A meta-analysis of unilateral axillary approach for robotic surgery compared with open surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The Da Vinci Robot is the most advanced micro-control system in endoscopic surgical instruments and has gained a lot of valuable experience today. However, the technical feasibility and oncological safety of the robot over open surgery are still uncertain. This work is to systematically evaluate the efficacy of the unilateral axillary approach for robotic surgery compared to open surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were utilized to search for relevant literatures of robotic thyroid surgery using unilateral axillary approach compared to open thyroid surgery, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software version 5.3. Statistical analysis was performed through Mantle-Haenszel and inverse variance methods. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2660 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with the open group, the robotic group had a longer total thyroidectomy time, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative bleeding, more postoperative drainage, fewer retrieved central lymph nodes, and higher cosmetic satisfaction (all P < 0.05). In contrast, temporary and permanent laryngeal recurrent nerve injury, temporary and permanent hypoparathyroidism or hypocalcemia, brachial plexus nerve injury, number of retrieved central lymph nodes, number of retrieved lymph nodes in the lateral cervical region, number of lymph node metastases in the lateral cervical region, hematoma, seroma, lymphatic leak, stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) and unstimulated thyroglobulin (uTg), and the number and recurrence rate of patients with sTg <1ng/ml were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The unilateral axillary approach for robotic thyroid surgery may achieve outcomes similar to those of open surgery. Further validation is required in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

The value of intraoperative nerve monitoring against recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid reoperations.

ABSTRACT: Reoperative thyroidectomy is challenging for surgeons because of the higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy. RLN identification is the gold standard during thyroidectomy; however, it is sometimes difficult to perform thyroid reoperations. In recent years, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) has gained increased acceptance, and the use of IONM can be a valuable adjunct to visual identification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of IONM during thyroid reoperation.A total of 109 patients who met our criteria at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from January 2010 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the IONM group and the visualization-alone group (VA group) according to whether neuromonitoring was used during the operation. The patients' characteristics, perioperative data, and intraoperative information including the RLN identification, time of RLNs confirmation, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and the rate of RLN injury were collected.Sixty-five procedures (94 RLNs at risk) were performed in the IONM group, whereas 44 (65 RLNs at risk) were in the VA group. The rate of RLN identification was 96.8% in the IONM group and 75.4% in the VA group (P < .05). The incidence of RLN injury was 5.3% in the IONM group and 13.8% in the VA group (P > .05). The incidence of surgeon-related RLN injury rate was 0% in the IONM group compared to 7.7% in the VA group (P < .05), but the tumor-related or scar-related RLN injury rate between the 2 groups were not significantly different (4.3% vs 3.1%, 1.1% vs 3.1%, P > .05).IONM in thyroid reoperation was helpful in improving the RLN identification rate and reducing the surgeon-related RLN injury rate, but was ineffective in reducing the tumor-related and scar-related RLN injury rate. In the future, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes may be needed to further assess the role of IONM in thyroid reoperations.

Diagnostic performances of the KWAK-TIRADS classification, elasticity score, and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology of TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of the KWAK Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (KWAK-TIRADS), elasticity score (ES), and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) in the diagnosis of suspicious thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 392 cases of TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules that underwent thyroidectomy between January 2017 and October 2019. All patients underwent ultrasonography, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) before surgery. The nodules were classified into different categories based on the KWAK-TIRADS, ES, and BSRTC. Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative pathological characteristics. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated. Student's t-test and Pearson chi-square test were used to compare diagnostic performance. RESULTS: There were 159 patients in the benign group and 233 in the malignant group. The percentage of malignant nodules in KWAK-TIRADS categories 4a, 4b, and 4c were 44.3%, 64.8%, and 92.9%, respectively. The percentages of malignant nodules in ES 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 0%, 37.1%, 93.8%, and 100%, respectively. The percentage of malignant nodules in BSRTC levels I, II, III, IV, V and VI were 57.1%, 2.8%, 9.9%, 76.6%, 99.1%, and 100%, respectively. Among those methods, the BSRTC had better diagnostic efficiency than the KWAK-TIRADS and ES (Sp 81.1%, Se 93.6%, and AUC 0.918, P<0.01). Among the combined methods, KWAK-TIRADS+ES+BSRTC was more effective than KWAK-TIRADS+ES, KWAK-TIRADS+BSRTC, and ES+BSRTC (Sp 93.7%, Se 91.4%, and AUC 0.967, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The combination of KWAK-TIRADS, ES, and BSRTC can improve the accuracy of identifying category 4 thyroid nodules.

Multiple Duodenal Lipomas as a Rare Cause of Upper Gastrointestinal Obstruction: Case Report and Literature Review.

Duodenal lipomas are rare benign tumors and pose a diagnostic challenge as their symptoms are non-specific. In this article, we reported a case of duodenal lipoma presenting as upper gastrointestinal obstruction and reviewed the literature on relevant clinical manifestation, diagnosis and treatment. Our review of literature indicated that multiple duodenal lipomas as a cause of upper gastrointestinal obstruction as reported here are extremely rare. The preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the key to diagnosis, and surgical resection is the most effective means for the management of such duodenal lipomas.