RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little research is available to provide practical guidance to health-care providers for exercise preparticipation screening and referral of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), including lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), to participate in remote, unsupervised exercise programs. RESEARCH QUESTION: What exercise preparticipation screening steps are essential to determine whether a patient with LAM is medically appropriate to participate in a remote, unsupervised exercise program? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen experts in LAM and ILD participated in a two-round modified Delphi study, ranking their level of agreement for 10 statements related to unsupervised exercise training in LAM, with an apriori definition of consensus. Additionally, 60 patients with LAM completed a survey of the perceived risks and benefits of remote exercise training in LAM. RESULTS: Seven of the 10 statements reached consensus among experts. Experts agreed that an in-person clinical exercise test is indicated to screen for exercise-induced hypoxemia and prescribe supplemental oxygen therapy as indicated prior to initiating a remote exercise program. Patients with recent pneumothorax should wait to start an exercise program for at least 4 weeks until after resolution of pneumothorax and clearance by a physician. Patients with high cardiovascular risk for event during exercise, severe resting pulmonary hypertension, or risk for falls may be more appropriate for referral to a rehabilitation center. A LAM-specific remote exercise preparticipation screening tool was developed from the consensus statements and agreed upon by the panelists. INTERPRETATION: A modified Delphi study approach was useful to develop disease-specific recommendations for safety and preparticipation screening prior to unsupervised, remotely administered exercise in LAM. The primary product of this study is a clinical decision aid for providers to use when medically screening patients prior to participation in the newly launched LAMFit remote exercise program.
RESUMO
RATIONALE: Alternatives to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation are needed to improve patient access to this important therapy. A critical challenge to overcome is how to maximize safety of unsupervised exercise for at-risk patients. We investigated if a novel remote monitoring-enabled mobile health (mHealth) program is safe, feasible, and effective for patients who experience exercise-induced hemoglobin desaturation. METHODS: An interstitial lung disease (ILD) commonly associated with pronounced exercise desaturation was investigated - the rare, female-predominant ILD lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). Over a 12-week program, hemoglobin saturation (SpO2) was continuously recorded during all home exercise sessions. Intervention effects were assessed with 6-min walk test (6MWT), maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), lower extremity computerized dynamometry, pulmonary function tests, and health-related quality of life (QoL) surveys. Safety was assessed by blood biomarkers of systemic inflammation and cardiac wall stress, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Fifteen LAM patients enrolled and 14 completed the intervention, with high adherence to aerobic (87 ± 15%) and strength (87 ± 12%) training components. An innovative characterization of exercise training SpO2 revealed that while mild-to-moderate desaturation was common during home workouts, participants were able to self-adjust exercise intensity and supplemental oxygen levels to maintain recommended exercise parameters. Significant improvements included 6MWT distance (+36 ± 34 m, p = 0.003), CPET time (p = 0.04), muscular endurance (p = 0.008), QoL (p = 0.009 to 0.03), and fatigue (p = 0.001 to 0.03). Patient acceptability and satisfaction indicators were high, blood biomarkers remained stable (p > 0.05), and no study-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: A remote monitoring-enabled home exercise program is a safe, feasible, and effective approach even for patients who experience exercise desaturation.
Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Feminino , Teste de Esforço , Terapia por Exercício/efeitos adversos , Tolerância ao Exercício , Biomarcadores , Hemoglobinas , PrescriçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) impacts mortality in antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS). Computed tomographic (CT) patterns and evolution in ASyS ILD are not well described. We report longitudinal CT patterns in ASyS-ILD and their impact on survival. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study of 47 patients with ASyS-ILD. Longitudinal CT patterns and fibrosis severity (severity of radiographic features indicating fibrosis) were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus. The association between imaging features and survival was examined using univariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 211 CT scans were analyzed with an average of 4 ± 2 CT scans/patient with a median follow-up of 79 months in 47 patients. Non-fibrotic patterns were present initially in 63.8% (n = 30) of patients, while fibrotic patterns occurred in 36.2% (n = 17). The initial non-fibrotic patterns/abnormalities resolved in 23.3% (n = 7), evolved in 6.7% (n = 2), persisted in 13.3% (n = 4), and progressed in 56.7% (n = 17), while initial fibrotic patterns persisted in 82.4% (n = 14) and progressed in 17.6% (n = 3). Radiographic progression of ILD (progression in CT pattern or increased fibrosis severity) occurred in 53.2% (n = 25) of patients. Advanced age and radiographic progression were associated with decreased survival (all p < 0.05). The presence of ground-glass opacities (GGO) and predominant lower lung distribution of abnormalities on initial CTs were associated with increased survival (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Progression occurred in 56.7% of ASyS-ILD patients presenting with non-fibrotic patterns. Fibrotic patterns tended to persist. Age and radiographic progression were associated with reduced survival while the initial presence of GGO and predominant lower lobe distribution were associated with increased survival. KEY POINTS: ⢠In ASyS-ILD, initial non-fibrotic patterns such as OP, cNSIP, or OP-cNSIP tended to progress to fNSIP. ⢠Fibrotic patterns such as fNSIP or UIP in ASyS-ILD tended to persist without pattern changes. ⢠GGO and lower lung predominance on initial CT were associated with better survival while advanced baseline age and radiographic ILD progression during follow-up were associated with decreased survival.
Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrose , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recombinant human pentraxin-2 (rhPTX-2) significantly decreased decline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and stabilized 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) during the 28-week, placebo-controlled, randomized period of the Phase II PRM-151-202 study. Interim (76-week) data from the open-label extension (OLE) demonstrated sustained safety and efficacy with rhPTX-2 treatment. Here, we present the entire long-term OLE safety and efficacy data to 128 weeks. METHODS: Patients who completed the randomized PRM-151-202 study period were eligible for the OLE, during which all patients received rhPTX-2, having started rhPTX-2 (i.e., crossed from placebo) or continued rhPTX-2 after Week 28. rhPTX-2 was administered in 28-week cycles, with 10 mg/kg intravenous infusions (60 min) on Days 1, 3, and 5 in the first week of each cycle, then one infusion every 4 weeks up to Week 128. The OLE primary objective was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of rhPTX-2. Other outcomes included FVC, 6MWD, and patient-reported outcomes (descriptive analysis). RESULTS: All 111 patients who completed the randomized period entered the OLE (n = 37 started rhPTX-2; n = 74 continued rhPTX-2); 57 (51.4%) completed to Week 128. The treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) profile was consistent with the randomized period, with the majority of TEAEs graded mild or moderate. Serious TEAEs occurred in 47 patients (42.3%), most frequently IPF (n = 11; 9.9%), pneumonia (n = 7; 6.3%), and acute respiratory failure (n = 3; 2.7%). Three patients underwent lung transplantation. Most serious TEAEs (and all 14 fatal events) were considered unrelated to rhPTX-2 treatment. For patients starting vs continuing rhPTX-2, mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline to Week 128 were, respectively, - 6.2% (- 7.7; - 4.6) and - 5.7% (- 8.0; - 3.3) for percent predicted FVC and - 36.3 m (- 65.8; - 6.9) and - 28.9 m (- 54.3; - 3.6) for 6MWD; however, conclusions were limited by patient numbers at Week 128. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment (up to 128 weeks) with rhPTX-2 was well tolerated in patients with IPF, with no new safety signals emerging in the OLE. The limited efficacy data over 128 weeks may suggest a trend towards a treatment effect. Trial registration NCT02550873; EudraCT 2014-004782-24.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Proteínas Recombinantes , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with PRM-151, a recombinant human pentraxin 2 protein, in a phase 2 double-blind, randomised controlled trial had significantly reduced decline in percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and stabilised 6-min walking distance compared with placebo over a 28-week period. Here we report the 76-week results of an open-label extension study. METHODS: Patients who completed the 28-week double-blind period of the PRM-151-202 trial were eligible to participate in the open-label extension study. Patients previously enrolled in the PRM-151 group continued this treatment and those previously in the placebo group crossed over to PRM-151. All patients received PRM-151 in 28-week cycles with loading doses of 10 mg/kg by 60 min intravenous infusions on days 1, 3, and 5 in the first week of each cycle followed by one infusion of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary objective of the open-label extension study was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of PRM-151, which were assessed by analysing adverse events (AEs) up to week 76 in all patients who received at least one dose of PRM-151 during the open-label extension study. Exploratory efficacy analyses were done by assessing changes from baseline in percentage of predicted FVC and 6-min walking distance, with descriptive statistics to week 76 and with random-intercept mixed models to week 52. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02550873, and with EudraCT, number 2014-004782-24. FINDINGS: Of 116 patients who completed the double-blind treatment period, 111 entered the open-label extension study (74 from the PRM-151 group and 37 from the placebo group). 84 (76%) of 111 patients received concomitant IPF therapy (pirfenidone n=55 or nintedanib n=29). AEs were consistent with long-term IPF sequelae. 31 (28%) patients had serious AEs. Those occurring in two or more patients were pneumonia (six [5%] of 111), IPF exacerbation (four [4%]), IPF progression (four [4%]), and chest pain (two [2%]). 21 (19%) patients had severe AEs, of which IPF exacerbation and IPF progression each occurred in two (2%) patients. Two (2%) patients experienced life-threatening AEs (one had pneumonia and one had small-cell lung cancer extensive stage). A persistent treatment effect was observed for PRM-151 in patients who continued treatment, with a decline in percentage of predicted FVC of -3·6% per year and in 6-min walking distance of -10·5 m per year at week 52. In patients who started PRM-151 during the open-label extension study, compared with the slopes for placebo, decline reduced for percentage of predicted FVC (from -8·7% per year in weeks 0-28 to -0·9% per year in weeks 28-52, p<0·0001) and 6-min walking distance (from -54·9 m per year to -3·5 m per year, p=0·0224). INTERPRETATION: Long-term treatment with PRM-151 was well tolerated and the effects on percentage of predicted FVC and 6-min walking distance were persistent on continuation and positive in patients who crossed over from placebo. These findings support further study of PRM-151 in larger populations of patients with IPF. FUNDING: Promedior.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Homeodomínio/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Componente Amiloide P Sérico/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is difficult to ascertain due to the insensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. Current diagnostic criteria require a positive endomyocardial biopsy or extra-cardiac biopsy with clinical features suggestive of CS. Common tests for diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis include bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), lung and mediastinal lymph node (MLN) biopsies. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic utility of these tests in patients with suspected CS and without prior history of pulmonary involvement. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 37 patients without history of extra-cardiac sarcoidosis referred for suspected CS. All patients underwent chest computed tomography (CT) staged using the modified Scadding criteria, and had BAL, and/or lung or MLN biopsy. BAL cellular analyses with lymphocytes>15% and/or CD4/CD8 ratio≥ 4 were considered suggestive of sarcoidosis. The number of positive biopsies and BALs were compared between normal CT (Scadding stage 0) and abnormal CT (Scadding stage 1-4) groups. RESULTS: A definitive diagnosis of sarcoidosis was ascertained in 18/31 (58%) patients undergoing lung or lymph node biopsy, and a potential diagnosis in 18/27 (67%) patients with BAL CD4/CD8>4 or lymphocytes>15%. Of the 12 patients in the normal CT group, 4/10 (40%) had positive lung biopsies, and 9/12 (75%) patients had either positive biopsy or BAL criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, a diagnosis of extra-cardiac sarcoidosis was ascertained in a majority of patients irrespective of degree of lung involvement on chest CT. Our results support referral for pulmonary biopsy/bronchoalveolar lavage in suspected CS to confirm the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
Assuntos
Biópsia/métodos , Lavagem Broncoalveolar/métodos , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Pulmão/patologia , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/imunologia , Broncoscopia/métodos , Relação CD4-CD8/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiomiopatias/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Mediastinoscopia/métodos , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Mediastino/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and Sarcoidosis are distinct clinical entities. Fibrotic disease in pulmonary sarcoidosis is typically upper lobe predominant. In IPF fibrosis is basilar and peripheral predominant [usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern]. Sarcoidosis and UIP have rarely been observed in the same patient. We sought to characterize patients manifesting both sarcoidosis and IPF and compare clinical features and survival to that of patients with "Lone-IPF" (IPF only) and pulmonary sarcoidosis with fibrosis in a non-UIP pattern. METHODS: Patients were identified from a clinical database and data abstracted from medical records (1995-2016): 1) 25 patients with combined sarcoidosis and IPF (CSIPF) defined by clinical and histological features of sarcoidosis and HRCT features of possible or definite UIP or UIP by histopathology; 2) Randomly selected control patients during the same period: 28 Lone-IPF, 25 stage III/IV pulmonary sarcoidosis. RESULTS: The gender and race of patients with CSIPF and Lone-IPF patients were similar (68% male and 84% Caucasian), as were survival outcomes. Mean time from IPF diagnosis to death: 3.2 years CSIPF, 3.6 years Lone-IPF (log rank p value 0.49). Among patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, mean time from diagnosis to death: 21.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics/behavior of patients with CSIPF was similar to Lone-IPF patients. It is possible that patients with sarcoidosis coincidentally developed IPF and/or have occult genetic predisposition factors to manifest both diseases at different time points. Further study is needed.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/etiologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abnormal acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) is hypothesised to play a role in progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to determine whether treatment of abnormal acid GER with laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery reduces the rate of disease progression. METHODS: The WRAP-IPF trial was a randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with IPF and abnormal acid GER recruited from six academic centres in the USA. We enrolled patients with IPF, abnormal acid GER (DeMeester score of ≥14·7; measured by 24-h pH monitoring) and preserved forced vital capacity (FVC). We excluded patients with a FVC below 50% predicted, a FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0·65, a history of acute respiratory illness in the past 12 weeks, a body-mass index greater than 35, and known severe pulmonary hypertension. Concomitant therapy with nintedanib and pirfenidone was allowed. The primary endpoint was change in FVC from randomisation to week 48, in the intention-to-treat population with mixed-effects models for repeated measures. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01982968. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2014, and Sept 30, 2016, we screened 72 patients and randomly assigned 58 patients to receive surgery (n=29) or no surgery (n=29). 27 patients in the surgery group and 20 patients in the no surgery group had an FVC measurement at 48 weeks (p=0·041). Intention-to-treat analysis adjusted for baseline anti-fibrotic use demonstrated the adjusted rate of change in FVC over 48 weeks was -0·05 L (95% CI -0·15 to 0·05) in the surgery group and -0·13 L (-0·23 to -0·02) in the non-surgery group (p=0·28). Acute exacerbation, respiratory-related hospitalisation, and death was less common in the surgery group without statistical significance. Dysphagia (eight [29%] of 28) and abdominal distention (four [14%] of 28) were the most common adverse events after surgery. There was one death in the surgery group and four deaths in the non-surgery group. INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with IPF and abnormal acid GER is safe and well tolerated. A larger, well powered, randomised controlled study of anti-reflux surgery is needed in this population. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/complicações , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/mortalidade , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
Importance: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic lung disease with poor prognosis. Approved therapies do not halt disease progression. Objective: To determine the effect of recombinant human pentraxin 2 vs placebo on change from baseline to week 28 in mean forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage of predicted value. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 18 sites in 7 countries of eligible patients with IPF (N = 117; aged 40-80 years; FVC ≥50% and ≤90% predicted; ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second/FVC >0.70; diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide [Dlco] ≥25% and ≤90% predicted; and distance of ≥150 m on the 6-minute walk test). Study period was August 2015-May 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either recombinant human pentraxin 2 (10 mg/kg intravenous every 4 weeks, n = 77) or placebo (n = 39) for 24 weeks, and stratified by concurrent IPF treatment status. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the least-squares mean change in FVC percentage of predicted value from baseline to week 28 (minimal clinically important difference, decline of 2%-6%). Secondary end points included mean change in lung volumes (total, normal, and interstitial lung abnormalities) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and 6-minute walk distance (minimal clinically important difference, 24-45 m). Results: Of 117 randomized patients, 116 received at least 1 dose of study drug (mean age, 68.6 years; 81.0% men; mean time since IPF diagnosis, 3.8 years), and 111 (95.7%) completed the study. The least-squares mean change in FVC percentage of predicted value from baseline to week 28 in patients treated with recombinant human pentraxin 2 was -2.5 vs -4.8 for those in the placebo group (difference, +2.3 [90% CI, 1.1 to 3.5]; P = .001). No significant treatment differences were observed in total lung volume (difference, 93.5 mL [90% CI, -27.7 to 214.7]), quantitative parenchymal features on HRCT (normal lung volume difference, -1.2% [90% CI, -4.4 to 1.9]; interstitial lung abnormalities difference, 1.1% [90% CI, -2.2 to 4.3]), or measurement of Dlco (difference, -0.4 [90% CI, -2.6 to 1.7]). The change in 6-minute walk distance was -0.5 m for patients treated with recombinant human pentraxin 2 vs -31.8 m for those in the placebo group (difference, +31.3 m [90% CI, 17.4 to 45.1]; P < .001). The most common adverse events in the recombinant human pentraxin 2 vs placebo group were cough (18% vs 5%), fatigue (17% vs 10%), and nasopharyngitis (16% vs 23%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study, recombinant human pentraxin 2 vs placebo resulted in a slower decline in lung function over 28 weeks for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Further research should more fully assess efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02550873.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Homeodomínio/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Componente Amiloide P Sérico/uso terapêutico , Capacidade Vital/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/farmacologia , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/fisiopatologia , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Componente Amiloide P Sérico/efeitos adversos , Componente Amiloide P Sérico/farmacologia , Teste de CaminhadaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some patients with autoimmune characteristics and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, particularly usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), do not fit neatly into the category of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or recently proposed yet to be validated criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). Outcomes of these patients are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study. Analyses of variance compared differences in mean change in FVC and diffusion capacity (Dlco) over 1 year among 124 well-defined patients (20 patients with positive autoantibodies with or without symptoms of connective tissue disease [AI-ILD], 15 patients with IPAF, 36 patients with CTD-ILD, and 53 patients with IPF with negative CTD serologies [Lone-IPF]). RESULTS: Of the patients, 75% with AI-ILD, 33% with IPAF, and 33% with CTD-ILD had UIP. Initial FVC and Dlco were similarly moderately reduced across groups. Mean change in FVC over 12 months was as follows: -60 mL (IPAF), -110 mL (AI-ILD), -10 mL (CTD-ILD), and -90 mL (Lone-IPF) (P = .52). Mean change in Dlco was as follows: 2.39 mL/mm Hg/min (IPAF), -1.15 mL/mm Hg/min (AI-ILD), -0.27 mL/mm Hg/min (CTD-ILD), and -1.05 mL/mm Hg/min (Lone-IPF) (P < .001). By pattern of disease, the mean change in FVC was as follows: -140 mL (UIP), 10 mL (nonspecific interstitial pneumonia), and 12 mL (unclassifiable/other) (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant differences in pulmonary function to distinguish between patients with AI-ILD, IPAF, CTD-ILD, and Lone-IPF were observed after 1 year. Longer periods of follow-up are needed to understand the outcomes of these patients. It is not yet clear whether AI-ILD is a distinct phenotype or a variant of the newly proposed entity IPAF.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/sangue , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo , Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Idoso , Autoimunidade/imunologia , Estudos de Coortes , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/diagnóstico , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas/diagnóstico , Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas/epidemiologia , Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas/imunologia , Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas/fisiopatologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/imunologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/fisiopatologia , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/imunologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Estatística como Assunto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Washington/epidemiologiaRESUMO
We sought to assess whether laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) is associated with decreased rates of disease progression in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).The study was a retrospective single-centre study of IPF patients with worsening symptoms and pulmonary function despite antacid treatment for abnormal acid gastro-oesophageal reflux. The period of exposure to LARS was September 1998 to December 2012. The primary end-point was a longitudinal change in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted in the pre- versus post-surgery periods.27 patients with progressive IPF underwent LARS. At time of surgery, the mean age was 65â years and mean FVC was 71.7% pred. Using a regression model, the estimated benefit of surgery in FVC % pred over 1â year was 5.7% (95% CI -0.9-12.2%, p=0.088) with estimated benefit in FVC of 0.22â L (95% CI -0.06-0.49â L, p=0.12). Mean DeMeester scores decreased from 42 to 4 (p<0.01). There were no deaths in the 90â days following surgery and 81.5% of participants were alive 2â years after surgery.Patients with IPF tolerated the LARS well. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of FVC decline pre- and post-LARS over 1â year; a possible trend toward stabilisation in observed FVC warrants prospective studies. The ongoing prospective randomised controlled trial will hopefully provide further insights regarding the safety and potential efficacy of LARS in IPF.
Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Análise de Regressão , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fumar , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
Simulation is a versatile technique used in a variety of health care settings for a variety of purposes, but the extent to which simulation may improve patient safety remains unknown. This systematic review examined evidence on the effects of simulation techniques on patient safety outcomes. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from their beginning to 31 October 2012 to identify relevant studies. A single reviewer screened 913 abstracts and selected and abstracted data from 38 studies that reported outcomes during care of real patients after patient-, team-, or system-level simulation interventions. Studies varied widely in the quality of methodological design and description of simulation activities, but in general, simulation interventions improved the technical performance of individual clinicians and teams during critical events and complex procedures. Limited evidence suggested improvements in patient outcomes attributable to simulation exercises at the health system level. Future studies would benefit from standardized reporting of simulation components and identification of robust patient safety targets.
Assuntos
Segurança do Paciente , Simulação de Paciente , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Competência Clínica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Gestão da Segurança/economiaRESUMO
Many home-based and leisure activities can generate hazardous respirable exposures. Routine domestic activities and a variety of hobbies, avocations, and leisure pursuits have been associated with a spectrum of respiratory tract disorders. Indoor environments present a special risk for high-intensity exposures and adverse health effects. There are important knowledge gaps regarding the prevalence of specific health hazards within and across communities, exposure-response effects, population and individual susceptibilities, best management strategies, the adverse health effects of mixed exposures, and long-term clinical outcomes following exposures. The home environment presents special health risks that should be part of the health assessment.
Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Habitação , Atividades de Lazer , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Substâncias Perigosas/toxicidade , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There are numerous challenges to successfully integrating palliative care in the intensive care unit. Our primary goal was to describe and compare the quality of palliative care delivered in an intensive care unit as rated by physicians and nurses working in that intensive care unit. DESIGN: Multisite study using self-report questionnaires. SETTING: Thirteen hospitals throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 188 physicians working in critical care (attending physicians, critical care fellows, resident physicians) and 289 critical care nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinicians provided overall ratings of the care delivered by either nurses or physicians in their intensive care unit for each of seven domains of intensive care unit palliative care using a 0-10 scale (0 indicating the worst possible and 10 indicating the best possible care). Analyses included descriptive statistics to characterize measurement characteristics of the ten items, paired Wilcoxon tests comparing item ratings for the domain of symptom management with all other item ratings, and regression analyses assessing differences in ratings within and between clinical disciplines. We used p < .001 to denote statistical significance to address multiple comparisons. The ten items demonstrated good content validity with few missing responses or ceiling or floor effects. Items receiving the lowest ratings assessed spiritual support for families, emotional support for intensive care unit clinicians, and palliative-care education for intensive care unit clinicians. All but two items were rated significantly lower than the item assessing symptom management (p < .001). Nurses rated nursing care significantly higher (p < .001) than physicians rated physician care in five domains. In addition, although nurses and physicians gave comparable ratings to palliative care delivered by nurses, nurses' and physicians' ratings of physician care were significantly different with nurse ratings of this care lower than physician ratings on all but one domain. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the content validity of the ten overall rating items and supports the need for improvement in several aspects of palliative care, including spiritual support for families, emotional support for clinicians, and clinician education about palliative care in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, our findings provide some preliminary support for surveying intensive care unit clinicians as one way to assess the quality of palliative care in the intensive care unit.