Validation of the Lung Subtyping Panel in Multiple Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Lung Tumor Gene Expression Data Sets.

Context .- A histologic classification of lung cancer subtypes is essential in guiding therapeutic management. Objective .- To complement morphology-based classification of lung tumors, a previously developed lung subtyping panel (LSP) of 57 genes was tested using multiple public fresh-frozen gene-expression data sets and a prospectively collected set of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung tumor samples. Design .- The LSP gene-expression signature was evaluated in multiple lung cancer gene-expression data sets totaling 2177 patients collected from 4 platforms: Illumina RNAseq (San Diego, California), Agilent (Santa Clara, California) and Affymetrix (Santa Clara) microarrays, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Gene centroids were calculated for each of 3 genomic-defined subtypes: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and neuroendocrine, the latter of which encompassed both small cell carcinoma and carcinoid. Classification by LSP into 3 subtypes was evaluated in both fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples, and agreement with the original morphology-based diagnosis was determined. Results .- The LSP-based classifications demonstrated overall agreement with the original clinical diagnosis ranging from 78% (251 of 322) to 91% (492 of 538 and 869 of 951) in the fresh-frozen public data sets and 84% (65 of 77) in the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded data set. The LSP performance was independent of tissue-preservation method and gene-expression platform. Secondary, blinded pathology review of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples demonstrated concordance of 82% (63 of 77) with the original morphology diagnosis. Conclusions .- The LSP gene-expression signature is a reproducible and objective method for classifying lung tumors and demonstrates good concordance with morphology-based classification across multiple data sets. The LSP panel can supplement morphologic assessment of lung cancers, particularly when classification by standard methods is challenging.

Anti-Endosialin Antibody-Drug Conjugate: Potential in Sarcoma and Other Malignancies.

Endosialin/TEM1/CD248 is a cell surface protein expressed at high levels by the malignant cells of about 50% of sarcomas and neuroblastomas. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) anti-endosialin-MC-VC-PABC-MMAE was selectively cytotoxic to endosialin-positive cells in vitro and achieved profound and durable antitumor efficacy in preclinical human tumor xenograft models of endosialin-positive disease. MC-VC-PABC-MMAE was conjugated with anti-endosialin with 3-4 MMAE molecules per ADC. The anti-endosialin-MC-VC-PABC-MMAE conjugate was tested for activity in four human cell lines with varied endosialin levels. The HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells do not express endosialin, A-673 Ewing sarcoma cells and SK-N-AS neuroblastoma cells are moderate expressers of endosialin, and SJSA-1 osteosarcoma cells express very high levels of endosialin. To determine whether endosialin expression was maintained in vivo, A-673 Ewing sarcoma, SK-N-AS neuroblastoma, and SJSA-1 osteosarcoma cells were grown as xenograft tumors in nude mice. The SK-N-AS neuroblastoma and the A-673 Ewing sarcoma lines were selected for in vivo efficacy testing of the anti-endosialin-MC-VC-PABC-MMAE conjugate. The treatment groups included a vehicle control, unconjugated anti-endosialin, an admix control consisting of anti-endosialin and a dose of free MMAE equivalent to the dose administered as the ADC, and the anti-endosialin-MC-VC-PABC-MMAE conjugate. The unconjugated anti-endosialin had no antitumor activity and resulted in similar tumor growth as the vehicle control. The admix control produced a modest tumor growth delay. Administration of the anti-endosialin-MC-VC-PABC-MMAE conjugate resulted in a marked prolonged tumor response of both xenograts. These proof-of-concept results break new ground and open a promising drug discovery approach to these rare and neglected tumors.

Gain of copy number and amplification of the RET gene in lung cancer.

RET rearrangement represents a unique molecular subset of lung cancer. The identification of specific clinicopathologic characteristics and RET gene status would provide critical information on targeted therapeutics. In this study, we investigated the patterns of RET gene in a series of lung carcinomas. Of one hundred and sixteen tumors, a low frequency (1.7%) of RET translocation was identified. Only two specimens of lung adenocarcinomas displayed the rearrangement of RET in 54% and 78% of tumor cells respectively. A high incidence of gain of copy number (3-4 copies) and amplification (≥ 5 copies) of the RET gene was observed in 52% and 12% of all 116 samples. An association between increased copy number of RET and EGFR mutation was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in these lung carcinomas. This study sheds light on the unique molecular characteristics of the RET gene in lung carcinomas.

Endosialin: a novel malignant cell therapeutic target for neuroblastoma.

Endosialin emerged recently as a potential therapeutic target for sarcoma. Since some sarcoma subtypes, such as Ewing's sarcoma, show characteristics of neuroendocrine differentiation, we wondered whether cancers with neuro-endocrine properties and/or neuroectodermal origin, such as neuroblastoma, small cell lung cancer and melanoma, may express endosialin. Endosialin protein expression was surveyed in neuroblastoma, small cell lung cancer and melanoma in human clinical specimens by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in human cell lines by flow cytometry. Side population cells were examined to determine whether cancer stem cells can express endosialin. Endosialin-expressing neuroblastoma cell lines were implanted in immunodeficient mice and allowed to grow. The xenograft tumors were resected and tested for endosialin expression by IHC. In human clinical specimens, vascular endosialin staining was observed in neuroblastoma, small cell lung cancer and melanoma. Malignant cell staining was strongest in neuroblastoma, weak in melanoma and rare in small cell lung cancer. In human cell lines, endosialin was detected in neuroblastoma cell lines, including cancer stem cell-like side population (SP) cells, but was absent in melanoma and was both rare and weak in small cell lung cancer. Human neuroblastoma xenograft tumors were found to be positive for endosialin. Our work suggests that endosialin may be a suitable therapeutic target for neuroblastoma.

Endosialin is expressed in high grade and advanced sarcomas: evidence from clinical specimens and preclinical modeling.

We previously surveyed the expression of endosialin/ CD248/TEM-1 by immunohistochemistry in human clinical specimens of sarcomas and documented expression in tumor cells, stromal cells and vasculature. In the present study, we completed a retrospective analysis of the diagnostic reports available for these same samples in order to identify high-grade and metastatic disease. Our results show that endosialin can be detected in advanced disease. We screened human sarcoma cell lines in vitro for endosialin expression and developed preclinical human xenograft models of disseminated sarcoma. We found that 22 out of 42 human sarcoma cell lines were positive for endosialin with a positive correlation between mRNA and protein levels. When implanted in vivo, endosialin was expressed at all sites of dissemination. These data provide clinical and preclinical evidence that endosialin can be detected in advanced sarcoma. These results demonstrate for the first time that endosialin is a suitable therapeutic target for poor prognosis and advanced disease.

Endosialin protein expression and therapeutic target potential in human solid tumors: sarcoma versus carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Endosialin/CD248/tumor endothelial marker 1 is expressed in stromal cells, endothelial cells, and pericytes in various tumors; however, few studies have focused on expression in malignant cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We studied expression of endosialin in clinical specimens, cell culture, and animal models and designed an anti-endosialin therapeutic prototype. RESULTS: Fifty human tumor cell lines and 6 normal cell types in culture were assayed by reverse transcription-PCR and/or flow cytometry for endosialin. Cell surface protein was found on 7 sarcoma lines, 1 neuroblastoma, and 4 normal cell types in culture. A fully human anti-endosialin antibody bound to human A-673 Ewing's sarcoma cells and SK-N-AS neuroblastoma cells but not HT-1080 cells. Exposure of cells to an anti-human IgG conjugated to saporin resulted in growth inhibition only of endosialin-expressing cells. Endosialin expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 250 clinical specimens of human cancer including 20 cancer subtypes. Endosialin is frequently found in human cancers. Endosialin expression is mainly a perivascular feature in carcinomas, with some expression in stromal cells. In sarcomas, endosialin is expressed by malignant cells, perivascular cells, and stromal cells. Development and characterization of experimental models for studying endosialin biology in sarcomas and evaluating anti-endosialin therapies is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that an anti-endosialin immunotoxin might be a promising therapeutic approach for endosialin-positive neoplasia, especially synovial sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, liposarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Thus, a diagnostic/therapeutic targeted therapeutic approach to treatment of endosialin-expressing tumors may be possible.

HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues.

To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration&approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (>5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.

Current status of HER2 testing.

HER2 gene amplification and receptor overexpression by tumors seems to be associated with poorer prognosis and may be predictive of response to certain anticancer therapies. Furthermore, and paramount to the clinician and patient, a positive HER2 status is a prerequisite eligibility requirement for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. As a consequence, issues relating to accurate and reliable laboratory assessment of HER2 status are a matter of significant debate to pathologists and oncologists. Out of a wide range of techniques that have been used in research for the detection of HER2 status, two technologies are now predominant in the routine clinical pathology laboratory: determination of HER2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). This article discusses some of the recent experiences, guidelines, and opinions of pathologists and clinicians concerning aspects of HER2 testing with respect to when to test (at initial diagnosis or pretreatment), the relative advantages/disadvantages of IHC and FISH, and where to test (local or centralized laboratories).