Implementing SAFER Responses to Misconduct and Responding to Biased Patient Requests ASAP.

Background: In response to encounters involving misconduct, discrimination, and harassment toward healthcare workers, the Experience Training, Education, and Coaching (XTEC) team was tasked with empowering staff members to respond to biased requests and misconduct appropriately and consistently. The aim of this article is to discuss communication strategies for how to respond to patient bias and misconduct. Methods: XTEC developed a training program with two focused communication strategies: (1) SAFER, a stepped approach to respond to patient and visitor misconduct and (2) ASAP, an approach for responding to patient bias which we describe as requests related to race, religion, ethnicity, gender, and other personal attributes of staff. Intervention: SAFER ASAP workshops were delivered to 2154 health care professionals through 109 face-to-face training over a 15-month period between January 2019 and March 2020. All trainings were discussion- and scenario-based, ranging in duration from 60 to 90 min. Participants were given pre- and post-training test case scenarios, in which respondents wrote responses to a challenging behavior to assess skill attainment post-training. Results:Seventy-one percent demonstrated higher levels of response ability post-training, and 92% of respondents indicated they would likely recommend this training to others. Conclusions: SAFER ASAP is an effective communication training program for responding to patient and visitor bias and misconduct.

Computer-Based Patient Bias and Misconduct Training Impact on Reports to Incident Learning System.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of computer-based training (CBT) and leadership communication on incident learning system reports pertaining to institutional policy that targets biased, prejudiced, and racist behaviors of patients and visitors toward health care employees. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mayo Clinic developed a CBT module and comprehensive communication strategy to educate staff on the Patient and Visitor Conduct Policy. Additional goals were to demonstrate leadership endorsement and support of the policy, teach how to report an incident, and facilitate how policy enforcement might occur. Using descriptive statistics, we compared the reporting data before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Participants were 13,980 employees in 68 clinics and 18 hospitals in the US Midwest. Bias and misconduct incidents entered in the incident reporting system increased 312% (n=140 incidents; preintervention, n=34) in the quarter (ie, 3 months) immediately after intervention. The number of incidents in the next quarter stayed increased (234%; n=114) compared with the preintervention number. Secondary debriefing with employees showed the value of the education and the importance of leadership support at the highest level to facilitate comfort in policy enforcement. CONCLUSION: Institutional policy that targets biased, prejudiced, and racist behaviors of patients toward employees in a health care setting can be augmented with employee education and leadership support to facilitate change. The CBT, paired with a robust communication plan and active leadership endorsement and engagement, resulted in increased reporting of biased, prejudiced, and racist behaviors of patients.