Self-reported Sexual Harassment and Subsequent Reporting Among Internal Medicine Residency Trainees in the US.

This study uses survey data to describe the types of sexual harassment experienced by internal medicine residents, their knowledge of reporting mechanisms, their reporting intentions and actions, and satisfaction with reporting outcomes.

Faculty Experiences Related to Career Advancement and Success in Academic Medicine.

Phenomenon: Faculty career success in academic medicine is complex. Dynamic interactions among faculty and between faculty and their socio-cultural working environments contribute to the mystique of academic advancement. There are few empirical studies that analyze the social practice of faculty career advancement in academic medicine, especially those that focus on relations between individual and environmental contexts. This study aimed to investigate various faculty members' experiences around career advancement in a medical school. Through the analytical lens of Bourdieu's theory of practice, we focused on the relationship among individuals, positions, and environmental contexts.Approach: Following a general process of interpretive grounded theory, we collected faculty members' perceptions and experiences related to their career development and advancement via in-depth semi structured-interviews of 23 faculty at a medical school in the United States. We analyzed the interview transcripts using thematic and constant-comparison analyses, informed by Bourdieu's theory of practice emphasizing the concepts of habitus, field, doxa, illusio, and capital.Findings: While there was a general perception of collaborative success in the school, access to resources seemed to be unequally distributed and linked to faculty positions. Career opportunities, such as leadership and promotion, were mostly granted by leaders based on interpersonal relationships (social capital). Clinical faculty's limited access to professional development activities (cultural capital), including research, limited their likelihood for promotion (symbolic capital) at the school. An institutional emphasis on clinical productivity reinforced clinical faculty's constraints on academic scholarship, which led to perceived inequities by clinical faculty. Participants also perceived subtle gender bias and an unequal distribution of power among the specialties, which contradicted a culture of collaboration and support in the school.Insights: Complex power structures influence faculty career success. Unequal access and differential power among faculty positions resulted in disparities in career advancement. Greater transparency, equity, and inclusivity are obvious suggestions for change to allow all faculty to benefit from essential resources and career building opportunities. Furthermore, building high-quality relationships between leaders and faculty and mutual respect between specialties are essential to sustaining an organizational culture conducive to career success for all faculty. Faculty will benefit from a greater awareness of the structural and normative aspects of a medical school that are less obvious and more difficult to change. This is the value of applying Bourdieu's theory of practice to the socio-cultural dynamics of the medical school.

The Impact of Internal Medicine Clerkship Characteristics and NBME Subject Exams on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Exam Performance.

BACKGROUND: Residency program directors will likely emphasize the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) exam more during residency application given the recent USMLE Step 1 transition to pass/fail scoring. We examined how internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exam scores affect USMLE Step 2 CK performance. DESIGN: The authors used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to determine associations between Step 2 CK performance and internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exams. The sample had 21,280 examinees' first Step 2 CK scores for analysis. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, Step 1 performance (standardized ß = 0.45, p < .001) and NBME medicine subject exam performance (standardized ß = 0.40, p < .001) accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in Step 2 CK performance. Students who completed the internal medicine clerkship last in the academic year scored lower on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = -3.17 p < .001). Students who had a criterion score for passing the NBME medicine subject exam scored higher on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = 1.10, p = .03). There was no association between Step 2 CK performance and other internal medicine clerkship characteristics (all p > 0.05) nor with the total NBME subject exams completed (ß=0.05, p = .78). CONCLUSION: Despite similarities between NBME subject exams and Step 2 CK, the authors did not identify improved Step 2 CK performance for students who had more NBME subject exams. The lack of association of Step 2 CK performance with many internal medicine clerkship characteristics and more NBME subject exams has implications for future clerkship structure and summative assessment. The improved Step 2 CK performance in students that completed their internal medicine clerkship earlier warrants further study given the anticipated increase in emphasis on Step 2 CK.

Analyzing Expert Criteria for Authentic Resident Communication Skills.

Phenomenon: Training and assessing communication skills requires flexible and holistic approaches, including feedback practices. Historically, assessing communication skills has predominantly relied on itemized scoring, which is less useful for providing meaningful feedback to learners. Even more troublesome, theoretical scoring criteria tend to become a refractive lens allowing observation of only the conduct that aligns with the theory. Few skills assessment efforts have embraced a holistic understanding of how physician-patient communication skills are enacted in real patient care. Therefore, this study focused on what experts refer to when they speak about physicians' communication skills and what they treat as important when evaluating these skills enacted during real patient encounters.Approach: This qualitative study was based on observations and grounded theory. Residents' encounters with real patients were recorded as part of a formative communication skills assessment program from July 2015 to June 2016. Evaluation panels with diverse backgrounds (e.g., medicine, education, communication, conversation analysis, and layperson) listened to these recordings and jointly developed feedback comments for the resident from January 2016 to July 2017. For this study, we recorded forty-one panel discussions to observe their consensus evaluation. We conducted open and axial coding using a constant comparison approach to generate themes from the data.Findings: Elements of communication skills were connected and interdependent around the concepts of thoroughness and natural flow, which were not addressed by formative assessment criteria. Themes included (1) thoroughness within a boundary via agenda-setting; (2) natural yet, controlled flow: authentic conversation by active listening and questioning; (3) making agenda setting explicit to all parties in the beginning; (4) designing questions using both open-ended and closed questions; (5) pre-/post-conditions for patient education: patient contextual factors and teach-back; (6) preconditions for shared decision-making: patient education and patient contextual factors; and (7) multifaceted empathy demonstrated in multiple ways.Insights: The main message of the study findings is that communication skills criteria should be treated as organically interrelated and connected in assessing physicians' communication skills. Current communication skills assessment practice should be revisited as it itemizes physicians' communication skills as distinct and separate constructs rather than mutually affecting dynamics. Rather than imposing a theoretical rubric, assessment criteria should evolve through naturalistic observations of physician-patient communication.

Women's Wellness Through Equity and Leadership (WEL): A Program Evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Women's Wellness through Equity and Leadership (WEL) program was developed as a collaboration between 6 major medical associations in the United States. The goal was to contribute to the creation of equitable work environments for women physicians. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the pilot implementation of WEL. METHODS: Participants included a diverse group of 18 early career to midcareer women physicians from across medical specialties, 3 from each partner organization. WEL was developed as an 18-month program with 3 series focused on wellness, equity, and leadership and included monthly virtual and in-person meetings. After institutional board review approval, a mixed-methods evaluation design was incorporated, which included postseries and postprogram surveys and in-depth telephone interviews. RESULTS: Participants delineated several drivers of program success, including peer support and/or networks; interconnectedness between the topics of wellness, equity, and leadership; and diversity of participants and faculty. Areas for improvement included more opportunities to connect with peers and share progress and more structured mentorship. Regarding program impact, participants reported increased knowledge and behavior change because of their participation. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal, cohort initiative resulted from a successful collaboration between 6 medical associations. Evaluation findings suggest that providing opportunities for women physicians to connect with and support each other while building knowledge and skills can be an effective way to advance wellness, equity, and leadership for women in medicine.

Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.

Phenomenon: Detection of visual and auditory clinical findings is part of medical students' core clinical performance abilities that a medical education curriculum should teach, assess, and remediate. However, there is a limited understanding of how students develop these skills. While training physical exam technical skills has received significant attention and emphasis, teaching and assessing medical students' ability to detect and interpret visual and auditory clinical findings skills has been less systematic. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate how medical students' visual and auditory clinical findings skills progress and develop over their four years of undergraduate medical education. This study will provide educators insights that can guide curriculum refinements that lead to improving students' abilities in this area. Approach: A computer-based progress exam was created to measure the longitudinal development of students' abilities to detect and interpret visual and auditory findings. After pilot testing, sixty test items were developed in collaboration with six clinical faculty members and two medical education researchers. The exam includes detection and description of ECG, x-ray, heart sounds, breath sounds, skin lesions, and movement findings. The exam was administered to students at the beginning of each training year since 2014. Additionally, the exam was administered to the Class of 2017 prior to their graduation. Measurement validity and reliability tests were conducted. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used to determine progress. Findings: More than 98% of students in four years of training completed the exam each year. The exam instrument had high reliabilities and demonstrated acceptable concurrent validity when compared with other academic performance data. Findings showed that students' visual and auditory clinical findings skills increased each training year until their fourth year. There was no performance improvement between incoming Year 4 students and graduating Year 4 students. While group means increased, class performance did not become more homogeneous across four years. Longitudinal data showed the same performance patterns as the cross-sectional data. Performance of the bottom quartile of graduating fourth-year students was not significantly higher than the performance of the top quartile of incoming first-year students who had not had formal medical training. Insights: A longitudinal study to follow learners' performance in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings can provide meaningful insights regarding the effects of medical training programs on performance growth. The present study suggests that our medical curriculum is not effective in bringing all students to a higher level of performance in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings. This study calls for further investigation how medical students can develop visual and auditory detection and interpretation skills in undergraduate medical education. There is a need for planned curriculum and assessment of medical students' skills in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings.

Evaluating clerkship competency without exams.

BACKGROUND: Using examination scores for grading clerkship threatens students' engagement at a time when clinical immersion is critical for socialising into medicine. Narratives of student performance, composed during training by multiple preceptors across diverse settings, may be used to judge competence instead. Preceptor commentary is not trusted as a basis for grading, but the alignment between performance narratives and examination scores has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Performance data were gathered retrospectively from five cohorts of internal medicine clerkship students at one institution. The correlation between end-of-rotation examination scores and the grading committee's ratings of student competency based on preceptors' comments was examined. Patterns in the performance narratives of high- and low-scoring students were also explored. RESULTS: The grading committee's narrative-based ratings of student competence were correlated with examination scores. The majority of preceptors' comments were positive and professionalism-oriented, although students who scored lowest on exams received fewer comments overall and more recommendations for improvement than their highest-scoring peers. Recommendations for the lowest-scoring students equally emphasised knowledge, clinical skill and professionalism, whereas recommendations to highest-scoring students emphasised knowledge and clinical skill at more than twice the rate of professionalism. DISCUSSION: Clerkship preceptors' narratives of student performance can inform competency judgements that are grounded in actual workplace learning and are related to the independent examination of knowledge and clinical performance. Using performance narratives as the basis for grading may be a viable approach to balancing learning and assessment needs during core clerkship block rotations.

Getting Real: Aligning the Learning Needs of Clerkship Students With the Current Clinical Environment.

The authors present follow-up to a prior publication, which proposed a new model for third-year clerkships. The new model was created to address deficiencies in the clinical year and to rectify a recognized mismatch between students' learning needs and the realities of today's clinical settings. The new curricular model was implemented at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in academic year 2016-2017. Guiding principles were developed. These were to more deeply engage students in experiential learning through clinical immersion; to pair individual faculty with individual students over longer periods of time so real trust could be developed; to provide students with longitudinal clinical reasoning education under controlled instructional conditions; to simplify goals and objectives for the core clerkships and align them with student learning needs; and to provide students with individualized activities to help them explore areas of interest, choose their specialty, and improve areas of clinical weakness before the fourth year. The authors discuss reactions by faculty and students to the new curriculum, which were mostly positive, as well as several outcomes. Students showed very different attitudes toward what they defined as success in the clerkship year, reflective of their deeper immersion. Students spent more time working in clinical settings and performed more procedures. Performance on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge and Clinical Skills was unchanged from traditional clerkship years. The 2015 article called for rethinking the third-year clerkships. The authors have shown that such change is possible, and the new curriculum can be implemented with successful early outcomes.