Treatment of osteochondral injuries of the humeral head using fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation.

Background: Large osteochondral lesions of the humeral head can result from locked posterior dislocations, avascular necrosis, and osteochondritis dissecans. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a treatment option for young patients with focal osteochondral defects of the humeral head. The purpose of this case series was to assess graft survivorship, subjective patient-reported outcomes, and satisfaction among 7 patients who underwent OCA transplantation of the humeral head. Methods: We identified 7 patients who underwent humeral head OCA transplantation between 2008 and 2017. A custom questionnaire including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QuickDash), Likert satisfaction, and reoperations was mailed to each patient. Clinical failure was defined as further surgery that involved removal of the allograft. Results: Median follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 4.6 to 13.5 years) with a median age of 21.6 years (range, 18.5 to 43.5 years). Most patients (86%) reported improved function and reduced pain. At the final follow-up, 71% of patients reported ongoing problems with their shoulder including pain, stiffness, clicking/grinding, limited range of motion, and instability. Return to recreational activities was high at 86% but 43% expressed limitations with activity due to their shoulder. Overall satisfaction was high at 71% with mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and QuickDASH scores at 62.4 and 29.2, respectively. Reoperation after OCA occurred in 1 patient (14%). Conclusion: Among this case series of 7 patients who underwent OCA transplantation of the humeral head, patient satisfaction was high at 10-year follow-up and most returned to recreational activity although most also had persistent shoulder symptoms.

Current trends in surgical treatment of the acromioclavicular joint injuries in 2023: a review of the literature.

Background: This article examines the wide range of surgical reconstruction options available for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, the lack of consensus regarding the most suitable surgical techniques is attributed to the high and variable failure rates observed with current approaches. Methods: This article presents a comprehensive overview of the current surgical principles and techniques used by renowned experts in the field of AC shoulder injury management. Results: It emphasizes the significance of addressing horizontal and rotational instability in AC injuries and highlights the impact of impaired scapular biomechanics. Conclusion: By exploring these emerging concepts and strategies, the article aims to lay the foundation for future studies aimed at improving treatment outcomes and patient management.

Performance and Return to Play After Surgery for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in Professional Baseball Players: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) remains a rare diagnosis but is being recognized as a cause of upper extremity dysfunction in professional baseball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to determine performance and return-to-play (RTP) outcomes in professional baseball players after surgical treatment of TOS. The hypothesis was that there would be a high RTP rate in professional baseball players after TOS surgery with no statistical differences in performance between pitchers who had TOS surgery and matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All professional baseball players who underwent surgical treatment of TOS between 2010 and 2017 were identified using the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System database. Demographic and performance data (before and after surgery) for each player were recorded. Performance variables were then compared between players who underwent TOS surgery and matched controls. The matching criteria were no history of previous surgeries on affected arm, age at time of surgery, throwing side, level of play (Major or Minor League Baseball), and years of experience playing professional baseball. RESULTS: Overall, 52 players underwent surgery for TOS, of whom 46 (88%) were pitchers. The type of TOS was neurogenic in 69% and venous in 29%. One player had arterial TOS. After TOS surgery, 79% of players returned to play at the same or higher level (RTSP) by 9.5 months and played ≥3 years after surgery. No differences were found in RTSP rate based on the type of TOS. No statistical difference was found in RTP rates between major and minor league players. Pitchers had a 76% RTSP, which was similar to the natural attrition for control pitchers (P = .874). After TOS surgery, pitchers saw a decline in several performance metrics, but these declines were not different from those of control pitchers, indicating that the decline in performance after TOS surgery was no faster than is seen in healthy professional pitchers as they age. CONCLUSION: The rate of RTSP after surgery for TOS in professional baseball players was 79%. There was no difference in RTP based on the type of TOS. Pitchers who underwent surgery for TOS had no significant differences in pitching performance metrics after surgery compared with matched controls.

Nonoperative Treatment of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries With and Without Platelet-Rich Plasma in Professional Baseball Players: A Comparative and Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies evaluating nonoperative treatment of elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have shown promising results. To date, no comparative studies have been performed on professional baseball players who have undergone nonoperative treatment with or without PRP injections for UCL injuries. HYPOTHESIS: Players who received PRP injections would have better outcomes than those who did not receive PRP. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The Major League Baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System identified 544 professional baseball players who were treated nonoperatively for elbow UCL injuries between 2011 and 2015. Of these, 133 received PRP injections (PRP group) before starting their nonoperative treatment program, and 411 did not (no-PRP group). Player outcomes and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were compared between groups. In addition, to reduce selection bias, a 1:1 matched comparison of the PRP group versus the no-PRP group was performed. Players were matched by age, position, throwing side, and league status: major (MLB) and minor (Minor League Baseball [MiLB]). A single radiologist with extensive experience in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation of elbow injuries in elite athletes analyzed 243 MRI scans for which images were accessible for tear location and grade interpretation. RESULTS: Nonoperative treatment of UCL injuries resulted in an overall 54% rate of return to play (RTP). Players who received PRP had a significantly longer delay in return to throwing (P < .001) and RTP (P = .012). The matched cohort analysis showed that MLB and MiLB pitchers in the no-PRP group had a significantly faster return to throwing (P < .05) and the MiLB pitchers in the no-PRP group had a significantly faster RTP (P = .045). The survival analysis did not reveal significant differences between groups over time. The use of PRP, MRI grade, and tear location were not statistically significant predictors for RTP or progression to surgery. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective matched comparison of MLB and MiLB pitchers and position players treated nonoperatively for a UCL tear, PRP did not improve RTP outcomes or ligament survivorship, although there was variability with respect to PRP preparations, injection protocols, time from injury to injection, and rehabilitation programs. MRI grade and tear location also did not significantly affect RTP outcomes or progression to surgery.

Scapulothoracic rhythm affects glenohumeral joint force.

HYPOTHESIS: Musculoskeletal computer models provide valuable insights into shoulder biomechanics. The shoulder is a complex joint composed of glenohumeral, scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular articulations, whose function is largely dependent on the many muscles spanning these joints. However, the range of patient-to-patient variability in shoulder function is largely unknown. We therefore assessed the sensitivity of glenohumeral forces to population-based model input parameters that were likely to influence shoulder function. METHODS: We constructed musculoskeletal models of the shoulder in the AnyBody Modeling System (AnyBody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark). We used inverse dynamics and static optimization to solve for glenohumeral joint forces during a simulated shoulder elevation. We generated 1000 AnyBody models by uniformly distributing the following input parameters: subject height, scapulohumeral rhythm, humeral head radius, and acromiohumeral interval. RESULTS: Increasing body height increased glenohumeral joint forces. Increasing the ratio of scapulothoracic to glenohumeral elevation also increased forces. Increasing humeral head radius and acromiohumeral interval decreased forces. The relative sensitivity of glenohumeral joint forces to input parameters was dependent on the angle of shoulder elevation. We developed an efficient method of generating and simulating musculoskeletal models representing a large population of shoulder arthroplasty patients. We found that scapulohumeral rhythm had a significant influence on glenohumeral joint force. CONCLUSIONS: This finding underscores the importance of more accurately measuring and simulating scapulothoracic motion rather than using fixed ratios or average scapulothoracic motion. This modeling approach can be used to generate virtual populations for conducting efficient simulations and generating statistical conclusions.

A Review of Commercially Available Point-of-Care Devices to Concentrate Bone Marrow for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Focal Cartilage Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising cell-based therapy treatment option for several orthopedic indications. Because culture expansion of MSC is time and cost intensive, a bedside concentration of bone marrow (BM) aspirate is used as an alternative. Many commercial systems are available but the available literature and knowledge regarding these systems is limited. We compared different point-of-care devices that concentrate BM (BMC) by focusing on technical features and quality parameters to help surgeons make informed decisions while selecting the appropriate device. METHODS: We compared published data on the BMC devices of Arteriocyte, Arthrex, Celling Biosciences, EmCyte, Exactech, ISTO Tech, Harvest Tech/Terumo BCT, and Zimmer/BIOMET regarding technical features (centrifugation speed/time, input/output volume, kit components, type of aspiration syringes, filter usage) and quality parameters of their final BMC product (hematocrit, concentration of platelets and total nucleated cells, concentration of MSC and connective tissue progenitor cells). RESULTS: The systems differ significantly in their technical features and centrifugation parameters. Only the fully automated systems use universal kits, which allow processing different volumes of BM. Only the Arthrex system allows selection of final hematocrit. There was no standardized reporting method to describe biologic potency. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data obtained in this review, recommending a single device is not possible because the reported data could not be compared between devices. A standardized reporting method is needed for valid comparisons. Furthermore, clinical outcomes are required to establish the true efficacy of these systems. We are conducting additional studies for more careful comparison among the devices.

Posterior augmented glenoid implants require less bone removal and generate lower stresses: a finite element analysis.

HYPOTHESIS: Glenoid retroversion can be corrected with standard glenoid implants after anterior-side asymmetric reaming or by using posterior augmented glenoid implants with built-in corrections. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 augmented glenoid designs with a standard glenoid design, measure the amount of bone removed, and compute the stresses generated in the cement and bone. METHODS: Finite element models of 3 arthritic scapulae with varying severities of posterior glenoid wear were each implanted with 4 different implant configurations: standard glenoid implant in neutral alignment with asymmetric reaming, standard glenoid implant in retroversion, glenoid implant augmented with a posterior wedge in neutral alignment, and glenoid implant augmented with a posterior step in neutral alignment. The volume of cortical and cancellous bone removed and the percentage of implant back surface supported by cortical bone were measured. Stresses and strains in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone were computed. RESULTS: Asymmetric reaming for the standard implant in neutral version required the most bone removal, resulted in the lowest percentage of back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to the most bone volume. The wedged implant removed less bone, had a significantly greater percentage of the back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to significantly less bone volume. CONCLUSIONS: The wedged glenoid implants appear to have various advantages over the standard implant for the correction of retroversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.

Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoids.

BACKGROUND: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior wear of the glenoid and posterior subluxation of the humerus (Walch type B) presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. Our hypothesis was that glenoids with biconcavity (B2) would be associated with worse outcomes (functional scores and complications) than B1 glenoids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 112 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (104 patients) with B glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography identified 64 B1 glenoids and 48 B2 glenoids (50 and 37 available for follow-up). RESULTS: A significant difference between B1 and B2 glenoids was noted in average retroversion (11° vs. 16°; P < .001) and average posterior humeral subluxation (65% vs. 75%; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in mean age (69.5 vs. 69.2 years) or body mass index (28.5 vs. 27.4) at time of surgery. At average follow-up of 60 months (range, 23-120 months), glenoid component radiolucencies (51.6%, B1; 47.9%, B2), range of motion, preoperative and postoperative scores of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Four revisions (4.6%) were documented for acute postoperative infection (2.3%), subscapularis failure (1.1%), and glenoid loosening (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although biconcave glenoids commonly have more severe retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humerus, we were unable to find a clinical or radiographic difference in outcome of patients with B1 or B2 glenoids treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at intermediate-term follow-up. Continued clinical and radiographic follow-up of these cohorts will be necessary to assess any future divergence in outcome.

Posterior augmented glenoid designs preserve more bone in biconcave glenoids.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Total shoulder arthroplasty is recommended treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, which often results in excessive posterior wear. Two recent glenoid components with posterior augments have been designed to correct excessive posterior wear and retroversion. Our primary hypothesis was that posterior augmented glenoid designs require less bone removal than a standard glenoid design. METHODS: Ten arthritic scapulae classified as Walch B2 glenoids were virtually implanted with standard, stepped, and wedged components. The volume of surgical bone removal, the maximum reaming depth, and the portion of the implant surface in contact with cancellous vs. cortical bone were calculated for each implant. RESULTS: The neoglenoid made up an average of 65% ± 12% of the glenoid width. Mean surgical bone volume removed was least for the wedged (2857 ± 1618 mm(3)) compared with the stepped (4307 ± 1485 mm(3); P < .001) and standard (5385 ± 2348 mm(3); P < .001) designs. Maximum bone depth removed for the wedged (4.2 ± 2.0 mm) was less than for the stepped (7.6 ± 1.2 mm; P < .001) and standard (9.9 ± 3.2 mm; P < .001). The mean percentage of the implant's back surface supported by cancellous bone was 18.2% for the standard, 8.8% for the stepped (P = .02), and 4.3% for the wedged (P = .01). DISCUSSION: Both augmented components corrected glenoid version to neutral and required less bone removal, required less reaming depth, and were supported by more cortical bone than in the standard implant. The least amount of bone removed was with the wedged design.

The use of an orthopaedic rating system in major league baseball.

BACKGROUND: Although the majority of Major League Baseball teams use an orthopaedic rating system to evaluate draft picks, little has been published on the topic. HYPOTHESIS: Our goal was to assess the attitudes among Major League Baseball physicians regarding 3 common diagnoses in pitching prospects, through the use of an orthopaedic rating system. Our hypothesis was that the assigned orthopaedic grades would vary among physicians, diagnoses, and operative-versus-nonoperative and recent-versus-past treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Survey. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: A survey in the form of 12 clinical vignettes was used to query Major League Baseball physicians regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries, type II superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, and internal impingement. Respondents graded draft picks using an orthopaedic rating system. The vignettes covered both operative and nonoperative and recent and past treatment (successful return to pitching for 1 year). RESULTS: THE ORTHOPAEDIC GRADES ASSIGNED BY RESPONDENTS WERE AS FOLLOWS (MINIMAL, MODERATE, SEVERE RISK): past UCL reconstruction (73%, 27%, 0%), recent UCL reconstruction (19%, 77%, 4%), past UCL strain (28%, 60%, 12%), recent UCL strain (0%, 48%, 52%), past SLAP repair (52%, 48%, 0%), recent SLAP repair (4%, 64%, 32%), past SLAP nonoperative (28%, 60%, 12%), recent SLAP nonoperative (0%, 36%, 64%), past internal impingement operative (24%, 68%, 8%), recent internal impingement operative (8%, 32%, 60%), past internal impingement nonoperative (24%, 68%, 8%), and recent internal impingement nonoperative (4%, 48%, 44%). CONCLUSION: Team physicians are optimistic regarding the outcome of UCL reconstruction. In contrast, UCL strains, type II SLAP lesions, and internal impingement carry a guarded prognosis. For all diagnoses, regardless of treatment, the prognosis improved if a player returned to pitching for 1 full season. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study represents a first step toward developing a standardized orthopaedic rating system that will facilitate more accurate player assessment and clearer communication among physicians.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty component center of rotation affects muscle function.

BACKGROUND: Medialization of the glenohumeral center of rotation alters the moment arm of the deltoid, can affect muscle function, and increases the risk for scapular notching due to impingement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of position of the glenosphere on deltoid efficiency and the range of glenohumeral adduction. METHODS: Scapulohumeral bone models were reconstructed from computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with primary or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implants. The placement of the glenosphere was varied to simulate differing degrees of "medialization" and inferior placement relative to the glenoid. Muscle and joint forces were computed during shoulder abduction in OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling software. RESULTS: The average glenohumeral joint reaction forces for the primary total shoulder arthroplasty were within 5% of those previously reported in vivo. Superior placement or full lateralization of the glenosphere increased glenohumeral joint reaction forces by 10% and 18%, respectively, relative to the recommended reverse total shoulder arthroplasty position. The moment arm of the deltoid muscle was the highest at the recommended baseline surgical position. The baseline glenosphere position resulted in a glenohumeral adduction deficit averaging more than 10° that increased to more than 25° when the glenosphere was placed superiorly. Only with full lateralization was glenohumeral adduction unaffected by superoinferior placement. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Selecting optimum placement of the glenosphere involves tradeoffs in bending moment at the implant-bone interface, risk for impingement, and deltoid efficiency. A viable option is partially medializing the glenosphere, which retains most of the benefits of deltoid efficiency and reduces the risk for scapular notching.

Augmented wedge-shaped glenoid component for the correction of glenoid retroversion: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study undertook a computational analysis of a wedged glenoid component for correction of retroverted glenoid arthritic deformity to determine whether a wedge-shaped glenoid component design with a built-in correction for version reduces excessive stresses in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone. Recommendations for correcting retroversion deformity are asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, or a glenoid component with posterior augmentation. Eccentric reaming has the disadvantages of removing normal bone, reducing structural support for the glenoid component, and increasing the risk of bone perforation by the fixation pegs. Bone grafting to correct retroverted deformity does not consistently generate successful results. METHODS: Finite element models of 2 scapulae models representing a normal and an arthritic retroverted glenoid were implanted with a standard glenoid component (in retroversion or neutral alignment) or a wedged component. Glenohumeral forces representing in vivo loading were applied and stresses and strains computed in the bone, cement, and glenoid component. RESULTS: The retroverted glenoid components generated the highest compressive stresses and decreased cyclic fatigue life predictions for trabecular bone. Correction of retroversion by the wedged glenoid component significantly decreased stresses and predicted greater bone fatigue life. The cement volume estimated to survive 10 million cycles was the lowest for the retroverted components and the highest for neutrally implanted glenoid components and for wedged components. CONCLUSION: A wedged glenoid implant is a viable option to correct severe arthritic retroversion, reducing the need for eccentric reaming and the risk for implant failure.

Humeral avulsions of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex involving the axillary pouch in professional baseball players.

INTRODUCTION: Humeral avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament is a rare injury in athletes and can involve different parts of the complex. Axillary pouch avulsion, in particular, has only recently been recognized in the literature, but has never been described in professional baseball pitchers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of professional baseball players presenting to our institution over 5 years was performed. Patients with Bankart lesions or fractures were excluded. Preoperative MRI was retrospectively correlated with the clinical and arthroscopic findings, as available. RESULTS: Four professional baseball pitchers were identified, all who had axillary pouch humeral avulsions of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. There was a concomitant avulsion of the anterior band in one patient. Associated findings included labral tears (n = 2) and partial thickness tear of the rotator cuff (n = 2). Three patients ultimately had their axillary pouch avulsions repaired at most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: APHAGL lesions can be seen in overhead athletes such as baseball pitchers and should be carefully considered as a potential cause of disability. Appropriate diagnosis is important to ultimately elucidate the optimal management of these lesions.

Glenoid Rim Anatomy: Risk for Glenoid Vault Perforation During Labral Repair.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the glenoid labrum frequently require repair with anchors. Placing anchor devices arthroscopically can be challenging, and anchor malpositioning can complicate surgical outcomes. PURPOSE: To determine the safe insertion range and optimal insertion angle of glenoid labral anchors at various positions on the glenoid rim and to establish surgical guidelines that minimize risk of anchor perforation. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 30 normal cadaveric specimens were obtained. A virtual model of a generic labral anchor was inserted into the rim of the glenoid at the clockface positions represented by 12:00, 1:30, 3:00, 4:30, 6:00, 7:30, 9:00, and 10:30. At each position, the safe insertion range was the maximal range measured, and the optimal insertion angle was identified as the angle between the bisector of the safe insertion range and the glenoid face. RESULTS: Progressing in the clockwise direction, beginning at the 12:00 position, the safe insertion ranges (mean ± SD ) were 55.9° ± 10.6°, 63.6° ± 17.6°, 47.7° ± 9.1°, 46.1° ± 8°, 73.9° ± 9.7°, 40.9° ± 6.5°, 40.4° ± 7.4°, and 39.9° ± 7.1°, respectively. The optimal insertion angles were 47.9° ± 7.6°, 53.1° ± 10.9°, 35.0° ± 4.4°, 42.4° ± 4.9°, 60.9° ± 8.4°, 36.6° ± 5.9°, 31.2° ± 4.9°, 34.8° ± 4.6°, respectively. CONCLUSION: Optimal insertion angles and safe insertion ranges varied significantly with respect to the position on the glenoid face. The safe insertion range and optimal insertion angle were found to be wider at the anterior glenoid as compared with the posterior glenoid. A posterolateral insertion angle was safer than an anterior insertion angle at the 10:30 position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Proper arthroscopic technique resulting in anchor insertion at the correct angle, depth, and location will prevent anchor-related glenohumeral complications such as glenoid perforation, cartilage damage, persistent pain, decreased range of motion, and failure of the reconstruction.

A quantitative three-dimensional templating method for shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanical validation in cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Press-fit humeral components for total shoulder arthroplasty have notable potential complications that may be minimized by preoperative templating and improvements in stem design. The purpose of this study was to develop a 3-dimensional templating technique for the humeral stem and to validate this templating in cadaveric specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cylindrical stem and a stem with a rectangular cross-section were selected for templating and force measurements. Templating was carried out for 15 clinical patients and 16 cadaveric shoulders, including calculation of the cortical-implant volume ratio (CIVR). Insertion forces for stem broaching and impaction were measured for 15 patients and 8 paired cadaveric shoulders. Hoop strain and periprosthetic fractures were monitored in cadaveric shoulders with strain gauges. RESULTS: A significant difference in the CIVR was noted between rectangular and cylindrical stems. No difference was observed in impact forces for ideally sized rectangular or cylindrical stems. A difference in insertion forces was found between oversized cylindrical and oversized rectangular implant stems and also between ideal and oversized cylindrical implant stems. The difference in maximal hoop strain between ideally sized rectangular and cylindrical stems was also statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: CIVR is useful to predict an ideal humeral stem size. Cylindrical stems have a different design rationale for fixation than rectangular stems. Surgeon awareness of the fixation rationale for a particular stem design is important because different stem types have different effects on the insertion force. More anatomic humeral stem designs may help to minimize the risk of complications and optimize stem fixation.

Glenoid morphology rather than version predicts humeral subluxation: a different perspective on the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid retroversion is thought be important in shoulder stability before and after shoulder arthroplasty; thus, many authors recommend glenoid reaming to correct retroversion and improve stability. Genetic analysis has revealed that glenoid vault and scapular development are controlled by different genes and environmental factors, resulting in diverse glenoid morphologies. We therefore analyzed the relative contribution of glenoid morphology and version to humeral head position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained 121 shoulder computed tomography scans preoperatively for shoulder arthroplasty. Humeral subluxation and glenoid version were measured on the axial image at the middle of each glenoid. Glenoid morphology was characterized as biconcave, worn, displaced, dysplastic, angled, or neutral. The strength of the correlation between humeral subluxation, glenoid version, and glenoid morphology was analyzed. RESULTS: Glenoid version did not correlate with humeral subluxation. The highest frequency of posterior subluxation was noted in biconcave glenoids. Shoulders with other glenoid morphologies were more likely to have anterior or central positioning of the humerus. The mean subluxation ratio for biconcave glenoids was 0.56 and was significantly different from all other morphologies (P < .02). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Even in the arthritic shoulder, glenoid orientation does not appear to explain the complex biomechanics of shoulder stability. The causes of humeral head subluxation before and after total shoulder arthroplasty are likely multifactorial and may include static and dynamic soft-tissue forces. The biconcave glenoid deserves more attention at surgery because of the high association with posterior subluxation.

Thin-filament length correlates with fiber type in human skeletal muscle.

Force production in skeletal muscle is proportional to the amount of overlap between the thin and thick filaments, which, in turn, depends on their lengths. Both thin- and thick-filament lengths are precisely regulated and uniform within a myofibril. While thick-filament lengths are essentially constant across muscles and species (∼1.65 µm), thin-filament lengths are highly variable both across species and across muscles of a single species. Here, we used a high-resolution immunofluorescence and image analysis technique (distributed deconvolution) to directly test the hypothesis that thin-filament lengths vary across human muscles. Using deltoid and pectoralis major muscle biopsies, we identified thin-filament lengths that ranged from 1.19 ± 0.08 to 1.37 ± 0.04 µm, based on tropomodulin localization with respect to the Z-line. Tropomodulin localized from 0.28 to 0.47 µm further from the Z-line than the NH(2)-terminus of nebulin in the various biopsies, indicating that human thin filaments have nebulin-free, pointed-end extensions that comprise up to 34% of total thin-filament length. Furthermore, thin-filament length was negatively correlated with the percentage of type 2X myosin heavy chain within the biopsy and shorter in type 2X myosin heavy chain-positive fibers, establishing the existence of a relationship between thin-filament lengths and fiber types in human muscle. Together, these data challenge the widely held assumption that human thin-filament lengths are constant. Our results also have broad relevance to musculoskeletal modeling, surgical reattachment of muscles, and orthopedic rehabilitation.

Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS: The arthritic glenoid is typically in retroversion and restoration to neutral version is recommended. While a method for measurement of glenoid version using axial computed tomography (CT) has been reported and has been widely accepted, its accuracy and reproducibility has not been established. METHODS: In 33 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty, glenoid version and maximum wear of the glenoid articular surface were measured with respect to the scapular body axis on 2-dimensional- (2D) CT slices as well as on 3-dimensional- (3D) reconstructed models of the same CT slices. RESULTS: Clinical CT scans were axially aligned with the patient's torso but were almost never perpendicular to the scapular body. The average absolute error in version measured on the 2D-CT slice passing through the tip of the coracoid was 5.1 degrees (range, 0 - 16 degrees , P < .001). On high-resolution 3D-CT reconstructions, the location of maximum wear was most commonly posterior and was missed on the clinical 2D-CT slices in 52% of cases. CONCLUSION: Error in measuring version and depth of maximum wear can substantially affect the determination of the degree of correction necessary in arthritic glenoids. Accurately measuring glenoid version and locating the direction of maximum wear requires a full 3D-CT reconstruction and analysis.

Genetic and biomechanical determinants of glenoid version: implications for glenoid implant placement in shoulder arthroplasty.

SUMMARY: The universally accepted method of measuring glenoid version to determine proper alignment of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty does not account for the complex and variable relationship of the glenoid vault with the scapular body. Existing evidence indicates that the glenoid and the scapular body development are controlled by independent genetic and biomechanical factors. This raises the question: How relevant is the relationship of the glenoid face to the scapular body? This review paper integrates our present understanding of the genetics of scapular development and congenital and neuromuscular conditions to generate insights into scapular morphology and biomechanics. Glenoid version as traditionally defined may have limited relevance when positioning the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty. Further studies of soft-tissue and muscular balance are needed to fully understand the consequences of variations in glenoid version. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review.