Recommendations for Tumor Mutational Burden Assay Validation and Reporting: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, College of American Pathologists, and Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been recognized as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in several tumor types. Several laboratories offer TMB testing, but there is significant variation in how TMB is calculated, reported, and interpreted among laboratories. TMB standardization efforts are underway, but no published guidance for TMB validation and reporting is currently available. Recognizing the current challenges of clinical TMB testing, the Association for Molecular Pathology convened a multidisciplinary collaborative working group with representation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the College of American Pathologists, and the Society for the Immunotherapy of Cancer to review the laboratory practices surrounding TMB and develop recommendations for the analytical validation and reporting of TMB testing based on survey data, literature review, and expert consensus. These recommendations encompass pre-analytical, analytical, and postanalytical factors of TMB analysis, and they emphasize the relevance of comprehensive methodological descriptions to allow comparability between assays.

Molecular and Morphologic Characterization of Intraductal Tubulopapillary Neoplasms of Pancreas with Novel Potentially Targetable Fusions.

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs) are rare pancreatic tumors with distinct histological and molecular features. Distinction of ITPN from other pancreatic neoplasms is crucial given the known favorable prognosis and the high frequency and diversity of potentially targetable fusions in ITPN. While the histological features of ITPN are well documented, there are few reports on the cytological features, and molecular characterization of ITPN. The authors reported three cases diagnosed in their laboratory between 2016 and 2021. Clinical data, cytomorphological and histological features, with immunophenotypic and molecular characterizations of these cases are described and compared with those reported in the literature. All 3 cases were diagnosed as ITPN based on the microscopic presence of intraductal nodules composed of tightly packed small tubular glands lined by cuboidal cells lacking apparent mucin. On molecular profiling KRAS and TP53 variants were found in Case 1, FGFR2-INA fusion in Case 2, and STARD3NL-BRAF fusion was detected in Case 3. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed that the neoplastic cells in Case 1 were MUC2 positive and MUC6 negative, but in Cases 2 and 3, were negative for MUC2 and positive for MUC6. These results demonstrate the immunophenotypic and molecular variabilities of histologically similar pancreatic neoplasms. The absence of alterations characteristic of more common pancreatic neoplasms should prompt the consideration of fusion studies in morphologically relevant cases. The combination of morphological, IHC, and molecular analyses is important for reliable identification of ITPN given its potential clinical management implications.

Molecular Methods: Clinical Utilization and Designing a Test Menu.

Pre-analytical factors in molecular oncology diagnostics are reviewed. Issues around sample collection, storage, and transport that might affect the stability of nucleic acids and the ability to perform molecular testing are addressed. In addition, molecular methods used commonly in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including newer technologies such as next-generation sequencing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction, as well as their applications, are reviewed. Finally, we discuss considerations in designing a molecular test menu to deliver accurate and timely results in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Clinical Utility and Reimbursement of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Testing for Myeloid Malignancies.

Next-generation sequencing is becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with established or suspected myeloid malignancies. These tests are being incorporated into clinical practice guidelines and many genetic alterations now constitute disease classification criteria. However, the reimbursement for these tests is uncertain. This study analyzed the clinical impact, ordering practices, prior authorization, and reimbursement outcomes of 505 samples from 477 patients sequenced with a 50-gene myeloid next-generation sequencing panel or a 15-gene myeloproliferative neoplasm subpanel. Overall, 98% (496 of 505) of tests provided clinically useful data. Eighty-nine percent of test results, including negative findings, informed or clarified potential diagnoses, 94% of results informed potential prognoses, and 19% of tests identified a potential therapeutic target. Sequencing results helped risk-stratify patients whose bone marrow biopsy specimens were inconclusive for dysplasia, monitor genetic evolution associated with disease progression, and delineate patients with mutation-defined diagnoses. Despite the clinical value, prior authorization from commercial payors or managed government payors was approved for less than half (45%) of requests. Only 51% of all cases were reimbursed, with lack of medical necessity frequently cited as a reason for denial. This study demonstrates the existence of a substantial gap between clinical utility and payor policies on test reimbursement.

Benchmarking bioinformatics approaches for tumour mutational burden evaluation from a large cancer panel against whole-exome sequencing.

Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is used to predict response to immunotherapies. Although several groups have proposed calculation methods for TMB, a clear consensus has not yet emerged. In this study, we explored TMB calculation approaches with a 586-gene cancer panel (1.75 Mb) benchmarked to TMB measured by whole-exome sequencing (WES), using 30 samples across a range of tumour types. We explored variant allelic fraction (VAF) cut-offs of 5% and 10%, population database filtering at 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.000025, as well as different combinations of synonymous, insertion/deletion and intronic (splice site) variants, as well as exclusion of hotspot mutations, and examined the effect on TMB correlation. Good correlation (Spearman, range 0.66-0.78) between WES and panel TMB was seen across all methods evaluated. Each method of TMB calculation evaluated showed good positive per cent agreement and negative per cent agreement using 10 mutations/Mb as a cut-off, suggesting that multiple TMB calculation approaches may yield comparable results.

Analytical Principles of Cancer Next Generation Sequencing.

This article covers analytical principles of cancer next generation sequencing (NGS). Cancer samples require special considerations due to the cancer-specific applications of testing, as well as cancer sample specific issues, including low input, low tumor purity, or fixation-related artifacts. Laboratories typically use a combination of approaches around specimen processing, assay design, and bioinformatics analysis to allow for successful detection of actionable biomarkers. Examples of these approaches for cancer NGS testing are discussed and reviewed here.

Pineal region ganglioglioma: A neoplasm with a bimodal age distribution.

Background: Gangliogliomas arise very rarely in the pineal region, where their natural histories and pathologic features are poorly understood. Case Description: In this report, we describe a 36-year-old woman who presented with a seizure followed by worsening headache, dizziness, confusion, and intermittent left facial numbness over the next few weeks. A head CT scan showed a partially calcified pineal region mass with hydrocephalus. After an endoscopic third ventriculostomy, the patient underwent a resection of the tumor that contained dysplastic ganglion cells and piloid glial cells. Molecular profiling of this CNS WHO Grade 1 ganglioglioma revealed polysomies of chromosomes 7 and 9, and a BUB1 variant of uncertain significance, without known MAP kinase pathway alterations. From a review of the literature, we found two distinct age distributions for pineal ganglioglioma, with modes at 1 and 36 years of age. Conclusion: Although very rare, this tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pineal region tumors in children and young adults.

Pan-tumor screening for NTRK gene fusions using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and RNA NGS fusion panel testing.

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS.

Investigation of discrepant mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability polymerase chain reaction test results for gynecologic cancers using next-generation sequencing.

Gynecologic cancers are routinely screened for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for microsatellite instability (MSI) to enable selection of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and screen for Lynch syndrome. The limited data that compare IHC and MSI in endometrial tumors have shown discordance rates of 5-10%. We reviewed MMR/MSI results in gynecologic cancers and used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to interrogate discrepancies. Of the 328 cases with both IHC and MSI results, 256 (78.0%) were microsatellite stable (MSS) with preserved MMR (pMMR), 64 (19.5%) cases were MSI-High (MSI-H) with MMR deficient (dMMR), 2 cases showed subclonal loss of MLH1 and PMS2 with MSI-H, and 6 cases were discordant. Overall, there was a 98.2% (322/328) IHC/MSI concordance. Discordant cases were retested and/or subject to NGS. Of the six discrepant cases, five showed dMMR with MSS and one showed pMMR with MSI-H. One dMMR/MSI-L case showed loss of PMS2 with a germline pathogenic mutation. The pMMR/MSI-H case was found to harbor pathogenic variants in MLH1 and MSH6. One of the two cases with subclonal populations demonstrated MSI-H in the dMMR area and MSS in the pMMR area. These results emphasize the importance of selecting the appropriate tumor tissue for both IHC and molecular testing and demonstrate that NGS can help resolve discrepant MMR and MSI results.

Molecular Methods: Clinical Utilization and Designing a Test Menu.

Pre-analytical factors in molecular oncology diagnostics are reviewed. Issues around sample collection, storage, and transport that might affect the stability of nucleic acids and the ability to perform molecular testing are addressed. In addition, molecular methods used commonly in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including newer technologies such as next-generation sequencing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction, as well as their applications, are reviewed. Finally, we discuss considerations in designing a molecular test menu to deliver accurate and timely results in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Diffuse midline glioma with novel, potentially targetable, FGFR2-VPS35 fusion.

We report a case of a slow-growing, diffuse, infiltrating glioma in the right brainstem of a 9-yr-old boy. The tumor was negative by immunohistochemical staining for histone H3 K27M, BRAF V600E, and IDH1 R132H mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization did not reveal a BRAF duplication. Genomic profiling of the tumor, by DNA methylation array and cancer whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing, was performed. This analysis showed copy-number alterations, including gains of several chromosomes. In addition, a novel fusion involving the first 17 exons of FGFR2 fused to exon 2 of VPS35 was identified. This novel fusion is predicted to result in activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling and is potentially targetable using FGFR inhibitors. This tumor expands the spectrum of pediatric diffuse gliomas.

Clinical Utilization, Utility, and Reimbursement for Expanded Genomic Panel Testing in Adult Oncology.

PURPOSE: The routine use of large next-generation sequencing (NGS) pan-cancer panels is required to identify the increasing number of, but often uncommon, actionable alterations to guide therapy. Inconsistent coverage and variable payment is hindering NGS adoption into clinical practice. A review of test utilization, clinical utility, coverage, and reimbursement was conducted in a cohort of patients diagnosed with high-risk cancer who received pan-cancer panel testing as part of their clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Columbia Combined Cancer Panel (CCCP), a 467-gene panel designed to detect DNA variations in solid and liquid tumors, was performed in the Laboratory of Personalized Genomic Medicine at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Utilization was characterized at test order. Results were reviewed by a molecular pathologist, followed by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board where clinical utility was classified by consensus. Reimbursement was reviewed after payers provided final coverage decisions. RESULTS: NGS was performed on 359 high-risk tumors from 349 patients. Reimbursement data were available for 246 cases. The most common reason providers ordered CCCP testing was for patients diagnosed with a treatment-resistant or recurrent tumor (n = 214; 61%). Findings were clinically impactful for 229 cases (64%). Molecular alterations that may inform future therapy in the event of progression or relapse were found in 42% of cases, and a targeted therapy was initiated in 23 cases (6.6%). The majority of tests were denied coverage by payers (n = 190; 77%). On average, insurers reimbursed 10.75% of the total NGS service charge. CONCLUSION: CCCP testing identified clinically impactful alterations in 64% of cases. Limited coverage and low reimbursement remain barriers, and broader reimbursement policies are needed to adopt pan-cancer NGS testing that benefits patients into clinical practice.

Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Interrater Agreement of Variant Classification Based on the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer.

This multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate interrater reliability of the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for interpretation and reporting of oncology sequence variants and to assess current practices and perceptions surrounding these guidelines. Fifty-one variants were distributed to 20 participants from 10 institutions for classification using the new guidelines. Agreement was assessed using chance-corrected agreement (Cohen κ). κ was 0.35. To evaluate if data sharing could help resolve disagreements, a summary of variant classifications and additional information about each variant were distributed to all participants. κ improved to 0.7 after the original classifications were revised. Participants were invited to take a web-based survey regarding their perceptions of the guidelines. Only 20% (n = 3) of the survey respondents had prior experience with the guidelines in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers to guideline implementation included the complexity of the guidelines, discordance between clinical actionability and pathobiologic relevance, lack of familiarity with the new classifications, and uncertainty when applying criteria to potential germline variants. This study demonstrates noteworthy discordances between pathologists for variant classification in solid tumors when using the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. These findings highlight potential areas for clarification/refinement before mainstream clinical adoption.

Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor, an Aggressive Tumor Often Misclassified as Small Cell Variant of Hepatoblastoma.

The clinical management of pediatric liver tumors involves stratification into risk groups. One previously defined, high-risk group of hepatoblastomas is the small cell undifferentiated variant. In light of molecular studies showing SMARCB1 deletion in these tumors, it is now recognized that most small cell, undifferentiated liver tumors represent an aggressive unrelated tumor-the malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT). SMARCB1 is a member of the chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex and encodes the INI1 protein. The histologic diagnosis of MRT is currently based on INI1 negative immunoreactivity and the presence of rhabdoid morphology. INI1-negative small cell liver tumors lacking classic rhabdoid morphology are often misclassified as small cell undifferentiated hepatoblastomas (SCUD-HB), according to the current classification. Pediatric liver tumors diagnosed between 2003-2017 as SCUD-HB (four cases) or MRT (two cases) were identified from the Columbia University Pathology Department Archives. All tumors were associated with normal or low serum alpha fetoprotein levels, and showed an absence of immunohistochemical staining of hepatocellular markers (Hep-par1, Arginase) and loss of INI1 staining. Two cases were initially diagnosed as MRT, one with prominent rhabdoid morphology, the other with predominant small cell morphology. The remaining four cases with small cell morphology were classified as SCUD-HB. Ancillary molecular studies confirmed the loss of SMARCB1, supporting the diagnosis of MRT in all cases, proving morphology an unreliable criterion. It is critical to eliminate the term INI1-negative hepatoblastoma from the current classification scheme, and classify INI1-negative tumors as MRT, particularly since high-risk HB-chemotherapy regimens are not effective for treating MRT.

Pathway analysis of genomic pathology tests for prognostic cancer subtyping.

Genomic test results collected during the provision of medical care and stored in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems represent an opportunity for clinical research into disease heterogeneity and clinical outcomes. In this paper, we evaluate the use of genomic test reports ordered for cancer patients in order to derive cancer subtypes and to identify biological pathways predictive of poor survival outcomes. A novel method is proposed to calculate patient similarity based on affected biological pathways rather than gene mutations. We demonstrate that this approach identifies subtypes of prognostic value and biological pathways linked to survival, with implications for precision treatment selection and a better understanding of the underlying disease. We also share lessons learned regarding the opportunities and challenges of secondary use of observational genomic data to conduct such research.

Targeting SLMAP-ALK-a novel gene fusion in lung adenocarcinoma.

Assessment of ALK gene rearrangements is strongly recommended by the Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients proposed by IASLC, AMP, and CAP at the time of diagnosis for patients with advanced stage disease. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK gene rearrangements or the resulting fusion proteins have been, for the most part, successfully targeted with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The most frequent rearrangement, the EML4-ALK oncogenic fusion, has more than 10 distinct variants, each with a discrete breakpoint in EML4 Recent studies have suggested that EML4-ALK variants may have differential responses to TKIs. Additionally, non-EML4-ALK fusions that result from ALK rearrangements with diverse 5' partners could possibly have varied biologic and clinical implications in their therapeutic responses and outcomes of patients with NSCLC. Existing literature documents at least 20 non-EML4 fusion partners for ALK, and the clinical responsiveness to crizotinib ranges from increased sensitivity to resistance. This underscores the importance of identifying the precise 5' fusion partner to ALK before initiation of therapy. Herein we report the identification of a novel SLMAP-ALK fusion in a patient with NSCLC.

Detection of Tumor NTRK Gene Fusions to Identify Patients Who May Benefit from Tyrosine Kinase (TRK) Inhibitor Therapy.

Chromosomal rearrangements involving the NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 genes (NTRK genes), which encode the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (TRKA), brain-derived neurotrophic factor/neurotrophin-3 (BDNF/NT-3) growth factor receptor (TRKB), and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) growth factor receptor (TRKC) tyrosine kinases (TRK proteins), act as oncogenic drivers in a broad range of pediatric and adult tumor types. NTRK gene fusions have been shown to be actionable genomic events that are predictive of response to TRK kinase inhibitors, making their routine detection an evolving clinical priority. In certain exceedingly rare tumor types, NTRK gene fusions may be seen in the overwhelming majority of cases, whereas in a range of common cancers, reported incidences are in the range of 0.1% to 2%. Herein, we review the structure of the three NTRK genes and the nature and incidence of NTRK gene fusions in different solid tumor types, and we summarize the clinical data showing the importance of identifying tumors harboring such genomic events. We also outline the laboratory techniques that can be used to diagnose NTRK gene fusions in clinical samples. Finally, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for solid tumors to facilitate the identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer. This algorithm accounts for the widely varying frequencies by tumor histology and the underlying prevalence of TRK expression in the absence of NTRK gene fusions and is based on a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization, next-generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry assays.

Identification of a secondary RET mutation in a pediatric patient with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia leads to the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic metastatic medullary thyroid cancer in a parent: a case for sequencing the germline.

The incorporation of tumor-normal genomic testing into oncology can identify somatic mutations that inform therapeutic measures but also germline variants associated with unsuspected cancer predisposition. We describe a case in which a RET variant was identified in a 3-yr-old male with relapsed leukemia. Sanger sequencing revealed the patient's father and three siblings carried the same variant, associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A (MEN2A). Evaluation of the father led to the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Detection of RET mutations in families with hereditary MTC allows for genetic risk stratification and disease surveillance to reduce morbidity and mortality.

The History and Impact of Molecular Coding Changes on Coverage and Reimbursement of Molecular Diagnostic Tests: Transition from Stacking Codes to the Current Molecular Code Set Including Genomic Sequencing Procedures.

Changes in coding and coverage generate an uncertain reimbursement environment for molecular pathology laboratories. We analyzed our experience with two representative molecular oncology tests: a T-cell receptor (TCR) ß rearrangement test and a large (467-gene) cancer next-generation sequencing panel, the Columbia Combined Cancer Panel (CCCP). Before 2013, the TCR ß test was coded using stacked current procedural terminology codes and subsequently transitioned to a tier 1 code. CCCP was coded using a combination of tier 1 and 2 codes until 2015, when a new Genomic Sequencing Procedure code was adopted. A decrease in reimbursement of 61% was observed for the TCR ß test on moving from stacking to tier 1 codes. No initial increase in total rejection rate was observed, but a subsequent increase in rejection rates in 2015 and 2016 was noted. The CCCP test showed a similar decrease (48%) in reimbursement after adoption of the new Genomic Sequencing Procedure code and was accompanied by a sharp increase in rejection rates both on implementation of the new code and over time. Changes in coding can result in substantial decreases in reimbursement. This may be a barrier to patient access because of the high cost of molecular diagnostics. Revisions to the molecular code set will continue. These findings help laboratories and manufacturers prepare for the financial impact and advocate appropriately.