Pain in the aftermath of trauma is a risk factor for post-traumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Identifying risk factors for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is important for understanding and ultimately preventing the disorder. This study assessed pain shortly after traumatic injury (i.e. peritraumatic pain) as a risk factor for PTSD. METHOD: Participants (n=115) were patients admitted to a Level 1 Surgical Trauma Center. Admission to this service reflected a severe physical injury requiring specialized, emergent trauma care. Participants completed a pain questionnaire within 48 h of traumatic injury and a PTSD diagnostic module 4 and 8 months later. RESULTS: Peritraumatic pain was associated with an increased risk of PTSD, even after controlling for a number of other significant risk factors other than acute stress disorder symptoms. An increase of 0.5 s.d. from the mean in a 0-10 pain rating scale 24-48 h after injury was associated with an increased odds of PTSD at 4 months by more than fivefold, and at 8 months by almost sevenfold. A single item regarding amount of pain at the time of hospital admission correctly classified 65% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: If these findings are replicated in other samples, high levels of peritraumatic pain could be used to identify individuals at elevated risk for PTSD following traumatic injury.

Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review.

BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes following lung injury have been reported using "lung sparing" techniques. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter 4-year review of patients who underwent lung resection following injury was performed. Resections were categorized as "minor" (suture, wedge resection, tractotomy) or "major" (lobectomy or pneumonectomy). Injury severity, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients (28 blunt, 115 penetrating) underwent lung resection after sustaining an injury. Minor resections were used in 75% of cases, in patients with less severe thoracic injury (chest AIS scores "minor" 3.8 +/- 0.9 vs. "major" 4.3 +/- 0.7, p = 0.02). Mortality increased with each step of increasing complexity of the surgical technique (RR, 1.8; CI, 1.4-2.2): suture alone, 9% mortality; tractotomy, 13%; wedge resection, 30%; lobectomy, 43%; and pneumonectomy, 50%. Regression analysis demonstrated that blunt mechanism, lower blood pressure at thoracotomy, and increasing amount of the lung resection were each independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Blunt traumatic lung injury has higher mortality primarily due to associated extrathoracic injuries. Major resections are required more commonly than previously reported. While "minor" resections, if feasible, are associated with improved outcome, trauma surgeons should be facile in a wide range of technical procedures for the management of lung injuries.

Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Construction of gastrointestinal anastomoses utilizing stapling devices has become a familiar procedure. In elective surgery, studies have shown no significant differences in complications between stapled and sutured anastomoses. Controversy has recently arisen regarding the accurate incidence of complications associated with anastomoses in the trauma patient. The objective of this multi-institutional study was to determine whether the incidence of postoperative complications differs between stapled and sutured anastomoses following the emergent repair of traumatic bowel injuries. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, all trauma registry records from five Level I trauma centers over a period of 4 years were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients with 289 anastomoses were identified. A surgical stapling device was used to create 175 separate anastomoses, while a hand-sutured method was employed in 114 anastomoses. A complication was defined as an anastomotic leak verified at reoperation, an intra-abdominal abscess, or an enterocutaneous fistula. The mean abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score and Injury Severity Score were similar in the two cohort groups. Stapling and suturing techniques were evenly distributed in both small and large bowel repairs. Seven of the total 175 stapled anastomoses and none of the 114 hand-sewn anastomoses resulted in a clinically significant leak requiring reoperation (RR = undefined, 95% CI 1.08-infinity, p = 0.04). Each anastomotic leak occurred in a separate individual. Nineteen stapled anastomoses and four sutured anastomoses were associated with an intra-abdominal abscess (RR = 2.7, 95% CI 0.96-7.57, p = 0.04). Enterocutaneous fistula formation was not statistically associated with either type of anastomoses (stapled cohort = 3 of 175 and sutured cohort = 2 of 114). Overall, 22 (13%) stapled anastomoses and 6 (5%) sutured anastomoses were associated with an intra-abdominal complication (RR = 2.08, 95% CI 0.89-4.86, p = 0.076). CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leaks and intra-abdominal abscesses appear to be more likely with stapled bowel repairs compared with sutured anastomoses in the injured patient. Caution should be exercised in deciding to staple a bowel anastomosis in the trauma patient.

Multiinstitutional experience with the management of superior mesenteric artery injuries.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injuries are rare and often lethal injuries incurring very high morbidity and mortality. The purposes of this study are to review a multiinstitutional experience with these injuries; to analyze Fullen's classification based on anatomic zone and ischemia grade for its predictive value; to correlate the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for abdominal vascular injury with mortality; and to identify independent risk factors predictive of mortality, describing current trends for the management of this injury in America. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective multiinstitutional study of patients sustaining SMA injuries involving 34 trauma centers in the US over 10 years. Outcomes variables, both continuous and dichotomous, were analyzed initially with univariate methods. For the subsequent multivariate analysis, stepwise logistic regression was used to identify a set of risk factors significantly associated with mortality. RESULTS: There were 250 patients enrolled, with a mean Revised Trauma Score (RTS) of 6.44 and a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25. Surgical management consisted of ligation in 175 of 244 patients (72%), primary [corrected] repair in 53 of 244 patients (22%), autogenous grafts were used in 10 of 244 (4%), and prosthetic grafts of PTFE in 6 of 244 patients (2%). Overall mortality was 97 of 250 patients (39%). Mortality versus Fullen's zones: zone I, 39 of 51 (76.5%); zone II, 15 of 34 (44.1%); zone III, 11 of 40 (27.5%); and zone IV, 25 of 108 (23.1%). Mortality versus Fullen's ischemia grade: grade 1, 22 of 34 (64.7%). Mortality versus AAST-OIS for abdominal vascular injury: grade I, 9 of 55 (16.4%); grade II, 13 of 51 (25.5%); grade III, 8 of 20 (40%); grade IV, 37 of 69 (53.6%); and grade V, 17 of 19 (89.5%). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for mortality the following: transfusion of greater than 10 units of packed RBCs, intraoperative acidosis, dysrhythmias, injury to Fullen's zone I or II, and multisystem organ failure. CONCLUSION: SMA injuries are highly lethal. Fullen's anatomic zones, ischemia grade, and AAST-OIS abdominal vascular injuries correlate well with mortality. Injuries to Fullen's zones I and II, Fullen's maximal ischemia grade, and AAST-OIS injury grades IV and V, high-intraoperative transfusion requirements, and presence of acidosis and disrhythmias are significant predictors of mortality. All of these predictive factors for mortality must be taken into account in the surgical management of these injuries.

Perceived threat to life predicts posttraumatic stress disorder after major trauma: risk factors and functional outcome.

BACKGROUND: The importance of psychological morbidity after major trauma, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), is continuing to gain attention in trauma outcomes research. The Trauma Recovery Project is a large prospective epidemiologic study designed to examine multiple outcomes after major trauma, including quality of life (QoL) and PTSD. The specific objectives of the present report are to examine risk factors for PTSD and to assess the impact on QoL at the 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up time points in the Trauma Recovery Project population. METHODS: Between December 1, 1993, and September 1, 1996, 1,048 eligible trauma patients triaged to four participating trauma center hospitals in the San Diego Regionalized Trauma System were enrolled in the study. The enrollment criteria for the study included age 18 years and older, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or greater, and length of stay > 24 hours. QoL was measured after injury using the Quality of Well-being scale, a sensitive index to the well end of the functioning continuum (range, 0 = death to 1.000 = optimum functioning). Early symptoms of acute stress reaction (SASR) at discharge were assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (score > 30 = SASR). PTSD at 6-month follow-up was diagnosed using standardized Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, criteria. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge. RESULTS: PTSD was diagnosed in 32% (261 of 824) patients at 6-month follow-up. Perceived threat to life predicted PTSD onset (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; p < 0.01) and early SASR (OR, 2.2; p < 0.001). PTSD was more frequent in women (39%) than in men (29%) and in younger low-income patients. Other major risk factors were penetrating trauma (OR, 2.3; p < 0.001) and assaults (OR, 1.5; p < 0.05). PTSD had a major impact on QoL at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up (Quality of Well-being scale score: 6 months, 0.576 vs. 0.658; 12 months, 0.620 vs. 0.691; 18 months, 0.620 vs. 0.700; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results provide new and provocative evidence that perceived threat to life and mechanism predict PTSD after major traumatic injury. PTSD had a prolonged and profound impact on short- and long-term outcome and QoL.

Severe traumatic brain injury from unmotorized scooter.

The popularity and use of unmotorized, foot-propelled scooters has risen dramatically in the last few years. Increasing reports of traumatic injuries from these scooters have paralleled their commercial sales and success in this country and worldwide. We report a case of a previously healthy 48-year-old woman who suffered a severe traumatic brain injury while riding one of these scooters, resulting in a devastating neurologic outcome and permanent vegetative state. This case emphasizes the importance of public awareness regarding the potential dangers and the need for appropriate precautions and protective gear when riding these recreational devices.

Hypertonicity rescues T cells from suppression by trauma-induced anti-inflammatory mediators.

Trauma causes the release of anti-inflammatory factors thought to cause infections by inhibiting T cells. We have found that hypertonic saline (HS) enhances functions of normal T cells. Here we studied if HS can rescue T cells from suppression by costimulating interleukin (IL)-2 production. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were treated with the immunosuppressive factors IL-4, IL-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta(1), and PGE(2) and with serum of trauma patients and stimulated with phytohemagglutinin, and IL-2 production was measured. Costimulation with HS tripled IL-2 production of normal cells. IL-4, IL-10, TGF-beta(1), and PGE(2) suppressed IL-2 production with IC(50) of 500, 1, 36,000, and 0.01 pg/ml, respectively. Costimulation of suppressed cells with HS restored IL-2 production and increased IC(50) values >70-fold. Serum from trauma patients could completely suppress normal cells; however, costimulation with HS restored IL-2 production by up to 80% of the control response. These findings show that HS can restore the function of suppressed T cells, suggesting that HS resuscitation of trauma patients could reduce posttraumatic sepsis.

Importance of evaluating organ parenchyma during screening abdominal ultrasonography after blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of screening ultrasonography for parenchymal abnormalities as well as free fluid during screening abdominal ultrasonography in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: A total of 2693 patients with blunt trauma who were triaged to a level 1 trauma center underwent screening abdominal ultrasonography in the resuscitation suite. Examinations were performed by experienced sonographers and included a screen for free intraperitoneal fluid and evaluation of the abdominal organ parenchyma and heart for traumatic injury. Screening ultrasonographic findings were reviewed and compared with findings from autopsy, laparotomy, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomography, repeated ultrasonography, cystography, and clinical outcome. Imaging studies of all patients with confirmed or suspected injuries were reviewed to identify those in whom parenchymal findings aided diagnosis. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients were found to have evidence of abdominal injury due to blunt trauma on the basis of clinical data, imaging, laparotomy, or autopsy. Forty-four of these patients had no sonographic evidence of hemoperitoneum at the time of initial ultrasonography. Screening ultrasonographic findings were positive for injury in 19 of 44 patients on the basis of parenchymal findings or small retroperitoneal collections of fluid thought to be indicative of trauma. In the remaining 25 patients, screening ultrasonography showed no abnormalities, and injuries were detected by repeated ultrasonography, subsequent computed tomography, or diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed for suspected occult injury on the basis of clinical parameters. In addition, 47 of 126 injured patients with sonographically detected free fluid had parenchymal findings that helped localize injury. Sixteen of those patients were taken to the operating room on the basis of clinical and sonographic findings without undergoing computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: The inability to show injuries with no hemoperitoneum or with delayed hemoperitoneum has been shown to be a limitation of ultrasonography in patients with blunt trauma. In our series, 26% of all patients with documented injuries had no free fluid visible on screening ultrasonography Attention to findings other than free fluid allowed detection in 43% of injured patients without sonographic evidence of hemoperitoneum.

Timing of urgent thoracotomy for hemorrhage after trauma: a multicenter study.

HYPOTHESIS: It is possible to quantify an amount of thoracic hemorrhage, after blunt and penetrating injury, at which delay of thoracotomy is associated with increased mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. SETTING: Five urban trauma centers. STUDY SELECTION: Patients undergoing urgent thoracotomy (within 48 hours of injury) for hemorrhage (excluding emergency department thoracotomy). DATA EXTRACTION: Respective registries identified patients who underwent urgent thoracotomy. Injury characteristics, initial and subsequent chest tube outputs, time before thoracotomy, and outcomes were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients (36 with blunt and 121 with penetrating injuries) underwent urgent thoracotomy for hemorrhage between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998. Mortality correlated with mean (+/- SD) Injury Severity Score (38 +/- 19 vs 22 +/- 12.6 for survivors; P<.01) and mechanism (24 [67%] for blunt vs 21 [17%] for penetrating injuries; P<.01). Mortality increased as total chest blood loss increased, with the risk for death at blood loss of 1500 mL being 3 times greater than at 500 mL. Blunt-injured patients waited a significantly longer time to thoracotomy than penetrating-injured patients (4.4 +/- 9.0 h vs 1.6 +/- 3.0 h; P =.02) and also had a greater total chest tube output before thoracotomy (2220 +/- 1235 mL vs 1438 +/- 747 mL; P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for death increases linearly with total chest hemorrhage after thoracic injury. Thoracotomy is indicated when total chest tube output exceeds 1500 mL within 24 hours, regardless of injury mechanism.

Irreversible shock is not irreversible: a new model of massive hemorrhage and resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Existing shock models do not address the patient with massive hemorrhage (> 1 blood volume). Such patients often die from irreversible shock. This model simulates the clinical scenario of massive hemorrhage and resuscitation (MHR) to determine if irreversible shock can be reversed. METHODS: Lewis rats were bled at a rate of 1 estimated blood volume (EBV) per hour for 2 hours with simultaneous infusion of resuscitation mixture (RM) consisting of red blood cells and crystalloid. Blood pressure was maintained at a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 50 mm Hg during the 2 hours of hemorrhage. Hemorrhage was stopped and resuscitation continued for 1 hour until 6, 8, or 10 x EBV of RM was infused. Control animals were subjected to a traditional fixed pressure hemorrhage to MAP of 50 mm Hg for 2 hours followed by resuscitation to MAP > 90 mm Hg for 1 hour with crystalloid alone. Two-week survival was compared using a chi2 test. RESULTS: Control animals (n = 13) were hemorrhaged 48% +/- 5% of EBV and had a mortality rate of 23%. MHR animals had severity and duration of hypotension identical to that of controls but were hemorrhaged 214% +/- 8% of EBV. Despite receiving 390 mL/kg of RM and a final hematocrit of 37%, 14 of 15 animals resuscitated with 6 x EBV died from "irreversible" shock (mortality, 93%; p < 0.001 vs. controls). When very large volumes of resuscitation were used, survival rates improved significantly. The 10 x EBV group received 120% of lost red blood cells and 530 mL/kg of crystalloid and had 64% survival at 2 weeks (p < 0.01 vs. 6 x EBV group). CONCLUSION: This MHR model is much more lethal than a traditional severe hemorrhage model and reproduces the clinical picture of irreversible shock. This irreversible shock can be reversed with very large volumes of resuscitation.

Patterns of fluid accumulation on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: comparison with site of injury.

The objectives of this study were to define where fluid accumulation is shown on screening ultrasonography after blunt abdominal trauma and to determine how fluid accumulation patterns are associated with the site of injury. From 1994 to 1998, 2,693 screening examinations for blunt abdominal trauma were performed, in which 7 regions were examined for fluid. On the basis of a preliminary analysis of patients with solitary injuries, all 194 patients with sonographically detected fluid were grouped by fluid accumulation pattern. Fluid patterns were compared with sites of injury. The patterns differed between hepatic and splenic injuries. Fluid in the left upper quadrant, in both upper quadrants, or diffusely distributed suggested splenic injury, whereas fluid in the right upper quadrant or the right upper quadrant and lower recesses suggested hepatic injury (P < .0001). Fluid accumulation was random after enteric injury. Patients with extraperitoneal injury had no fluid or had fluid focally at the injury site. The ability to predict the injury site on the basis of fluid patterns should expedite treatment of hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Quantification of fluid on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: a simple scoring system to predict severity of injury.

A simple ultrasonographic method of fluid quantification, which counted the number of fluid recesses, was developed to predict the severity of injury after blunt abdominal trauma. From 1994 to 1998, 2,693 screening ultrasonographic examinations were performed for blunt abdominal trauma. Of this group, 2,499 patients had a fluid score of 0 (no fluid), and 1.4% had injuries (0.4% requiring surgery); 110 had a score of 1 (fluid in a single examined region), and 59% had injuries (13% requiring surgery); 33 had a score of 2, and 85% had injuries (36% requiring surgery); 30 had a score of 3, and 83% had injuries (63% requiring surgery); and 21 had a score of 4, and 95% had injuries (81 % requiring surgery). Patients with scores of 3 or greater had significantly higher rates of injury (P < .002) and injury requiring surgery (P < .0001) than patients with lower scores. The ability to predict injury severity on the basis of a simple ultrasonographic scoring system should expedite treatment of patients with severe trauma.

The impact of major in-hospital complications on functional outcome and quality of life after trauma.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of major in-hospital complications on functional outcome in the short- and long-term period after serious injury. The Trauma Recovery Project (TRP) is a large, prospective, epidemiologic study designed to examine multiple outcomes after major trauma, including quality of life and functional limitation. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge. The specific objectives of the present report are to examine the effect of postinjury complications on functional outcomes at discharge and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up time points in the TRP population. METHODS: Between December 1, 1993, and September 1, 1996, 1,048 eligible trauma patients triaged to four participating trauma center hospitals in the San Diego Regionalized Trauma System were enrolled in the study. The enrollment criteria for the study included age 18 years or older; admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or greater; and length of stay greater than 24 hours. Quality of life was measured after injury using the Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale, a sensitive index to the well end of the functioning continuum (range, 0 [death] to 1.000 [optimum functioning]). Major in-hospital complications were assessed for 820 patients and were coded as pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematologic, infections, renal, musculoskeletal, neurologic, and vascular, on the basis of standardized codes used in the Trauma Registry. RESULTS: Major in-hospital complications were present in 83 (10.1%) patients. Discharge QWB scores were significantly lower in patients with major complications (0.394 vs. 0.402, p < 0.05). QWB scores were also significantly lower at 6-month follow-up in patients with major complications (0.575 vs. 0.637, p < 0.0001). Types of major complications with significantly lower 6-month follow-up QWB scores were pulmonary, gastrointestinal, infections, and musculoskeletal. Patients with major complications also had significantly lower 12-month (0.626 vs. 0.674, p < 0.01) and 18-month (0.646 vs. 0.681, p < 0.05) follow-up QWB scores. Pulmonary major complications and infections were associated with significantly lower QWB scores at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results provide new evidence that major in-hospital complications may have an important impact on functional outcomes after major trauma.

The importance of gender on outcome after major trauma: functional and psychologic outcomes in women versus men.

BACKGROUND: Outcome after major trauma is an increasingly important focus of injury research. The effect of gender on functional and psychological outcomes has not been examined. The Trauma Recovery Project is a large, prospective, epidemiologic study designed to examine multiple outcomes after major trauma, including quality of life, functional outcome, and psychological sequelae such as depression and early symptoms of acute stress reaction. The specific objectives of the present report are to examine gender differences in short- and long-term functional and psychological outcomes in the Trauma Recovery Project population. METHODS: Between December 1, 1993, and September 1, 1996, 1,048 eligible trauma patients triaged to four participating trauma center hospitals in the San Diego Regionalized Trauma System were enrolled in the study. The enrollment criteria for the study included age 18 years and older, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or greater, and length of stay greater than 24 hours. Quality of life was measured after injury using the Quality of Well-being scale, a sensitive index to the well end of the functioning continuum (range, 0 = death to 1.000 = optimum functioning). Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale and early symptoms of acute stress reaction were assessed using the Impact of Events scale. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge. RESULTS: Functional outcome was significantly worse at each follow-up time point in women (n = 313) versus men (n = 735). Quality of Well-being scale scores were markedly and significantly lower at 6-month follow-up in women compared with those in men (0.606 vs. 0.646, p < 0.0001). This association persisted at 12-month (0.637 vs. 0.6685, p < 0.0001) and 18-month (0.646 vs. 0.6696, p < 0.0001) follow-up. Women were also significantly more likely to be depressed at all follow-up time points (discharge odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, p < 0.05; 6-month follow-up OR = 2.2, p < 0.01; 12-month follow-up OR = 2.0, p < 0.01; 18-month follow-up OR = 2.2, p < 0.01) and to have early symptoms of acute stress reaction at discharge (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05). These differences remained significant and independent after adjusting for injury severity, mechanism, age, and sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: Women are at risk for markedly worse functional and psychological outcomes after major trauma than men, independent of injury severity and mechanism. Gender differences in short- and long-term trauma outcomes have important implications for future studies of recovery from trauma.

Us of blunt abdominal trauma: importance of free pelvic fluid in women of reproductive age.

PURPOSE: To assess the importance of free fluid and to determine the accuracy of screening ultrasonography (US) in female patients of reproductive age with trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US was performed in 1,047 patients, aged 10-60 years, to evaluate blunt trauma. Patients were retrospectively assigned to groups on the basis of presence and location of intraperitoneal free fluid. Injury and surgical injury rates were assessed by comparing US results with computed tomographic, repeat US, cystographic, peritoneal lavage, surgical, and/or autopsy findings in 144 patients and with final clinical outcome in 903. US scans were positive if fluid was outside the cul-de-sac or if suspicious parenchymal abnormalities were present. RESULTS: In 939 patients, no fluid was seen: Eight had injuries; three were surgical. In 56, anechoic fluid was isolated to the cul-de-sac: Two had injuries; one was surgical. In 26, fluid was isolated to the upper abdomen: Fifteen had injuries; five were surgical. In 22, fluid involved the pelvis and abdomen: Nineteen had injuries; 14 were surgical. In four, questionable fluid was isolated to the supravesical space. Patients with fluid in the cul-de-sac had similar injury and surgical injury rates as those with no fluid but had lower rates than those of patients with fluid elsewhere (P<.02 to P<.001). US screening had 89% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 97% accuracy, a 61% positive predictive value, and a 99% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: In female patients of reproductive age with trauma, free fluid isolated to the cul-de-sac is likely physiologic; clinical follow-up should suffice. Patients with fluid elsewhere usually have clinically important injury and require further evaluation.

Blunt abdominal trauma: screening us in 2,693 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of screening abdominal ultrasonography (US) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent US. The abdomen and pelvis were scanned for free fluid, the visceral organs were assessed for heterogeneity, and duplex US was performed if necessary. Empty bladders were filled with 200-300 mL of sterile saline through a Foley catheter. US findings were considered positive if free fluid was present or if parenchymal abnormalities that could be consistent with trauma were detected. Screening US results were compared with findings of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, repeat US, computed tomography (CT), cystography, surgery, and/or autopsy and/or the clinical course. RESULTS: Findings from 2,693 US examinations were evaluated and were positive in 145 of 172 patients with injuries (sensitivity, 84%) and 64 (89%) of 72 patients who ultimately underwent laparotomy with surgical repair of injuries. False-negative findings were retroperitoneal injury, bowel injury, and intraperitoneal solid organ injury without hemoperitoneum. No patient with false-negative findings died. Specificity of US was 96% (2,429 of 2,521 patients), and overall accuracy was 96% (2,574 of 2,693 patients). Positive predictive value was 61% (145 of 237 patients), and negative predictive value was 99% (2,429 of 2,456 patients). CONCLUSION: Abdominal US is useful in screening for injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, and its use represents a notable change in institutional practice. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is rarely performed, and CT is used when screening US findings are positive, when injury is clinically suspected despite negative US findings, or when US is not available.

Anatomic exposures for vascular injuries.

The exposure of vascular injuries is contingent on knowledge of anatomy and the limitations and boundaries for proximal and distal control of each artery. In this article, these are conveniently organized into arteries of the neck, of the chest, of the abdomen, and of the extremities. In addition, the interface between the neck and chest, and the chest and the abdomen provide particular challenges because of the need to expose two body regions frequently. The anatomy, the points of proximal and distal control, the details of exposure, and the key maneuvers required to expose particular arteries are reviewed.

Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: We present our experience in the management of penetrating pancreatic injuries, focusing on factors related to complications and death. METHODS: Retrospective trauma registry-based analysis of 62 consecutive patients with penetrating pancreatic injuries during an 11-year period. Overall injury severity was assessed by the injury severity score (ISS) and the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI). Pancreatic injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scaling (OIS). Complications were characterised using standardised definitions. Mortality was recorded as early (within 48 h after admission) and late (after 48 h). RESULTS: Thirty patients suffered gunshot wounds and 24 had grade I pancreatic injuries. Shotgun and gunshot wounds were more destructive than stab wounds (higher PATI, number of intraabdominal injuries and mortality). Seventeen patients died. Most deaths occurred within 1 h after admission due to massive bleeding and severe associated injuries. Only one death was potentially related to the pancreatic injury. Mortality rate also correlated with pancreatic injury grading. Sixty-one patients had associated intraabdominal injuries. Combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries were present in 13 patients, and five died. Simple drainage was the most common procedure performed. Pancreas-related complications were found in 12 out of 47 patients who survived more than 48 h; intraabdominal abscess (n=7) that was associated with colon injuries, and pancreatic fistula (n=5). CONCLUSION: An approach based on injury grade and location is advised. Routine drainage is recommended; distal resection is indicated in the presence of main duct injury, and the management of severe injuries will be tailored according to the overall physiologic status, presence of associated injuries, and duodenal viability. Morbidity and mortality is mainly due to associated injuries.

Outcome after major renovascular injuries: a Western trauma association multicenter report.

BACKGROUND: Major renal vascular injuries are uncommon and are frequently associated with a poor outcome. In addition to renal dysfunction, posttraumatic renovascular hypertension may result, although the true incidence of this complication is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe the factors contributing to outcome after major renovascular trauma. We hypothesized that the highest percentage of renal salvage would be achieved by minimizing the time from injury to repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review over a 16-year period conducted at six university trauma centers of patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV/V renal injuries surviving longer than 24 hours. Postinjury renal function with poor outcome was defined as renal failure requiring dialysis, serum creatinine greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL, renal scan showing less than 25% function of the injured kidney, postinjury hypertension requiring treatment, or delayed nephrectomy. Data collected for analysis included demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of shock, presence of hematuria, associated injuries, type of renal injury (major artery, renal vein, segmental artery), type of repair (primary vascular repair, revascularization, observation, nephrectomy), time from injury to definitive renal surgery, and type of surgeon performing the operation (urologist, vascular surgeon, trauma surgeon). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria; 49% were injured from blunt mechanisms. Patients with blunt injuries were 2.29 times more likely to have a poor outcome compared with those with penetrating injuries. Similarly, the odds ratio of having a poor outcome with a grade V injury (n = 32) versus grade IV (n = 57) was 2.2 (p = 0.085). Arterial repairs had significantly worse outcomes than vein repairs (p = 0.005). Neither the time to definitive surgery nor the operating surgeon's specialty significantly affected outcome. Ten percent (nine patients) developed hypertension or renal failure postoperatively: three had immediate nephrectomies, four had arterial repairs with one intraoperative failure requiring nephrectomy, and two were observed. Of the 20 good outcomes for grade V injuries, 15 had immediate nephrectomy, 1 had a renal artery repair, 1 had a bypass graft, 1 underwent a partial nephrectomy, and 2 were observed. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with a poor outcome following renovascular injuries include blunt trauma, the presence of a grade V injury, and an attempted arterial repair. Patients with blunt major vascular injuries (grade V) are likely to have associated major parenchymal disruption, which contributes to the poor function of the revascularized kidney. These patients may be best served by immediate nephrectomy, provided that there is a functioning contralateral kidney.