fashion, resulted in early study termination due to tolerability issues, effects were observed on multiple pain tests that may support further investigation of Nav 1.8 inhibitors as pain treatments.

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Effects of VX-150, a Highly Selective NaV1.8 Inhibitor, in Healthy Male Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic potential, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of VX-150, a pro-drug of a highly selective NaV1.8 inhibitor, in healthy subjects. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy male subjects with an age of 18-55 years, inclusive, were enrolled. Eligibility was based on general fitness, absence of current or previous medical conditions that could compromise subject safety, and a training assessment of pain tolerance across pain tests to exclude highly tolerant individuals whose tolerance could compromise the ability to detect analgesic responses. All dosed subjects completed the study. METHODS: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to one of two sequences receiving a single VX-150 dose and subsequently placebo, or vice versa, with at least 7 days between dosing. A battery of pain tests (pressure, electrical stair, [capsaicin-induced] heat, and cold pressor) was administered before dosing and repetitively up to 10 h after dosing, with blood sampling up to 24 h after dosing. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Data were analyzed with a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. RESULTS: VX-150 induced analgesia in a variety of evoked pain tests, without affecting subject safety. Significant effects were reported for the cold pressor and heat pain thresholds. Maximum median concentration for the active moiety was 4.30 µg/mL at 4 h after dosing. CONCLUSION: Results of this proof-of-mechanism study are supportive of the potential of VX-150, a highly selective NaV1.8 channel inhibitor, to treat various pain indications.

Systematic analysis of chromatin interactions at disease associated loci links novel candidate genes to inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed many susceptibility loci for complex genetic diseases. For most loci, the causal genes have not been identified. Currently, the identification of candidate genes is predominantly based on genes that localize close to or within identified loci. We have recently shown that 92 of the 163 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-loci co-localize with non-coding DNA regulatory elements (DREs). Mutations in DREs can contribute to IBD pathogenesis through dysregulation of gene expression. Consequently, genes that are regulated by these 92 DREs are to be considered as candidate genes. This study uses circular chromosome conformation capture-sequencing (4C-seq) to systematically analyze chromatin-interactions at IBD susceptibility loci that localize to regulatory DNA. RESULTS: Using 4C-seq, we identify genomic regions that physically interact with the 92 DRE that were found at IBD susceptibility loci. Since the activity of regulatory elements is cell-type specific, 4C-seq was performed in monocytes, lymphocytes, and intestinal epithelial cells. Altogether, we identified 902 novel IBD candidate genes. These include genes specific for IBD-subtypes and many noteworthy genes including ATG9A and IL10RA. We show that expression of many novel candidate genes is genotype-dependent and that these genes are upregulated during intestinal inflammation in IBD. Furthermore, we identify HNF4α as a potential key upstream regulator of IBD candidate genes. CONCLUSIONS: We reveal many novel and relevant IBD candidate genes, pathways, and regulators. Our approach complements classical candidate gene identification, links novel genes to IBD and can be applied to any existing GWAS data.