Sex differences in outcomes after endovascular treatment in posterior circulation stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry.

BACKGROUND: Women with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) have been reported to have worse outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) than men. Whether these disparities also exist in LVO of the posterior circulation is yet uncertain. We assessed sex differences in clinical, technical, and safety outcomes of EVT in posterior circulation LVO. METHODS: We used data of patients with posterior circulation LVO included in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2018). Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days assessed with multivariable ordinal regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome (mRS ≤3), functional independence (mRS ≤2), death within 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 24-48 hours postintervention, complications, successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2B-3), and procedure duration analyzed with multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 264 patients (42% women). Compared with men, women were older (median age 68 vs 63 years), more often had prestroke disability (mRS ≥1: 37% vs 30%), and received intravenous thrombolytics less often (45% vs 56%). Clinical outcomes were similar between sexes (adjusted (common) OR (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.34; favorable functional outcome 50% vs 43%, aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.25; death 32% vs 29%, aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.84). In addition, NIHSS score after 24-48 hours (median 7 vs 9), successful reperfusion (77% vs 73%), and complications did not differ between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in women treated with EVT for posterior circulation LVO were similar compared with men despite less favorable baseline characteristics in women. Therefore men and women may benefit equally from EVT.

Role of intravenous alteplase on late lesion growth and clinical outcome after stroke treatment.

Several acute ischemic stroke mechanisms that cause lesion growth continue after treatment which is detrimental to long-term clinical outcome. The potential role of intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT), a standard in stroke care, in cessing the physiological processes causing post-treatment lesion development is understudied. We analyzed patients from the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial with good quality 24-hour and 1-week follow-up Non-Contrast CT scans. We delineated hypo- and hyper-dense regions on the scans as lesion. We performed univariable logistic and linear regression to estimate the influence of IVT on the presence (growth > 0 ml) and extent of late lesion growth. The association between late lesion growth and mRS was assessed using ordinal logistic regression. Interaction analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of IVT on this association. Of the 63/116 were randomized to included patients, IVT. Median growth was 8.4(-0.88-26) ml. IVT was not significantly associated with the presence (OR: 1.24 (0.57-2.74, p = 0.59) or extent (ß = 5.1(-8.8-19), p = 0.47) of growth. Late lesion growth was associated with worse clinical outcome (aOR: 0.85(0.76-0.95), p < 0.01; per 10 ml). IVT did not influence this association (p = 0.18). We did not find evidence that IVT influences late lesion growth or the relationship between growth and worse clinical outcome. Therapies to reduce lesion development are necessary.

Sex differences in onset to hospital arrival time, prestroke disability, and clinical symptoms in patients with a large vessel occlusion: a MR CLEAN Registry substudy.

BACKGROUND: Women have been reported to have worse outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT), despite a similar treatment effect in non-clinical trial populations. We aimed to assess sex differences at hospital presentation with respect to workflow metrics, prestroke disability, and presenting clinical symptoms. METHODS: We included consecutive patients from the Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in The Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2018) who received EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO). We assessed sex differences in workflow metrics, prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥1), and stroke severity and symptoms according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on hospital admission with logistic and linear regression analyses and calculated the adjusted OR (aOR). RESULTS: We included 4872 patients (47.6% women). Compared with men, women were older (median age 76 vs 70 years) and less often achieved good functional outcome at 90 days (mRS ≤2: 35.2% vs 46.4%, aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82). Mean onset-to-door time was longer in women (2 hours 16 min vs 2 hours 7 min, adjusted delay 9 min, 95% CI 4 to 13). This delay contributed to longer onset-to-groin times (3 hours 26 min in women vs 3 hours 13 min in men, adjusted delay 13 min, 95% CI 9 to 17). Women more often had prestroke disability (mRS ≥1: 41.1% vs 29.1%, aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.82). NIHSS on admission was essentially similar in men and women (mean 15±6 vs 15±6, NIHSS <10 vs ≥10, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06). There were no clear sex differences in the occurrence of specific stroke symptoms. CONCLUSION: Women with LVO had longer onset-to-door times and more often prestroke disability than men. Raising awareness of these differences at hospital presentation and investigating underlying causes may help to improve outcome after EVT in women.

Siamese model for collateral score prediction from computed tomography angiography images in acute ischemic stroke.

Introduction: Imaging biomarkers, such as the collateral score as determined from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images, play a role in treatment decision making for acute stroke patients. In this manuscript, we present an end-to-end learning approach for automatic determination of a collateral score from a CTA image. Our aim was to investigate whether such end-to-end learning approaches can be used for this classification task, and whether the resulting classification can be used in existing outcome prediction models. Methods: The method consists of a preprocessing step, where the CTA image is aligned to an atlas and divided in the two hemispheres: the affected side and the healthy side. Subsequently, a VoxResNet based convolutional neural network is used to extract features at various resolutions from the input images. This is done by using a Siamese model, such that the classification is driven by the comparison between the affected and healthy using a unique set of features for both hemispheres. After masking the resulting features for both sides with the vascular region and global average pooling (per hemisphere) and concatenation of the resulting features, a fully connected layer is used to determine the categorized collateral score. Experiments: Several experiments have been performed to optimize the model hyperparameters and training procedure, and to validate the final model performance. The hyperparameter optimization and subsequent model training was done using CTA images from the MR CLEAN Registry, a Dutch multi-center multi-vendor registry of acute stroke patients that underwent endovascular treatment. A separate set of images, from the MR CLEAN Trial, served as an external validation set, where collateral scoring was assessed and compared with both human observers and a recent more traditional model. In addition, the automated collateral scores have been used in an existing functional outcome prediction model that uses both imaging and non-imaging clinical parameters. Conclusion: The results show that end-to-end learning of collateral scoring in CTA images is feasible, and does perform similar to more traditional methods, and the performance also is within the inter-observer variation. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the end-to-end classification results also can be used in an existing functional outcome prediction model.

[Resumption of antithrombotic treatment after an intracerebral haemorrhage]. / Hervatten van antistolling na een hersenbloeding.

There is no evidence from randomised clinical trials with regard to the question if and when to resume antithrombotic medication in patients who have suffered an intracerebral haemorrhage and in whom medication continues to be indicated. It is unknown whether new oral anticoagulants are more suitable than vitamin K antagonists in this group of patients. Oral anticoagulants should probably not be resumed in patients with a lobar intracerebral haemorrhage caused by cerebral amyloid angiopathy. They can be considered in patients with a haemorrhage in subcortical regions of the brain, the brain stem or the cerebellum, provided that blood pressure levels are under control. Depending on the risk of a cardiac embolus, antithrombotic medication can be resumed from 1 to 10 weeks after the intracerebral haemorrhage. In patients with atrial fibrillation this risk can be calculated using the CHA2DS2-VASc score. In patients with a cardiac indication for antithrombotic medication the decision whether or not to resume medication should be made by a cardiologist and a neurologist in collaboration.