Endoscopic aortic valve surgery in isolated and concomitant procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate early outcomes of endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) and risks of concomitant procedures done through the same working port. METHODS: At our institution, we performed a data analysis of 342 consecutive patients (from July 2013 to May 2021) who underwent endoscopic AVR with or without associated major procedure. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative data were evaluated. Subsequently, we perform a comparative analysis between the isolated and concomitant surgery group. The surgical access was a 3- to 4-cm working port in the second right intercostal space and 3 additional 5-mm mini-ports for the introduction of the thoracoscope, the transthoracic clamp and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary by-pass was achieved through peripheral cannulation. RESULTS: 105 patients (30.7%) underwent combined procedure: 2 coronary artery bypass (1.9%), 21 ascending aorta replacement (19.6%), 41 mitral surgery (38.3%), 16 mitral and tricuspid surgery (15%) and 25 other procedure (27%). Death occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) in the isolated group versus 2 patients (1.9%) in the combined group (P = 0.175). Seven strokes were observed, 4 in isolated procedures (1.7%) and 3 in the concomitant ones (2.85%) (P = 0.481). Surgical revision for bleeding was performed always through the same access in 13 patients (5.4%) versus 11 patients (10.4%) (P = 0.096). Pacemaker implantation was necessary in 5 patients (2.1%) versus 8 patients (7.6%) (P = 0.014). Median intubation time was 5 (2) h vs 6 (8) (P < 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: Through a single working port made for endoscopic AVR, a concomitant procedure may be done without affecting in-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rate.

Totally Endoscopic Constrictive Pericarditis Treatment: A Case Series.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has increased in popularity to reduce the morbidity associated with open heart surgery. In this article, a totally endoscopic case series is presented in which anterior pericardiectomy is performed by peripheral femoral arterial and venous cannulation. Right periareoal incision and right submammary incision were used for male and female patients, respectively, to access the heart by the fourth intercostal space.

Surgical redo versus transseptal or transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral valve bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) is the current standard of care for patients with failed bioprosthetic mitral valve (MV). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TMViV) is arising as an alternative to SMVR in high risk patients. We sought to evaluate procedural safety, early and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent transseptal TMViV (TS-TMViV), transapical TMViV (TA-TMViV), or redo-SMVR. METHODS: We identified patients with failed bioprosthetic MV who underwent TS-TMViV, TA-TMViV, or SMVR at four Italian Centers. Clinical and echocardiographic data were codified according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium definition (MVARC), except for significant valve stenosis. RESULTS: Between December 2012 and September 27, 2019 patients underwent TS-TMViV, 22 TA-TMViV, and 29 redo-SMVR. TS-TMViV and TA-TMViV patients presented higher mean age and surgical risk scores compared with SMVR group (77.8 ± 12 years, 77.3 ± 7.3 years, 67.8 ± 9.4 years, p < .001; STS PROM 8.5 ± 7.2; 8.9 ± 4.7; 3.6 ± 2.6, p < .001). TS-TMViV procedure was associated with shorter intensive care unit time and total length of stay (LOS) compared with TA-TMViV and SMVR group. There were no differences in MVARC procedural success at 30-days (74.1, 72.7, and 51.7%, p = .15) and one-year all-cause mortality between groups (14.8, 18.2, and 17.2%, p = 1.0). MV mean gradient was similar between TS-TMViV, TA-TMViV, and SMVR groups at 30 days and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: For the selected patients, TS-TMViV and TA-TMViV are to be considered a valid alternative to redo-SMVR with comparable 1-year survival. TS-TMViV is the less invasive strategy and has the advantage of shortening the LOS compared with TA-TMViV.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results.

To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients' characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51 ± 1.39) underwent isolated E-AVR due to a severe stenosis in 99 cases and insufficiency in 26 cases. The surgical access was a 3-4 cm working port in the second right intercostal space with no rib-spreading and 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved through a femoro-femoral cannulation. All patients successfully underwent E-AVR. Stended bioprostheses were implanted in 56 cases, Rapid Deployment and Sutureless valves in 23 and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and CPB times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, and a significant difference between the types of prostheses was observed: 69.1 ± 15.1 and 106.2 ± 21.8 minutes (Sutureless) vs 93.2 ± 15.1 and 135.5 ± 21.8 minutes (Rapid Deployment) vs 100.6 ± 17.2 and 138.9 ± 21.9 minutes (Stented). Mean ventilation and ICU times and hospital stay were 10.9 ± 39.3 hours, 45.9 ± 58.4 hours, and 8.3 ± 9.3 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. E-AVR is associated with low mortality and few complications. Sutureless bioprostheses significantly reduce cross-clamping and CPB times. In dedicated centers, this approach may become a valid alternative to other minimally invasive techniques.

Presepsin and Procalcitonin Levels as Markers of Adverse Postoperative Complications and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Backgound: This study was aimed at evaluating the presepsin and procalcitonin levels to predict adverse postoperative complications and mortality in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: A total of 122 cardiac surgery patients were enrolled for the study. Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were measured 48 h after the procedure. The primary endpoints were adverse renal, respiratory, and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. RESULTS: Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse renal and respiratory outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.0081). The presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse cardiovascular outcome (p = 0.023) and the procalcitonin values in patients with sepsis (p = 0.0013). Presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients who died during hospitalization (382 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 243-717.5 vs. 1,848 pg/mL, IQR 998-5,451.5, p = 0.049). In addition, the predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality was higher for presepsin, with a significant difference between the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.025, p = 0.035, p = 0.003; respectively). Presepsin and procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Although a positive trend was notable for presepsin and adverse renal outcome (area under the ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curves [AUC] of 0.760, 95% CI 0.673-0.833 versus procalcitonin: AUC 0.692; 95% CI 0.601-0.773): no statistically significant difference was evident between the AUC of the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin and -procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for -adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Also, presepsin possesses a better predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality.

Persistent decrease of renal functional reserve in patients after cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury despite clinical recovery.

Background: Cardiac surgery is a leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). Such AKI patients may develop progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). Others, who appear to have sustained no permanent loss of function (normal serum creatinine), may still lose renal functional reserve (RFR). Methods: We extended the follow-up in the observational 'Preoperative RFR Predicts Risk of AKI after Cardiac Surgery' study from hospital discharge to 3 months after surgery for 86 (78.2%) patients with normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and re-measured RFR with a high oral protein load. The primary study endpoint was change in RFR. Study registration at clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03092947, ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN16109759. Results: At 3 months, three patients developed new CKD. All remaining patients continued to have a normal eGFR (93.3 ± 15.1 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, when stratified by post-operative AKI and cell cycle arrest (CCA) biomarkers, AKI patients displayed a significant decrease in RFR {from 14.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 9.5 - 24.3] to 9.1 (IQR 7.1 - 12.5) mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001} and patients without AKI but with positive post-operative CCA biomarkers also experienced a similar decrease of RFR [from 26.7 (IQR 22.9 - 31.5) to 19.7 (IQR 15.8 - 22.8) mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001]. In contrast, patients with neither clinical AKI nor positive biomarkers had no such decrease of RFR. Finally, of the three patients who developed new CKD, two sustained AKI and one had positive CCA biomarkers but without AKI. Conclusions: Among elective cardiac surgery patients, AKI or elevated post-operative CCA biomarkers were associated with decreased RFR at 3 months despite normalization of serum creatinine. Larger prospective studies to validate the use of RFR to assess renal recovery in combination with biochemical biomarkers are warranted.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement techniques using endoscopic surgery: 'must dos' and 'preferences'.

Aortic valve replacement via a full sternotomy remains the gold standard for aortic stenosis treatment; however, minimally invasive techniques have grown in popularity and continue to evolve. A recent evolution of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is endoscopic surgical aortic valve replacement: a miniaturized surgical approach under video guidance. To ensure a safe and reproducible procedure, we have developed 'must dos' and 'preferences' for endoscopic surgical aortic valve replacement. These include specific endoscopic surgical skills to avoid severe adverse events or an emergency conversion to a full sternotomy.

Routine adoption of TIMP2 and IGFBP7 biomarkers in cardiac surgery for early identification of acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a severe complication affecting many hospitalized patients after cardiac surgery, with negative impacts on short- and long-term clinical outcomes and on healthcare costs. Recently, clinical interest has been aimed at defining and classifying AKI, identifying risk factors and developing diagnostic strategies to identify patients at risk early on. Achieving an early and accurate diagnosis of AKI is a crucial issue, because prevention and timely detection may help to prevent negative clinical outcomes and avoid AKI-associated costs. In this retrospective study, we evaluate the NephroCheck Test as a diagnostic tool for early detection of AKI in a high-risk population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the San Bortolo Hospital of Vicenza. METHODS: We assessed the ability of the NephroCheck Test to predict the probability of developing CSA-AKI (cardiac surgery-associated AKI) and evaluated its accuracy as a diagnostic test, by building a multivariate logistic regression model for CSA-AKI prediction. RESULTS: Based on our findings, when the results of the NephroCheck Test are included in a multivariate model its performance is substantially improved, as compared to the benchmark model, which only accounts for the other clinical factors. We also define a rule - in terms of a probability cut-off - for discriminating cases that are at higher risk of developing AKI of any stage versus those in which AKI is less likely. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has implications in clinical practice: when a Nephrocheck Test result is >0.3 ng/dL, an automated electronic alert prompts the physician to intervene by following a checklist of preventive measures.

Procalcitonin and Interleukin-6 Levels: Are They Useful Biomarkers in Cardiac Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury is an independent predictor of chronic renal disease and mortality. The scope of this study was to determine the utility of procalcitonin (PCT) and plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in predicting renal outcome and mortality in these patients. METHODS: PCT and plasma IL-6 levels of 122 cardiac surgery patients were measured at 48 h after the surgical procedure. Primary endpoints were adverse renal outcome and mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, bleeding, and number of transfusions. RESULTS: PCT was found to be a better predictor of adverse renal outcome than IL-6. IL-6 seemed to be a better predictor of both 30-day and overall mortality than PCT. Neither PCT nor IL-6 levels were found to be good predictors of intensive care unit stay and bleeding. CONCLUSION: PCT may be considered a good predictor of adverse renal outcome in cardiac surgery patients, whereas IL-6 seems to possess a good predictive value for mortality in this population of patients.