Subgroups of pelvic pain are differentially associated with endometriosis and inflammatory comorbidities: a latent class analysis.

ABSTRACT: Chronic pelvic pain is heterogeneous with potentially clinically informative subgroups. We aimed to identify subgroups of pelvic pain based on symptom patterns and investigate their associations with inflammatory and chronic pain-related comorbidities. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of participants (n = 1255) from the Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A) cohort. Six participant characteristics were included in the LCA: severity, frequency, and impact on daily activities of both menstruation-associated (cyclic) and non-menstruation-associated (acyclic) pelvic pain. Three-step LCA quantified associations between LC subgroups, demographic and clinical variables, and 18 comorbidities (10 with prevalence ≥10%). Five subgroups were identified: none or minimal (23%), moderate cyclic only (28%), severe cyclic only (20%), moderate or severe acyclic plus moderate cyclic (9%), and severe acyclic plus severe cyclic (21%). Endometriosis prevalence within these 5 LCA-pelvic pain-defined subgroups ranged in size from 4% in "none or minimal pelvic pain" to 24%, 72%, 70%, and 94%, respectively, in the 4 pain subgroups, with statistically significant odds of membership only for the latter 3 subgroups. Migraines were associated with significant odds of membership in all 4 pelvic pain subgroups relative to those with no pelvic pain (adjusted odds ratios = 2.92-7.78), whereas back, joint, or leg pain each had significantly greater odds of membership in the latter 3 subgroups. Asthma or allergies had three times the odds of membership in the most severe pain group. Subgroups with elevated levels of cyclic or acyclic pain are associated with greater frequency of chronic overlapping pain conditions, suggesting an important role for central inflammatory and immunological mechanisms.

Diet Quality, Sedentary Time, and Blood Pressure in the POUCHmoms Study.

BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a major contributor to cardiovascular disease in womens; diet and sedentary time (ST) are modifiable lifestyle factors thought to influence BP. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine 2 diet-quality measures and ST in relation to BP among parous womens. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis uses data from 677 womens (age 25-55 y) enrolled in the Pregnancy Outcomes and Community Health (POUCH) Study and followed up in the POUCHmoms study 7-15 y after delivery (2011 and 2014). Follow-up measures included a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), self-report of ST (occupational and leisure), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively). The FFQ was used to calculate 2 diet-quality measures, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH). Total ST h/wk was dichotomized at the median and labeled "low" or "high." In weighted unadjusted and adjusted regression models, BP was assessed in relation to diet scores (linear and threshold associations) and combinations of dichotomized diet-quality scores ("poor" = lowest quartile compared with "not poor" = upper 3 quartiles) and ST. RESULTS: Higher mean SBP and DBP occurred mainly in women with a '"poor" diet-quality score (AHEI and DASH). Among womens with a "poor"-quality diet (on the basis of the AHEI score) and "high" ST, (N = 93) adjusted mean SBP and DBP were 4.5 mmHg and 4.4 mmHg higher, respectively, than that of the counterparts who did not have a poor-quality diet and had "low" ST (N = 275). Results were similar in analyses using the DASH diet score. CONCLUSIONS: Women with poor-quality diets and more ST may need closer BP monitoring. Even modest improvements in womens' diet quality and reductions in ST might help lower their BP, but this observation needs testing in prospective studies..