Pain and Health-related Quality of Life with Biweekly Versus Triweekly Cabazitaxel Schedule in Older Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Multicenter, Randomized CABASTY Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The CABASTY study showed that more frequent administration of a lower dose of cabazitaxel (CBZ) reduced toxicity in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), without compromising efficacy. Here, we investigated the impact of a biweekly CBZ schedule on patient-reported pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: We randomized 196 patients from 25 centers (1:1, stratified by age and G8 score) to the biweekly CBZ16 (CBZ 16 mg/m2) experimental arm or the triweekly CBZ25 (CBZ 25 mg/m2) control arm (CABASTY study, NCT02961257). We assessed pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 141 patients were available for a pain and 160 for an HRQoL analysis. Median time to pain progression (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-4.22, p = 0.3) and median time to first opiate use (stratified HR: 1.05, CI: 0.44-2.55, p = 0.9) did not differ between arms. We did not see a significant difference in median time to deterioration of FACT-P total score between treatments (stratified HR: 0.88, CI: 0.47-1.7, p = 0.7). Interestingly, the time to onset of several adverse events was significantly longer in the biweekly CBZ16 group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: HRQoL did not significantly differ between the biweekly CBZ16 and the standard schedule. Additionally, onset of some adverse events was delayed. These results may increase health care providers' confidence in using CBZ in older patients with mCRPC who are denied chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are often preferred to taxane chemotherapy as a treatment of second or subsequent line in older metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients due to more frequent treatment-related toxicities. Here, we showed that quality of life and pain did not differ significantly with an adapted schedule of cabazitaxel (CBZ), compared with the standard regimen. This CBZ schedule could increase eligibility of older patients for chemotherapy.

The Benefit of Combining Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized and Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer is Predicted by ERG Expression: An Analysis of Two GETUG Phase 3 Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel has become a standard component of care for advanced prostate cancer (PC); however, its benefits are not universal among patients. A subset of PC cases exhibit TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, resulting in ERG overexpression in tumors. Our aim was to assess biomarkers for docetaxel efficacy in men with hormone-sensitive PC (HSPC). METHODS: Pretreatment prostate biopsies were obtained from participants in two randomized phase 3 clinical trials investigating docetaxel in high-risk localized PC (GETUG 12) and metastatic HSPC (GETUG 15). Immunohistochemistry staining for Ki67, PTEN, RB, and phosphorylated RB was conducted for GETUG 12 samples, and ERG staining for GETUG 12 and GETUG 15 samples. We examined biomarker association with outcomes using univariate and multivariable analyses adjusted for other validated prognostic factors. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among GETUG 12 patients, Ki67 was associated with a worse relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.72; p = 0.0092). A pooled analysis for the two trials (pinteraction = 0.056) revealed that docetaxel-based chemotherapy improved failure-free survival for patients with ERG-positive cancer (HR 0.58; p = 0.03), but not patients with ERG-negative cancer (HR 1.08; p = 0.72). In the ERG-positive subgroup in GETUG 12 (high-risk localized PC), median RFS was 7.79 yr with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, and was not reached with ADT + docetaxel. In the ERG-negative subgroup, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.79 yr with ADT alone versus 7.08 yr with ADT + docetaxel. In the ERG-positive subgroup in GETUG 15 (metastatic HSPC), mPFS was 10.7 mo with ADT alone versus 18.8 mo with ADT + docetaxel. In the ERG-negative subgroup, mPFS was 10.6 mo with ADT alone versus 13.2 mo with ADT + docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ki67 may serve as a prognostic factor in HSPC, while ERG expression appears to predict a response to docetaxel in both high-risk localized and metastatic HSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed factors that could predict outcomes after docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We found that expression of a protein called ERG can predict a good response to docetaxel in these patients.

Assessing Long-term Treatment Benefits Using Complementary Statistical Approaches: An In Silico Analysis of the Phase III Keynote-045 and Checkmate-214 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials.

BACKGROUND: The Keynote-045 trial illustrates that the long-term benefit (LTB) of treatment does not always translate to improved progression-free survival (PFS). Milestone survival and flexible parametric survival model with cure (FPCM) have been proposed as complementary statistical approaches to more comprehensively evaluate LTBs of treatments. OBJECTIVE: The current study compares milestone survival and FPCM analyses to evaluate treatment effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) phase III trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data, from initial and follow-up analyses of Keynote-045 (urothelial cancer) and Checkmate-214 (advanced renal cell carcinoma), were reconstructed for PFS. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Each trial was reanalyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression and two complementary methods (milestone survival and FPCM) to estimate treatment impact on the LTB. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For each trial, there was evidence of nonproportional hazards. For the long-term analysis of the Keynote-045 trial, FPCM identified a time-dependent effect on PFS, but the Cox model found no statistical difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.08). Milestone survival and FPCM identified improvements in the LTB fractions. This was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of Keynote-045, based on the shorter follow-up, although the LTB fraction was not retained. The increase in PFS in Checkmate-214 was identified by both Cox model and FPCM. Experimental treatment-dependent improvement in the LTB fraction was demonstrated using milestone survival and FPCM. The LTB fraction estimated with FPCM was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of the shorter follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Although ICIs show substantial shifts toward LTBs in terms of PFS, based on a conventional Kaplan-Meier or Cox model analysis, our approach provides an alternative assessment of benefit-risk ratios for new therapeutics and facilitates communicating risk to patients. Kidney patients treated with ICIs can be counseled that they are potentially cured, but future work will need to definitively validate this conclusion. PATIENT SUMMARY: Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments show substantial shifts toward long-term benefits in terms of progression-free survival, a more rigorous attempt to quantify this shift, rather than simply using a Kaplan-Meier estimate or comparing progression-free survival curves using the classic Cox model, is warranted. Our results suggest that advanced renal cell carcinoma patients who had not received a previous treatment are functionally cured by nivolumab and ipilimumab, which is not the case for second-line urothelial carcinoma.

Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P = 0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.).

Biweekly vs Triweekly Cabazitaxel in Older Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The CABASTY Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many patients 65 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are denied taxane chemotherapy because this treatment is considered unsuitable. Objective: To determine whether biweekly cabazitaxel (CBZ), 16 mg/m2 (biweekly CBZ16), plus prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at each cycle reduces the risk of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications (eg, febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection, or sepsis) compared with triweekly CBZ, 25 mg/m2 (triweekly CBZ25), plus G-CSF (standard regimen). Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 196 patients 65 years or older with progressive mCRPC were enrolled in this prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted in France (18 centers) and Germany (7 centers) between May 5, 2017, and January 7, 2021. All patients had received docetaxel and at least 1 novel androgen receptor-targeted agent. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (experimental group) or triweekly CBZ25 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (control group). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia measured at nadir and/or neutropenic complications. Results: Among 196 patients (97 in the triweekly CBZ25 group and 99 in the biweekly CBZ16 group), the median (IQR) age was 74.6 (70.4-79.3) years, and 181 (92.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 31.3 (22.5-37.5) months. Relative dose intensities were comparable between groups (median [IQR], 92.7% [83.7%-98.9%] in the triweekly CBZ25 group vs 92.8% [87.0%-98.9%] in the biweekly CBZ16 group). The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications was significantly higher with triweekly CBZ25 vs biweekly CBZ16 (60 of 96 [62.5%] vs 5 of 98 [5.1%]; odds ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08; P < .001). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common with triweekly CBZ25 (70 of 96 [72.9%]) vs biweekly CBZ16 (55 of 98 [56.1%]). One patient (triweekly CBZ25 group) died of a neutropenic complication. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, compared with the standard regimen, biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF significantly reduced by 12-fold the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications, with comparable clinical outcomes. The findings suggest that biweekly CBZ16 regimen should be offered to patients 65 years or older with mCRPC for whom the standard regimen is unsuitable. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02961257.

Design and rationale of a single-arm phase II study of neoadjuvant Durvalumab and Gemcitabine associated with Cisplatin or Carboplatin for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: the iNDUCT trial (NCT04617756).

BACKGROUND: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often locally advanced at initial diagnosis and is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has shown a recurrence-free survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial, while neoadjuvant treatment seems promising in retrospective series. On the contrary, little is known about the role of perioperative immunotherapy and its combination with chemotherapy for UTUC patients, although initial positive results have been published for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS: Against this backdrop, we are running a multi-centre single-arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin or Carboplatin for high-risk UTUC patients. The primary outcome is pathological complete response rate at RNU. Secondary endpoints include the partial pathological response rate, safety, as well as disease-free and overall survival. A biomarker analysis is also planned. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Included patients must have a good performance status and harbour a non-metastatic UTUC, considered at high risk of progression, defined as either biopsy-proven high-grade disease or invasive features at imaging with or, more recently, without high-grade cytology at the multidisciplinary team discretion, as specified in the latest amendment. Enrolled patients receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy before RNU, and the standard of care thereafter. The trial is registered as NCT04617756 and is supervised by an independent data monitoring committee.

Very Long-Term Complete Remission Can Be Achieved in Men With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer and a Very High PSA Value: An Analysis of the GETUG 12 Phase 3 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a well-known prognostic parameter in men with prostate cancer. The treatment of men with very high PSA values and apparently no detectable metastases is not fully established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ancillary analysis from the GETUG 12 phase 3 trial. Patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer by bone and computerized tomography (CT) scan were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel plus estramustine or ADT alone. Relapse-free survival (RFS), clinical RFS, metastases-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for different levels of PSA (50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL). The relationship between PSA and outcomes was studied using residual-based approaches and spline functions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years (range: 0-15.3). Baseline PSA (<50 ng/mL, n = 328; ≥50ng/mL, n = 85) was associated with improved RFS (P = .0005), cRFS (P = .0024), and MFS (P = .0068). The 12-year RFS rate was 46.33% (CI 40.59-51.86), 33.59% (CI 22.55-44.97), and 11.76% (1.96-31.20) in men with PSA values <50 ng/mL (n = 328), 50-100 ng/mL (n = 68), and ≥100 ng/mL (n = 17), respectively. Exploratory analyses revealed no deviation from the linear relationship assumption between PSA and the log hazard of events. CONCLUSIONS: Men with apparently localized prostate cancer and a high baseline PSA value have a reasonable chance of being long-term disease-free when treated with curative intent combining systemic and local therapy.

Innovation in Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancers: Radiochemical Perspective and Recent Therapeutic Practices.

Prostate cancer represents the second cause of death by cancer in males in western countries. While early-stage diseases are accessible to surgery and/or external radiotherapy, advanced metastatic prostate cancers are primarily treated with androgen deprivation therapy, to which new generation androgen receptor antagonists or taxane-based chemotherapies are added in the case of tumor relapse. Nevertheless, patients become invariably resistant to castration with a median survival that rarely exceeds 3 years. This fostered the search for alternative strategies, independent of the androgen receptor signaling pathway. In this line, radionuclide therapies may represent an interesting option as they could target either the microenvironment of sclerotic bone metastases with the use of radiopharmaceuticals containing samarium-153, strontium-89 or radium-223 or tumor cells expressing the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protein found at the surface of prostate cancer cells. This review gives highlights the chemical properties of radioligands targeting prostate cancer cells and recapitulates the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of radionuclide therapies, alone or in combination with other approved treatments, in patients with castration-resistant prostate tumors. It discusses some of the encouraging results obtained, especially the benefit on overall survival that was reported with [177Lu]-PSMA-617. It also addresses the specific requirements for the use of this particular class of drugs, both in terms of medical staff coordination and adapted infrastructures for efficient radioprotection.

Quality of Life with Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have improved the prognosis for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers (la/mUC) but little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with this mode of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of changes in HRQoL global health and domain scores in patients with la/mUC receiving mAb therapies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting databases were searched from January 2015 to June 18, 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were updated on February 3, 2023. Eligible studies were prospective trials assessing HRQoL in patients with la/mUC treated with mAbs. Patients treated for local disease or with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone were excluded. Meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded. The validity of randomized trials was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and the strength of outcome evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The data were analyzed via qualitative synthesis of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 1066 studies identified, nine were included (2364 patients); eight were interventional trials and one was an observational study. The mean change in global health score ranged from -2.8 to 1.9. Constipation, fatigue and pain symptoms, and emotional, physical, role and social functioning improved with treatment in at least two studies. No study demonstrated a significant improvement in global health score. Eight studies reported stability. In the RANGE trial, the global health score decreased. Only two studies had high internal validity according to RoB2 assessment. The HRQoL domain certainty was low, with moderate certainty only for the pain symptom domain. Disease- and treatment-related symptoms, tumor shrinkage, and disease recurrence were correlated to HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Patient HRQoL with mAb therapies for la/mUC did not worsen over time. HRQoL is influenced by several factors related to treatment, tumor characteristics, and the patient's health condition. Evidence was moderate at best and further studies are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the evidence on health-related quality-of-life for patients with advanced bladder cancer treated with antibody therapies. We found that quality of life does not worsen on treatment, and sometimes improves. We conclude that these treatments do not negatively affect quality of life, but further studies are needed to draw solid conclusions.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab, an anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma, after failure or intolerance to sonic Hedgehog inhibitors: UNICANCER AcSé NIVOLUMAB trial.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy. In most cases, BCC has slow progression and can be definitively cured by surgery or radiotherapy. However, in rare cases, it can become locally advanced or, even more rarely, metastatic. The alternative recommended treatments are Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibitors; however, the response is often short-lived. METHODS: This was a phase 2 basket study (NCT03012581) evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in a cohort of 32 advanced BCC patients, enrolled after failure of Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, including 29 laBCC (91%) and 3 mBCC (9%). RESULTS: Compared to previously published studies, our population consisted of severe patients with a poor prognosis because they had already received multiple lines of treatment: all patients received previous Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, 53% of patients already had chemotherapy and 75% radiotherapy. At 12 weeks, we reported 3.1% of complete responses, 18.8% of partial responses, and 43.8% of stable diseases. The best response rate to nivolumab reached 12.5% of complete responses (four patients), 18.8% of partial responses (three patients), and 43.8% of stable diseases (14 patients). Adverse events (AE) were mostly grade 2 or 3, slightly different to the adverse events observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (higher rate of diabetes, no thyroid dysfunction). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab is a relevant therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsing/refractory BCC.

Feasibility and Safety of Single-Probe Cryoablation with Liquid Nitrogen: An Initial Experience in 24 Various Tumor Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cryoablation with liquid nitrogen is a new technique being used in the treatment of some malignant tumors. Our objective was to assess its feasibility in the ablation of tumor lesions of various sizes and locations. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study included all consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation with liquid nitrogen between December 2019 and March 2021. Cryoablation was performed using 10G or 13G cryoprobes. The ablation volume was measured on post-treatment CT or MRI. RESULTS: 22 patients (24 lesions) were included, 16 of whom were men (73%), while median age was 66 years. The lesions were located in the bone (42%), kidney (29%), soft tissue (17%), lung (8%), or liver (4%). It was feasible in all tumor locations and produced median ablation zones 25 mm in width and 35 mm in length, with a 23 min median freezing time. Freezing duration was correlated with the ice volume (p Spearman = 0.02), but not with the ablation volume (p = 0.11). The average difference between the ablation zone and ice ball sizes were -6.4 mm in width and -7.7 mm in length. Both ice and ablation volumes were larger when using the 10G probe as compared to when the 13G was used. No complications were reported. DISCUSSION: We showed that this technique was safe and feasible in all organs tested. The freezing duration was correlated with the ice ball size, but not with the ablation zone.

[Molecular signatures in castration-resistant prostate cancers: An update]. / Signatures moléculaires dans les cancers de la prostate résistants à la castration : état des lieux.

Castration resistant prostate cancers are highly heterogenous at the molecular level. With the use of new generation sequencing technologies, a series of alterations were identified, opening the way for potential alternative treatments that could be more efficient for specific molecular subtypes. In this brief update, we summarize the new targetable pathways that are currently investigated. In this era of liquid biopsy and of precision medicine, it seems pertinent to be able to screen for these alterations on a more systematic basis before initiating any treatment.

[Locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: Identification of barriers and levers of patients' pathway in France]. / Cancer de la vessie localement avancé ou métastatique : identification des freins et leviers du parcours des patients en France.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer is currently ranked as the 8th most common cancer in France. However, the patient care pathway for this cancer is still not well known. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted with fifteen healthcare professionals, ten patients, and five family caregivers between November 2020 and March 2021. The objectives of this survey were to identify the major steps in the care pathway according to the medical, emotional and societal dimensions, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, the associated barriers, and the initiatives to be implemented to improve it. RESULTS: Several barriers were identified at different stages of the overall care pathway, including lack of knowledge of risk factors and warning signs of the disease by the general population and some healthcare professionals, difficulties linked to the announcement consultation, lack of psychological support for patients and their caregivers, and lack of information given about the disease and supportive care. DISCUSSION: These results allowed us to identify three major initiatives which could improve the overall care pathway and the quality of life of patients and their caregivers: 1/implementation of a public awareness campaign on bladder cancer; 2/creation of booklets for patients and their caregivers to provide them with a source of reliable information; and 3/the creation of communication tools between healthcare professionals and patients to facilitate exchanges during consultations.

Cabozantinib-nivolumab sequence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The CABIR study.

Nivolumab and cabozantinib are approved agents in mRCC patients after sunitinib/pazopanib (TKI) failure. However, the optimal sequence, cabozantinib then nivolumab (CN) or nivolumab then cabozantinib (NC), is still unknown. The CABIR study aimed to identify the optimal sequence between CN and NC after frontline VEGFR-TKI. In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected data from mRCC pts receiving CN or NC, after frontline VEGFR-TKI. A propensity score (PrS) was calculated to manage bias selection, and sequence comparisons were carried out with a cox model on a matched sample 1:1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second line to progression in third line (PFS2-3 ). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival from second line (OS2 ). Out of 139 included mRCC patients, 38 (27%) and 101 (73%) received CN and NC, respectively. Overlap in PrS allowed 1:1 matching for each CN pts, with characteristics well balanced. For both PFS2-3 and OS2 , NC sequence was superior to CN (PFS2-3 : HR = 0.58 [0.34-0.98], P = .043; OS2 : 0.66 [0.42-1.05], P = .080). Superior PFS2-3 was in patients treated between 6 and 18 months with prior VEGFR-TKI (P = .019) and was driven by a higher PFSL3 with cabozantinib when given after nivolumab (P < .001). The CABIR study shows a prolonged PFS of the NC sequence compared to CN in mRCC after first line VEGFR-TKI failure. The data suggest that cabozantinib may be more effective than nivolumab in the third-line setting, possibly related to an ability of cabozantinib to overcome resistance to PD-1 blockade.

Nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (BIONIKK): a biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported a 35-gene expression classifier identifying four clear-cell renal cell carcinoma groups (ccrcc1 to ccrcc4) with different tumour microenvironments and sensitivities to sunitinib in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Efficacy profiles might differ with nivolumab and nivolumab-ipilimumab. We therefore aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients according to tumour molecular groups. METHODS: This biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial included patients from 15 university hospitals or expert cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had previously untreated metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of varying sizes to receive either nivolumab or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc1 and ccrcc4 groups), or either a VEGFR-TKI or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 groups). Patients assigned to nivolumab-ipilimumab received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to nivolumab received intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to VEGFR-TKIs received oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks) or oral pazopanib (800 mg daily continuously). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the population who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02960906, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2016-003099-28, and is closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between June 28, 2017, and July 18, 2019, 303 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment (61 to nivolumab, 101 to nivolumab-ipilimumab, 40 to a VEGFR-TKI). In the nivolumab group, two patients were excluded due to a serious adverse event before the first study dose and one patient was excluded from analyses due to incorrect diagnosis. Median follow-up was 18·0 months (IQR 17·6-18·4). In the ccrcc1 group, objective responses were seen in 12 (29%; 95% CI 16-45) of 42 patients with nivolumab and 16 (39%; 24-55) of 41 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·25-1·56]). In the ccrcc4 group, objective responses were seen in seven (44%; 95% CI 20-70) of 16 patients with nivolumab and nine (50% 26-74) of 18 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·78 [95% CI 0·20-3·01]). In the ccrcc2 group, objective responses were seen in 18 (50%; 95% CI 33-67) of 36 patients with a VEGFR-TKI and 19 (51%; 34-68) of 37 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·95 [95% CI 0·38-2·37]). In the ccrcc3 group, no objective responses were seen in the four patients who received a VEGFR-TKI, and in one (20%; 95% CI 1-72) of five patients who received nivolumab-ipilimumab. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were hepatic failure and lipase increase (two [3%] of 58 for both) with nivolumab, lipase increase and hepatobiliary disorders (six [6%] of 101 for both) with nivolumab-ipilimumab, and hypertension (six [15%] of 40) with a VEGFR-TKI. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients in the nivolumab group, 38 (38%) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group, and ten (25%) patients in the VEGFR-TKI group. Three deaths were treatment-related: one due to fulminant hepatitis with nivolumab-ipilimumab, one death from heart failure with sunitinib, and one due to thrombotic microangiopathy with sunitinib. INTERPRETATION: We demonstrate the feasibility and positive effect of a prospective patient selection based on tumour molecular phenotype to choose the most efficacious treatment between nivolumab with or without ipilimumab and a VEGFR-TKI in the first-line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb, ARTIC.

[Development of a therapeutic education program for prostate cancer patients undergoing new generation hormone therapy]. / Élaboration d'un programme d'éducation thérapeutique dédié aux patients atteints d'un cancer de la prostate sous hormonothérapie de nouvelle génération.

New generation hormone therapies (NGHT) is the gold standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancers and/or castration-resistant tumors. Four molecules have been approved: enzalutamide, abiraterone acetate, apalutamide and darolutamide. These treatments are oral therapies taken on a daily basis, which raise issues of adherence to treatment, adverse effects and drug interactions. Therapeutic educational programs for patients represent an emerging care activity that allows patients to acquire skills to better live with their disease and treatment. As of today, no such specific program to new generation hormone therapy in prostate cancer has been developed in France, which was the goal of our current study. This was conducted in three steps: i) identification of patients' educational needs through an exchange with a focus group of patients, ii) gathering of expert opinions on useful information to be given to patients on NGHT via a questionnaire submitted to GETUG members and iii) implementation of the program per se. Qualitative analysis of exchanges with the focus group of patients led to the identification of 7 meaning categories. Expert opinions regarding useful information to deliver to patients identified 13 key items. Based on these preliminary data concerning patients' educational needs, we set up the first french program dedicated to metastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing NGHT that included three therapeutic education workshops: "Experience of the disease", "Management of the treatment" and "Physical activity and diet".

Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Impact of Cisplatin Delivery on Renal Function and Local Control Rate in the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy before surgery is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy modalities have not been precisely defined to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the VESPER trial, patients received after randomization either gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC, 4 cycles) or methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dose dense [dd]-MVAC, 6 cycles). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated before each cycle according to the Cockroft and Gault formula. Definition criteria for local control after neoadjuvant chemotherapy included pathological complete response (ypT0N0), pathological downstaging (

PXR Modulates the Prostate Cancer Cell Response to Afatinib by Regulating the Expression of the Monocarboxylate Transporter SLC16A1.

Resistance to castration is a crucial issue in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Kinase inhibitors (KIs) have been tested as potential alternatives, but none of them are approved yet. KIs are subject of extensive metabolism at both the hepatic and the tumor level. Here, we studied the role of PXR (Pregnane X Receptor), a master regulator of metabolism, in the resistance to KIs in a prostate cancer setting. We confirmed that PXR is expressed in prostate tumors and is more frequently detected in advanced forms of the disease. We showed that stable expression of PXR in 22Rv1 prostate cancer cells conferred a resistance to dasatinib and a higher sensitivity to erlotinib, dabrafenib, and afatinib. Higher sensitivity to afatinib was due to a ~ 2-fold increase in its intracellular accumulation and involved the SLC16A1 transporter as its pharmacological inhibition by BAY-8002 suppressed sensitization of 22Rv1 cells to afatinib and was accompanied with reduced intracellular concentration of the drug. We found that PXR could bind to the SLC16A1 promoter and induced its transcription in the presence of PXR agonists. Together, our results suggest that PXR could be a biomarker of response to kinase inhibitors in castration-resistant prostate cancers.