Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
6.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 6(1): e000439, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31258922

RESUMO

Introduction: The Its Not JUST Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Study (INJUSTIS) is a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. The aims of this study are to identify genetic, serum and other biomarkers that may identify specific molecular mechanisms, reflecting disease endotypes that are shared among patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis regardless of aetiology. Furthermore, it is anticipated that these biomarkers will help predict fibrotic activity that may identify patterns of disease behaviour with greater accuracy than current clinical phenotyping. Methods and analysis: 200 participants with the multidisciplinary team confirmed fibrotic lung disease (50 each of rheumatoid-interstitial lung disease (ILD), asbestosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and unclassifiable ILD) and 50 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis participants, recruited as positive controls, will be followed up for 2 years. Participants will have blood samples, lung function tests, quality of life questionnaires and a subgroup will be offered bronchoscopy. Participants will also be given the option of undertaking blinded home handheld spirometry for the first 3 months of the study. The primary end point will be identification of a biomarker that predicts disease progression, defined as 10% relative change in forced vital capacity (FVC) or death at 12 months. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Committee Nottingham (18/EM/0139). All participants must provide written informed consent. The trial will be overseen by the INJUSTIS steering group that will include a patient representative, and an independent chairperson. The results from this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at regional and national conferences. Trial registration number: NCT03670576.


Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alveolite Alérgica Extrínseca/sangue , Alveolite Alérgica Extrínseca/diagnóstico , Alveolite Alérgica Extrínseca/genética , Asbestose/sangue , Asbestose/diagnóstico , Asbestose/genética , Biomarcadores/análise , Estudos de Coortes , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/sangue , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/genética , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Espirometria , Adulto Jovem
7.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 79(4): 221-224, 2018 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29620991

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Operation notes are often poorly completed, potentially compromising patient care. This project was undertaken to improve the quantity, quality and clarity of information included in operation notes, and make them easier to locate within a set of patient notes. METHODS: Operation notes were audited against standards laid out in national guidelines. The time taken for staff to locate an operation note, and information within it, was then measured. The layout was re-designed, followed by a re-audit. RESULTS: The number of operation notes with all measured domains completed rose from 4% to 34% (P<0.001). The mean time to locate the operation note fell from 30 to 4 seconds, and the mean time to locate all requested pieces of information within the operation note fell from 35 to 20 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The interventions have improved quality and speed of access of operation notes, but there is still room for improvement.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Documentação/métodos , Documentação/normas , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA