Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 19(8): 976-982, 2017 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28013270

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In its fiscal year 2015 final rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) required reporting of tobacco treatment quality measures as part of the Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System (IPF PPS). This pre-intervention, post-intervention policy analysis evaluates the impact of that policy at a large academic medical center that opted to improve performance as it implemented reporting measures. METHODS: Electronic medical record data were collected retrospectively for all adult (≥18 years) inpatient psychiatric admissions from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Data from admissions were analyzed to determine changes in the provision of tobacco treatment including the proportions of patients screened for tobacco use, receiving tobacco cessation counseling, and receiving tobacco cessation medication(s) using a chi-square test. Covariate analysis of treatment differences based on psychiatric diagnosis was analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Breslow-Day test. RESULTS: Post-policy screening for admissions increased significantly (85% vs. 97%; p < .001). Referral to cessation counseling increased 18-fold (4% vs. 74%; p < .001). Receipt of Counselling (8% vs. 67%; p < .001) and referral for cessation medication (32% vs. 68%; p < .001) also increased dramatically. Though statistically non-significant, the number of tobacco users who actually received medications increased markedly between 2014 and 2015, 24% versus 35%. Gains in screening, referral, and treatment did not differ by psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program resulted in a 10-fold increase in the number of smokers who received inpatient tobacco treatment. Should CMS link prospective payment to performance, it could have a major impact on quality of care for tobacco dependence. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to examine the implementation and impact of new 2015 IPFQR program tobacco measures. This study may illustrate the potential effect that performance based penalties can have should facilities be required to do more than simply report on these tobacco measures. This study exemplifies the impact these new reporting measures can have when psychiatric facilities move beyond letter of the policy, to continually assess organizational performance and implement changes to improve treatment delivery.


Assuntos
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar , Adulto , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/terapia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 42(5): 219-24, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27066925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most persons living with HIV smoke cigarettes and tend to be highly dependent, heavy smokers. Few such persons receive tobacco treatment, and many die from tobacco-related illness. Although advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have increased the quality and quantity of life, the health harms from tobacco use diminish these gains. Without cessation assistance, thousands will benefit from costly ART, only to suffer the consequences of tobacco-related disease and death. A study was conducted to examine in detail inpatient tobacco treatment for smokers with HIV. METHODS: Data collected at hospital admission and data collected by tobacco treatment specialists were examined retrospectively for all inpatients with HIV who were admitted to an academic medical center for a five-year period. Specifically, the prevalence of cigarette smoking, factors predictive of referral to tobacco treatment, referral for tobacco treatment, treatment participation, and abstinence at six months posttreatment were measured. Differences in referral and treatment participation between all smokers and smokers with HIV were also assessed. RESULTS: Among the 422 admitted persons with HIV, 54.5% smoked and 21.7% were referred to inpatient tobacco treatment services. Substance abuse and tobacco-related diagnoses were predictive of referral to inpatient tobacco treatment specialists. Among the 14 treatment participants reached for follow-up, 11 (78.6%) made quit attempts and 3 (21.4%) reported abstinence. Smokers with HIV were less likely to be referred to and treated by tobacco treatment services than all smokers admitted during the same time frame. CONCLUSIONS: Although tobacco is a major cause of mortality, few smokers with HIV are offered treatment during hospitalization. Those who are treated attempt to quit. Hospitalization offers a prime opportunity for initiating smoking cessation among those with HIV.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , Pacientes Internados , Melhoria de Qualidade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Kansas , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 71(17): 1469-79, 2014 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25147171

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The impact of an innovative medication reconciliation and discharge education program on 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits was evaluated. METHODS: An observational pre-post analysis was conducted at an academic medical center to compare rates of hospital readmissions and return to ED visits during three-month periods before and after implementation of a restructured pharmacy practice model including (1) medication reconciliation at transitions of care for every patient and discharge education for a high-risk subgroup, (2) new or expanded services in the preanesthesia testing clinic and ED, (3) a medication reconciliation technician team, and (4) pharmacist-to-patient ratios of 1:30 on acute care floors and 1:18 on critical care units. The primary outcome was the composite of rates of readmissions and return to ED visits within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: A total of 3,316 patients were included in the study. Pharmacy teams completed medication reconciliation in 95.8% of cases at admission and 69.7% of cases at discharge. Discharge education was provided to 73.5% of high-risk patients (defined as those receiving anticoagulation therapy or treatment for acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia). No significant difference was observed between the preimplementation and postimplementation groups with regard to the primary outcome. In the high-risk subgroup, there was a significant reduction in the 30-day rate of hospital readmissions, which declined from 17.8% to 12.3% (p=0.042); cost projections indicated that this reduction in readmissions could yield annual direct cost savings of more than $780,000. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a team-based pharmacy practice model resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of 30-day readmissions for high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Reconciliação de Medicamentos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA