What Do Program and Geographic Preference Signals Signal? A Survey of Diagnostic Radiology and Integrated Interventional Radiology Residency Applicants.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: As part of the 2022-2023 Diagnostic/Interventional Radiology residency application process, applicants could participate in the ERAS supplemental application, including sending up to six preference signals and three geographic signals. Our goal was to survey Diagnostic Radiology and Integrated Interventional Radiology applicants at two large academic institutions in different geographic locations regarding their perceived impact of program and geographic preference signaling on the application process. METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to 282 applicants between two academic medical centers asking about their participation in program and geographic preference signaling as well as their perception on its impact on the application process. RESULTS: 105 applicants responded to the survey (37.2% [105/282]). Most applicants (26% [27/102]) received four interviews from signaled programs. When prompted to best describe their sentiments with respect to program signaling (one being most negative and five being most positive), the plurality of applicants reported a positive sentiment of four (36% [37/103]). Applicants that received four to six interviews from signaled programs were significantly more likely to feel positively towards program signaling than those that received one to three interviews (p = 0.01). Geography was the most important deciding factor on which programs to signal for applicants (57% [58/101]). DISCUSSION: Our survey results demonstrate that most applicants felt positively towards program signaling and it increased their odds of receiving interviews from preferred programs, which is consistent with the current literature. CONCLUSION: Program and geographic signaling are relatively new features of the ERAS residency application process and therefore, their effects on the match outcome are still in question. However, our study results indicate that they are perceived positively by most applicants and that they boost their chances in finding their ideal match.

Metastatic Pulmonary Calcification: Single-Center Review of Typical and Atypical Imaging Features.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to bring attention to an atypical form of metastatic pulmonary calcification, which is conventionally described as a metabolic process with upper lobe predominance in patients with a specific clinical history, which has not been reported as a distinct entity. METHODS: Patients with metastatic pulmonary calcification (MPC) were first identified with mPower keyword search, including MPC or metastatic calcifications on computed tomography chest radiological reports. Patients were then filtered on likelihood of MPC based off imaging reports. Images were then reviewed by three senior radiologists for pertinent characteristics such as location of MPC, degree of calcifications and pleural effusions. Based on the predominant location of MPC, cases were labeled as either typical or atypical. Clinical and imaging characteristics relevant to MPC were noted and compared across typical and atypical cases. RESULTS: In our study, we describe 25 patients with MPC, 13 defined as typical MPC and 12 with atypical MPC. Through consensus of senior radiologists, MPC was deemed to be mild (52%), moderate (44%), or severe (4%). Twenty-three patients (92%) had underlying renal disease including 21 requiring dialysis at the time of diagnosis. Outside of age at diagnosis, there was no significant clinical difference between the two groups. Evaluation of imaging characteristics (average HU attenuation, 267; range, 186-295), pattern and distribution of calcification, and clinical history strongly supported a diagnosis of atypical MPC. CONCLUSION: This study presents several cases of lower lobe subpleural MPC associated with pleural effusions, which has not been reported as a distinct entity, despite comprising a significant portion of MPC cases at our institution.

Lung-Reporting and Data System 2.0: Impact of the Updated Approach to Juxtapleural Nodules During Lung Cancer Screening Using the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial Data Set.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of malignancy of nonperifissural juxtapleural nodules (JPNs) measuring 6 to < 10 mm in a subset of low-dose chest computed tomographies from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial and the rate of down-classification of such nodules in Lung-Reporting and Data System (RADS) 2.0 compared with Lung-RADS 1.1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of a subset of the National Lung Screening Trial was performed. An exemption was granted by the Institutional Review Board. The dominant noncalcified nodule measuring 6 to <10 mm was identified on all available prevalence computed tomographies. Nodules were categorized as pleural or nonpleural. Benign or malignant morphology was recorded. Initial and updated categories based on Lung-RADS 1.1 and Lung-RADS 2.0 were assigned, respectively. The impact of the down-classification of JPN was assessed. Both classification schemes were compared using the McNemar test (P < 0.01). RESULTS: A total of 2813 patients (62 ± 5 y, 1717 men) with 4408 noncalcified nodules were studied. One thousand seventy-three dominant nodules measuring 6 to <10 mm were identified. Three hundred forty-eight (32.4%) were JPN. The updated scheme allowed down-classification of 310 JPN from categories 3 (n = 198) and 4A (n = 112) to category 2. We, therefore, estimate a 4.8% rate of down-classification to category 2 in the entire National Lung Screening Trial screening group. Two/348 (0.57%) JPN were malignant, both nonbenign in morphology. The false-positive rate decreased in the updated classification (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the low malignant potential of benign morphology JPN measuring 6 mm to <10 mm. The Lung-RADS 2.0 approach to JPN is estimated to reduce short-term follow-ups and false-positive results.

Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices.

PURPOSE: Prone position is known to improve acute lung injury, and chest radiographs are often necessary to monitor disease and confirm support device placement. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding radiographs obtained in this position. We evaluated prone radiographs for distinguishing features and ability to identify support devices. METHODS: Pairs of prone and supine radiographs obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed retrospectively. IRB approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained. Radiographs were assessed for imaging adequacy, distinguishing features, and support device identification (endotracheal tube, enteric tube, or central line). Radiographs were reviewed by ≥ 2 cardiothoracic radiologists. RESULTS: Radiographs from 81 patients (63yo ± 13, 30% women) were reviewed. Prone and supine radiographs were comparable for imaging the lung bases (81% vs. 90%, p = 0.35) and apices (93% vs. 94%, p = 1); prone radiographs more frequently had significant rotation (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.021). To identify prone technique, scapula tip located beyond the rib border was 89% sensitive (95%CI 80-95%) and 85% specific (76-92%), and a fundal stomach bubble was 44% sensitive (33-56%) and 90% specific (81-96%). For women, displaced breast shadow was 46% sensitive (26-67%) and 92% specific (73-99%). Prone and supine radiographs each identified > 99% of support devices. Prone exams trended toward increased rate of malpositioned device (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Scapula position reliably distinguishes prone from supine position; fundal stomach bubble or displaced breast shadow is specific for prone position. Prone radiographs reliably identify line and tube position, which is particularly important as prone patients appear at increased risk for malpositioned devices.

Cardiac MRI Findings of Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND. A possible association has been reported between COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination and myocarditis. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to describe cardiac MRI findings in patients with myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients without known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent cardiac MRI between May 14, 2021, and June 14, 2021, for suspected myocarditis within 2 weeks of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Information regarding clinical presentation, hospital course, and events after hospital discharge were recorded. A cardiothoracic imaging fellow and cardiothoracic radiologist reviewed cardiac MRI examinations in consensus. Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS. Of 52 patients without known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent cardiac MRI during the study period, five underwent MRI for suspected myocarditis after recent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. All five patients were male patients ranging in age from 16 to 19 years (mean, 17.2 ± 1.0 [SD] years) who presented within 4 days of receiving the second dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Troponin levels were elevated in all patients (mean peak troponin I value, 6.82 ± 4.13 ng/mL). Alternate possible causes of myocarditis were deemed clinically unlikely on the basis of medical history, physical examination findings, myocarditis viral panel, and toxicology screening. Cardiac MRI findings were consistent with myocarditis in all five patients on the basis of the Lake Louise criteria, including early gadolinium enhancement and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in all patients and corresponding myocardial edema in four patients. All five patients had a favorable hospital course and were discharged from the hospital in stable condition with improved or resolved symptoms after hospitalization (mean length of hospital stay, 4.8 days). Two patients underwent repeat cardiac MRI that showed persistent, although decreased, LGE. Three patients reported mild intermittent self-resolving chest pain after hospital discharge, and two patients had no recurrent symptoms after discharge. CONCLUSION. In this small case series, all patients with myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination were male adolescents and had a favorable initial clinical course. All patients showed cardiac MRI findings typical of myocarditis from other causes. LGE persisted in two patients who underwent repeat MRI. These observations do not establish causality. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiologists should be aware of a possible association of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and myocarditis and recognize the role of cardiac MRI in the assessment of suspected myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination.

The Effect of Virtual Interviews and Social Media on Applicant Decision-Making During The 2020-2021 Resident Match Cycle.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered the residency application and interview process. Due to social distancing concerns, residency programs have had to virtually showcase their program to applicants, many utilizing social media. Similarly, applicants have had to devise novel ways of assessing "goodness of fit", one of the top factor's applicants use when ranking programs (1). Whether or not these attempts made an impact on an applicant's decision-making process has yet to be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residency candidates interviewing for a diagnostic and/or interventional radiology residency position at our institution completed an online survey. The goal of the survey was to assess the potential influence of virtual interviews, social media, and virtual events on an applicant's decision to apply to, interview at, and rank residency programs. RESULTS: 78/156 (50%) candidates completed the survey. Thirty-five percent reported applying to more programs and 58% reported accepting more interviews than they would have if interviews were not virtual. Forty-two percent reported that social media played a vital role during the application season and 71% reported using social media to learn more about the program. Sixty-nine percent attended a virtual open house, 57% of whom reported that attending the open house influenced their decision to apply to a program. Sixty-three percent reported that attending a virtual reception influenced a program's ranking. CONCLUSION: Social media has had a growing role in the medical community, and the COVID-19 pandemic likely accelerated an inevitable shift in residency program "branding" and how applicants perceive overall "goodness of fit".

Potential Impact of a Pass or Fail United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 Scoring System on Radiology Residency Applications.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the anticipated impact of the change in United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scoring from numerical to pass or fail on the future selection of radiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous electronic 14-item survey was distributed to 308 members of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology and included questions regarding the anticipated importance of various application metrics when Step 1 becomes pass or fail. Secondary analyses compared responses based on the current use of a Step 1 scoring screen. RESULTS: Eighty eight respondents (28.6% [88/308]) completed the survey. Most (64% [56/88]) noted that the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score will likely be one of the top three most important factors in assessing applicants, followed by class ranking or quartile (51% [45/88]) and the Medical Student Performance Evaluation/Dean's Letter (42% [37/88]). Over 90% (82/88) of respondents anticipate potentially or definitively requiring Step 2 CK scores before application review, and 50% (44/88) of respondents anticipate extending interview invites at a later date to receive Step 2 CK scores. These results did not significantly differ between programs who currently use a Step 1 scoring screen and those who do not. CONCLUSION: As Step 1 transitions from a numerical score to pass or fail, radiology residency program directors will likely rely on Step 2 CK scores as an objective and standardized metric to screen applicants. Further investigation is needed to identify other objective metrics to evaluate applicants before Step 1 becomes pass or fail.

Chest Radiograph and CT Findings in Patients Hospitalized with Breakthrough COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To characterize chest radiograph and CT imaging appearance in patients with breakthrough COVID-19 (defined as an illness occurring in patients that previously received a COVID-19 vaccination) in a hospital setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients admitted to the hospital between August 26 and September 8, 2021 with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed infection who were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 were evaluated. Clinical, laboratory data, and outcomes were collected and assessed. All patients had chest imaging performed (either radiography, CT, or a combination of both). Chest radiographs and CTs were assessed and scored on admission and on follow up to determine the extent and type of pulmonary involvement. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Charts of 60 hospitalized patients that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were reviewed for a prior history of COVID-19 vaccination. Eight (13.3%) such patients were identified and included for analysis (mean age, 54 years; range 34-81 years; four women). Patients received either two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 6), two doses of Moderna (n = 1), or one dose of Johnson and Johnson (n = 1). Five (63%) patients were immunosuppressed at the time of presentation, and six (75%) reported respiratory symptoms. Most of the patients had normal radiographs (4 of 7; 57%). The most common chest CT findings were ground glass opacities (three of five), with mild to moderate severity scores (average, 51; range 8-88). Two patients required intensive care unit admission. However, no patients died and all were either discharged or were on room air without residual respiratory symptoms by the end of the study period. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19 breakthrough illness, normal to mild or moderately positive imaging findings were observed.©RSNA, 2021.

Rapid Onset Development of Myocardial Calcifications in the Setting of Renal Failure and Sepsis.

Myocardial calcifications can arise following damage to myocardial tissue or in the setting of disturbances in the calcium and phosphorus balance. They are associated with a number of cardiac sequelae, as well as higher mortality. Three cases of rapid-onset myocardial calcifications that developed within the course of 5 to 13 weeks in patients who had a history of sepsis and renal failure while undergoing hemodialysis are described. Baseline imaging from several weeks prior without myocardial calcification are shown for each of the three patients, demonstrating the rapid onset of these calcifications. The clinical significance of these findings is discussed. © RSNA, 2021.

Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.

Background The American College of Radiology updated Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) version 1.0 to version 1.1 in May 2019, with the two key changes involving perifissural nodules (PFNs) and ground-glass nodules (GGNs) now designated as a negative screening result. This study examines the effects of these changes using National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) data. Purpose To determine the frequency of PFNs and GGNs reclassified from category 3 or 4A to the more benign category 2 in the updated Lung-RADS version 1.1, as compared with Lung-RADS version 1.0, using CT scans from the NLST. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of the NLST, the authors studied all noncalcified nodules (NCNs) found on the incident scan. Nodules were evaluated using criteria from both Lung-RADS version 1.0 and version 1.1, which were compared to determine changes in the number of nodules deemed benign. A McNemar test was used to assess statistical significance. Results A total of 2813 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 62 years ± 5; 1717 men) with 4408 NCNs were studied. Of the largest 1092 solid NCNs measuring at least 6 mm but less than 10 mm, 216 (19.8%) were deemed PFNs (category 2) using Lung-RADS version 1.1. Eleven of the 1092 solid NCNs (1.0%) were malignant, but none were PFNs. Of 161 GGNs, three (1.9%) were category 3 according to Lung-RADS version 1.0, of which two (66.7%) were down-classified to category 2 with version 1.1. One of the three down-categorized GGNs (version 1.1) proved to be malignant (false-negative finding). Statistically significant improvement for Lung-RADS version 1.1 was found for total nodules (P < .01) and PFNs (P < .01), but not GGNs (P = .48). Conclusion This secondary analysis of National Lung Screening Trial data shows that Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System version 1.1 decreased the number of false-positive results. This was related to the down-classification of perifissural nodules in the range of 6 up to 10 mm. The increase in allowable nodule size for ground-glass nodules in category 2 from 20 mm (version 1.0) to 30 mm (version 1.1) showed no benefit. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Mayo and Lam in this issue.

Utilization of Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System: A Survey of Cardiovascular Imaging Societies.

OBJECTIVE: This survey was performed to determine the extent of utilization of Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) since its introduction in 2016 among members of cardiovascular imaging societies. METHODS: A survey regarding use of CAD-RADS was distributed to members of North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging and Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. RESULTS: A total of 246 surveys were completed, and results show that, although most respondents are familiar with CAD-RADS (95%), less than half (45%) report using CAD-RADS for all coronary CTA. Rates of CAD-RADS utilization were similar among physicians who work in a variety of settings. Years of clinical experience did not affect the rates of CAD-RADS utilization; however, a higher weekly volume of cardiac computed tomography was associated with higher rates of CAD-RADS utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Four years after the introduction of CAD-RADS, the reporting system is used by less than half of surveyed members of North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging and Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography regardless of practice model and range of practice experience with cardiac computed tomography.

Dual-energy CT evidence of pulmonary microvascular occlusion in patients with sickle cell disease experiencing acute chest syndrome.

PURPOSE: Acute chest syndrome (ACS), defined by the presence of a chest radiographic opacity in sickle cell disease patients experiencing respiratory symptoms is a leading cause of death in these patients. The etiology is ACS is not well understood however pulmonary microvascular occlusion has been postulated to be a major pathophysiologic driver. Our study aims to assess the value of dual-energy CT (DECT) as a marker of pulmonary microvascular occlusion. MATERIALS/METHODS: A search tool was used to identify CT angiography studies from 1/1/2017 to 9/15/2019 with any variation of the phrases "Acute chest syndrome" and "Sickle cell". These studies were manually reviewed for the use of DECT technique. An age-matched control group was created. DECT pulmonary blood volume (PBV) maps were reviewed semi-quantitatively for the presence of iodine defects and the number of involved bronchopulmonary segments were scored. Other recorded values included type of parenchymal opacities, diameter of main pulmonary artery (MPA) and presence of right ventricular dilatation. Mean values between cases and controls were compared using a two-sample t-test. RESULTS: Nine sickle cell DECT cases with PBV maps and nine age-matched controls were evaluated. Bronchopulmonary segments with iodine defects were significantly higher in cases vs controls (mean: 4.7 vs 0.3, p < 0.003). PBV defects were more extensive than parenchymal findings. MPA diameter was higher in cases (2.9 cm) vs control (2.4 cm), P < 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: DECT demonstrates abnormal PBV in sickle cell patients, often the predominant abnormality identified early, and likely reflects the presence of pulmonary microvascular occlusion.

Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Challenges and a Look Ahead, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems.

In 2014, the American College of Radiology (ACR) created Lung-RADS 1.0. The system was updated to Lung-RADS 1.1 in 2019, and further updates are anticipated as additional data become available. Lung-RADS provides a common lexicon and standardized nodule follow-up management paradigm for use when reporting lung cancer screening (LCS) low-dose CT (LDCT) chest examinations and serves as a quality assurance and outcome monitoring tool. The use of Lung-RADS is intended to improve LCS performance and lead to better patient outcomes. To date, the ACR's Lung Cancer Screening Registry is the only LCS registry approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and requires the use of Lung-RADS categories for reimbursement. Numerous challenges have emerged regarding the use of Lung-RADS in clinical practice, including the timing of return to LCS after planned follow-up diagnostic evaluation; potential substitution of interval diagnostic CT for future LDCT; role of volumetric analysis in assessing nodule size; assessment of nodule growth; assessment of cavitary, subpleural, and category 4X nodules; and variability in reporting of the S modifier. This article highlights the major updates between versions 1.0 and 1.1 of Lung-RADS, describes the system's ongoing challenges, and summarizes current evidence and recommendations.

A Case-Based Review of Vaping-Induced Injury-Pulmonary Toxicity and Beyond.

The last 10 years has seen a steady rise in the use of electronic cigarettes ("e-cigarettes" or ECIGs) or "vape pens." Though initially developed to assist with smoking cessation, use among adolescents has been particularly high. A concomitant rise in ECIG-related injuries disproportionately affecting young patients has been recognized. This unique case series highlights both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary ECIG-induced injuries including vape tip ingestion, maxillofacial fractures after vape pen explosion, myocarditis, and several different manifestations of vaping-associated lung injury. Becoming familiar with expected imaging findings in the wide array of ECIG-induced complications will help radiologists recognize these findings, recommend further imaging as needed, facilitate early diagnosis by help referring clinicians elicit the relevant history from patients, and expedite appropriate treatment.

Interobserver Reliability of the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System in Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate interobserver reproducibility between cardiothoracic radiologists applying the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) to describe atherosclerotic burden on coronary computed tomography angiography. METHODS: Forty clinical computed tomography angiography cases were retrospectively and independently evaluated by 3 attending and 2 fellowship-trained cardiothoracic radiologists using the CAD-RADS lexicon. Radiologists were blinded to patient history and underwent initial training using a practice set of 10 subjects. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed using an intraclass correlation (ICC) on the basis of single-observer scores, absolute agreement, and a 2-way random-effects model. Nondiagnostic studies were excluded. ICC was also performed for CAD-RADS scores grouped by management recommendations for absent (0), nonobstructive (1 to 2), and potentially obstructive (3 to 5) CAD. RESULTS: Interobserver reproducibility was moderate to good (ICC: 0.748, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.639-0.842, P<0.0001), with higher agreement among cardiothoracic radiology fellows (ICC: 0.853, 95% CI: 0.730-0.922, P<0.0001) than attending radiologists (ICC: 0.711, 95% CI: 0.568-0.824, P<0.0001). Interobserver reproducibility for clinical management categories was marginally decreased (ICC: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.570-0.802, P<0.0001). The average percent agreement between pairs of radiologists was 84.74%. Percent observer agreement was significantly reduced in the presence (M=62.22%, SD=15.17%) versus the absence (M=80.91%, SD=17.97%) of modifiers, t(37.95)=3.566, P=0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability and agreement with the CAD-RADS terminology are moderate to good in clinical practice. However, further investigations are needed to characterize the causes of interobserver disagreement that may lead to differences in management recommendations.

Preprocedure CT Findings of Right Heart Failure as a Predictor of Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether imaging features of right heart failure seen on CT performed before transcatheter aorta valve replacement (TAVR) predict poor outcomes after the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated findings on CT performed before TAVR for 505 consecutive patients seen from 2014 to 2018. Of these patients, 300 underwent TAVR. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical and procedural data were recorded. Imaging features, including signs of right heart failure, left heart failure, lung disease, coronary artery disease, and concomitant mitral valve and apparatus calcifications were evaluated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year after TAVR. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were alive (group 1) and those who had died (group 2) by 1 year after TAVR. These groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests when applicable. Multivariate logistic regression with a backward stepwise approach was performed. Results were correlated with echo-cardiography findings. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (10.3%) died within 1 year of TAVR. The presence and size of pericardial effusions were strongly associated with mortality within 1 year after TAVR (p = 0.002). Pericardial effusion was noted in 25 patients in group 1 (9.3%) and eight patients in group 2 (25.8%). Increased size of the main pulmonary artery was associated with death (p = 0.024), with a median main pulmonary artery size of 2.9 cm (interquartile range, 2.6-3.3 cm) in group 1 and 3.2 cm (interquartile range, 2.9-3.5 cm) in group 2. In multivariate analysis, pericardial effusion size and pulmonary artery size, both of which are indicative of right heart failure, were predictors of death, independent of the routinely used clinical Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (AUC, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.671-0.845). Depressed right ventricular ejection fraction, as identified on echocardiography, was associated with mortality within 1 year after TAVR (p = 0.034), further corroborating the CT findings. CONCLUSION: Features related to right heart failure on pre-TAVR CT were associated with increased all-cause mortality within the first year after TAVR, even after adjustment for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. Such imaging findings can help in further risk stratification of patients before TAVR.

Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Pulmonary Artery Volumetry as a Diagnostic Tool for Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated use of three-dimensional pulmonary artery volumes derived from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in a group with pulmonary hypertension (PH) compared with healthy controls as a tool for the diagnosis of PH. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 40 CTPA scans obtained within 90 days of right heart catheterization demonstrating PH. The CTPA scans of 40 age- and sex-matched patients without cardiopulmonary disease were used as comparison. Diameters and volumes of the pulmonary arteries were compared. RESULTS: Adjusted total volume of the main, right, and left proximal pulmonary arteries (PAvol) demonstrated area under the curve of 0.918 (95% confidence interval, 0.860-0.975) for detection of PH, comparable to main pulmonary artery diameter measurement. Area under the curve values for PAvol were higher in subgroups divided by sex and PH severity. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric analysis of the proximal pulmonary arteries using CTPA is a promising diagnostic tool for PH in a real-world cohort.

CT Scans Obtained for Nonpulmonary Indications: Associated Respiratory Findings of COVID-19.

Background Atypical manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are being encountered as the pandemic unfolds, leading to non-chest CT scans that may uncover unsuspected pulmonary disease. Purpose To investigate patients with primary nonrespiratory symptoms who underwent CT of the abdomen or pelvis or CT of the cervical spine or neck with unsuspected findings highly suspicious for pulmonary COVID-19. Materials and Methods This retrospective study from March 10, 2020, to April 6, 2020, involved three institutions, two in a region considered a hot spot (area of high prevalence) for COVID-19. Patients without known COVID-19 were included who presented to the emergency department (ED) with primary nonrespiratory (gastrointestinal or neurologic) symptoms, had lung parenchymal findings suspicious for COVID-19 at non-chest CT but not concurrent chest CT, and underwent COVID-19 testing in the ED. Group 1 patients had reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results obtained before CT scan reading (COVID-19 suspected on presentation); group 2 had RT-PCR results obtained after CT scans were read (COVID-19 not suspected). Presentation and imaging findings were compared, and outcomes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results Group 1 comprised 62 patients (31 men, 31 women; mean age, 67 years ±17 [standard deviation]), and group 2 comprised 57 patients (28 men, 29 women; mean age, 63 years ± 16). Cough and fever were more common in group 1 (37 of 62 [60%] and 29 of 62 [47%], respectively) than in group 2 (nine of 57 [16%] and 12 of 57 [21%], respectively), with no significant difference in the remaining symptoms. There were 101 CT scans of the abdomen or pelvis and 18 CT scans of the cervical spine or neck. In group 1, non-chest CT findings provided the initial evidence of COVID-19-related pneumonia in 32 of 62 (52%) patients. In group 2, the evidence was found in 44 of 57 (77%) patients. Overall, the most common CT findings were ground-glass opacity (114 of 119, 96%) and consolidation (47 of 119, 40%). Major interventions (vasopressor medication or intubation) were required for 29 of 119 (24%) patients, and 27 of 119 (23%) died. Patients who underwent CT of the cervical spine or neck had worse outcomes than those who underwent abdominal or pelvic CT (P = .01). Conclusion In a substantial percentage of patients with primary nonrespiratory symptoms who underwent non-chest CT, CT provided evidence of coronavirus disease 2019-related pneumonia. © RSNA, 2020.