Trauma-informed care: Insights from a Q-methodology study of advanced practice registered nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-informed care (TIC) aims to create a safe and supportive healthcare environment that empowers patients and cultivates understanding of the role trauma plays in short-term and long-term health. TIC also has the potential to improve health outcomes and foster clinician wellness. Nurse educators must design evidence-based instruction to develop advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) who deliver high-quality TIC while also protecting their own wellbeing. OBJECTIVES: To identify patterns in subjective viewpoints about TIC among APRN students and describe how those patterns influence their learning experience in an advanced health assessment course. DESIGN: Q methodology was used to explore student perceptions of TIC. SETTING: A virtual advanced health assessment course at a large, midwestern university in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five APRN students from six specialty APRN programs. METHODS: Students completed an online Q-sort activity by ranking 32 TIC statements according to how well the statements aligned with their own perspectives. Q-sorts were analyzed using factor analysis and narrative responses to open-ended questions. RESULTS: Four factors were extracted that revealed different student viewpoints on TIC and their learning experiences: Comfortable/Confident Learners, Uncomfortable/Apprehensive Learners, Empathetic/Hesitant Learners, and Inexperienced/Uncertain Learners. CONCLUSIONS: All students acknowledged the need to learn about TIC to implement it effectively in practice. It is important for faculty to understand the potential range of divergent student viewpoints about TIC and acknowledge, accept, and support students who have anxiety related to learning about TIC.

An audit of mental health questions on U.S. nursing licensure applications: Evidence to guide urgent action for change.

BACKGROUND: Nurses often forgo needed mental healthcare due to stigma and fear of losing their license. The decision to access care or disclose mental health struggles is intensified when registered nurses (RNs) or advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) discover that licensure applications ask invasive mental health questions that could impact their ability to work. AIMS: This study highlights findings from an audit of mental health and substance use questions included in RN and APRN licensure applications across the United States. METHODS: A sequential 4-step approach was used to retrieve RN and APRN licensure applications: (1) review of Board of Nursing (BON) websites, (2) communication with BON staff, (3) communication with Deans of Nursing to ask for retrieval assistance, and (4) creation of mock applicants. An embedded checklist within the Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes Foundation's Remove Intrusive Mental Health Questions from Licensure and Credentialing Applications Toolkit guided the audit. Two study team members reviewed the applications independently for intrusive mental health questions, which were designated as non-compliant with the Toolkit's recommendations and arbitrated for consensus. States were designated as non-compliant if ≥1 item on the checklist was violated. RESULTS: At least one RN and APRN application was obtained from 42 states. Only RN applications were obtained from five states, while only APRN applications were obtained from three states. Only 13 states (26%) fully adhered to the Took-Kit checklist. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The majority of BONs did not fully adhere to the Took-Kit checklist. Guidance from national organizations and legislation from state governments concerning the removal or revision of probing mental health and substance use questions is urgently needed to cultivate a stigma-reducing environment where nurses are supported in seeking needed mental health treatment.

PhD student perspectives on maintaining and formalizing peer mentorship during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mentorship is important for doctoral education and development. Students in Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Nursing programs traditionally receive formal mentorship from more experienced faculty mentors, creating a top-down, mentor-mentee relationship. Peer mentorship, characterized by a mentor-mentee relationship between peers in similar career stages, provides unique opportunities for career development and socialization. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic limited in-person interactions and introduced new, complex challenges to peer mentorship. The authors, current and recently graduated PhD in Nursing students, were forced to create new ways of connecting with peers and sought to explore how other PhD in Nursing students experienced and maintained peer mentorship in their respective programs during the pandemic. In this article, the authors share their personal experiences with peer mentorship during the pandemic, their process of creating a formal peer mentor model, and findings from a national, cross-sectional survey on COVID-related, peer mentorship experiences among PhD in Nursing students from other academic institutions. Most respondents were able to maintain peer mentorship throughout the pandemic, however, less than half reported receiving faculty support to do so. Recommendations for PhD in Nursing program administrators are provided, based on the experiences of the authors and survey results from PhD in Nursing students across the United States.

A Randomized Trial of Digitally Delivered, Self-Administered Parent Training in Primary Care: Effects on Parenting and Child Behavior.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a self-administered, digital behavioral parent training program on parent and child behavior for parents of young children. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial compared ezParent (digital delivery of the evidence-based Chicago Parent Program) with an enhanced usual-care control. Introduction to the study occurred during well-child visits at 4 primary care clinics. In total, 287 parents of children age 2-5 years were randomized to ezParent or the control. Parents responded to surveys evaluating parent behavior, self-efficacy, and stress, and child behavior at baseline, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months postbaseline. Multilevel growth models examined parent and child outcomes for intervention efficacy in intent-to-treat analyses. Secondary moderation analysis explored intervention effects by program use and baseline parenting stress and child behavior problems. RESULTS: The intervention main effect was not significant for parent and child behaviors. In exploratory moderation analysis, parents in the ezParent condition with greater baseline parenting stress reported less corporal punishment (P = .044); and greater improvement in parental warmth (P = .008), setting limits (P = .026), and proactive parenting (P = .019). Parents reporting greater baseline child behavior problems reported greater improvements in parental warmth (P = .007), setting limits (P = .003), and proactive parenting (P = .010). There were no differences in outcomes based on program usage. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ezParent as a self-administered behavioral parent training program may not be intense enough for child and parent behavioral change as a universal prevention model. Parents may require different levels of support for completion based on their level of service seeking, family characteristics, risk profile, and motivation for change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02723916.