Prognostic factors of second-line nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study for 184 cases.

BACKGROUND: The real-world efficacy, prognostic factors, and adverse events of second-line nivolumab monotherapy and subsequent third-line therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 184 consecutive patients treated with second-line nivolumab monotherapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, adverse events, long-term survival, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 128 patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 23% and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 45%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 14%, but no treatment-related deaths presented. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 months and overall survival was 14 months, respectively. C-reactive protein level and performance status were identified as significant prognostic factors of overall survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis. The group with two favorable prognostic factors showed better overall survival than the groups with either one or zero prognostic factors (median overall survival: 22, 15, and 4.4 months, respectively). Among 69 patients who received third-line taxane anticancer agents, the progression-free survival was 6.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the real-world outcomes of second-line nivolumab monotherapy were comparable to those of previous randomized clinical trials in terms of tumor response, safety, and long-term survival. Furthermore, a good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may identify patients who are likely to benefit from therapy. Third-line chemotherapy after nivolumab treatment may have an enhanced effect; however, further prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with cT4 and/or supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (M1Lym) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) is administered as standard treatment for patients with cT4 and/or M1Lym esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, its long-term result is inadequate. Although several studies have reported that conversion surgery can improve the survival of these patients, none have identified significantly better long-term survival than that achieved by DCRT. Thus, enhancing DCRT seems important to improve the survival of these patients. A strategy of shrinking tumor volume before DCRT and providing consolidation chemotherapy for systemic control is expected to improve the survival of these patients. Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and fluorouracil has demonstrated good local control and significant improvement in the survival of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Based on these results, the following strategy is proposed: This protocol should be applied as induction for these patients; then, DCRT should be provided depending on the initial response; and finally, adjuvant chemotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor should be given to all responders.

The real-world data of immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The real-world efficacy, feasibility, and prognostic factors of immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are not fully established. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 71 consecutive patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, safety, and long-term survival. RESULTS: In patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 58%, and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 80%. Five patients (7.0%) underwent successful conversion surgery. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 13% of patients, and one patient (1.4%) died due to cholangitis. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 6.5-not reached). C-reactive protein levels and performance status were identified as significant predictors of progression-free survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer demonstrated comparable tumor response, safety, and long-term survival to previous randomized clinical trials. Patients with good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may be suitable candidates for this treatment.