Patient perceptions of a comprehensive cancer navigation service.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the extent to which comprehensive navigation augments the provincial health system for meeting the needs of newly-diagnosed cancer patients (clients). We also assessed reactions of attending physicians to comprehensive navigation. METHODS: Clients who completed navigation as an employee benefit or through membership in an insurance organization were polled to determine whether they needed help beyond that provided by the provincial health system and the extent to which that help was provided by navigation. Exit interviews were analyzed for perceptions of the clients about reactions by their attending physicians to navigation. RESULTS: Of eligible clients, 72% responded. They reported needing help beyond that which the provincial system could provide in 64%-98% of specified areas. Navigation provided help in more than 90% of those cases. Almost all respondents (98%) appreciated having a designated oncology nurse navigator. Family doctors were perceived to be positive or neutral about navigation in 100% of exit interviews. Oncologists were positive or neutral in 92% (p < 0.001 for difference from family doctors). CONCLUSIONS: In many areas, cancer patients need additional help beyond that which the provincial health system can provide. Comprehensive cancer navigation provides that help to a considerable extent. Clients perceived the reactions of attending physicians to comprehensive navigation to be generally supportive or neutral.

Dosage parameters in chemotherapy of breast cancer.

The concept of dose intensity provides a starting point for studying dose-response relationships. The summation dose intensity method (SDI) is an improvement over previous methods of calculating dose intensity because it accounts for differences in drug activity and allows the dose intensity of combinations containing the different drugs to be compared on one scale. It may also ultimately prove useful in defining the contribution of cumulative dose and dose size. Results from initial randomized trials testing dose intensification in breast cancer suggested but did not confirm its importance because dose size and cumulative dose were usually increased concurrently. Results from several recent trials in which dose intensity was increased while cumulative dose was held constant suggest that dose intensity may not be pre-eminent, but that both dosage parameters affect outcome. In addition, there may be a threshold dose intensity that must be exceeded before treatment causes tumor regression. From both retrospective analyses and prospective trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, it is clear that the subsets of patients who benefit most from dosage increases are those with poor prognostic factors. Larger dose sizes contribute more toxicity but, within the conventional range, probably contribute little independent therapeutic benefit. In contrast, reduced size doses of non-antimetabolites given at very short intervals may reduce acute toxicity, maintain dose intensity above threshold, and allow delivery of larger cumulative amounts of chemotherapy. This dose dense strategy may produce results superior to the use of fewer but larger doses.

Oral sequelae of chemotherapy: an important teaching opportunity for oncology health care providers and their patients.

The object of this work was to conduct a rapid assessment of a teaching hospital's promotion of optimal oral health among its chemotherapy patients. A pilot study was undertaken, which included focus interviews with oncology clinic staff, a review of the fellowship training curriculum, and unobtrusive observations in the clinic setting. Charts were also audited for oncology patients who were probable chemotherapy candidates. A review of the data offered no evidence that oral health care was routinely addressed in a preventive context prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. Promotion of oral health care will help reduce the risk of oral sequelae of chemotherapy for patients and the subsequent impact of the oral sequelae on patients' chemotherapeutic regimen, thereby improving patients' chances of survival and improving their quality of life. Other teaching hospitals may wish to conduct a similar rapid assessment to determine whether they too could improve patient care and professional education in this area by incorporating pre-chemotherapy oral health evaluation and treatment into routine care for cancer patients.

The relationship between high-dose treatment and combination chemotherapy: the concept of summation dose intensity.

The most important variables for the clinical use of antitumor agents (AAs) are dose and combination chemotherapy. The objectives of this study were to analyze the relationship between these two variables and to propose a unified conceptual framework for the construct and interpretation of clinical trials. Definitions and variables with respect to dose include potency, therapeutic index, standard dose, efficacy, relative efficacy, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose rate, dose density, dose intensity, and fractional dose intensity. Our overarching concept, that is, summation dose intensity (SDI), was calculated in several ways, depending upon the nature of the data, and included the relative efficacy method, the unit regimen method, and the high dose method. The SDI concept was then applied to disease categories and strategies to determine its usefulness and effectiveness in integrating dose and combinations. The tumors and settings were: mustargen-vincristine-procarbazine-prednisone in Hodgkin's disease, combination chemotherapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia in children, metastatic breast cancer including dose and combinations, selected other solid tumors, alternating chemotherapy, and high dose studies in the leukemias and lymphomas. SDI was effective in integrating and quantifying dose and combination chemotherapy. For classical AAs, the implication of SDI for the construct and analysis of clinical trials was emphasized. In addition to new drug development, emphasis should be given to reducing or eliminating DLTs, such as those of the marrow, now and, in the future, those of the gastrointestinal tract toxicity and other DLTs. The above was derived from and applies to the classical AAs. Whether they will apply to, with appropriate adjustment, agents with significantly different dose-response curves, such as biotherapeutics and hormonal agents, remains to be determined.

A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity.

PURPOSE: To construct a single scale for comparing the dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First-line single-agent trials in metastatic disease were reviewed. The unit dose-intensity (UDI) that was required to produce a 30% complete response plus partial response (CR + PR) rate was determined for each drug. Randomized trials were then analyzed that prospectively tested dose-intensity. The dose-intensities of the drugs in each arm were expressed as fractions of their UDIs and added together. This yielded each arm's summation dose-intensity (SDI), which was then correlated with treatment outcomes. RESULTS: In the single-agent trials, dose-response relationships were linear when the studies covered a range of dose-intensities. In the randomized trials that tested dose-intensity in metastatic disease, response rates and median survival correlated linearly with the SDIs of the treatment arms. An increment of one SDI unit increased CR + PR rate by approximately 30%, CR rate by 10%, and median survival by 3.75 months. Metastatic disease trials were negative if the difference between the arms was less than 0.54 SDI units. Adjuvant trials that tested a dose-intensity difference of less than 0.65 SDI units were also negative. CONCLUSION: A single-agent dose-response database can be derived from historic literature that enables comparison of the dose-intensity of all combination regimens on one scale. The dose-intensity increase required to improve outcome can then be identified in earlier trials that tested that variable. SDI methodology should be tested prospectively in contemporary patients, and may be useful in guiding dosage increases beyond the conventional range.

Feasibility of a randomized trial of a high-vegetable diet to prevent breast cancer recurrence.

Epidemiologic evidence supports the concept that diet influences risk for breast cancer and suggests that prognosis after the diagnosis of breast cancer may also be related to modifiable nutritional factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a randomized trial of a high-vegetable, reduced-fat, and increased-fiber diet intervention to reduce risk for recurrence among breast cancer survivors. This major change in dietary pattern was promoted through intensive telephone counseling. Participants were 93 women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer (stages I, II, and IIIA) within the previous four years and who had completed their initial treatment. We assessed adherence to the study diet using repeated 24-hour dietary recalls at 6 and 12 months and measurement of circulating carotenoid concentrations. Six months after randomization, the intervention group had significantly increased their mean intake of vegetables (+4.6 servings/day), fruit (+0.7 servings/day), and fiber (+6.4 g/1,000 kcal) and significantly reduced their intake of dietary fat (-9.9% of energy) compared with the control group. Circulating concentrations of carotenoids also increased in the intervention group. These changes persisted at the 12-month visit. Results of this study demonstrate that telephone counseling can be a useful approach in diet intervention and that breast cancer survivors can adopt and maintain a high-vegetable, reduced-fat dietary pattern.

"Decadose" effects of cisplatin on squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. II. Clinical studies.

There is evidence that solid tumors rapidly acquire cellular resistance to cisplatin. This resistance is usually mild to moderate and could be circumvented with higher concentrations of drug exposure if ancillary methods were available to avoid systemic cytotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a tenfold increase in dose (decadose) would overcome cisplatin resistance. In a clinical trial, response effects of cisplatin at dose intensities ranging from 32.5 to 200 mg/m2 per week, which were delivered by highly selective intra-arterial infusions with a simultaneously administered intravenous neutralizing agent, were measured in 31 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT). The overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] to cisplatin therapy at dose intensity intervals of 0 to 74, 75 to 149, and 150 to 200 mg/m2 per week were 45.5%, 72.7%, and 100%, respectively. The average received dose intensities for nonresponders and responders (CR and PR) were 57.8 and 120.7 mg/m2 per week, respectively (P = .031). The results indicate that resistance to standard doses of cisplatin by SCC of the UADT, both previously untreated and recurrent, can be substantially overcome with "decadose" cisplatin therapy. Progress toward improving survival of patients with head and neck cancer, and possibly other site-specific malignancies, may be achieved by incorporating decadose cisplatin therapy into a multimodality treatment plan.

Importance of multiagent chemotherapy regimens in ovarian carcinoma: dose intensity analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the previous meta-analysis of dose intensity (dosage) of chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer, we analyzed data on cyclophosphamide, altretamine (hexamethylmelamine), doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Only cisplatin showed statistically significant association of complete and partial clinical response with dose intensity. PURPOSE: This analysis updates the previous results and further characterizes response to cisplatin alone or in multiagent regimens. METHODS: We analyzed data from 18 regimens containing platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) that were used in nine new randomized trials, in addition to data from the 60 groups of patients in our previous study in which responses were reported. Relative dose intensity was calculated as a fraction of the dosage of a drug in the standard regimen of cyclophosphamide, altretamine, doxorubicin, and platinum (CHAP). We performed single and multiple regression analyses to determine the relationship between disease outcome and relative dose intensity for cyclophosphamide, platinum, and doxorubicin alone or in combination. RESULTS: The association between outcome and dose intensity for platinum alone or in multiagent regimens was statistically significant. This association was of borderline significance for cyclophosphamide alone but was not significant for this drug in multiagent regimens. There were insufficient data to test the relationship for doxorubicin as a single agent, but in multiagent regimens, the relationship was borderline (P = .05). Multiagent regimens containing platinum produced greater response rates than platinum alone for any fixed, planned relative dose intensity for platinum. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support other published findings that use of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin increases the efficacy of single-agent platinum. Relative dose intensity values for cyclophosphamide used alone were larger than those used in multiagent regimens, which might explain why the relationship between relative dose intensity and outcome for cyclophosphamide was not significant for use in multiagent regimens. Similarly, none of the multiagent regimens incorporated doxorubicin at a relative dose intensity for which the drug is found to be effective as a single agent. IMPLICATIONS: Prospective clinical trials are required to test the effect of higher relative dose intensity for doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide added to platinum in advanced ovarian cancer. An important element in the design of prospective trials will be to test for the relative importance of dose intensity versus total dose. This testing is best achieved in a three-arm study design such as that reported in adjuvant treatment of stage II breast cancer conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

The role of dose intensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

To determine whether the dose intensity of chemotherapeutic regimens correlates with the complete remission rate in adult patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma, reports of comparative trials of therapy were reviewed. Reports were identified using MEDLINE, through references from review articles, and through review of selected abstracts. Twenty-two studies including 14 randomized and eight cohort trials were analyzed to assess projected dose intensity. Four other studies were analyzed to assess the role of received dose intensity. Dose intensities were calculated using described methods and correlated with complete remission rates. Individual trials were assessed using "levels of evidence." A metaanalysis of randomized trials and a cross-trial analysis of all comparative trials using a weighted least squares linear regression were performed. Using levels of evidence, support was obtained for the hypothesis that dose intensity correlates with the remission rate from two trials in which dose intensity was "indirectly" tested. As these studies did not "directly" test dose intensity, confounding variables, including those arising from the assumptions made in calculating dose intensity, cannot be excluded. Metaanalysis showed a relative probability of achieving complete remission of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.58) favoring the pooled arm of high dose intensity. Cross-trial analysis showed a relatively weak association between dose intensity and remission rate (r = .49, P = .0001). Two of four reports retrospectively assessing received dose intensity suggested that increased dose intensity is associated with superior remission rates. These analyses suggest that dose intensity may correlate with the remission rate in advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma. However, properly designed trials directly testing dose intensity have not been performed and are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

A randomized trial comparing 12 weeks versus 36 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer.

A randomized trial has been performed in which women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were allocated to either a short intensive 12-week chemohormonal treatment consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, vincristine, prednisone, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and tamoxifen (CMFVP plus AT) or 36 weeks of CMFVP. The median follow-up is 37 months. Of the 222 women randomized to the 12-week treatment, 113 (50.9%) have experienced either recurrence or death as compared with 90 patients (41.9%) in the 36-week treatment group. The corresponding 3-year relapse-free survivals are 55% and 64%, respectively, P = .003. Fifty-nine (26.6%) of the patients in the 12-week group have died compared with 46 (21.4%) of the 36-week group. The corresponding 3-year survival rates are 78% and 85%, respectively, P = .04. A Cox regression analysis showed an associated increased risk ratio for recurrence or death of 1.7, P = .003, and for death of 1.8, P = .017 in the 12-week treatment group compared with the 36-week group. Thus, this 12-week regimen of adjuvant chemohormonal therapy is inadequate treatment for women with axillary node-positive breast cancer; possible explanations for this inferiority are its shorter duration and/or a negative interaction of tamoxifen on the chemotherapy.