Assisted Reproduction for a Same-Sex Couple: Interdisciplinary Preclinical Active Learning Module Combining Case-Based Small Group Discussion and Patient Panel.

OBJECTIVE: Physicians often feel they are not equipped to serve the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBTQ) community, but integrating education that incorporates LGBTQ content and perspective into an already-condensed medical school curriculum is challenging. We developed a preclinical active learning module on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in LGBTQ care, integrating clinical and basic science content with patient perspective. METHODS: We created a module that combined a case-based small group discussion with a patient panel. We developed a case for discussion in collaboration with a female cis-gender same-sex couple who conceived through ART. A patient panel with the same couple followed the discussion. All first-year medical students attended both parts of the module. Prior to participation, students learned reproductive endocrinology and genetics concepts through lectures. After the module, students voluntarily completed an anonymous survey to evaluate self-perceived changes in familiarity and confidence with LGBTQ patients and satisfaction with the module. RESULTS: Of the 126 students who attended, 72 (57%) completed the survey. Of these, 69 (95.8%) felt the module gave them better perspectives on LGBTQ patient experiences, and 66 to 69 (92-96%) agreed the small group discussion achieved its learning objectives on LGBTQ health barriers and the application of ART. Students valued the patient panel (84.7%) and cited a better understanding of reproductive barriers for LGBTQ patients as its most valuable point. CONCLUSION: A preclerkship module combining a case-based small group discussion and patient panel on ART delivered in the context of a real-life LGBTQ patient experience provided an opportunity for the students to integrate basic science and clinical science knowledge to reflect on the healthcare needs of this patient population. Creating the case in collaboration with the same-sex couple and having them present their own experience provided an authentic perspective to students on reproductive healthcare issues and how they impact members of the LGBTQ community.

Safety testing of Ovaprene: An investigational nonhormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety of Ovaprene, an investigational nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive designed for monthly use. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception who underwent assessments during five menstrual cycles: baseline postcoital test cycle, diaphragm postcoital test cycle, Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, colposcopies, Nugent scores, determination of community state types of vaginal microbiota, and anti-Escherichia coli activity and inflammatory markers in cervicovaginal fluids. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants. Of these, 33 used Ovaprene and completed 77 Ovaprene cycles. The most common product-related urogenital treatment-emergent adverse events were bacterial vaginosis and vaginal odor. The frequency of transitioning from Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV (not Lactobacillus-dominated) was similar before Ovaprene use and afterwards. Mean Nugent scores were <4 at each visit without a discernible upward trend. Inflammatory markers showed wide variation but no upward trend, and E. coli inhibitory activity of cervical secretions did not change. We found no Staphylococcus aureus, the causative agent in toxic shock syndrome, on used Ovaprenes or in vaginal samples. No clinically important changes in systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, or colposcopies occurred during Ovaprene use. CONCLUSIONS: Ovaprene use did not result in cervicovaginal irritation or adverse effects on resident vaginal microbiota and did not impact transitions from a Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that the use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly user-controlled nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive, does not appear to result in adverse changes in vaginal health during short-term use supports further evaluation of the contraceptive potential of the device.

Successful postcoital testing of Ovaprene: An investigational non-hormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate reduction in progressively motile sperm per high power field (HPF) in midcycle cervical mucus after intercourse with Ovaprene: an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive consisting of a vaginal ring and mechanical barrier, releasing spermiostatic ferrous gluconate. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception. Participants underwent a baseline postcoital test cycle with no device to confirm the presence of sperm, followed by one diaphragm postcoital test cycle, one Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. In each postcoital test cycle, participants underwent a midcycle cervical mucus evaluation to confirm an Insler score ≥10 and absence of sperm, and then returned two to four hours after vaginal intercourse for repeat cervical mucus evaluation. We considered <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF indicative of preliminary contraceptive effectiveness. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants; 23 completed the study. All participants had ≥5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in the baseline cycle and <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in all 49 Ovaprene cycles and all 35 diaphragm cycles, meeting the definition of a successful postcoital test. This was true regardless of examiner blinding, prior vaginal delivery or vaginal ring use, body mass index, or dislodgements noted by the participant or investigator. The mean of 27.2 (±17.9) progressively motile sperm/HPF in baseline postcoital test cycles was reduced to 0.5 (±1.1) and 0.5 (±1.3) progressively motile sperm/HPF in the first and second Ovaprene cycles, respectively. Ovaprene fit all participants and all could insert, position, and remove it. CONCLUSION: Use of Ovaprene resulted in meeting the prespecified criterion for contraceptive effect by all participants during all postcoital test cycles. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive, resulted in postcoital testing of cervical mucus that met the pre-specified definition of success (<5 progressively motile sperm/HPF) supports further evaluation of contraceptive efficacy of the device in users at risk for pregnancy.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing second-trimester dilation and evacuation for intrauterine fetal demise vs induced abortion.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) are at higher risk of complications when undergoing dilation and evacuation (D&E) compared to patients undergoing abortion for other indications. We aimed to compare baseline characteristics and describe outcomes, including frequencies of complications such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and hemorrhage, in patients undergoing D&E for IUFD vs induced abortion, with a goal of identifying associated risk factors for complications. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of patients undergoing nonemergent D&Es for singleton ≥14-0/7-week IUFD January 1, 2019 to May 31, 2021, matched with two patients undergoing induced second-trimester D&Es by cesarean delivery history, patient age, and gestational age (GA). We collected demographics, history, GA, coagulation studies, quantitative blood loss (QBL), and complications. We calculated descriptive statistics and tested for association using chi-square, Fisher's exact, t, and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests. RESULTS: Of 1390 procedures, 64 patients with IUFD met inclusion criteria and were matched with 128 patients undergoing induced D&E. Eight (12.5%) patients with IUFD and six (4.7%) undergoing induced D&E had hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.90, 95% confidence interval [0.96, 8.77]). Six (9.4%) patients with IUFD and none undergoing induced D&E had DIC (OR = 28.56 [1.58, 515.38]). Median QBL was 75.0 mL (50, 162.5) for patients with IUFD vs 110.0 mL (50, 200) for those undergoing induced D&E (p = 0.083). Twelve (18.8%) patients with IUFD vs seven (5.5%) undergoing induced D&E received at least one intervention due to bleeding complications (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher DIC frequency but no significant difference in hemorrhage or QBL in IUFD D&E compared to induced abortion. Our IUFD D&E complication frequency is higher than those previously published. IMPLICATIONS: Our results affirm current standards of care for D&E in patients with IUFD. Large referral centers may have higher proportions of complications compared to other sites.

Vomiting and risk of endotracheal intubation related to preoperative doxycycline use for dilation and evacuation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate of vomiting from oral doxycycline 200 mg given the night before second trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E), proportion of anesthesia modalities, and anesthetic complications. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients presenting for second trimester D&E (14-0/7 to 23-6/7 weeks gestation) July 1, 2019-June30, 2020 following their scheduled preoperative visit as identified by billing codes. We recorded vomiting within 30 minutes of ingestion, anesthetic modality, and anesthetic complications. We tested for associations using chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon-rank sum for non-normal numeric variables. RESULTS: We reviewed 702 charts, of which 461 (66%) met inclusion criteria and 420 (60%) took doxycycline as prescribed. Of those who took doxycycline as prescribed, 30 (7.14%) reported vomiting within 30 minutes of ingestion. Nulliparity, primigravida and age less than 30 were significantly associated with vomiting (p = 0.005, p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively), but gestational age (p = 0.53), BMI (p = 0.93), and gastrointestinal conditions (p > 0.99) were not. Only gravidity (p < 0.001) and parity (p = 0.01) remained significant in each of their respective multivariate models. None of the 10 patients who received general endotracheal tube anesthesia (2.4%) had vomited from doxycycline preoperatively. We observed 5 (1.2%) anesthetic complications (postoperative nausea or vomiting, anaphylaxis, and aspiration) that occurred only in those without vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Vomiting rates following doxycycline were lower than those previously published. We found no significant association between doxycycline-associated vomiting and increased need for general endotracheal tube anesthesia or anesthetic complications; however, our study is underpowered to draw further conclusions. IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this study are consistent with guidelines indicating deep sedation as an effective anesthetic modality with low complication rates. Nulliparous patients may benefit from administration of an antiemetic prior to doxycycline prophylaxis, but routine antiemetic use may not be necessary.

Implementation of telemedicine preoperative visits for abortion procedures through 18 weeks gestation at a Northern California hospital-based center.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the implementation of a preoperative telemedicine program at a Northern California hospital-based center for abortion procedures requiring cervical preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a pilot program using telemedicine for preoperative visits for patients needing cervical preparation prior to an abortion procedure from 12 to 18 weeks. We required ultrasonography for gestational age documentation in addition to placental localization in patients with a prior cesarean delivery. We prescribed misoprostol for cervical preparation for patients undergoing the telemedicine preoperative visit; in-person preoperative visits typically involve placement of osmotic dilators. Secondarily, we surveyed patients who had telemedicine and in-person preoperative visits to compare their preoperative experiences. RESULTS: Implementation required 8 months of multidisciplinary meetings. From March 2018 through March 2019, we received 200 abortion referrals at 12 to 18 weeks gestation. Of these 200 patients, 119 did not meet telemedicine eligibility criteria, most commonly due to inability to obtain required ultrasonography (n = 89 [75%]). Of the remaining 81 patients, 43 scheduled telemedicine visits of which 41 initiated and 38 (88%) completed the visits. Twenty-one (55%) telemedicine encounters had no or minor technical difficulties. Thirty-one of 34 (91%) telemedicine and 91 of 108 (84%) in-person visit patients expressed high satisfaction with their preoperative appointment (p = 0.4); none reported dissatisfaction. Patients chose the telemedicine visit primarily for convenience and transportation concerns. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary team is essential for the successful implementation of a preoperative telemedicine program for procedural abortion care. Patients reported high satisfaction and reduced logistical burdens with the telemedicine option. IMPLICATIONS: Telemedicine preoperative visits for abortion procedures at 12 to 18 weeks gestation may improve access to abortion care, reduce patient burdens, and provide an alternative encounter option which may improve the patient experience.

Complex family planning and pediatric hematology oncology integrated clinic for young people with blood disorders and heavy or abnormal menstrual bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: To describe practice patterns of an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic for patients with blood disorders STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients who had an initial consultation for blood disorders impacting menstrual bleeding in an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic from October 2015 to September 2020. We reviewed all charts to extract medical and gynecologic history, blood disorder diagnosis, hormonal treatment prior to and following initial consultation, subsequent visits to the integrated clinic, and hormonal treatment up to 24 months after initial consultation. RESULTS: We saw 47 patients; their most common blood disorder diagnosis was protein defect (14 of 47, 30%). Most patients (30 of 47, 64%) were not using any hormonal treatment prior to their initial consultation. After the initial consultation, 26 (55%) elected to start, change, or discontinue hormonal treatment for abnormal menstrual bleeding, the most common treatment being combined hormonal contraception (CHC, 22 of 47, 47%), alone or as dual therapy. Over the study duration, 36 patients (77%) initiated, changed, or discontinued their hormone treatment, 22 (61%) of whom changed their treatment plan more than once. CHC usage decreased from 19 of 47 (40%) to 8 of 37 (22%) and hormonal device usage, particularly the implant, increased from 9 of 47 (19%) to 11 of 37 (30%) over the 24 months from initial consultation. CONCLUSION: Most patients in an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic will change their menstrual bleeding hormone treatment with initial consultation, although management may require multiple changes. The most common treatment 24 months following the initial consultation was hormonal devices. IMPLICATIONS: Patients with blood disorders affecting menstrual bleeding have complex needs that could be addressed by an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic. Most patients require multiple changes in treatment to achieve adequate control of their bleeding, and patients were more likely to choose hormonal devices for management over time.

Mifepristone prior to osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation cervical preparation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate mifepristone impact on osmotic dilator placement and procedural outcomes when given 18 to 24 hours before dilator placement for dilation and evacuation (D&E) at 18 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from April 2019 through February 2021, enrolling participants undergoing osmotic dilator (Dilapan) placement for a planned, next-day D&E. Participants took mifepristone 200 mg or placebo orally 18 to 24 hours before dilator placement. We used a gestational age-based protocol for minimum number of dilators. Our primary outcome was the proportion of participants for whom 2 or more additional dilators could be placed compared to the minimum gestational age-based standard. We secondarily evaluated cervical dilation after dilator removal in the operating room, subjective procedure ease, and complication rates (cervical laceration, uterine perforation, blood transfusion, infection, hospitalization, or extramural delivery). RESULTS: Of the planned 66 participants, we enrolled 44 (stopped due to coronavirus disease 2019-related obstacles), and 41 (19 mifepristone; 22 placebo) completed the study. We placed 2 or more additional dilators compared to standard in 7 (36.8%) and 3 (13.6%) participants after mifepristone and placebo, respectively (p = 0.14). We measured greater median initial cervical dilation in the mifepristone (3.2 cm[2.6-3.6]) compared to placebo (2.6 cm[2.2-3.0]) group, p = 0.03. Surgeon's perception of procedure being "easy" (8/19[42.1] vs 9/22[40.9], respectively, p = 1.00) and complication rate (3/19[15.8%] vs 3/22[13.6], respectively, p = 1.00) did not differ. CONCLUSION: Our underpowered study did not demonstrate a difference in cervical dilator placement, but mifepristone 18 to 24 hours prior to dilators increases cervical dilation without increasing complications. IMPLICATIONS: Mifepristone 18 to 24 hours prior to cervical dilator placement may be a useful adjunct to cervical dilators based on increased cervical dilation at time of procedure; however, logistical barriers, such as an additional visit, may preclude routine adoption without definite clinical benefit.

Mechanical dilation to remove incarcerated laminaria during a second trimester abortion.

Cervical preparation with laminaria reduces complications with 2nd trimester dilation and evacuation. During a surgical abortion at 22 weeks, we could not remove laminaria manually or with ring forceps due to laminaria "dumbbelling" [1]. Without pushing laminaria into the uterus, we mechanically dilated the cervix and removed the incarcerated laminaria.

Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if gabapentin 600 mg reduces pain after osmotic dilator placement the day before a dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (stratified by vaginal parity) trial among women undergoing osmotic dilator placement before D&E at 15-23 5/7 weeks gestation. Subjects received gabapentin 600 mg or placebo 30 min before dilator placement, with re-dosing 8 h later. We assessed pain after dilator placement using a numeric rating scale (NRS; scale 0-10) at 5 min, 2, 4, and 8 h, and at presentation for D&E. The primary outcome was median NRS pain score change from baseline to 8 h after dilator placement. Secondary outcomes included gabapentin-related side effects and analgesic use. RESULTS: Of 121 randomized women, we excluded three subjects (allergic reaction [placebo], randomization error, no NRS data), leaving 60 gabapentin and 58 placebo subjects. Of 110 (93%) women who provided 8-hour data, median pain score changes from baseline did not differ between gabapentin and placebo groups overall (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.52), in vaginally nulliparous women (2 vs. 4, p = 0.10) or in parous women (2 vs. 1.5, p = 0.37). We found no statistically significant differences in median pain score change from baseline to any timepoint overall or when stratified by parity. Beginning at 2 h after dilator placement, more gabapentin than placebo users experienced dizziness (29/53[55%] vs. 11/53[21%], p = 0.001) and tiredness (34/54[63%] vs. 17/54[31%], p = 0.002). The proportion of women using narcotics did not differ between gabapentin (35/60[58%]) or placebo (40/58[69%]) users (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin does not reduce pain with overnight osmotic dilator placement prior to D&E and causes drug-related side effects. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Women experience pain, mostly mild to moderate, with overnight cervical dilator placement at 15-23 5/7 weeks gestation. About 2/3 of women will use a limited quantity of narcotics if provided. Gabapentin does not decrease the pain with or following dilator placement and does not decrease narcotic use.

Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone antagonization with high-dose oral progesterone. METHODS: We planned to enroll 40 patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. We enrolled patients at 44-63 days of gestation with ultrasound-confirmed gestational cardiac activity who were planning surgical abortion. Participants ingested mifepristone 200 mg and initiated oral progesterone 400 mg or placebo 24 hours later twice daily for 3 days, then once daily until their planned surgical abortion 14-16 days after enrollment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 3±1, 7±1, and 15±1 days after mifepristone intake with ultrasonography and blood testing for human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone. Participants exited from the study when they had their surgical abortion or earlier for gestational cardiac activity absence, gestational sac expulsion, or medically indicated suction aspiration. We assessed the primary outcome of continued gestational cardiac activity at approximately 2 weeks (15±1 day), side effects after drug ingestion, and safety outcomes including hemorrhage and emergent treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled participants from February to July 2019 and stopped enrollment after 12 patients for safety concerns. Mean gestational age was 52.5 days. Two (one per group) voluntarily discontinued 3 days after mifepristone ingestion for subjective symptoms (nausea and vomiting, bleeding). Among the remaining 10 patients (five per group), gestational cardiac activity continued for 2 weeks in four in the progesterone group and two in the placebo group. One patient in the placebo group had no gestational cardiac activity 3 days after mifepristone use. Severe hemorrhage requiring ambulance transport to hospital occurred in three patients; one received progesterone (complete expulsion, no aspiration) and two received placebo (aspiration for both, one required transfusion). We halted enrollment after the third hemorrhage. No other significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: We could not estimate the efficacy of progesterone for mifepristone antagonization due to safety concerns when mifepristone is administered without subsequent prostaglandin analogue treatment. Patients in early pregnancy who use only mifepristone may be at high risk of significant hemorrhage. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03774745.

Comparing preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess relationships between preoperative and postoperative dating of second-trimester surgical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We used a deidentified institutional database to extract demographic, dating and pathology data for surgical abortions performed at 14 to 23-6/7 weeks' gestational age (GA) from 9/2015 to 5/2017. We excluded women with multiple gestations, fetal anomalies and missing fetal biometric measurements. We assigned preoperative GA by ultrasonography for unknown last menstrual period (LMP) or when discrepancy between sonographic and LMP dating exceeded 7 days (<15-6/7 weeks), 10 days (16 to 21-6/7 weeks) or 14 days (22 to 23-6/7 weeks). We determined postoperative GA using fetal foot length pathology standards published by Streeter in 1920 and Drey et al. in 2005. We performed regression analysis to estimate the relationship between pre- and postoperative estimates of GA and to assess demographic effects on these estimates, and χ2 tests to assess whether fetal foot lengths were concordant with, larger than or smaller than the expected range for the preoperative GA. RESULTS: The 469 patients analyzed had a median preoperative GA of 19-4/7 weeks (range 14-0/7 to 23-6/7 weeks). Preoperative dating highly correlated with postoperative dating using both pathology standards (r2=0.95, p<.001), without any clinically relevant effect by body mass index (Streeter and Drey, p=.79), parity (Streeter p=.89; Drey p=.71), race (Streeter p=.06; Drey p=.07) or GA. Fetal foot lengths were larger than expected in 134 (28.6%) women using Streeter and 17 (3.6%) women using Drey standards (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortion highly correlate. Use of Streeter standards results in more women with a postoperative GA greater than expected compared to Drey standards. IMPLICATIONS: Increasing legal gestational age restrictions have placed additional burden on clinicians providing safe abortions, but guidelines on gestational age determination are lacking. Contemporary pathology standards consistent with modern practice and universally accepted by abortion providers and gynecologic pathologists are critical to our goal of safe and legal abortion provision.

Persistent free-floating pelvic trophoblastic cysts following an interstitial ectopic pregnancy.

Persistent trophoblast after ectopic pregnancy has been demonstrated at the surgical site or as peritoneal implants. A 37-year-old woman (G5P2) experienced persistently low levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after surgical treatment for an interstitial pregnancy. Evaluation for persistent trophoblast, gestational trophoblastic neoplasm and heterophilic antibodies was negative. After 15 months without resolution, she elected for hysterectomy. We found four smooth, freely floating avascular cysts intraoperatively; pathological evaluation identified the cysts as trophoblastic tissue. Serum beta-hCG resolved postoperatively and remained negative at 1 year. Our case demonstrates the novel finding of trophoblastic tissue existing as free-floating cysts in the peritoneal cavity. With appropriate suspicion, these cysts can be identified on radiologic investigation and removed laparoscopically.

Prospective quantification of fetomaternal hemorrhage with dilation and evacuation procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) during second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E) to evaluate if Rhesus-immune globulin (RhIG) 100 mcg (used in the United Kingdom) and 300 mcg (used in the United States) provide adequate prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an exploratory prospective descriptive study of women undergoing D&E between 15 weeks 0 days and 23 weeks 6 days of gestation. Enrolled participants had Kleihauer-Betke testing on specimens obtained before and after D&E. We assessed the main outcome measures of FMH in mL suggesting need for more than 100 mcg and 300 mcg RhIG (FMH of 10 mL and 30 mL fetal whole blood, respectively) and association of postprocedure FMH with demographic characteristics and procedure-related variables. RESULTS: The 300 participants had a mean gestational age of 19 weeks 6 days±2 weeks 2 days. The median preprocedure FMH was 0 mL (range 0-50 mL) with 2 (0.67%) women exceeding 10 mL (19 mL and 50 mL). The median postprocedure FMH was 1 mL (range 0-60 mL). Almost all participants had postprocedure FMH <10 mL (n=295, 98.3%) and <30 mL (n=298, 99.3%). All participants under 18 weeks had FMH <10 mL. We found no demographic or procedure-related factors to be predictive of FMH quantity. CONCLUSIONS: FMH occurring with routine second-trimester D&E procedures is minimal. Adequate prophylaxis with RhIG 100 mcg and 300 mcg occurred in >98% of women and in all cases <18 weeks of gestation. This study is the first step to potentially reducing the dose and costs of RhIG administration with D&E. IMPLICATIONS: This study is a first step in quantifying fetomaternal hemorrhage with routine dilation and evacuation procedures; larger trials are needed, especially to understand why some women have recognizable hemorrhage preprocedure. If dosing requirements are too high with current guidelines, lower doses will result in resource and cost savings.

Comparing Postpartum Visit Attendance with a Scheduled 2- to 3-Week or 6-Week Visit after Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether scheduling a 2- to 3-week versus 6-week postpartum visit results in higher visit attendance. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a quasi-experimental before-after study to compare postpartum visit attendance after changing routine scheduling of visits from 6 weeks to 2 to 3 weeks after delivery. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction and breastfeeding continuation at 3 and 6 months postpartum. We collected postpartum visit information through a chart review and conducted telephonic interviews at 3 and 6 months postpartum to assess satisfaction with visit timing and breastfeeding status. We performed multivariable analyses to assess predictors of visit attendance. RESULTS: Women scheduled at 2 to 3 weeks postpartum demonstrated higher visit attendance (90.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.6-93.9%) compared with 6 weeks (81.6%; 95% CI: 76.3-86.2%; p < 0.01). Predictors for visit attendance include postpartum visit timing, age, education, parity, prior miscarriage, and high-risk index pregnancy in multivariate analysis. Scheduling at 2 to 3 weeks postpartum increased visit completion in women who were younger and had lower educational attainment, high-risk index pregnancy, and no prior miscarriages. We found no differences in patient satisfaction or breastfeeding continuation at 3 and 6 months postpartum related to postpartum visit timing. CONCLUSION: Scheduling a 2- to 3-week postpartum visit is associated with higher attendance.