Donor Specificity but Not Broadness of Sensitization Is Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Renal Allograft Recipients.

Panel-reactive antibodies are widely regarded as an important immunological risk factor for rejection and graft loss. The broadness of sensitization against HLA is most appropriately measured by the "calculated population-reactive antibodies" (cPRA) value. In this study, we investigated whether cPRA represent an immunological risk in times of sensitive and accurate determination of pretransplantation donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). Five hundred twenty-seven consecutive transplantations were divided into four groups: cPRA 0% (n = 250), cPRA 1-50% (n = 129), cPRA 51-100% (n = 43), and DSA (n = 105). Patients without DSA were considered as normal risk and received standard immunosuppression without T cell-depleting induction. Patients with DSA received an enhanced induction therapy and maintenance immunosuppression. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 3 and 6 months. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. Among the three cPRA groups, there were no differences regarding the 1-year incidence of ABMR (p = 0.16) and TCMR (p = 0.75). The 5-year allograft survival rates were similar and around 87% (p = 0.28). The estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up was 50-53 mL/min (p = 0.45). On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the strongest independent predictor for ABMR and (death-censored) graft survival was pretransplantation DSA. cPRA were not predictive for ABMR, TCMR, or (death-censored) graft survival. We conclude that with current DSA assignment, the broadness of sensitization measured by cPRA does not imply an immunological risk.

Detection of clinical and subclinical tubulo-interstitial inflammation by the urinary CXCL10 chemokine in a real-life setting.

Urinary CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for tubulo-interstitial allograft inflammation, but its diagnostic characteristics have not been assessed in a real-life setting. We investigated urinary CXCL10 in 213 consecutive renal allograft recipients having 362 surveillance biopsies at 3/6 months and 80 indication biopsies within the first year posttransplant. Allograft histology results were classified as (i) acute Banff score zero, (ii) interstitial infiltrates only, (iii) tubulitis t1, (iv) tubulitis t2-3 and (v) isolated vascular compartment inflammation. For clinical and subclinical pathologies, urinary CXCL10 correlated well with the extent of tubulo-interstitial inflammation. To determine diagnostic characteristics of urinary CXCL10, histological groups were separated into two categories: no relevant inflammation (i.e. acute Banff score zero and interstitial infiltrates only) versus all other pathologies (i.e. tubulitis t1-3 and isolated vascular compartment inflammation). For subclinical pathologies, AUC was 0.69 (sensitivity 61%, specificity 72%); for clinical pathologies, AUC was 0.74 (sensitivity 63%, specificity 80%). A urinary CXCL10-guided biopsy strategy would have reduced performance of surveillance and indication biopsies by 61% and 64%, respectively. Missed (sub)clinical pathologies were mostly tubulitis t1 and isolated vascular compartment lesions. In real life, urinary CXCL10 had clinically useful diagnostic properties making it a candidate biomarker to guide allograft biopsies.