Performance of lactating dairy cows fed corn as whole plant silage and grain produced from genetically modified corn containing event DAS-59122-7 compared to a nontransgenic, near-isogenic control.

The nutritional equivalency of grain plus whole plant silage from genetically modified corn plants containing the DAS-59122-7 (59122) event expressing the Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins to grain and silage from a near-isogenic corn hybrid without this trait (control) was assessed using lactating dairy cows. Corn plants with event 59122 are resistant to western corn rootworm and tolerant to the herbicide active ingredient glufosinate-ammonium. Effects on feed intake, milk production, and milk composition were determined. The 59122 grain and the control grain were produced in 2005 from isolated plots in Richland, Iowa. Whole plant corn silage for the 59122 and control treatments were grown in isolated plots at the Kansas State University Dairy Center and ensiled in Ag-Bags. Thirty lactating Holstein cows blocked by lactation number, day of lactation, and previous energy-corrected milk production were used in a switchback design. All cows were fed diets that contained 22.7% grain plus 21.3% whole plant silage from either the 59122 or the control hybrid, in addition to 21% wet corn gluten feed, 12.3% protein mix, 8.0% whole cottonseed, and 14.7% alfalfa hay. Each period of the switchback trial included 2 wk for diet adjustment followed by 4 wk for data and sample collection. Milk samples (a.m. and p.m.) collected from 2 consecutive milkings of each collection wk were analyzed for fat, protein, lactose, solids-not-fat, milk urea nitrogen, and somatic cell count. Percentages of milk fat, protein, lactose, and solids-not-fat were not affected by dietary treatment. Yields of milk, 4% fat-corrected milk, energy-corrected milk, solids-corrected milk, and the concentrations and yields of milk fat, milk protein, milk solids, and milk lactose were not significantly different between treatments. Efficiencies of milk, fat-corrected milk, energy-corrected milk, and solids-corrected milk production also were not different when cows were fed crops from 59122 than when they were fed the control hybrid. Milk production efficiency averaged 1.48 and 1.50 kg/kg of dry matter intake for cows fed diets containing the control and 59122 corn, respectively. These data indicate that the nutritional value for milk production was not different between a diet containing grain plus whole plant corn silage produced from a 59122 corn hybrid versus a diet containing grain and corn silage from its near-isogenic control corn hybrid.

Evaluation of corn grain with the genetically modified input trait DAS-59122-7 fed to growing-finishing pigs.

A growth performance experiment was conducted to assess the feeding value of a double-stacked transgenic corn grain for growing-finishing pigs. The genetically modified corn grain contained event DAS-59122-7, which expresses the Cry34/35Ab1 binary insecticidal protein for the control of corn rootworm. This modified transgenic grain is resistant to western corn rootworm and is also tolerant to herbicides containing the active ingredient glufosinate-ammonium. The modified grain (59122), a nontransgenic near-isoline grain (control corn), and a commercial corn (Pioneer brand hybrid 35P12) were grown in a 2005 production trial in individually isolated plots that were located 201 m apart. A total of 108 pigs were allotted to corn-soybean meal diets containing 1 of the 3 grains as the sole source of corn. There were 3 pigs per pen and 12 replicate pens per treatment. Pigs were fed grower diets from 37 to 60 kg, early finisher diets from 60 to 90 kg, and late finisher diets from 90 to 127 kg. Within each phase, data for ADG, ADFI, and G:F were calculated. At the conclusion of the experiment, pigs were slaughtered and data for carcass quality were collected. Differences between 59122 and the control corn were evaluated, with statistical significance at P<0.05. No differences in ADG, ADFI, or G:F between pigs fed the control corn and pigs fed the modified corn were observed during the grower, early finisher, or late finisher phases. For the entire experimental period, no difference between pigs fed the control and the 59122 corn were observed for final BW (128.9 vs. 127.1 kg), ADG (1.02 vs. 1.00 kg), ADFI (2.88 vs. 2.80 kg), or G:F (0.356 vs. 0.345 kg/kg). Likewise, no differences in dressing percentage (76.48 vs. 76.30%), LM area (49.8 vs. 50.4 cm(2)), 10th-rib back fat (2.20 vs. 2.12 cm), and carcass lean content (52.9 vs. 53.4%) were observed between pigs fed the control and the 59122 corn grain. It was concluded that the nutritional value of the modified transgenic corn grain containing event DAS-59122-7 was similar to that of the nontransgenic near-isoline control.

The emerging role of physician assistants in the delivery of dermatologic health care.

The NAMCS provides a wealth of information on use of PAs in all practices, including dermatology. Two important points regarding the NAMCS and SDPA data are addressed here: the number of visits to PAs for dermatologic symptoms and the expected growth of PA use in dermatologists' offices. Dermatologic symptoms were evaluated frequently by PAs, accounting for 14% of PA visits. These statistics do not address the number of referrals those PAs made to dermatologists. Perhaps PAs as a group should be targeted for increased dermatologic education, particularly stressing the need for appropriate referral to a dermatologist. PAs could increase the number of dermatology referrals from primary care offices with improved understanding of the importance of the dermatologist in the management of patients' overall skin health. At projected growth rates, the number of PAs employed by dermatologists should exceed 500 by the end of 2000. Most of this growth has been in private practices and rarely in HMOs or in large multispecialty clinics. There are a number of reasons for this growth, as follows: A PA may help reduce the patient load on the dermatologist, especially with sameday appointments and drop-ins. Some dermatologists are moving away from clinical dermatology into cosmetics, which not only leaves a vacuum in clinical dermatology, but also creates job opportunities for PAs in cosmetic dermatology. Regarding managed care growth, PAs can have a positive impact on the problem of having to see more patients for less money. PAs are cost-effective. In the 1998 SDPA survey, the ratio of billings generated (production) to gross income for the average dermatology PA ranged from 3:1 to 6:1. Even with inexperienced PAs new to dermatology, this ratio was usually at least 2:1 at the end of the first year. PAs can cover satellite offices, allowing for practice expansion. Effective with the new Medicare laws of January 1, 1998, PAs can now see new Medicare patients or Medicare patients with new conditions without the physician being on site, opening up the possibility for satellite offices in remote areas. Just as dermatologists may move toward specialization in surgery, cosmetics, or medical dermatology, PAs may do the same, filling a niche in a particular practice. As in other specialties, patient acceptance of seeing dermatology PAs has not been a significant problem. Continued access to the dermatologist remains unfettered, but, over time, many patients become willing to see either. Are PAs likely to become future competitors of dermatologists? Genuinely concerned dermatologists worry that a dermatology-trained PA will become part of a gatekeeper system that impedes patient access to dermatologists. This is not happening and is not at all likely to become a trend, for a number of reasons. First, primary care cannot compete with dermatology practices in remuneration for PAs. Just as financial benefits in high-production specialty practices entice physicians, the same benefits entice PAs as well. Second, according to member surveys of the SDPA, virtually 100% of fellow members work with dermatologists. Although PAs can work in any type of practice and evaluate dermatologic symptoms just as a general practitioner would, PAs who specialize in dermatology primarily practice with dermatologists, a collegial association most PAs seek out. PAs have steadfastly maintained their dependent, noncompetitive relationship with physicians and would not have it any other way. Although PAs see a good number of patients (2.8 million) with dermatologic symptoms, the NAMCS data indicate that most (72%) of these patients are also seen by a physician. Third, physicians are ultimately responsible for the actions of their PA employee. A general practitioner not trained to perform excisions or manage certain dermatologic conditions should not allow a PA to perform such duties. Similar to much of medicine, the PA profession continues to evolve, with many members moving awa

Tobacco smoking contributes little to facial wrinkling.

BACKGROUND: The potential detrimental effects of tobacco smoking have been widely cited. Tobacco smoking has been linked with facial wrinkling, but some previous studies have failed to take into account a number of potential confounders or were unblinded and thus subjective to bias. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine if there was increased facial wrinkling in smokers directly associated with tobacco usage after controlling for solar risk behavior. SUBJECTS: Eighty-two smokers (> 10 cigarettes per day) and 118 non-smokers (< 100 lifetime cigarettes) were recruited. Caucasian participants completed a questionnaire designed to assess demographic variables and other suspected factors related to wrinkling. METHODS: Three dermatologists, blinded to demographic information, reviewed three photographs of each subject and rated the wrinkling on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Stepwise linear regression was performed on all variables which attained a P < 0.1 level of independent significance. RESULTS: Overall the model accounted for 75.4% (P = 0.0001) of the variance in wrinkling, and predictive variables (P < or = 0.02) included age (partial R2 = 0.69), smoking pack years (R2 = 0.04), hours of outdoor work (R2 = 0.008), freckling (R2 = 0.007), and eye color (R2 = 0.004). A second model was created excluding age which accounted for 37.8% of the variance. The predictive variables in the second model (P < 0.08) included education (partial R2 = 0.08), smoking pack years (R2 = 0.05), hours of outdoor work (R2 = 0.03), weight change (R2 = 0.02), female sex (R2 = 0.02), hours of lifetime sun (R2 = 0.03), tanning bed use (R2 = 0.01), and sunscreen use (R2 = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking may significantly contribute to facial wrinkling, but accounts for only 6% of the explained variance. If there is a role for tobacco smoking in causing wrinkling, this role is a minor one.