Impact of time from diagnosis to chemotherapy on prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Due to the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer, prompt initiation of treatment is critical. We investigated the effect of the interval between cancer diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre study, consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer between April 2013 and March 2022 were analyzed. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic, locally advanced or resectable pancreatic cancer or who received chemotherapy due to either being intolerant of or declining surgery. We compared overall survival between two groups: the early waiting time group (waiting time ≤30 days from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation) and the elective waiting time group (waiting time ≥31 days). Prognostic factors, including biliary drainage, were considered. The impact of waiting time on survival was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazard models. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to balance bias, accounting for significant poor prognosis factors, age and sex. RESULTS: The study involved 137 patients. Overall survival exhibited no statistically significant difference between the early and elective waiting time groups (207 and 261 days, P = 0.2518). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified poor performance status and metastasis presence as predictors of worse prognosis. This finding persisted post propensity score matching (275 and 222 days, P = 0.8223). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that initiating chemotherapy ˃30 days later does not significantly affect treatment efficacy compared to within 30 days of diagnosis.

Impact of Initial Body Weight Loss on Prognosis in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a poor prognosis, with body weight loss commonly observed at diagnosis. However, the impact on PC prognosis of weight loss at the time of diagnosis on PC prognosis is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled consecutively patients diagnosed with metastatic or locally advanced PC or resectable PC who were intolerant of or refused surgery. Patients who had lost more than 5% of their body weight or more than 2% and had a body mass index (BMI) of less than 20 kg/m2 at diagnosis were classified as experiencing body weight loss. Patients were subclassified into 2 groups: patients with and without weight loss. The study evaluated patient-related and PC-related factors affecting prognosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess factors affecting prognosis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Additionally, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. RESULTS: In total, 220 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 74 years, and 49.1% were male. Weight loss at diagnosis was observed in 43.2% of patients. There were no significant differences in clinical factors, except for anthropometric parameters, between the groups. The median survival time did not differ between the weight loss and no weight loss groups (149 and 173 days, respectively, P = .669). After matching, no significant differences in survival times were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no association between weight loss at diagnosis and prognosis in patients with advanced PC treated with best supportive care or chemotherapy.

Gastrointestinal symptoms in 609 Japanese patients with COVID-19: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: GI symptoms are common in acute COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to characterize the GI symptoms occurring in Japanese COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 751 hospitalized acute COVID-19 patients. The primary outcomes were the frequency and severity of GI symptoms. The secondary outcomes included the association between COVID-19 severity and GI symptoms and the timing of GI symptom onset. RESULTS: After exclusion, the data of 609 patients were analyzed. The median age was 62 years, and 55% were male. The median time from initial symptom onset to admission was five days. On admission, 92% of the patients had fever, 35.1% had fatigue, 75% had respiratory symptoms, and 75% had pneumonia. The sample included patients with mild (19%), moderate (59%), and severe COVID-19 (22%). A total of 218 patients (36%) had GI symptoms, of which 93% were classified as grade 1/2; 170 patients had both respiratory and GI symptoms. Diarrhea was the most frequent GI symptom, occurring in 170 patients, followed by anorexia in 73 patients and nausea/vomiting in 36 patients, and abdominal pain in 8 patients. There was no significant relationship between COVID-19 severity and GI symptoms. Among COVID-19 patients with both GI and respiratory symptoms, 48% had respiratory symptoms preceding GI symptoms, 25% had GI symptoms preceding respiratory symptoms and 27% had a simultaneous onset of respiratory and GI symptoms. CONCLUSION: Thirty-six percent of the Japanese COVID-19 patients had GI symptoms; diarrhea was the most frequent GI symptom but did not predict severe COVID-19.

Antithrombotic drug use does not affect the fecal immunochemical test PPV for colorectal cancer, but warfarin may have an impact in a Japanese cohort.

BACKGROUND: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Patients on antithrombotic drugs (ATs) are often screened for CRC, but the effect of ATs on FIT results is controversial. METHODS: We divided individuals with FIT-positive results into two groups, patients treated with and without ATs, and retrospectively compared invasive CRC rates, advanced neoplasia detection rates (ANDRs), adenoma detection rates (ADRs), and polyp detection rates (PDRs) between the two groups. We evaluated the factors influencing the FIT positive predictive value (PPV) using propensity matching, adjusting for age, sex, and bowel preparation. RESULTS: We enrolled 2327 individuals (54.9% male; mean age, 66.7  ± â€Š12.7 years). We grouped 463 individuals into the AT user group and 1864 into the nonuser group. Patients in the AT user group were significantly older and more likely to be male. After propensity score matching for age, sex, and Boston bowel preparation scale, the ADR and PDR in the AT user group were significantly lower than those in the nonuser group. Univariate logistic analysis revealed that multiple AT use (odds ratio [OR]: .39, p < 0.001) had the lowest OR for FIT PPV, followed by age- and sex-adjusted factors for the ADR and any AT use (OR: .67, p = 0.0007). No significant factors related to AT use were observed among age-adjusted predictive factors for invasive CRC, but warfarin use was a borderline significant positive predictive factor (OR: 2.23, p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: AT use may not affect the PPV for detecting invasive CRC in patients with positive FIT results, but warfarin may have an impact.

Predictive factors of collateral vessel development induced by oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Oxaliplatin can lead to hepatic sinusoidal injury, called hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), resulting in portal hypertension-related complications. This could worsen the clinical course of the patients treated with oxaliplatin. Early diagnosis is challenging. We explored predictive markers of oxaliplatin-induced collateral vessels. METHODS: Patients who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively screened. We evaluated their laboratory findings and spleen size on computed tomography immediately before oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and after 6 months of treatment. The primary outcome was collateral vessel development, as a surrogate marker for oxaliplatin-induced SOS in patients who underwent oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The secondary outcome was the identification of factors that predicted the development of collateral vessels. RESULTS: We enrolled 161 patients who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. They had a median age of 69 years, and 63.3% were men. Collateral vessels developed in nine (5.6%) patients during the study period. After oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, the spleen size increased in 104 patients (64.6%), with a ≥ 30% increase in 19.4% of the patients. Univariate analysis showed that the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index (≥ 1.76; OR 9.17), aspartate aminotransferase:platelet ratio index (APRI) (≥ 0.193; OR 9.62), cumulative dose of oxaliplatin (≥ 1000 mg; OR 8.43), and increase in spleen size (≥ 30%; OR 6.01) were significant risk factors for collateral vessel development. Multivariate analysis after stepwise selection revealed that the FIB-4 index and spleen size were significant independent predictive factors. CONCLUSION: A ≥ 1.76 increase in the FIB-4 index and a ≥ 30% increase in spleen size after 6 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were significant predictive markers for collateral vessel development.

Stratification Based on Risk Factors at Diagnosis Could Predict Progression in Patients with Pancreatic Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the risk of malignant transformation in pancreatic cyst patients is challenging. AIM: We retrospectively investigated the risk factors for malignant transformation in pancreatic cyst patients. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cysts diagnosed using imaging tests were followed from November 2008 to December 2021. A significant change was defined as the additional development of high-risk stigmata (HRS), worrisome features (WFs), or pancreatic cancer during monitoring. RESULTS: In total, 479 patients were analyzed, with a median observation period of 50 months. Forty-four patients (9.2%) showed significant changes, and eight (1.7%) developed pancreatic cancer. The univariate analysis showed that the cyst diameter at diagnosis (≥ 14 mm), main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter at diagnosis (≥ 3 mm), presence of multilocular cysts, and an inconsistent MPD caliber were significant predictive factors for a significant change. One point was assigned for each significant factor. We grouped the patients into three groups: the low-risk group (total score 0), medium-risk group (score 1-2), and high-risk group (score 3-4). The high-risk group had a higher risk of a significant change than the medium- and low-risk groups (age-adjusted HRs for the medium-risk and high-risk groups were 3.0 and 5.2 compared with the low-risk group). CONCLUSION: Stratification based on risk factors may help predict the development of significant changes in pancreatic cyst patients.

Impact of anticoagulants on the clinical outcomes of colonic diverticular bleeding comparing warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants.

Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been widely used as antithrombotic agents to replace warfarin, but their clinical impact in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding is unclear. We compared the effects of warfarin and DOACs on the outcomes of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding. The patients were divided into warfarin and DOAC groups. We compared the clinical outcomes and the effect of the DOAC dosing and examined any readmissions due to colonic diverticular bleeding within 1 year. A total of 95 events (warfarin group: n = 43 and DOAC group: n = 52) were included. Compared with the warfarin group, the DOAC group was significantly older, had a lower rate of concomitant antiplatelet agents, and a shorter hospital stay, but no significant differences were found in the other clinical outcomes. Thirty-seven patients (71.2%) in the DOAC group had appropriate dosing, whereas 15 patients (28.9%) had an inappropriate dose. The patients with overdose or contraindications had significantly lower minimum hemoglobin levels. In the univariate analysis, prior hospitalization for colonic diverticular bleeding was a significant predictor of readmission. Compared with warfarin, patients with colonic diverticular bleeding treated with DOACs were older and had shorter hospital stays, and the inappropriate use of DOACs may worsen outcomes.

Centrosomal BRCA2 is a target protein of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP).

BRCA2 localizes to centrosomes between G1 and prophase and is removed from the centrosomes during mitosis, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. Here we show that BRCA2 is cleaved into two fragments by membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), and that knockdown of MT1-MMP prevents the removal of BRCA2 from centrosomes during metaphase. Mass spectrometry mapping revealed that the MT1-MMP cleavage site of human BRCA2 is between Asn-2135 and Leu-2136 ((2132)LSNN/LNVEGG(2141)), and the point mutation L2136D abrogated MT1-MMP cleavage. Our data demonstrate that MT1-MMP proteolysis of BRCA2 regulates the abundance of BRCA2 on centrosomes.