[Presentation of the green dialysis guide]. / Présentation du guide de la dialyse verte.

Treatment by dialysis has a high environmental impact. In 2023 the green team of the French Society of Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation has edited guidelines for a green dialysis, which recommendations cover a large range of actions, going from simple behavorial changes to technical and sometimes expensive measures. The editing of the guide has been associated with a plan of diffusion and education with a special effort to raise patient awareness of ecological issues.

The Green Nephrology Group of the SFNDT: initial reflections / Groupe Néphrologie verte de la SFNDT : premières réflexions

Preserving the environment is becoming a universal priority. Human activities must be redesigned to best adapt them to available resources and to reduce their deleterious impact on the planet. The Green Nephrology Group of the "Société française de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation" (SFNDT) has started a reflection on these issues, in particular on dialysis, a vital treatment but with high carbon production, associated with high water consumption. The data available on these points are presented such as, among others, the collection of indicators and action plans, the recycling of waste from water treatment, the reduction of dialysate flow, the reuse and regeneration of spent dialysate as well as calculations of carbon emission by dialysis activity. Architectural experiences are reported as well as the regulatory constraints applying to manufacturers and organizations in the sector. Potential solutions require the mobilization of all stakeholders, ranging from patients to health authorities, including caregivers, pharmacists, technicians, nephrologists and facility managers. They will be formalized very soon in a guide being prepared by the SFNDT Green Nephrology Group.

La préservation de l'environnement devient une priorité universelle. Les activités humaines doivent être repensées pour les adapter au mieux aux ressources disponibles et réduire leur impact délétère sur la planète. Le groupe Néphrologie verte de la Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT) a entamé une réflexion sur ces problématiques, en particulier sur la dialyse, traitement à caractère vital mais à production de carbone élevée, associée à une consommation d'eau importante. Les données disponibles sur ces points sont présentées comme, entre autres, le recueil d'indicateurs et les plans d'action, le recyclage du rejet du traitement d'eau, la réduction de débit du dialysat, la réutilisation et régénération du dialysat usé ainsi que les calculs d'émission de carbone par l'activité de dialyse. Les expériences architecturales sont rapportées de même que les contraintes réglementaires s'appliquant aux industriels et établissements du secteur. Les solutions potentielles nécessitent la mobilisation de tous les acteurs, allant des patients aux autorités de santé, en passant par les soignants, pharmaciens, techniciens, néphrologues et les directions d'établissement. Elles seront formalisées très prochainement dans un guide en cours de préparation par le groupe Néphrologie verte de la SFNDT.

The 2022-2026 Transplantation Plan: objectives and priorities for a new development of kidney transplantation / Le Plan greffe 2022-2026 : objectifs et priorités pour un nouvel essor de la transplantation rénale

The 2022-2026 Transplantation Plan has been launched by the French government to stimulate the activities of organ harvesting and transplantation, after the failure of the previous one. It has been designed by the Biomedicine Agency in collaboration with learning societies, including the SFNDT, and patient associations. The plan is original in its objectives, its regional organization with its driving by the Regional Health Agencies, the involvement of advanced practice nurses and its funding. The ambition is to transplant every transplantable patient. The increase in the number of kidney transplantations, more of all from a living donor, requires the active participation of all the nephrologists, who are the first in delivering information to the patients and their family on advanced chronic kidney disease treatment and living donation.

Le Plan greffe 2022-2026 a été lancé par le Gouvernement pour stimuler le prélèvement et la transplantation rénale, après l'échec du plan précédent. Il a été élaboré par l'Agence de biomédecine en concertation avec les sociétés savantes, dont la Société française de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT), et les associations de patients. Il est original, du fait de ses objectifs concernant l'activité de prélèvement et de transplantation ­ exprimés non pas en données chiffrées mais en couloirs de croissance ­, de son organisation régionale pilotée par les agences régionales de santé, tendant à aligner les niveaux d'activité entre les régions, de l'implication des infirmières de pratique avancée et de son financement. L'ambition est de donner un accès à la greffe à tous les patients transplantables. L'augmentation du nombre de transplantations rénales, en premier lieu à partir d'un donneur vivant, nécessite l'implication de tous les néphrologues, premiers intervenants dans l'information aux patients sur le traitement de l'insuffisance rénale chronique avancée et le don du vivant.

Very Low Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulins Versus Basiliximab in Non-Immunized Kidney Transplant Recipients.

The choice between Basiliximab (BSX) or Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) as induction therapy in non-immunized kidney transplant recipients remains uncertain. Whilst ATG may allow steroid withdrawal and a decrease in tacrolimus, it also increases infectious complications. We investigated outcomes in non-immunized patients receiving a very low dosage of ATG versus BSX as induction. Study outcomes were patient/graft survival, cumulative probabilities of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), infectious episode including CMV and post-transplant diabetes (PTD). Cox, logistic or linear statistical models were used depending on the studied outcome and models were weighted on propensity scores. 100 patients received ATG (mean total dose of 2.0 mg/kg) and 83 received BSX. Maintenance therapy was comparable. Patient and graft survival did not differ between groups, nor did infectious complications. There was a trend for a higher occurrence of a first BPAR in the BSX group (HR at 1.92; 95%CI: [0.77; 4.78]; p = 0.15) with a significantly higher BPAR episodes (17% vs 7.3%, p = 0.01). PTD occurrence was significantly higher in the BSX group (HR at 2.44; 95%CI: [1.09; 5.46]; p = 0.03). Induction with a very low dose of ATG in non-immunized recipients was safe and associated with a lower rate of BPAR and PTD without increasing infectious complications.

A cluster of broadly neutralizing IgG against BK polyomavirus in a repertoire dominated by IgM.

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an opportunistic pathogen, which is only pathogenic in immunosuppressed individuals, such as kidney transplant recipients, in whom BKPyV can cause significant morbidity. To identify broadly neutralizing antibodies against this virus, we used fluorescence-labeled BKPyV virus-like particles to sort BKPyV-specific B cells from the PBMC of KTx recipients, then single-cell RNAseq to obtain paired heavy- and light-chain antibody sequences from 2,106 sorted B cells. The BKPyV-specific repertoire was highly diverse in terms of both V-gene usage and clonotype diversity and included most of the IgM B cells, including many with extensive somatic hypermutation. In two patients where sufficient data were available, IgM B cells in the BKPyV-specific dataset had significant differences in V-gene usage compared with IgG B cells from the same patient. CDR3 sequence-based clustering allowed us to identify and characterize three broadly neutralizing "41F17-like" clonotypes that were predominantly IgG, suggesting that some specific BKPyV capsid epitopes are preferentially targeted by IgG.

One-month humoral response following two or three doses of messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines as primary vaccination in specific populations in France: first results from the Agence Nationale Recherche contre le Sida (ANRS)0001S COV-POPART cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the 1-month humoral response to two or three doses of a messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine as a primary vaccination regimen in specific populations compared with that in healthy adults. METHODS: Agence Nationale Recherche contre le Sida (ANRS)0001S-COV-POPART (NCT04824651) is a French nation-wide, multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort study assessing the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines routinely administered to 11 sub-groups of patients with chronic conditions and two control groups. Patients and controls who received at least two vaccine doses and whose results 1 month after the second dose were available were included. The humoral response was assessed 1 month after the first, second and third doses (if applicable) based on the percentage of responders (positive for anti-Spike severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] IgG antibodies), geometric means of anti-Spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and proportion of participants with anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies (in vitro neutralization assay for the original SARS-CoV-2 strain). All analyses were centralized. RESULTS: We included 4091 participants in this analysis: 2979 participants from specific sub-populations and 1112 controls. Only 522 (17.5%) participants from the specific populations received three doses as a primary vaccination regimen. Patients living with human immunodeficiency virus, cancer and diabetes had high percentages of responders after two doses, whereas patients with solid organ transplants, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants and hypogammaglobulinaemia had the lowest percentage of responders (35.9% [95% CI, 29.2-43.0], 57.4% [95% CI, 48.1-66.3] and 77.1% [95% CI, 65.6-86.3], respectively). In those who received the third dose, the percentage of responders reached 54.2% (95% CI, 42.9-65.2) (vs. 32.3% [95% CI, 16.7-51.4] after 2 doses) among those with solid organ transplants and 73.9% (95% CI, 58.9-85.7) (vs. 56.1% [95% CI, 46.2-65.7] after 2 doses) among those with hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Similar results were found with anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: A lower humoral response to COVID-19 vaccines was observed in the specific populations compared with that in the controls. The third dose of this vaccine in the primary regimen had a positive effect on the percentages of patients who developed anti-Spike IgG antibodies and specific neutralizing antibodies.

Impact of parathyroidectomy on kidney graft function in post-transplant tertiary hyperparathyroidism: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Parathyroidectomy to treat tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT) is now on a par with calcimimetic treatment. The effects of cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy on kidney transplant function remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate kidney transplant function in THPT patients treated either by parathyroidectomy, cinacalcet, or not treated. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 231 patients with functional grafts presenting THPT, defined either by calcaemia superior to 2.5 mmol/L with elevated PTH level or hypercalcaemia with non-adapted PTH level 1 year after kidney transplantation, were included. Hyperparathyroid patients treated by cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy were matched for age, sex, graft rank, and baseline eGFR with cinacalcet-only and untreated patients. Conditional logistic regression models were used to compare eGFR variations 1 year after parathyroidectomy between operated patients and matched controls. Five-year survivals were compared with the Mantel-Cox test. RESULTS: Eleven patients treated with parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet were matched with 16 patients treated by cinacalcet-only and 29 untreated patients. Demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. Estimated odds ratios for eGFR evolution in operated patients compared with cinacalcet-only and untreated patients were 0.92 [95%CI 0.83-1.02] and 0.99 [0.89-1.10] respectively, indicating no significant impairment of eGFR 1 year after surgery. Five-year allograft survival was not significantly impaired in operated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy did not appear to substantially alter or improve graft function 1 year after surgery or 5-year allograft survival. It could be hypothesized that in addition to its known benefits, parathyroidectomy can be safely performed vis-à-vis graft function in tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

Impact of targeted hypothermia in expanded-criteria organ donors on recipient kidney-graft function: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (HYPOREME).

INTRODUCTION: Expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) are used to reduce the shortage of kidneys for transplantation. However, kidneys from ECDs are associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), a risk factor for allograft loss and mortality. HYPOREME will be a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing targeted hypothermia to normothermia in ECDs, in a country where the use of machine perfusion for organ storage is the standard of care. We hypothesise that hypothermia will decrease the incidence of DGF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: HYPOREME is a multicentre RCT comparing the effect on kidney function in recipients of targeted hypothermia (34°C-35°C) and normothermia (36.5°C-37.5°C) in the ECDs. The temperature intervention starts from randomisation and is maintained until aortic clamping in the operating room. We aim to enrol 289 ECDs in order to analyse the kidney function of 516 recipients in the 53 participating centres. The primary outcome is the occurrence of DGF in kidney recipients, defined as a requirement for renal replacement therapy within 7 days after transplantation (not counting a single session for hyperkalemia during the first 24 hours). Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with individual organs transplanted in each group; the number of organs transplanted from each ECD and the vital status and kidney function of the recipients 7 days, 28 days, 3 months and 1 year after transplantation. An interim analysis is planned after the enrolment of 258 kidney recipients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society (CE-SRLF-16-07) on 26 April 2016 and by the competent French authorities on 20 April 2016 (Comité de Protection des Personnes-TOURS-Région Centre-Ouest 1, registration #2016-S3). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented during national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03098706.

Occurrence of De novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Low Despite Immunosuppression Modulation.

Introduction: Decreased immunosuppression has been proposed for kidney transplant recipients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the impact on the alloreactive immune response during and after infection has been poorly investigated. We evaluated the occurrence of antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) (post-COVID-19) and rejection episodes after COVID-19 with particular focus on immunosuppression modulation. Methods: Kidney transplant recipients from 2 French institutions had anti-HLA antibody screening before and after COVID-19. Management of immunosuppression, rejection episodes, COVID-19 severity, inflammatory markers, and antiviral therapies were recorded. Results: From 251 recruited patients, 72 were excluded because of COVID-19-related death (n = 25) and incomplete immunologic follow-up (n = 47). Among the remaining 179 included patients, almost half were hospitalized (49.2%). Antimetabolites were interrupted in 47% of patients (82% in hospitalized, median time of resumption of 23 days and in 15% nonhospitalized, median time of resumption of 7 days). Calcineurin inhibitors were interrupted in 12% of patients (all hospitalized, median time of resumption of 11 days). The incidence of post-COVID-19 DSA was 4% (8% and 0% in hospitalized and nonhospitalized, respectively). Allograft rejection occurred in 3 patients (1.7%) and all were hospitalized. Younger age, transplantation <1 year, and preexisting DSA were more frequently observed in patients with post-COVID-19 DSA, whereas inflammatory markers, lymphopenia, and use of antiviral therapies were not. Conclusion: The incidence of post-COVID-19 DSA among COVID-19-positive kidney transplant recipients was low (4%) despite a significant decrease in immunosuppression and was mainly restricted to high-risk immunologic patient's status. COVID-19 severity was not associated with post-COVID-19 DSA and/or rejection.

Vaccination and COVID-19 Dynamics in Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dialysis patients have a high mortality risk after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and an altered immunologic response to vaccines, but vaccine clinical effectiveness remains unknown in this population. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using Bayesian multivariable spatiotemporal models, we estimated the association between vaccine exposure and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) severe infections (with hospital admission) in dialysis patients from simultaneous incidence in the general population. For dialysis patients, cases were reported within the French end-stage kidney disease REIN registry from March 11, 2020, to April 29, 2021, and vaccine exposure (first dose) was reported in weekly national surveys since January 2021. Cases in the general population were obtained from the national exhaustive inpatient surveillance system (SI-VIC database), and vaccination coverage (first dose) was obtained from the national surveillance system (VAC-SI database). RESULTS: During the first wave, incidence in dialysis patients was approximately proportional to the general population. However, we showed a lower relative incidence for dialysis patients during the second wave (compared with that observed in nondialysis patients), suggesting an effect of prevention measures. Moreover, from the beginning of the vaccination rollout, incidence in dialysis patients was lower compared with predictions based on the first and second waves. Adding vaccination coverages in dialysis and nondialysis patients as predictors allowed the reported cases to be fit correctly (3685 predicted cases, 95% confidence interval, 3552 to 3816, versus 3620 reported). Incidence rate ratios were 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.71) for vaccine exposure in dialysis patients and 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.61) per 10% higher in vaccination coverage in the same-age general population, meaning that vaccine exposure in dialysis patients and the general population was independently associated with lower hospitalization rate of dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that vaccination may yield a protective effect against severe forms of COVID-19 in dialysis patients, despite altered immunologic vaccine responses.

Age-adapted percentiles of measured glomerular filtration in healthy individuals: extrapolation to living kidney donors over 65 years.

OBJECTIVES: Most data on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) originate from subjects <65 years old, complicating decision-making in elderly living kidney donors. In this retrospective multi-center study, we calculated percentiles of measured GFR (mGFR) in donors <65 years old and extrapolated these to donors ≥65 years old. METHODS: mGFR percentiles were calculated from a development cohort of French/Belgian living kidney donors <65 years (n=1,983), using quantiles modeled as cubic splines (two linear parts joining at 40 years). Percentiles were extrapolated and validated in an internal cohort of donors ≥65 years (n=147, France) and external cohort of donors and healthy subjects ≥65 years (n=329, Germany, Sweden, Norway, France, The Netherlands) by calculating percentages within the extrapolated 5th-95th percentile (P5-P95). RESULTS: Individuals in the development cohort had a higher mGFR (99.9 ± 16.4 vs. 86.4 ± 14 and 82.7 ± 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) compared to the individuals in the validation cohorts. In the internal validation cohort, none (0%) had mGFR below the extrapolated P5, 12 (8.2%) above P95 and 135 (91.8%) between P5-P95. In the external validation cohort, five subjects had mGFR below the extrapolated P5 (1.5%), 25 above P95 (7.6%) and 299 (90.9%) between P5-P95. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that extrapolation of mGFR from younger donors is possible and might aid with decision-making in elderly donors.

The spectrum of kidney function alterations in adolescents with a solitary functioning kidney.

BACKGROUND: A precise assessment of glomerular filtration rate is key to delineate the care of children with a solitary functioning kidney (SFK). Data regarding measured GFR (mGFR) in this population is restricted to a single study of 77 individuals, which suggested that a GFR estimation (eGFR) method based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR-CKiD2) performed better than Schwartz's equation (eGFR-Schwartz). METHODS: We measured GFR in 210 consecutive adolescents (7 to 22 years old) with an SFK referred to our institution between 2014 and 2019 and in 43 young candidates for kidney donation (18 to 25 years old). We compared the distribution of mGFR in both groups and determined the factors associated with reduced mGFR in adolescents with an SFK. We further compared different eGFR formulas with mGFR and assessed the association of mGFR and eGFRs with PTH and FGF23, two early indicators of GFR reduction. RESULTS: While adolescents with an SFK had a similar median mGFR to healthy controls (103 ± 24ml/min/1.73m2 vs. 107 ± 12 ml/min/1.73m2), the fraction of individuals with an mGFR below 90 ml/min/1.73m2 was higher in patients with SFK (23% vs. 5% in controls; P = 0.005). Multiple linear regression identified older age, ipsilateral abnormalities of the urinary tract, lack of compensatory hypertrophy, and treated hypertension as independent factors associated with reduced mGFR. A smaller bias using eGFR-Schwartz (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 3 to 7) was revealed when compared to other eGFR. Compared to eGFR-Schwartz, mGFR showed a stronger correlation with PTH (r = 0.04 vs. r = 0.1) and FGF23 (r = 0.03 vs. r = 0.05). CONCLUSION: SFK is not a benign condition, since 20% of the patients display altered kidney function. Our results raise caution regarding the use of the cystatin-based equation. mGFR shows a better ability than eGFR-Schwartz to differentiate patients showing early homeostatic adaptation to GFR reduction.