Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 60(9): 1091-1099, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313177

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding tumor staging, operability, resectability, and treatment strategy in patients with esophageal cancer are made at multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences. We aimed to assess interobserver agreement from four national MDT conferences and whether this would have a clinical impact. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with esophageal cancer were included across all four upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer centers. Fully anonymized patient data were distributed among the MDT conferences which decided on TNM category, resectability, operability, curability, and treatment strategy blinded to each other's decisions. The interobserver agreement was expressed as both the raw observer agreement and with Krippendorff's α values. Finally, a case-by-case evaluation was performed to determine if disagreement would have had a clinical impact. RESULTS: A total of 80 MDT evaluations were available for analysis. A moderate to near-perfect observer agreement of 79.2%, 55.8%, and 82.5% for TNM category was observed, respectively. Substantial agreement for resectability and moderate agreement for curability were found. However, an only fair agreement was observed for the operability category. The treatment strategies had a slight agreement which corresponded to disagreement having a clinical impact in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer MDT conferences had an acceptable interobserver agreement on resectability and TM categories; however, the operability assessment had a high level of disagreement. Consequently, the agreement on treatment strategy was reduced with a potential clinical impact. In future MDT conferences, emphasis should be on prioritizing the relevant information being readily available (operability, T & M categories) to minimize the risk of disagreement in the assessments and treatment strategies, and thus, delayed or suboptimal treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22275974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases develop in nearly half of patients with advanced melanoma and in 15-20% CNS is the first site of relapse. Median overall survival is short, ranging from two to four months, and one-year survival rate is only 10-15%. THA has been shown to have both anti-angiogenetic and immuno-modulating effects. TMZ is an oral alkylating agent with an excellent oral bioavailability and it is highly lipophillic with an ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. TMZ and THA in combination were tested in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma. METHODS: Between June 2004 and February 2007 patients with measurable metastatic melanoma in progression and PS ≤ 1 received TMZ in a dose of 150 mg/m(2) qd for seven days, followed by seven days off therapy and THA in 200 mg qd, both orally administered. Concomitant treatment with steroids was allowed. PBMCs were collected from the last 14 consecutive patients for evaluation of immune parameters. RESULTS: Forty screened patients were eligible and evaluable for response, and 39 were evaluable for toxicity. 25 patients had asymptomatic and 15 symptomatic brain metastases. The toxicity was primarily grade 1-2 with no grade 4 or treatment-related deaths. Four patients had thromboembolic events grade 3. One patient obtained a CR and five a PR in the CNS, while two had CR and four had PR outside CNS. Overall response rate was 17.5%. We found a significant positive correlation between lymphopenia and objective response. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment was well tolerated but with more frequent thromboembolic events compared to single drug TMZ or THA. The treatment demonstrated activity in CNS as well as outside CNS. The correlation between lymphopenia and objective response needs further investigation.

4.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 162(49): 6679-82, 2000 Dec 04.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11188055

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal pneumothorax (NP) is associated with an increased mortality. However, few studies have evaluated which parameters are associated with neonatal death and infant death. METHODS: Retrospective study of newborns treated for NP at a university hospital in the period 1.1.1989 to 31.12.1998. RESULTS: Forty-seven newborns (30 boys, 17 girls) had NP. Thirty-two infants (68%) had chest tube insertion, and 15 (32%) did not need chest tube. Nine infants (19%) died within one week after birth. Six of these were mature infants with additional major congenital malformations. The remaining three were premature infants with gestational ages of 25, 26 and 29 weeks, respectively. Another 29 week old infant died during the first year of life, bringing the total number of deaths within one year to ten (21%). No deaths occurred among infants with NP who did not have chest tube insertion. Apart from the presence of additional major congenital malformations (p = 0.001/0.003) and the need for mechanical ventilation after tube insertion (p = 0.058/0.035) none of the selected parameters (sex, birth weight, gestational age, way of delivery, CPAP treatment before tube insertion, mechanical ventilation before tube insertion, uni or bilateral pneumothorax, and total number of tubes) had significant relationship to neonatal death or infant death. DISCUSSION: The presence of additional congenital malformations and the need for mechanical ventilation after tube insertion were the only parameters in this series which were associated with an increased mortality in infants with NP demanding tube drainage.


Assuntos
Pneumotórax , Anormalidades Múltiplas/mortalidade , Tubos Torácicos , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Incidência , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/métodos , Masculino , Pneumotórax/mortalidade , Pneumotórax/cirurgia , Pneumotórax/terapia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 156(34): 4795-7, 4800, 1994 Aug 22.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7992411

RESUMO

The diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer (CRC) of rigid sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood test (Hemoccult-II) (H-II) was investigated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome in general practice in a three year period and the results were compared with those of the previous three years, where rigid sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema (DCBE) were the initial preferred examinations. Colonoscopy was recommended in patients with positive H-II, but also in patients with repeated negative H-II within three months, provided that the symptoms persisted. CRC was detected in 141 of 630 patients with positive H-II and in 52 of 8697 with negative H-II. The number of CRC's in the two study periods was similar, in spite of a pronounced reduction in DCBE's from 12,196 to 5656 and a small increase in colonoscopies from 3053 to 4127. It was concluded that the new strategy was no worse than the previous one and the major savings in DCBE's could be used to exchange the rigid sigmoidoscopy with a 60 cm flexible sigmoidoscopy, increasing diagnostic accuracy, shortening delay of diagnosis and removing more adenomas, which eventually may reduce the future incidence of CRC and thereby the mortality from CRC.


Assuntos
Doenças Funcionais do Colo/diagnóstico , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Sangue Oculto , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Humanos , Proctoscopia , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA