Making a Difference: Affective Distress Explains Discrepancy Between Objective and Subjective Cognitive Functioning After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between subjective cognitive symptoms and objective cognitive test scores in patients after concussion. We additionally examined factors associated with subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction, as well as their discrepancy. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six individuals (65.1% female; 74.4% adult) from an interdisciplinary concussion clinic. METHODS: Subjective and objective cognitive functioning was measured via the SCAT-Symptom Evaluation and the CNS Vital Signs Neurocognition Index (NCI), respectively. Cognitive discrepancy scores were derived by calculating standardized residuals (via linear regression) using subjective symptoms as the outcome and NCI score as the predictor. Hierarchical regression assessed predictors (age, education, time postinjury, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, affective distress, and sleep disturbance) of cognitive discrepancy scores. Nonparametric analyses evaluated relationships between predictor variables, subjective symptoms, and NCI. RESULTS: More severe affective and sleep symptoms (large and medium effects), less time postinjury (small effect), and older age (small effect) were associated with higher subjective cognitive symptoms. Higher levels of affective distress and less time since injury were associated with higher cognitive discrepancy scores (ß = .723, P < .001; ß = -.204, P < .05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Clinical interpretation of subjective cognitive dysfunction should consider these additional variables. Evaluation of affective distress is warranted in the context of higher subjective cognitive complaints than objective test performance.

Exploratory study of sport-related concussion effects on peripheral micro-RNA expression.

OBJECTIVE: Explore changes in micro-RNA (miRNA) expression in blood after sport-related concussion (SRC) in collegiate athletes. METHODS: Twenty-seven collegiate athletes (~41% male, ~75% white, age 18.8 ± 0.8 years) provided both baseline and post-SRC blood samples. Serum was analyzed for expression of miR-153-3p (n = 27), miR-223-3p (n = 23), miR-26a-5p (n = 26), miR-423-3p (n = 23), and miR-let-7a-5p (n = 23) at both time points via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Nonparametric analyses were used to compare miRNA expression changes between baseline and SRC and to evaluate associations with clinical outcomes (symptom severity, cognition, balance, and oculomotor function, and clinical recovery time). RESULTS: Participants manifested a significant increase in miRNA expression following SRC for miR153-3p (Z = -2.180, p = .029, 59% of the participants increased post-SRC), miR223-3p (Z = -1.998, p = .046, 70% increased), and miR-let-7a-5p (Z = -2.190, p = .029, 65% increased). There were no statistically significant associations between changes in miRNA expression and clinical test scores, acute symptom severity, or clinical recovery time. CONCLUSION: MiR-153-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-let-7a-5p were significantly upregulated acutely following SRC in male and female collegiate athletes compared to baseline levels, though several athletes demonstrated no change or a decrease in expression. The biological mechanisms and functional implications of the increased expression of these circulating miRNA are unclear and require more research, as does their relevance to clinical outcomes.