Pyroptosis and inflammasomes in cancer and inflammation.

Nonprogrammed cell death (NPCD) and programmed cell death (PCD) are two types of cell death. Cell death is significantly linked to tumor development, medication resistance, cancer recurrence, and metastatic dissemination. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of cell death is essential for the treatment of cancer. Pyroptosis is a kind of PCD distinct from autophagy and apoptosis in terms of the structure and function of cells. The defining features of pyroptosis include the release of an inflammatory cascade reaction and the expulsion of lysosomes, inflammatory mediators, and other cellular substances from within the cell. Additionally, it displays variations in osmotic pressure both within and outside the cell. Pyroptosis, as evidenced by a growing body of research, is critical for controlling the development of inflammatory diseases and cancer. In this paper, we reviewed the current level of knowledge on the mechanism of pyroptosis and inflammasomes and their connection to cancer and inflammatory diseases. This article presents a theoretical framework for investigating the potential of therapeutic targets in cancer and inflammatory diseases, overcoming medication resistance, establishing nanomedicines associated with pyroptosis, and developing risk prediction models in refractory cancer. Given the link between pyroptosis and the emergence of cancer and inflammatory diseases, pyroptosis-targeted treatments may be a cutting-edge treatment strategy.

Modulating the tumor immune microenvironment with sunitinib malate supports the rationale for combined treatment with immunotherapy.

Small molecule inhibitors have proven useful in the treatment of a variety of tumors, but they are often limited by unsustainable benefits and confer resistance quickly. Immunotherapy can result in durable clinical responses, but activity only occurs in a minority of patients. The unfavorable tumor microenvironment (TME) is an important factor limiting immunotherapy. An appropriate understanding of how small molecule inhibitors modulate the TME may optimize the combination of targeted treatment and immunotherapy in managing tumors. In this study, we found that transient treatment with sunitinib malate inhibited the disorganized extension of tumor vessels, pericytes and collagen IV but increased the relative ratio of pericyte-wrapping blood vessels with alleviated hypoxia in tumors, which resulted from tumor vascular normalization. Sunitinib malate increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells and decreased regulatory T cells (Tregs), accompanied by inhibited expression of TGF-ß1 and IL-10 and increased CCL-28, IFN-γ and IL-12, but no significant inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) was observed. In addition, sunitinib malate increased the levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in TME, combined with anti-PD-1 therapy showed a significant reduction in tumor burden compared with either monotherapy, suggesting that anti-PD-1 therapy is reasonable after sunitinib malate treatment.

Alpha-enolase promotes cell glycolysis, growth, migration, and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer through FAK-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway.

BACKGROUND: During tumor formation and expansion, increasing glucose metabolism is necessary for unrestricted growth of tumor cells. Expression of key glycolytic enzyme alpha-enolase (ENO1) is controversial and its modulatory mechanisms are still unclear in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The expression of ENO1 was examined in NSCLC and non-cancerous lung tissues, NSCLC cell lines, and immortalized human bronchial epithelial cell (HBE) by quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and Western blot, respectively. The effects and modulatory mechanisms of ENO1 on cell glycolysis, growth, migration, invasion, and in vivo tumorigenesis and metastasis in nude mice were also analyzed. RESULTS: ENO1 expression was increased in NSCLC tissues in comparison to non-cancerous lung tissues. Similarly, NSCLC cell lines A549 and SPCA-1 also express higher ENO1 than HBE cell line in both mRNA and protein levels. Overexpressed ENO1 significantly elevated NSCLC cell glycolysis, proliferation, clone formation, migration, and invasion in vitro, as well as tumorigenesis and metastasis in vivo by regulating the expression of glycolysis, cell cycle, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated genes. Conversely, ENO1 knockdown reversed these effects. More importantly, our further study revealed that stably upregulated ENO1 activated FAK/PI3K/AKT and its downstream signals to regulate the glycolysis, cell cycle, and EMT-associated genes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ENO1 is responsible for NSCLC proliferation and metastasis; thus, ENO1 might serve as a potential molecular therapeutic target for NSCLC treatment.