CYP3A4*22 Impairs the Elimination of Ticagrelor, But Has No Significant Effect on the Bioactivation of Clopidogrel or Prasugrel.

CYP3A enzymes participate in the elimination of ticagrelor and the bioactivation of clopidogrel and prasugrel. We studied the effects of functional CYP3A genetic variants (CYP3A4*22; rs35599367 and CYP3A5*3; rs776746) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel. Six healthy volunteers with the CYP3A4*1/*22 and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (CYP3A4*22 carriers), eight with the CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype (CYP3A5 expressors), and 11-13 with the CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotypes (controls) ingested single doses of ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel on separate occasions. Ticagrelor area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was 89% (P = 0.004) higher in CYP3A4*22 carriers than in controls. CYP3A4*22 carriers also showed more pronounced platelet inhibition at 24 hours after ticagrelor ingestion than the controls (43% vs. 21%; P = 0.029). The CYP3A5 genotype did not affect ticagrelor pharmacokinetics. Neither CYP3A5 nor CYP3A4 genotypes significantly affected prasugrel or clopidogrel. In conclusion, the CYP3A4*22 allele markedly impairs ticagrelor elimination enhancing its antiplatelet effect.

Effects of Genetic Variants on Carboxylesterase 1 Gene Expression, and Clopidogrel Pharmacokinetics and Antiplatelet Effects.

Several single nucleotide variations (SNVs) affect carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) activity, but the effects of genetic variants on CES1 gene expression have not been systematically investigated. Therefore, our aim was to investigate effects of genetic variants on CES1 gene expression in two independent whole blood sample cohorts of 192 (discovery) and 88 (replication) healthy volunteers and in a liver sample cohort of 177 patients. Furthermore, we investigated possible effects of the found variants on clopidogrel pharmacokinetics (n = 106) and pharmacodynamics (n = 46) in healthy volunteers, who had ingested a single 300 mg or 600 mg dose of clopidogrel. Using massively parallel sequencing, we discovered two CES1 SNVs, rs12443580 and rs8192935, to be strongly and independently associated with a 39% (p = 4.0 × 10-13 ) and 31% (p = 2.5 × 10-8 ) reduction in CES1 whole blood expression per copy of the minor allele. These findings were replicated in the replication cohort. However, these SNVs did not affect CES1 liver expression, or clopidogrel pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Conversely, the CES1 c.428G>A missense SNV (rs71647871) impaired the hydrolysis of clopidogrel, increased exposure to clopidogrel active metabolite and enhanced its antiplatelet effects. In conclusion, the rs12443580 and rs8192935 variants reduce CES1 expression in whole blood but not in the liver. These tissue-specific effects may result in substrate-dependent effects of the two SNVs on CES1-mediated drug metabolism.

Clopidogrel Carboxylic Acid Glucuronidation is Mediated Mainly by UGT2B7, UGT2B4, and UGT2B17: Implications for Pharmacogenetics and Drug-Drug Interactions .

The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel is metabolized to an acyl-ß-d-glucuronide, which causes time-dependent inactivation of CYP2C8. Our aim was to characterize the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes that are responsible for the formation of clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide. Kinetic analyses and targeted inhibition experiments were performed using pooled human liver and intestine microsomes (HLMs and HIMs, respectively) and selected human recombinant UGTs based on preliminary screening. The effects of relevant UGT polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel were evaluated in 106 healthy volunteers. UGT2B7 and UGT2B17 exhibited the greatest level of clopidogrel carboxylic acid glucuronidation activities, with a CLint,u of 2.42 and 2.82 µl⋅min-1⋅mg-1, respectively. Of other enzymes displaying activity (UGT1A3, UGT1A9, UGT1A10-H, and UGT2B4), UGT2B4 (CLint,u 0.51 µl⋅min-1⋅mg-1) was estimated to contribute significantly to the hepatic clearance. Nonselective UGT2B inhibitors strongly inhibited clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide formation in HLMs and HIMs. The UGT2B17 inhibitor imatinib and the UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 inhibitor mefenamic acid inhibited clopidogrel carboxylic acid glucuronidation in HIMs and HLMs, respectively. Incubation of clopidogrel carboxylic acid in HLMs with UDPGA and NADPH resulted in strong inhibition of CYP2C8 activity. In healthy volunteers, the UGT2B17*2 deletion allele was associated with a 10% decrease per copy in the plasma clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide to clopidogrel carboxylic acid area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4) ratio (P < 0.05). To conclude, clopidogrel carboxylic acid is metabolized mainly by UGT2B7 and UGT2B4 in the liver and by UGT2B17 in the small intestinal wall. The formation of clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide is impaired in carriers of the UGT2B17 deletion. These findings may have implications regarding the intracellular mechanisms leading to CYP2C8 inactivation by clopidogrel.

Effect of carboxylesterase 1 c.428G > A single nucleotide variation on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril and enalapril.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) c.428G > A (p.G143E, rs71647871) single nucleotide variation (SNV) on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril and enalapril in a prospective genotype panel study in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a fixed-order crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype and 12 with the c.428G/G genotype ingested a single 10 mg dose of quinapril and enalapril with a washout period of at least 1 week. Plasma concentrations of quinapril and quinaprilat were measured for up to 24 h and those of enalapril and enalaprilat for up to 48 h. Their excretion into the urine was measured from 0 h to 12 h. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-∞) of active enalaprilat was 20% lower in subjects with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype than in those with the c.428G/G genotype (95% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio 0.64, 1.00; P = 0.049). The amount of enalaprilat excreted into the urine was 35% smaller in subjects with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype than in those with the c.428G/G genotype (P = 0.044). The CES1 genotype had no significant effect on the enalaprilat to enalapril AUC0-∞ ratio or on any other pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of enalapril or enalaprilat. The CES1 genotype had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of quinapril. CONCLUSIONS: The CES1 c.428G > A SNV decreased enalaprilat concentrations, probably by reducing the hydrolysis of enalapril, but had no observable effect on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril.

Effect of grapefruit juice on the bioactivation of prasugrel.

AIMS: The P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel is a prodrug, which is activated after its initial hydrolysis partly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Grapefruit juice, a strong inactivator of intestinal CYP3A4, greatly reduces the activation and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of grapefruit juice on prasugrel. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, seven healthy volunteers ingested 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water three times daily for 4 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 10 mg dose of prasugrel with an additional 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water. Plasma concentrations of prasugrel metabolites and the antiplatelet effect were measured. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice increased the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) of the primary, inactive metabolite of prasugrel to 164% of the control value (95% confidence interval 122-220%, P = 0.008), without a significant effect on its peak plasma concentration (C(max)). The C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of the secondary, active metabolite were decreased to 51% (95% confidence interval 32-84%, P = 0.017) and 74% of the control value (95% confidence interval 60-91%, P = 0.014) by grapefruit juice (P < 0.05). The average platelet inhibition, assessed with the VerifyNow® method at 0-24 h after prasugrel intake, was 5 percentage points (95% confidence interval 1-10 percentage points) lower in the grapefruit juice phase than in the water phase (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice reduces the bioactivation of prasugrel, but this has only a limited effect on the antiplatelet effect of prasugrel.

Grapefruit juice markedly increases the plasma concentrations and antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor in healthy subjects.

AIM: This study examined the effects of grapefruit juice on the new P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor, which is a substrate of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers ingested 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water thrice daily for 4 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 90 mg dose of ticagrelor. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice increased ticagrelor geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) to 165% (95% confidence interval 147, 184%) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0,∞)) to 221% of control (95% confidence interval 200, 245%). The Cmax and AUC(0,34 h) (P < 0.05) but not the AUC(0,∞) of the active metabolite C12490XX were decreased significantly. Grapefruit juice had a minor effect on ticagrelor elimination half-life prolonging it from 6.7 to 7.2 h (P = 0.036). In good correlation with the elevated plasma ticagrelor concentrations, grapefruit juice enhanced the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor, assessed with VerifyNow® and Multiplate® methods, and postponed the recovery of platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice increased ticagrelor exposure by more than two-fold, leading to an enhanced and prolonged ticagrelor antiplatelet effect. The grapefruit juice-ticagrelor interaction seems clinically important and indicates the significance of intestinal metabolism to ticagrelor pharmacokinetics.