Improving image quality and in-stent restenosis diagnosis with high-resolution "double-low" coronary CT angiography in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the image quality of a high-resolution, low-dose coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and second-generation motion correction algorithms, namely, SnapShot Freeze 2 (SSF2) algorithm, and its diagnostic accuracy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in comparison with standard-dose CCTA with high-definition mode reconstructed by adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction Veo algorithm (ASIR-V) and the first-generation motion correction algorithm, namely, SnapShot Freeze 1 (SSF1). Methods: Patients after PCI and suspected of having ISR scheduled for high-resolution CCTA (randomly for 100 kVp low-dose CCTA or 120 kVp standard-dose) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively enrolled in this study. After the basic information pairing, a total of 105 patients were divided into the LD group (60 patients underwent 100 kVp low-dose CCTA reconstructed with DLIR and SSF2) and the SD group (45 patients underwent 120 kVp standard-dose CCTA reconstructed with ASIR-V and SSF1). Radiation and contrast medium doses, objective image quality including CT value, image noise (standard deviation), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the aorta, left main artery (LMA), left ascending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) of the two groups were compared. A five-point scoring system was used for the overall image quality and stent appearance evaluation. Binary ISR was defined as an in-stent neointimal proliferation with diameter stenosis ≥50% to assess the diagnostic performance between the LD group and SD group with ICA as the standard reference. Results: The LD group achieved better objective and subjective image quality than that of the SD group even with 39.1% radiation dose reduction and 28.0% contrast media reduction. The LD group improved the diagnostic accuracy for coronary ISR to 94.2% from the 83.8% of the SD group on the stent level and decreased the ratio of false-positive cases by 19.2%. Conclusion: Compared with standard-dose CCTA with ASIR-V and SSF1, the high-resolution, low-dose CCTA with DLIR and SSF2 reconstruction algorithms further improves the image quality and diagnostic performance for coronary ISR at 39.1% radiation dose reduction and 28.0% contrast dose reduction.

Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification.

BACKGROUND: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) has been used for cardiac computed tomography imaging. However, DLIR and ASIR-V may influence the quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: CT images of 96 patients were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V 50%, and three levels of DLIR [low (L), medium (M), and high (H)]. Image noise and the Agatston, volume, and mass scores were compared between the reconstructions. Patients were stratified into six Agatston score-based risk categories and five CAC percentile risk categories adjusted by Agatston score, age, sex, and race. The number of patients who were switched to another risk stratification group when ASIR-V and DLIR were used was compared. Bland-Altman plots were used to present the agreement of Agatston scores between FBP and the different reconstruction techniques. RESULTS: Compared to that with FBP, image noise was significantly decreased with ASIR-V 50%, and DLIR-L, -M, and -H (all P<0.001). The Agatston, volume, and mass scores with ASIR-V 50% and DLIR-L, -M, and -H showed significant decreases in comparison to those calculated with FBP (all P<0.001). Severity classification showed no significant differences between the five reconstruction techniques in any of the CAC score-based risk categories (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR and ASIR-V show great potential for improving CT image quality, and appear to have no pronounced impact on CAC quantification or Agatston score-based risk stratification.