The spectrum of oestrogen receptor expression in endometrial carcinomas of no specific molecular profile.

AIMS: Decreased oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a marker of poor prognosis in endometrial carcinomas (EC) of no specific molecular profile (NSMP), but the optimal cut-off to separate high-risk 'low ER' versus low-risk 'high ER' expression has not been defined. Here we characterised the distribution of ER staining in a cohort of ECs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biopsy specimens from 120 cases of NSMP EC were stained for ER and assigned an Allred score. In 66 additional cases ER staining of matched biopsy and hysterectomy were compared. Twelve of 120 tumours had an Allred score of 0-3, including three endometrioid carcinomas (EEA) (one G1, two G3), four clear cell carcinomas (CCC), two mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) and one each of: gastric-type adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma NOS. Three had Allred scores of 4-5: two MLA and one high-grade carcinoma with yolk sac differentiation. Five had Allred scores of 6: four EEA (one G1, one G2, two G3) and one mixed clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. The remaining 100 tumours with Allred scores ≥ 7 were all EEA (66 G1, 28 G2, five G3 and one grade unknown). Comparing the biopsy versus hysterectomy ER staining (n = 66), the results were within a single Allred score point, except two cases with strong diffuse expression in the biopsy (Allred 8) and moderate expression in the hysterectomy (Allred 5). CONCLUSIONS: Most NSMP ECs (> 80%) show high ER expression (Allred score ≥ 7). All non-endometrioid carcinomas and a few endometrioid carcinomas had lower ER expression (Allred score ≤ 6) or were completely negative.

Endometrial Carcinosarcomas are Almost Exclusively of p53abn Molecular Subtype After Exclusion of Mimics.

SUMMARY: Our aim was to assess the molecular subtype(s) and perform a detailed morphologic review of tumors diagnosed as carcinosarcoma in a population-based cohort. Forty-one carcinosarcomas were identified from a cohort of 973 endometrial carcinomas diagnosed in 2016. We assessed immunostaining and sequencing data and undertook expert pathology reviews of these cases as well as all subsequently diagnosed (post-2016) carcinosarcomas of no specific molecular profile (NSMP) molecular subtype (n=3) from our institutions. In the 2016 cohort, 37 of the 41 carcinosarcomas (91.2%) were p53abn, 2 (4.9%) were NSMP, and 1 each (2.4%) were POLE mut and mismatch repair deficiency molecular subtypes, respectively. Of the 4 non-p53abn tumors on review, both NSMP tumors were corded and hyalinized (CHEC) pattern endometrioid carcinoma, the mismatch repair deficiency tumor was a grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma with reactive stromal proliferation, and the POLE mut tumor was grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cell growth, that is, none were confirmed to be carcinosarcoma on review. We found 11 additional cases among the 37 p53abn tumors that were not confirmed to be carcinosarcoma on the review (3 undifferentiated or dedifferentiated carcinomas, 5 carcinomas with CHEC features, 2 carcinomas showing prominent reactive spindle cell stroma, and 1 adenosarcoma). In the review of institutional cases reported as NSMP carcinosarcoma after 2016, 3 were identified (1 adenosarcoma and 2 mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma on review). In this series, all confirmed endometrial carcinosarcomas were p53abn. The finding of any other molecular subtype in a carcinosarcoma warrants pathology review to exclude mimics.

High concordance of molecular subtyping between pre-surgical biopsy and surgical resection specimen (matched-pair analysis) in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma using p16- and p53-immunostaining.

OBJECTIVE: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) can be stratified into three molecular subtypes based on the immunoexpression of p16 and p53: HPV-independent p53-abnormal (p53abn) (most common, biologically aggressive), HPV-associated, with p16-overexpression (second most common, prognostically more favourable) and more recently recognised HPV-independent p53-wildtype (p53wt) (rarest subtype, prognostically intermediate). Our aim was to determine whether molecular subtypes can be reliably identified in pre-operative biopsies and whether these correspond to the subsequent vulvectomy specimen. METHODS: Matched-paired pre-surgical biopsies and subsequent resection specimen of 57 patients with VSCC were analysed for the immunohistochemical expression of p16 and p53 by performing a three-tiered molecular subtyping to test the accuracy rate. RESULTS: Most cases 36/57 (63.2%) belonged to the HPV-independent (p53-abn) molecular subtype, followed by HPV-associated 17/57 (29.8%) and HPV-independent (p53wt) 4/57 (7.0%). The overall accuracy rate on biopsy was 91.2% (52/57): 97.3% for p53-abnormal, 94.1% for p16-overexpression and 50% for p16-neg/p53-wt VSCC. Incorrect interpretation of immunohistochemical p53 staining pattern was the reason for discordant results in molecular subtyping in all five cases. In one case there was an underestimation of p53 pattern (wildtype instead of abnormal/aberrant) and in one case an overestimation of the p53 staining pattern (abnormal/aberrant instead of wildtype). In 3/5 there was a "double positive" staining result (p16 overexpression and abnormal/aberrant p53 staining pattern). In that cases additional molecular workup is required for correct molecular subtyping, resulting in an overall need for molecular examination of 3/57 (3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the final resections specimen, the three-tiered molecular classification of VSCC can be determined on pre-surgical biopsies with a high accuracy rate. This enables more precise surgical planning, prediction of the response to (chemo) radiation, selection of targeted therapies and planning of the optimal follow-up strategy for patients in the age of personalised medicine.