Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 44(3): 1553-1561, 2023 Mar 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922216

RESUMO

Farmland is the important soil carbon pool of terrestrial ecosystems and organic nutrient pool for crop growth. To clarify the impact of climate warming on the soil carbon pool, this study analyzed the effects of warming and fertilization on soil organic carbon and its labile components under rice-wheat rotation using a free-air temperature increase system. The variation in soil carbon pool management index (CPMI) was also evaluated. The results showed that the combined effects of warming and fertilization on soil organic carbon content and labile organic carbon components were insignificant. Warming increased the soil organic carbon (SOC) content, and the differences between warming and the ambient control in total organic carbon (TOC) and recalcitrant organic carbon (ROC) reached a statistically significant level. Compared with those under the ambient control, the contents of TOC, ROC, and labile organic carbon (LOC) subjected to warming increased by 7.72%, 7.42%, and 10.11%, respectively. The increased microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content (20.4%) and decreased particulate organic carbon (POC) content (36.51%) may have been the main reason for the variation in SOC. Warming showed no significant effect on soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content, whereas it markedly reduced its soluble microbial by-product components (41.89%). The results also showed that fertilization had no significant effect on soil TOC, ROC, and LOC, but it notably reduced the contents of DOC and POC and increased the MBC content. Compared with those under the control without fertilization, the contents of DOC and POC subjected to fertilization decreased by 35.44% and 28.33%, respectively, and the MBC content increased by 33.38%. Additionally, fertilization tended to increase the anthropogenic humus component (5.13%) and soluble microbial by-product component (29.41%) in dissolved organic matter and reduce the terrestrial humus component (13.33%). Warming and fertilization both tended to improve soil CPMI. Affected by SOC and LOC, the increase in soil carbon pool index and soil lability index were the main reason for the increase in soil CPMI under warming and fertilization, respectively. Overall, the results revealed that climate warming can affect the soil carbon pool by changing soil labile carbon components, which are not affected by fertilization.


Assuntos
Oryza , Solo , Carbono , Triticum , Ecossistema , Fertilização , Agricultura/métodos
2.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 44(1): 473-481, 2023 Jan 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36635835

RESUMO

Clayey soil seriously affects water-holding capacity and nutrient movement. Adopting appropriate agronomic measures to optimize the distribution of soil inorganic nitrogen (SIN) and reduce the nitrogen (N) loss in this soil is the key to agricultural sustainable development. To clarify the effect of deep fertilization of slow/controlled release fertilizer with sowing on N loss in a clayey soil wheat field, two types of fertilizers, conventional fertilizer (CN) and slow/controlled release fertilizer (RCU), were selected in this study. Here, we evaluated the effects of these two fertilizer types on wheat yield, seasonal N runoff loss, ammonia volatilization, and N2O emissions in wheat fields in two typical fertilization modes (manual surface sowing and spreading (B) and belowground fertilization of slow/controlled release urea with mechanized strip sowing (D)). The temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of SIN in topsoil were also analyzed. The results showed that under the same fertilizer type, the wheat yield of D treatment was significantly higher than that of B treatment, whereas the yield of RCU was notably higher than that of CN under the same fertilization mode. D-RCU achieved the highest yield of 6.97 t·hm-2. The seasonal N losses from runoff and ammonia volatilization were higher than that from N2O emissions, and the responses of different N loss pathways to fertilizer types and fertilization methods were diverse. Fertilizer type and runoff occurrence time were the main influencing factors of N runoff loss, and N runoff loss of the RCU treatment was higher in the non-fertilization period. Unfortunately, affected by annual rainfall pattern, the seasonal N runoff loss of the RCU treatment (20.35 kg·hm-2) was significantly higher than that of the CN treatment (10.49 kg·hm-2). The late growth period was the main phase of ammonia volatilization, and the later period was jointly affected by fertilization modes and fertilizer types. The B-CN treatment induced the highest seasonal ammonia volatilization (18.15 kg·hm-2), which was significantly higher than that of the other treatments (7.31-8.38 kg·hm-2). Additionally, the D-RCU treatment (2.41 kg·hm-2) tended to reduce the N2O emissions in comparison to that in the B-CN treatment (4.02 kg·hm-2). The results also indicated that the horizontal movement of SIN was higher than the vertical movement. Deep fertilization of RCU was conducive to optimizing the spatial and temporal distribution of SIN, which was the main reason for the increase in wheat yield and the control of N loss from wheat fields. These results suggest that RCU is a suitable alternative fertilizer for increasing yield and reducing N loss in clayey soil wheat fields; D-RCU can increase the wheat yield and reduce ammonia volatilization and N2O emissions in wheat fields by optimizing the spatial and temporal distribution of SIN, and its increasing effect on N runoff loss in the non-fertilization period deserves attention.


Assuntos
Fertilizantes , Solo , Fertilizantes/análise , Triticum , Argila , Amônia/análise , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Agricultura/métodos , Nitrogênio , Óxido Nitroso/análise
3.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 42(7): 3451-3457, 2021 Jul 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212672

RESUMO

Hydrochar can mitigate ammonia volatilization when applied in paddy fields due to its acidity and adsorption property. To realize the recycling of agricultural biowaste as well as the control of nutrient loss from paddy fields, a simulation soil-column experiment with wheat straw hydrochar (WHC) and water-washed hydrochar (W-WHC) was conducted to evaluate the performance of rice yield and ammonia volatilization from paddy fields. The results showed that WHC and W-WHC applied in paddy fields both increased the rice yield and the increased effect at low application rate (0.5%) was higher than that at high application rate (1.5%). In comparison with the control treatment (CKU), the rice yields achieved from low application rate treatments for WHC and W-WHC increased by 17.16% and 20.20% respectively. Except for the equal emission rate between W-WHC with low application rate and CKU treatments, hydrochar (WHC, W-WHC) addition reduced the ammonia volatilization from paddy fields when compared with the CKU. Among them, the ammonia volatilization levels from low-application WHC and high-application W-WHC treatments were significantly lower than that from the CKU treatment, reduced by 31.01% and 17.40%, respectively. Based on the analysis of ammonia volatilization during different fertilization stages, the control effect of hydrochar addition on ammonia volatilization was mainly benefited from tillering and panicle fertilizer stages. The change in the nitrogen concentration of surface water at the tillering fertilizer stage and in pH at the panicle fertilizer stage with the addition of hydrochar was the main driving factor for the reduction in ammonia volatilization. The results show that sufficient amounts of hydrochar derived from wheat straw application can increase crop yield while reducing ammonia volatilization from paddy fields. This method provides an effective route for recycling agricultural biowastes.


Assuntos
Amônia , Oryza , Amônia/análise , Fertilizantes/análise , Nitrogênio/análise , Solo , Triticum , Volatilização
4.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 41(12): 5648-5655, 2020 Dec 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33374082

RESUMO

Biochar application on farmlands is an efficient way to realize agricultural/forestry biowaste recycling in parallel with carbon sequestration. Recently, hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonization processes has attracted attention due to the advantages over conventional pyrolytic production (i.e., easier production process, higher carbon yield, reduced energy consumption, and lower flue gas emissions). To clarify the effects of hydrochar applied in farmlands on crop production, as well as to realize the recycling of agricultural/forestry biowaste resources, this study evaluated the effects of four types of modified-hydrochar addition on rice yield and nitrogen uptake in two typical soils and the possible influencing factors through soil-column experiments and material characterization. The results showed that sawdust hydrochar and/or straw hydrochar could increase rice yield and nitrogen uptake, as well as reduce N loss, in both treated soils after physical or biological modification, an effect that was independent of the application rate (5‰, 15‰; mass fraction). In comparison to the control, the rice yield and nitrogen uptake of hydrochar-addition treatments increased by 9.2%-20.7% and 7.7%-17.0% respectively. Sawdust hydrochar, with a wider C/N material, was conducive to improving nitrogen uptake in high fertility soils; meanwhile, the nitrogen utilization in low fertility soils was less affected by the type of hydrochar due to the limitations imposed by multiple factors. The results of material characterization showed that the surface of the hydrochar was rich in nutrients; the pore structure of hydrochar after washing or biological modification was greatly improved, the relative content of C was remarkably reduced, and the relative contents of N and O notably increased, which could affect nutrient fixation and supply. Thus, the improved pore structure and increased contents of N and O of modified hydrochars may be the key drivers for the increase in rice yield and nitrogen uptake with hydrochar addition. These results suggest that modified hydrochar is beneficial to realizing agricultural/forestry biowaste recycling and improving crop yield and nitrogen utilization, as well as reducing N loss from farmlands.


Assuntos
Nitrogênio , Oryza , Agricultura , Carbono , Solo
5.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 40(8): 3746-3752, 2019 Aug 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31854784

RESUMO

Nitrification inhibitor and biochar are commonly used as soil synergists. Among them, nitrification inhibitor can increase crop yields and N use efficiency, while biochar is a relatively new way of using biomass resources and has certain adsorption characteristics. In order to reduce nitrogen loss and environmental pollution caused by ammonia volatilization in paddy fields, a pot experiment with chemical fertilizer application (CN) as a control was conducted to study the effects of biochar (B), nitrapyrin (CP), and compound application (BCP) on pH, NH4+-N concentration dynamics in the flood water, rice yields, and ammonia volatilization from paddy fields. The results showed that the application of these two synergists had no significant effect on rice yields, and the nitrification inhibitors had a tendency to increase rice yields. The two synergists significantly increased ammonia volatilization from paddy fields, accounting for 25%-35% of the total N rate. Ammonia volatilization during periods of fertilizer application accounted for 86%-91% of the total loss, representing the main period of ammonia volatilization. Compared with the CN treatment, the CP treatment increased NH4+-N concentrations in flood water and the loss of ammonia via volatilization, which was increased by 59.18% and mainly occurred during a week after the basal fertilization(138%) and spike fertilization (48%), and non-fertilization stage (78%). Biochar had a promoting effect on ammonia volatilization with typically phased characteristics. The initial increasing effect of biochar on ammonia volatilization was higher than during the later stages, when NH4+-N concentrations and the pH of flood water showed the same trend. In addition, the coupling of nitrification inhibitor and biochar significantly increased the total loss of ammonia via volatilization loss due to the promotion effect of CP and B. The problem of increased ammonia volatilization loss caused by the application of nitrification inhibitors requires further research.

6.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 39(11): 5170-5179, 2018 Nov 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628242

RESUMO

Building a nutrient channel between eutrophic water and agricultural fields could reduce nutrient input into fields and alleviate eutrophication by returning nitrogen. In order to determine the feasibility of returning nitrogen by biochar loading, a rhizobox experiment was conducted with two nitrogen applied methods, namely SN (applied nitrogen by nitrogen fertilizer solution) and BN (applied nitrogen by nitrogen-loaded biochar). The results showed that BN, in comparison with SN, decreased the biomass and nitrogen uptake of the aboveground paddy by 16% and 14%, respectively, increased biomass root-shoot ratios by 25%-27%, and reduced nitrogen recovery use efficiency. Two nitrogen application methods affected the length and volume of paddy adventitious roots. Paddy underground biomass and nitrogen uptake were positively correlated with soil ammonium content, whereas paddy aboveground nitrogen uptake was negatively correlated with root tips. It was suggested that the paddy biomass and nitrogen uptake would be influenced when nitrogen was applied solely by nitrogen-loaded biochar. However, no affinity and no significance in nitrogen use efficiency were found for plant uptake between chemical nitrogen and biochar-loaded nitrogen. Additionally, biochar promoted soil mineral nitrogen content for further plant uptake. Therefore, biochar could be used as the carrier for returning nitrogen from waterbodies to fields. The replacement rate of chemical nitrogen fertilizer is the key to influencing plant growth and needs future study.


Assuntos
Carvão Vegetal , Fertilizantes , Nitrogênio/metabolismo , Oryza/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Raízes de Plantas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Solo/química
7.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 38(12): 5326-5332, 2017 Dec 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964597

RESUMO

In order to reduce the ammonia volatilization in paddy fields, seven treatments were evaluated. These included three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers[sulfur-coated urea (SCU); resin-coated urea (RCU); release bulk blending fertilizer (RBB)], two fertilization modes[single base fertilization (B) and combined with panicle fertilizer (BF)], and conventional split fertilization (CN). The effects of side deep fertilization for slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on ammonia volatilization and surface water nitrogen dynamics were examined using a rice transplanter with a fertilizer sowing mechanism in the Taihu Lake region. The results showed that total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen concentration in the surface water of the SCU treatment in the base period were higher, and those for RCU and RBB were lower than in the CN treatment. The cumulative ammonia volatilization during the whole rice season varied among different types of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers from 3.84% to 28.17% of the total N applied. The nitrogen loss from ammonia volatilization using the three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers was decreased when compared with conventional split fertilization. The ammonia volatilization loss exhibited the following relationship for the treatments:CN, B-SCU > BF-SCU, BF-RBB, BF-RCU, B-RBB, and B-RCU. When the slow-release nitrogen fertilizers were applied in single base fertilization, the total ammonia volatilization for the SCU was significantly higher than those for the RCU and RBB, while no significant differences were detected when these three slow-release fertilizers were combined with panicle fertilizer. Moreover, although the ammonia volatilization of BF-SCU was lower than that of B-SCU, those of BF-RCU and BF-RBB were higher than those with the B-RCU and B-RBB treatments, respectively. There are no significant differences for nitrogen volatilization when any of these three different fertilizers are applied as B or BF. The results for the emissions during ammonia volatilization during different stages indicated that the ammonia volatilization of SCU at the basal-tillering fertilization stage (7.54%) and the tillering-panicle fertilization stage (16.04%) were higher than those of the panicle fertilization-mature stage. The N loss from ammonia volatilization for RBB in the base-tillering fertilization stage (2.91%) increased more than in the tillering-panicle fertilization stage and panicle fertilization-mature stage. For RCU treatment, the highest rate for ammonia volatilization was detected at the panicle fertilization-mature stage (2.75%). Compared with the single base fertilization mode, ammonia volatilization during the panicle fertilization-mature stage was increased when combined with panicle fertilizer (BF) for the slow-release fertilizer. There was no obvious correlation between the N loss with ammonia volatilization for the three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and the concentration of ammonium nitrogen in surface water during the panicle fertilization-mature stage.


Assuntos
Amônia/metabolismo , Fertilizantes , Oryza/metabolismo , Solo/química , Agricultura , Nitrogênio , Volatilização
8.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 37(10): 3963-3970, 2016 Oct 08.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964433

RESUMO

A pot experiment was conducted to study the effect of straw returning and domestic sewage irrigation on the dynamics of NH4+-N concentration and pH in the flood water, and ammonia volatilization of paddy fields. The results showed that the NH4+-N concentration in flood water was significantly increased by wheat straw returning while significantly decreased by domestic sewage irrigation. The cumulative ammonia volatilization in the whole rice season under tap water irrigation and straw removal treatment was 58.29 kg·hm-2, accounting for 24.29% of the total N applied. The N loss ratio of ammonia volatilization was significantly increased to 45.66% by wheat straw returning, while significantly decreased to 17.26% under straw removal and 32.72% under straw returning by domestic sewage irrigation. Significant positive interaction was observed between straw incorporation and domestic sewage irrigation on ammonia volatilization loss. The average N loss from ammonia volatilization during the tillering stage was the highest among the three fertilization stages, accounting for 7.38%-24.44% of the total N applied. In addition, ammonia volatilization fluxes showed a significant positive correlation with the flood water NH4+-N concentration, irrespective of the irrigation water, but had no significant correlation with pH. These results indicated that straw returning increased ammonia volatilization losses, whereas domestic sewage irrigation could effectively reduce ammonia volatilization losses and simultaneously replace 44.41% of chemical nitrogen fertilizer by the N contained in the domestic sewage. The combination of domestic sewage irrigation and straw returning would be an ecological and environmental-friendly measure for rice nitrogen management in Taihu Lake region.


Assuntos
Irrigação Agrícola , Amônia/química , Esgotos , Volatilização , Poluentes Químicos da Água/química , Fertilizantes , Nitrogênio , Oryza , Caules de Planta , Solo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA