Hormone replacement therapy in women with iatrogenic premature ovarian insufficiency after radiotherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort and survey study.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the uptake of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cervical cancer patients with iatrogenic menopause. Survival in relation to HRT use was assessed via a retrospective chart study, and the severity of menopausal symptoms, motivations and barriers to starting HRT were examined via questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 293 women under the age of 51 and treated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2020 were identified. Medical records were searched for information on HRT use. If still living, women were sent digital questionnaires addressing menopausal symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and potential barriers and motivations concerning HRT use. Univariable data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test, while logistical regression was used to analyse relationships between certain variables and use of HRT and survival. RESULTS: Overall HRT uptake was 78.1 %, which was related to age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, but independent of the duration of radiotherapy or FIGO stage. Overall survival was higher for HRT users (χ2(1) = 4.3, p = 0.038). Questionnaires were sent to 193 patients and 100 completed it (response rate 51.8 %). Main reasons for HRT use were relief of hot flushes and improvement in QoL. For women below age 51, QoL was indeed higher for current HRT users than for non-HRT users (EQ-index 0.8 vs. 0.7, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HRT prescription rate was inversely correlated with age. Survival was not negatively affected by HRT use. It is important to stress the benefits of HRT and address women's fears regarding its use.

Childbirth Related Labial Trauma Management in the UK: A Brief Report.

Trauma to the labia occurs in up to 49% of vaginal births1. Trauma to the perineal body resulting from childbirth is well defined using widely used categories, and recommended management of perineal body trauma is based on high level evidence. Currently no similar evidence exists to inform the classification or management of labial trauma. This is reflected in variation in clinical practice with some practitioners favouring suturing of labial trauma, whilst others favour healing by secondary intention. A survey of practice was undertaken in three NHS organisations, over a five-week period in 2019 with data collected on 332 vaginal births. Overall, 47.3% (n=157) of women sustained labial trauma, of whom 29.3% (n=46) sustained trauma described as involving skin and underlying tissues. Of the labial trauma which involved skin and underlying tissues 76.0% (n=35) was sutured and the remainder unsutured. The survey confirmed a lack of consistency in practice and the need for further research to inform care for women.