Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
8.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res ; 2(2): 143-6, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20559979

RESUMO

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision process for approving or clearing medical devices is often determined by a review of robust clinical data and extensive preclinical testing of the device. The mission statement for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) is to review the information provided by manufacturers so that it can promote and protect the health of the public by ensuring the safety and effectiveness of medical devices deemed appropriate for human use (Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, Section 903(b)(1, 2(C)), December 31, 2004; accessed December 17, 2008 http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fdcact/fdctoc.htm). For high-risk devices, such as ventricular assist devices (VADs), mechanical heart valves, stents, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, pacemakers, and defibrillators, the determination is based on FDA's review of extensive preclinical bench and animal testing followed by use of the device in a clinical trial in humans. These clinical trials allow the manufacturer to evaluate a device in the intended use population. FDA reviews the data from the clinical trial to determine if the device performed as predicted and the clinical benefits outweigh the risks. This article reviews the regulatory framework for different marketing applications related to cardiovascular devices and describes the process of obtaining approval to study a cardiovascular device in a U.S. clinical trial.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/instrumentação , Aprovação de Equipamentos , Regulamentação Governamental , Política de Saúde , Animais , Cardiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , Comportamento Cooperativo , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Guias como Assunto , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Marca-Passo Artificial , Rotulagem de Produtos , Desenho de Prótese , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol ; 286(3): H909-17, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14604852

RESUMO

Energy requirements for successful antiarrhythmia shocks are arrhythmia specific. However, it remains unclear why the probability of shock success decreases with increasing arrhythmia complexity. The goal of this research was to determine whether a diminished probability of shock success results from an increased number of functional reentrant circuits in the myocardium, and if so, to identify the responsible mechanisms. To achieve this goal, we assessed shock efficacy in a bidomain defibrillation model of a 4-mm-thick slice of canine ventricles. Shocks were applied between a right ventricular cathode and a distant anode to terminate either a single scroll wave (SSW) or multiple scroll waves (MSWs). From the 160 simulations conducted, dose-response curves were constructed for shocks given to SSWs and MSWs. The shock strength that yielded a 50% probability of success (ED(50)) for SSWs was found to be 13% less than that for MSWs, which indicates that a larger number of functional reentries results in an increased defibrillation threshold. The results also demonstrate that an isoelectric window exists after both failed and successful shocks; however, shocks of strength near the ED(50) value that were given to SSWs resulted in 16.3% longer isoelectric window durations than the same shocks delivered to MSWs. Mechanistic inquiry into these findings reveals that the two main factors underlying the observed relationships are 1) smaller virtual electrode polarizations in the tissue depth, and 2) differences in preshock tissue state. As a result of these factors, intramural excitable pathways leading to delayed breakthrough on the surface were formed earlier after shocks given to MSWs compared with SSWs and thus resulted in a lower defibrillation threshold for shocks given to SSWs.


Assuntos
Cardioversão Elétrica , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Animais , Simulação por Computador , Cães , Técnicas In Vitro , Potenciais da Membrana/fisiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
10.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 14(10 Suppl): S249-56, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14760930

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has demonstrated that defibrillation shocks terminate or reset reentrant activity in the myocardium through the generation of virtual electrode polarization (VEP). Previous research has revealed that the shock establishes phase singularities (PSs) in the tissue via the VEP mechanism. The aim of this study was to examine, as a function of shock strength and electrode configuration, the relationship between end-shock PSs and the reentrant circuits established after failed defibrillation attempts. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study uses a complex three-dimensional finite-element bidomain model of a slice of the canine heart characterized by realistic geometry and fiber architecture and undergoing a single scroll wave. Defibrillation shocks of increasing strength are delivered through three different electrode configurations. The results demonstrated that >98% of all PSs have a lifetime of half a reentrant cycle or less. Stronger shocks result in a faster rate of annihilation of postshock PSs. For failed shocks, the surviving PSs underlie the activity of one or more scroll waves, which remain stationary in the slice. For all electrode configurations tested, the increase in shock strength leads to a rapid initial increase in the number of postshock reentries followed by a slower decrease; similar behavior is observed with regard to end-shock PSs. CONCLUSION: These results present new evidence regarding the mechanisms underlying failure of defibrillation shocks.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Eletrochoque , Coração/fisiopatologia , Animais , Cães , Cardioversão Elétrica , Técnicas In Vitro , Potenciais da Membrana/fisiologia , Modelos Biológicos , Miocárdio/citologia , Miócitos Cardíacos/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA