Doubling down on the future of gynecologic oncology: The SGO future of the profession summit report.

The original vision of the field of gynecologic oncology was to establish a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with gynecologic cancers. Fifty years later, scientific advances have markedly changed the overall practice of gynecologic oncology, but the profession continues to struggle to define its value-financial and otherwise. These issues were examined in full at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Future of the Profession Summit and the purpose of this document is to summarize the discussion, share the group's perceived strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for gynecologic oncologists, further educate members and others within the patient care team about the unique role of gynecologic oncologists, and plan future steps in the short- and long- term to preserve the subspecialty's critical mission of providing comprehensive, longitudinal care for people with gynecologic cancers.

Splenic metastases - hematogenous disease or invasive peritoneal implants? Case reports of two patients.

BACKGROUND: Metastases from gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancy may occur through lymphatic channels, through venules of the cancer or into the peritoneal space. The metastatic process involves lymphatic, hematogenous or transcoelomic dissemination. METHODS: Two patients with splenic metastases are presented. Their clinical course is presented in an attempt to identify the route of cancer dissemination to the spleen. Lymphatic, hematogenous, or transcoelomic patterns of cancer dissemination are possible. Transcoelomic cancer dissemination into the peritoneal space results in peritoneal metastases. RESULTS: In a woman with ovarian cancer peritoneal metastases, a large lesion within the parenchyma of the spleen was described. This disease was present at multiple other sites as peritoneal metastases but no hematogenous or lymphatic metastases. A second patient with mucinous appendiceal neoplasm with peritoneal metastases was studied. Hematogenous metastases from this malignancy is extremely rare and lymphatic metastases were not present at the time of right colon resection. After studying these two patients, our hypothesis is that splenic metastases result from transcoelomic dissemination to the splenic hilum or splenic notches with progression of disease into the parenchyma of the spleen. CONCLUSIONS: When oncologists are considering aggressive local-regional treatments for peritoneal metastases important patient management decisions are influenced by the presence versus absence of hematogenous metastases. We suggest that the presence of splenic metastases does not indicate systemic (hematogenous) or lymphatic metastatic process but an extension of peritoneal metastases at the hilum of the spleen or within splenic notches deep into the parenchyma of the spleen.

Proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer proximal fluids: validation of elevated peroxiredoxin 1 in patient peripheral circulation.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy in the United States. Unfortunately, a validated protein biomarker-screening test to detect early stage disease from peripheral blood has not yet been developed. The present investigation assesses the ability to identify tumor relevant proteins from ovarian cancer proximal fluids, including tissue interstitial fluid (TIF) and corresponding ascites, from patients with papillary serous EOC and translates these findings to targeted blood-based immunoassays. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Paired TIF and ascites collected from four papillary serous EOC patients at the time of surgery underwent immunodepletion, resolution by 1D gel electrophoresis and in-gel digestion for analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, which resulted in an aggregate identification of 569 and 171 proteins from TIF and ascites, respectively. Of these, peroxiredoxin I (PRDX1) was selected for validation in serum by ELISA and demonstrated to be present and significantly elevated (p = 0.0188) in 20 EOC patients with a mean level of 26.0 ng/mL (±9.27 SEM) as compared to 4.19 ng/mL (±2.58 SEM) from 16 patients with normal/benign ovarian pathology. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We have utilized a workflow for harvesting EOC-relevant proximal biofluids, including TIF and ascites, for proteomic analysis. Among the differentially abundant proteins identified from these proximal fluids, PRDX1 was demonstrated to be present in serum and shown by ELISA to be elevated by nearly 6-fold in papillary serous EOC patients relative to normal/benign patients. Our findings demonstrate the facile ability to discover potential EOC-relevant proteins in proximal fluids and confirm their presence in peripheral blood serum. In addition, our finding of elevated levels of PRDX1 in the serum of EOC patients versus normal/benign patients warrants further evaluation as a tumor specific biomarker for EOC.