The value of a learning needs analysis to establish educational priorities in a new clinical workforce.

A learning needs analysis was undertaken in a newly formed workforce. The goal of the learning needs analysis was to establish both the skill set and educational needs in the nursing workforce prior to moving to a new purpose built facility. The results would then enable nurse educators to develop, plan and deliver appropriate educational strategies. Staff (73%) completed an online survey; the results were collated and analysed. The results of the learning needs analysis suggested an experienced workforce that had great capacity to care for children across a wide spectrum of acute clinical needs. Interestingly the results of the learning needs analysis conflicted with the clinical reality. To investigate possible reasons for this difference we conducted a focus group session with nurse educators. The focus group findings highlighted the significance of change and how that impacted on the clinical capacity of experienced staff. We concluded that the results of the learning needs analysis were representative however they needed careful interpretation in the context of substantial change.

Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop and implement guidelines for sedation and analgesia management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and evaluate the impact, feasibility and acceptability of these as part of a programme of research in this area and as a prelude to future trial work. METHOD: This pilot study used a pre-post design using a historical control. SETTING: Two PICUs at different hospitals in an Australian metropolitan city. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to the PICU and ventilated for ≥24 h, aged more than 1 month and not admitted for seizure management or terminal care. INTERVENTION: Guidelines for sedation and analgesia management for critically ill children including algorithm and assessment tools. OUTCOME VARIABLES: In addition to key outcome variables (ventilation time, medication dose and duration, length of stay), feasibility outcomes data (recruitment, data collection, safety) were evaluated. Guideline adherence was assessed through chart audit and staff were surveyed about merit and the use of guidelines. RESULTS: The guidelines were trialled for a total of 12 months on 63 patients and variables compared with the historical control group (n=75). Analysis revealed differences in median Morphine infusion duration between groups (pretest 3.63 days (87 h) vs post-test 2.83 days (68 h), p=0.05) and maximum doses (pretest 120 µg/kg/h vs post-test 97.5 µg/kg/h) with no apparent change to ventilation duration. Chart audit revealed varied use of tools, but staff were positive about the guidelines and their use in practice. CONCLUSIONS: The sedation guidelines impacted on the duration and dosage of agents without any apparent impact on ventilation duration or length of stay. Furthermore, the guidelines appeared to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice. The results of the study have laid the foundation for follow-up studies in withdrawal from sedation, point prevalence and longitudinal studies of sedation practices as well as drug trial work.

The KIDS SAFE checklist for pediatric intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Checklists have been recognized by multiple industries as a valuable tool to reduce errors of omission. In the busy environment of a pediatric intensive care unit, adverse events are common and can have severe consequences. Researchers have focused on developing evidence-based practice guidelines; however, the nature of human error means that consistent application of this evidence in practice is challenging. OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based checklist as a tool to reduce preventable adverse events and enhance clinical care in pediatric intensive care units. METHODS: After a systematic review of literature and a retrospective review of local reporting of adverse events in pediatric intensive care units, nominal group technique was used to determine the structure and content for the checklist. RESULTS: An 8-element mnemonic checklist (KIDS SAFE) was developed: kids' development needs, infection, deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis, skin integrity, sedation, analgesia, family, and enteral needs. CONCLUSION: Prevention of adverse events is better than cure. Use of the KIDS SAFE checklist has the potential to reduce errors of omission in pediatric intensive care units.

A survey of sedation assessment and management in Australian and New Zealand paediatric intensive care patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: A retrospective analysis of sedation management for children receiving prolonged ventilation in one Australian paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) revealed no identifiable pattern in sedation management and an inadequacy in the sedation scoring system. Therefore, the investigators sought to explore the current practice of sedation in critically ill children in PICUs across Australia and New Zealand. METHOD: This study used a mail-out survey to audit sedation management within the eight dedicated Australian and New Zealand PICUs. RESULTS: 100% of the units surveyed replied (n=8). There were a total of 6,133 admissions to 8 Australian and New Zealand PICUs, where 3036 (49.5%) required ventilation. Of these children, 888 (29.2%) required ventilation > or =72 hours. Only 4 units had written guidelines for sedation management. A combined sedation regime of benzodiazepines and opioids was employed in six units. Administration and titration of sedation agents was managed by nursing staff alone in six units. All units indicated that they aimed to achieve a 'moderate level' of sedation. Two units used designated assessment tools for sedation and withdrawal assessment. One unit utilised Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring. CONCLUSION: There were similarities observed in the methods and types of sedation agents used within Australian and New Zealand PICUs. However, only half of the units had guidelines for sedation management, and most units did not use validated paediatric scales to assist staff in assessing patient sedation and pain levels. Therefore it is recommended that a standardised approach to sedation assessment and management of critically ill children requiring prolonged ventilation be developed and tested.

Gastric residual volumes in critically ill paediatric patients: a comparison of feeding regimens.

This study examined the effect of gastric feeding regimens, either continuous or intermittent, on fourth hourly gastric residual volumes (GRV) in a group of critically ill paediatric patients where delayed gastric emptying is defined as a GRV greater than 5ml/kg. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), with 45 participants being randomly assigned to either the continuous (n=22) or intermittent (n=23) gastric feeding groups. Participants remained in the assigned group for the duration of the study and, fourth hourly, GRV were assessed to monitor the incidence of delayed gastric emptying. Both groups were similar in age, weight, gender, diagnosis, paediatric index mortality (PIM) score, and usage of pharmacological agents known to affect the gastrointestinal tract. No differences emerged in study duration or the volume of administered enteral formula (ml/kg/day). The intermittent feeding group commenced enteral feeding earlier in the PICU admission (13.0 hours versus 18.5 hrs, p=0.05). Repeated measures analysis revealed no overall difference in median GRV/kg values between treatment groups over the 72 hour study period. Additionally, the incidence of fourth hourly GRV, greater than 5ml/kg, was not different between the continuous and intermittent feeding groups. The provision of enteral nutrition via the gastric route is a common treatment in the PICU, and GRV are frequently used as a measure of gastric tolerance. The result of this analysis provides some support for the theoretical definition of delayed gastric emptying being >5ml/kg. However, further work is required to confirm this finding and to determine its relevance when providing enteral nutrition to the critically ill paediatric patient.

Gastric feeding in critically ill children: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Provision of enteral nutrition via the gastric route is a common nursing procedure in pediatric intensive care units. Little research, however, has focused on children's tolerance of different types of gastric feeding regimens. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between 2 gastric feeding regimens, continuous and intermittent, and children's tolerance as measured by the number of stools and prevalences of diarrhea and vomiting. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in an Australian pediatric intensive care unit; 45 children were randomly assigned to either the continuous or the intermittent gastric feeding groups. Participants remained in the assigned feeding group for the duration of the study, and values of variables used to monitor patients' tolerance were recorded. RESULTS: Both feeding groups were similar with respect to Pediatric Index Mortality score, age, weight, sex, diagnosis, and use of pharmacological agents known to affect the gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, the 2 groups did not differ in study duration or the daily volume of administered enteral formula per kilogram of body weight. The number of stools per day and the prevalences of diarrhea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION: Continuous and intermittent gastric feeding regimens have similar outcomes with respect to the number of stools per day and the prevalence of diarrhea and vomiting in pediatric intensive care patients. Further gastric feeding studies and the development of enteral feeding guidelines for critically ill children are needed.