Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the functional status score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) after translation and cross-cultural adaptation.

PURPOSE: The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) is designed to assess the physical functional status of patients in ICU settings. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the FSS-ICU for the Chinese context and to evaluate its reliability and validity. METHODS: Following Beaton's translation model, the original FSS-ICU was subjected to forward translation, back-translation, and synthesis. After cultural adaptation and preliminary testing, the Chinese version of the FSS-ICU was established, and then two rehabilitation therapists assessed the functional status of 51 ICU patients using this scale, evaluating its reliability and validity. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the FSS-ICU exhibits excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.934. The inter-rater and intra-rater correlation coefficients are 0.995 and 0.997, respectively. Both item-level and scale-level content validity indices are 1.00. The FSS-ICU demonstrates good convergent validity with other physical function assessment tools (Medical Research Council Sum-Score, grip strength, the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale), with |rs| values all above 0.5, and satisfactory discriminant validity with non-physical function assessment indicators (body mass index, blood glucose), with |rs| values all below 0.2. Additionally, it demonstrated no ceiling or floor effects. CONCLUSION: The Chinese FSS-ICU, demonstrating strong reliability and validity, can serve as an effective assessment tool for physical function in ICU patients.

The Chinese version of the Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) is a robust tool for assessing physical function in ICU settings in China, characterized by high reliability and validity.As in other countries, the FSS-ICU may be used as part of clinical care and clinical research when evaluating ICU patients' physical status.This instrument facilitates tracking the progression of physical capabilities and tailoring targeted rehabilitation plans.

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates.

An increasing number of patients are surviving critical illness, but some experience new or worsening long-lasting impairments in physical, cognitive and/or mental health, commonly known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The need to better understand and improve PICS has resulted in a growing body of literature exploring its various facets. This narrative review will focus on recent studies evaluating various aspects of PICS, including co-occurrence of specific impairments, subtypes/phenotypes, risk factors/mechanisms, and interventions. In addition, we highlight new aspects of PICS, including long-term fatigue, pain, and unemployment.

Improving patient selection for use of consumer grade physical activity monitors in the hospital.

BACKGROUND: Bedrest is toxic for inpatients and consumer grade physical activity monitors offer an economical solution to monitor patient ambulation. But these devices may not be accurate in debilitated hospitalized patients who frequently ambulate very slowly. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measures of physical capacity can help identify inpatients for whom wearable physical activity monitors may accurately measure step count. METHODS: Prospective observational study of 54 adult inpatients with acute neurological diagnoses. Patients were assessed using 2 physical capacity assessments (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form [AM-PAC IMSF] and Katz Activities of Daily Living [ADL] scale). They also completed a 2-minute walk test (2MWT) wearing a consumer grade physical activity monitor. RESULTS: The wearable activity monitor recorded steps (initiated) in 33 (61%) of the inpatients, and for 94% of inpatients with gait speeds >0.43 m/s. Physical capacity assessments correlated well with gait speed, AM-PAC IMSF r = 0.7, and Katz ADL r = 0.6, p < 0.05. When the physical activity monitor initiated, the mean absolute percent error (SD) comparing device calculated steps to observed steps, was 10% (13). AM-PAC IMSF (T-score >45) and Katz ADL (>5) cutoff scores identified inpatients for whom physical activity monitors initiated with a sensitivity of 94 and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physical capacity assessments, such as AM-PAC, and Katz ADL, may be a useful and feasible screening strategy to help identify inpatients where wearable physical activity monitors can measure their mobility.

Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Assistants' Perspectives on Using Three Physical Function Measures in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Purpose: We sought to understand physiotherapists' and physiotherapist assistants' perspectives on using three physical function measures in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting: the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form, the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale, and the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit. Method: A six-item questionnaire was developed and administered to physiotherapists and physiotherapist assistants working in adult ICUs at one U.S. teaching hospital. A single semi-structured focus group was conducted with seven physiotherapists, recruited using purposive sampling to include participants with a range of clinical experience. Results: Of 22 potential participants, 18 physiotherapists and 2 physiotherapist assistants completed the questionnaire. Seven physiotherapists participated in the focus group. The questionnaire found favourable perspectives on the use of the three physical function measures in clinical practice, and the focus group identified five themes related to clinicians' experience with using them: (1) ease of scoring, (2) usefulness in inter-professional communication, (3) general ease of use, (4) responsiveness to change in physical function, and (5) generalizability across patients. Conclusions: The most frequently discussed themes in this study were ease of scoring and usefulness in inter-professional communication, highlighting their importance in designing and selecting physical function measures for clinical use in the ICU setting.

Objectif : comprendre le point de vue des physiothérapeutes et des assistants-physiothérapeutes à l'égard de trois mesures de la fonction physique en soins intensifs : le questionnaire court sur la mesure de la mobilité des patients hospitalisés après des soins intensifs, l'échelle de mobilité la plus élevée de Johns Hopkins et le score de l'état fonctionnel en soins intensifs. Méthodologie : questionnaire en six questions distribué aux physiothérapeutes et assistants-physiothérapeutes travaillant dans une unité de soins intensifs pour adultes d'un hôpital universitaire américain. Les chercheurs ont formé un seul groupe de travail semi-structuré composé de sept physiothérapeutes recrutés par échantillonnage dirigé pour inclure des participants ayant diverses expériences cliniques. Résultats : sur le total de 22 participants potentiels, 18 physiothérapeutes et deux assistants-physiothérapeutes ont rempli le questionnaire. Sept physiothérapeutes ont participé au groupe de travail. Le questionnaire a fait état de points de vue favorables à l'égard de l'utilisation des trois mesures de la fonction physique en milieu clinique, et le groupe de travail a relevé cinq thèmes liés à leur utilisation : 1) facilité à établir le score, 2) utilité pour les communications interprofessionnelles, 3) facilité générale d'utilisation, 4) réactivité aux changements de la fonction physique et 5) généralisabilité entre les patients. Conclusion : la facilité à établir le score et l'utilité pour les communications interprofessionnelles étaient les thèmes les plus abordés pendant la présente étude, ce qui en souligne l'importance lors de la conception et du choix de mesures de la fonction physique en soins intensifs.

Inter-observer reliability of trained physiotherapists on the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit Chilean-Spanish version.

Purpose: Evaluate inter-observer reliability of trained physiotherapists administering the Chilean-Spanish version of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU).Methods: Six adult patients in a medical-surgical ICU were assessed and video-recorded by 1 of 2 expert physiotherapists. Twelve physiotherapists were then trained using recommended Spanish-language FSS-ICU materials. The 12 physiotherapists independently scored the FSS-ICU for the 6 video-recorded patients. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-observer reliability, and modified Bland-Altman plots evaluated agreement between the physiotherapists and experts.Results: This study was performed between May and August 2018. The FSS-ICU total score had a median score of 18 (range: 6 to 34) for the 6 patients. The ICC of the total score was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.00), and for each of the 5 individual FSS-ICU tasks, the ICC ranged between 0.87 and 0.92. The modified Bland-Altman plot revealed a mean difference of 0.6 (95% limits of agreement: -3.3 to 4.5).Conclusions: Twelve trained physiotherapists had excellent inter-observer reliability when administering the Chilean-Spanish FSS-ICU using videos of six critically ill patients, and had excellent agreement with an expert, revealing differences within the established minimal important difference. These findings provide new data supporting clinimetric properties of the Chilean-Spanish FSS-ICU.

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Functional Status Score for the ICU after translation and cross-cultural adaptation.

PURPOSE: The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) evaluates the physical function of ICU patients. The objective of the study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the FSS-ICU into Korean and assess its reliability and validity. METHODS: An expert committee supervised the forward and backward translation process and the final translated version. Experienced physiotherapists assessed patients (n= 31) from a medical ICU using the Korean version of FSS-ICU. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman's plots were used to evaluate reliability, and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Construct validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Two physiotherapists in each of the two university hospitals independently assessed 31 medical ICU patients, with a mean FSS-ICU total score of 23 (range: 4-35). The FSS-ICU Korean version demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.897 for the total FSS-ICU score, and a range of 0.844-0.892 with deletion of each individual activity within the FSS-ICU. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were excellent for all of five FSS-ICU activities and the total score, with an ICC range of 0.930-0.993. Bland-Altman's plots revealed a mean difference in FSS-ICU total score of 0.2 (95% limits of agreement: -1.9 to 2.3) between two physiotherapists. The Korean version of FSS-ICU had good convergent and divergent validity with moderate to strong correlation with mobility and muscle strength measures, and poor correlation with unrelated measures. CONCLUSIONS: The Korean version of the FSS-ICU showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity for medical ICU patients. The results of this study, along with prior publications, support that the FSS-ICU Korean version is a valid and reliable assessment tool for the ICU environment.Implications for rehabilitationIntensive care unit patients usually experience decreased muscle strength and physical function.The Korean version of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) is suitable for use with Korean speakers and has a valid, reliable measurement tool for physical function of intensive care unit patients.A well-standardized training with videos and written materials is important to ensure correct implementation of the Korean version of the FSS-ICU.

Inter-rater reliability of the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale (JH-HLM) in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is used to document the observed mobility of hospitalized patients, including those patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the JH-HLM, completed by physical therapists, across medical, surgical, and neurological adult ICUs at a single large academic hospital. METHODS: The JH-HLM is an ordinal scale for documenting a patient's highest observed level of activity, ranging from lying in bed (score = 1) to ambulating >250 feet (score = 8). Eighty-one rehabilitation sessions were conducted by eight physical therapists, with 1 of 2 reference physical therapist rater simultaneously observing the session and independently scoring the JH-HLM. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine the inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: A total of 77 (95%) of 81 assessments had perfect agreement. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-rater reliability was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.99), with similar scores in the medical, surgical, and neurological ICUs. A Bland-Altman plot revealed a mean difference in JH-HLM scoring of 0 (limits of agreement: -0.54 to 0.61). CONCLUSION: The JH-HLM has excellent inter-rater reliability as part of routine physical therapy practice, across different types of adult ICUs.

Inter-rater reliability of activity measure for post-acute care '6-Clicks' inpatient mobility short form in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the inter-rater reliability of the activity measure for post-acute care (AM-PAC) inpatient mobility short form (IMSF) when completed by physical therapists (PTs), during routine clinical practice, in a variety of patients with critical illness. METHODS: A prospective observational evaluation at single, large academic hospital in the United States. Patients (n = 76) in surgical, medical and neurological intensive care units (ICUs) were evaluated as part of routine clinical practice using the AM-PAC IMSF administered by eight PTs with at least 6 months of experience using this tool. One of two reference rater PTs observed the physical therapy session, and simultaneously scored the AM-PAC IMSF. The reference rater and clinical PTs were blinded to each other's scores with a minimum of 10 assessments completed by each clinical PT. Bland-Altman plots were constructed and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed using a random intercept (physical therapy session) model. RESULTS: Eighty one assessments (five patients assessed twice) were scored by both a clinical PT and reference rater PT (total assessments = 162). Bland-Altman plots revealed a mean difference in AM-PAC IMSF scoring of 0.0 (95% limits of agreement: -3.0 to +3.0), with an ICC (95% confidence interval) of 0.957 (0.947-0.964). The ICC (95% confidence interval) for patients in surgical, medical and neurological ICUs was very similar: 0.949 (0.927-0.959), 0.963 (0.946-0.971) and 0.936 (0.886-0.955), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AM-PAC IMSF demonstrates excellent reliability compared with reference rater PTs when performed by PTs during clinical care across surgical, medical and neurological ICUs.

Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and assessment of psychometric properties of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit.

Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit instrument to Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties.Methods: An expert committee supervised forward and backward translation. Thirteen participants reviewed the pre-final version of Turkish Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit instrument providing minor revisions to improve its readability. Two physiotherapists assessed patients (N = 50) from a coronary intensive care unit using the Turkish Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit instrument.Results: Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.949). Inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability were excellent for each of five functional tasks and total scores (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.955-0.996). The Turkish Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit score had moderate to high correlations with other functional measures as follows: Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score (Spearman's r = 0.92), Katz Activities of Daily Living (r = 0.80), handgrip strength (r = 0.76-0.77), and knee extension strength (r = 0.70-0.71).Conclusion: The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit instrument was translated and culturally adapted to Turkish and demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including internal consistency, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation professionals strive to assess and document patient status using validated and reliable outcome measures as part of good clinical practice.Longitudinal evaluation of physical function in the intensive care units is important.The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit is a validated and reliable physical functioning measurement instrument suitable for the intensive care units.The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit was translated and culturally adapted to Turkish, and demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including internal consistency, intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects.

Increasing patient mobility through an individualized goal-centered hospital mobility program: A quasi-experimental quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired functional decline due to decreased mobility has negative impacts on patient outcomes. Current nurse-directed mobility programs lack a standardized approach to set achievable mobility goals. PURPOSE: We aimed to describe implementation and outcomes from a nurse-directed patient mobility program. METHOD: The quality improvement mobility program on the project unit was compared to a similar control unit providing usual care. The Johns Hopkins Mobility Goal Calculator was created to guide a daily patient mobility goal based on the level of mobility impairment. FINDINGS: On the project unit, patient mobility increased from 5.2 to 5.8 on the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility score, mobility goal attainment went from 54.2% to 64.2%, and patients exceeding the goal went from 23.3% to 33.5%. All results were significantly higher than the control unit. DISCUSSION: An individualized, nurse-directed, patient mobility program using daily mobility goals is a successful strategy to improve daily patient mobility in the hospital.

Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures.

Background: The lack of common language among interprofessional inpatient clinical teams is an important barrier to achieving inpatient mobilization. In The Johns Hopkins Hospital, the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Inpatient Mobility Short Form (IMSF), also called "6-Clicks," and the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) are part of routine clinical practice. The measurement characteristics of these tools when used by both nurses and physical therapists for interprofessional communication or assessment are unknown. Objective: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the reliability and minimal detectable change of AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM when completed by nurses and physical therapists and to evaluate the construct validity of both measures when used by nurses. Design: A prospective evaluation of a convenience sample was used. Methods: The test-retest reliability and the interrater reliability of AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM for inpatients in the neuroscience department (n = 118) of an academic medical center were evaluated. Each participant was independently scored twice by a team of 2 nurses and 1 physical therapist; a total of 4 physical therapists and 8 nurses participated in reliability testing. In a separate inpatient study protocol (n = 69), construct validity was evaluated via an assessment of convergent validity with other measures of function (grip strength, Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale, 2-minute walk test, 5-times sit-to-stand test) used by 5 nurses. Results: The test-retest reliability values (intraclass correlation coefficients) for physical therapists and nurses were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively, for AM-PAC IMSF and 0.94 and 0.95, respectively, for JH-HLM. The interrater reliability values (intraclass correlation coefficients) between physical therapists and nurses were 0.96 for AM-PAC IMSF and 0.99 for JH-HLM. Construct validity (Spearman correlations) ranged from 0.25 between JH-HLM and right-hand grip strength to 0.80 between AM-PAC IMSF and the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale. Limitations: The results were obtained from inpatients in the neuroscience department of a single hospital. Conclusions: The AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM had excellent interrater reliability and test-retest reliability for both physical therapists and nurses. The evaluation of convergent validity suggested that AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM measured constructs of patient mobility and physical functioning.

Using a Real-Time Location System for Assessment of Patient Ambulation in a Hospital Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using an infrared-based Real-Time Location System (RTLS) for measuring patient ambulation in a 2-minute walk test (2MWT) by comparing the distance walked and the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) score to clinician observation as a criterion standard. DESIGN: Criterion standard validation study. SETTING: Inpatient, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=25) in an adult neuroscience/brain rescue unit. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RTLS and clinician-reported ambulation distance in feet, and JH-HLM score on an 8-point ordinal scale. RESULTS: The RTLS ambulation distance for the 25 patients in the 2MWT was between 68 and 516ft. The mean difference between clinician-reported and RTLS ambulation distance was 8.4±11.7ft (2.7%±4.6%). The correlation between clinician-reported and RTLS ambulation distance was 97.9% (P<.01). The clinician-reported ambulation distance for 2 patients was +100ft and -99ft compared with the RTLS distance, implying clinician error in counting the number of laps (98ft). The correlation between the RTLS distance and clinician-reported distance excluding these 2 patients is 99.8% (P<.01). The accuracy of the RTLS for assessment of JH-HLM score for all 25 patients was 96%. The average patient speed obtained from RTLS data varied between 0.4 and 3.0mph. CONCLUSIONS: The RTLS is able to accurately measure patient ambulation and calculate JH-HLM for a 2MWT when compared with clinician observation as the criterion standard.