Prevalence and Risk Factors of Post-chemoembolization Syndrome After Chemo-Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: The data regarding the incidence of post-embolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of post-embolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand. METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization for five years. Post-embolization syndrome was defined as fever and/or abdominal pain, and/or nausea or vomiting that occurred within three days after the transarterial chemoembolization procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma or hospital discharge. Pre-defined predictors for post-embolization syndrome were explored using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 298 patients and 739 transarterial chemoembolization procedures, the incidence of post-embolization syndrome was 68.1% (203/298) and the incidence density was 53.9% (398/739). Tumor size, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages, and dose of chemotherapy showed no association with the occurrence of PES. However, a model for end-stage liver disease score was the only predictor for post-embolization syndrome [adjusted IRR 0.91 (0.84-0.98); p = 0.01]. There were three patients developing fever after transarterial chemoembolization due to infection. CONCLUSION: Post-embolization syndrome was common in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with a lower model for end-stage liver disease scores were at increased risk of post-embolization syndrome. This study highlights the burden of post-embolization syndrome among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving transarterial chemoembolization.

Characteristics of Drug-induced Liver Injury in Chronic Liver Disease: Results from the Thai Association for the Study of the Liver (THASL) DILI Registry.

Background and Aims: The impact of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) on patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is unclear. There are few reports comparing DILI in CLD and non-CLD patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence and outcomes of DILI in patients with and without CLD. Methods: We collected data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI between 2018 and 2020 who were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and the severity of DILI. We compared the causative agents, clinical features, and outcomes of DILI among subjects with and without CLD who were enrolled in the Thai Association for the Study of the Liver DILI registry. Subjects with definite, or highly likely DILI were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 200 subjects diagnosed with DILI were found in the registry. Of those, 41 had CLD and 159 had no evidence of CLD in their background. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) products were identified as the most common class of DILI agents. Approximately 59% of DILI in the CLD and 40% in non-CLD group were associated with CAM use. Individuals with pre-existing CLD had similar severity including mortality. Twelve patients (6%) developed adverse outcomes related to DILI including seven (3.5%) deaths and five (2.5%) with liver failure. Mortality was 4.88% in CLD and 3.14% in non-CLD subjects over median periods of 58 (8-106) days and 22 (1-65) days, respectively. Conclusions: In this liver disease registry, the causes, clinical presentation, and outcomes of DILI in subjects with CLD and without CLD patients were not different. Further study is required to confirm our findings.

Virological breakthrough and resistance in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues in clinical practice.

UNLABELLED: Virological breakthrough (VBT) is the first manifestation of antiviral drug resistance during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but not all VBTs are due to drug resistance. This study sought to determine the incidence of VBT and genotypic resistance (GR) in patients with CHB who were receiving NUCs in clinical practice. Records of patients with CHB who were receiving NUCs were reviewed. All patients with VBT were tested for drug resistance mutations. Of 148 patients included, 73% were men and mean age was 44.9 years. During a mean follow-up of 37.5 ± 20.1 months, 39 (26%) patients had at least 1 VBT. Of these 39 patients, 15 (38%) were not confirmed to have VBT on retesting, and 10 of these 15 had no evidence of GR. The cumulative probability of VBT, confirmed VBT, and GR at 5 years was 46.1%, 29.7%, and 33.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, failure to achieve undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was the only factor significantly associated with VBT. Among the 10 patients who had VBT but no confirmed VBT or GR and who were maintained on the same medications, serum HBV DNA decreased in all 10, and nine had undetectable HBV DNA at a mean of 6.8 months after the VBT. Four patients had persistently undetectable HBV DNA, six had transient increase in HBV DNA during follow-up, and none had GR. CONCLUSION: VBT was common in patients with CHB receiving NUCs in clinical practice, but nearly 40% of the VBTs were not related to antiviral drug resistance. Counseling of patients with CHB on medication adherence and confirmation of VBT and/or GR can avoid unnecessary changes in antiviral medications.

New pharmacologic therapies in chronic hepatitis B.

Approximately 350 million persons worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis B, which can result in cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, 2 interferons and 5 nucleos(t)ide analogues have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This article discusses the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, optimal dose, clinical efficacy, and side effects of medications used for the treatment of CHB.