Four-dimensional Flow MRI-based Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation for Noninvasive Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Assessment in Patients with Cirrhosis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Background Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis and recurrent symptoms of portal hypertension is primarily assessed with US and confirmed with invasive catheter venography, which can be used to measure the portosystemic pressure gradient (PSPG) to identify TIPS-refractory portal hypertension. To avoid the risks and costs of invasive catheter venography, noninvasive PSPG evaluation strategies are needed. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of the combination of four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for noninvasive PSPG assessment in participants with cirrhosis and TIPS. Materials and Methods Abdominal 4D flow MRI was performed prospectively in participants with cirrhosis and TIPS between January 2019 and September 2020. Flow rates were measured within the TIPS and inferior vena cava (IVC). The portal vein (PV), TIPS, right hepatic vein, and IVC were segmented on MRI scans to create a CFD mesh. The PV and infrahepatic IVC were defined as inflows for 4D flow MRI-derived flow rates. The suprahepatic IVC was defined as the outflow. CFD simulations were used to noninvasively estimate PSPG as the difference between the simulated pressures in the PV and suprahepatic IVC. Invasive venographic measurements of the PSPG served as the reference standard, and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between noninvasive estimates and invasive measurements. Results In all 20 participants with cirrhosis (mean age, 58 years ± 9 [SD]; 11 men), 4D flow MRI-based CFD simulations enabled visualization of flow velocities and pressure distributions within the segmented vasculature and TIPS. Noninvasive estimates and invasive measures of PSPG were strongly correlated (r = 0.77; P < .001). The 4D flow MRI-based CFD simulations correctly classified the presence or absence of a post-TIPS PSPG greater than 12 mm Hg in 16 of 20 participants (80%). Conclusion The combination of 4D flow MRI and CFD was feasible for noninvasive PSPG assessment in participants with cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and TIPS. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Motosugi and Watanabe in this issue.

Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom.

BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is feasible for portal blood flow evaluation after placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, clinical acceptance of 4D flow CMR in TIPS patients is limited due to the lack of validation studies. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D flow CMR-derived measurements in TIPS stent grafts using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed flow phantom. METHODS: A translucent flow phantom of the portal vasculature was 3D-printed. The phantom consisted of the superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein draining into the portal vein, the TIPS-tract, and the hepatic vein. A TIPS stent graft (Gore® Viatorr®) was positioned within the TIPS-tract. Superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein served as inlets for blood-mimicking fluid. 4D flow CMR acquisitions were performed at 3T at preset flow rates of 0.8 to 2.8 l/min using velocity encoding of both 1.0 and 2.0 m/s. Flow rates and velocities were measured at predefined levels in the portal vasculature and within the stent graft. Accuracy of 4D flow CMR was assessed through linear regression with reference measurements obtained by flow sensors and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) CMR. Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed through Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: At a velocity encoding of 2.0 m/s, 4D flow CMR-derived flow rates and velocities showed an excellent correlation with preset flow rates and 2D PC CMR-derived flow velocities at all vascular levels and within the stent graft (all r ≥ 0.958, p ≤ 0.003). At a velocity encoding of 1.0 m/s, aliasing artifacts were present within the stent graft at flow rates ≥ 2.0 l/min. 4D flow CMR-derived measurements revealed high intra- and interobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro accuracy and precision of 4D flow CMR is unaffected by the presence of TIPS stent grafts, suggesting that 4D flow CMR may be used to monitor TIPS patency in patients with liver cirrhosis.