Electrochemically actuated microelectrodes for minimally invasive peripheral nerve interfaces.

Electrode arrays that interface with peripheral nerves are used in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders; however, they require complex placement surgeries that carry a high risk of nerve injury. Here we leverage recent advances in soft robotic actuators and flexible electronics to develop highly conformable nerve cuffs that combine electrochemically driven conducting-polymer-based soft actuators with low-impedance microelectrodes. Driven with applied voltages as small as a few hundreds of millivolts, these cuffs allow active grasping or wrapping around delicate nerves. We validate this technology using in vivo rat models, showing that the cuffs form and maintain a self-closing and reliable bioelectronic interface with the sciatic nerve of rats without the use of surgical sutures or glues. This seamless integration of soft electrochemical actuators with neurotechnology offers a path towards minimally invasive intraoperative monitoring of nerve activity and high-quality bioelectronic interfaces.

Electrophysiological In Vitro Study of Long-Range Signal Transmission by Astrocytic Networks.

Astrocytes are diverse brain cells that form large networks communicating via gap junctions and chemical transmitters. Despite recent advances, the functions of astrocytic networks in information processing in the brain are not fully understood. In culture, brain slices, and in vivo, astrocytes, and neurons grow in tight association, making it challenging to establish whether signals that spread within astrocytic networks communicate with neuronal groups at distant sites, or whether astrocytes solely respond to their local environments. A multi-electrode array (MEA)-based device called AstroMEA is designed to separate neuronal and astrocytic networks, thus allowing to study the transfer of chemical and/or electrical signals transmitted via astrocytic networks capable of changing neuronal electrical behavior. AstroMEA demonstrates that cortical astrocytic networks can induce a significant upregulation in the firing frequency of neurons in response to a theta-burst charge-balanced biphasic current stimulation (5 pulses of 100 Hz × 10 with 200 ms intervals, 2 s total duration) of a separate neuronal-astrocytic group in the absence of direct neuronal contact. This result corroborates the view of astrocytic networks as a parallel mechanism of signal transmission in the brain that is separate from the neuronal connectome. Translationally, it highlights the importance of astrocytic network protection as a treatment target.

Clinical evaluation for the difference of absorbed doses calculated to medium and calculated to water by Monte Carlo method.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the difference of absorbed doses calculated to medium and to water by a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm based treatment planning system (TPS), and to assess the potential clinical impact to dose prescription. METHODS: Thirty patients, 10 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), 10 lung cancer and 10 bone metastases cases, were selected for this study. For each case, the treatment plan was generated using a commercial MC based TPS and dose was calculated to medium (Dm). The plan was recalculated for dose to water (Dw) using the same Monitor Units (MU) and control points. The differences between Dm and Dw were qualitatively evaluated by dose-volume parameters and by the plan subtraction method. All plans were measured using the MapCheck2, and gamma passing rates were calculated. RESULTS: For NPC and Lung cases, the mean differences between Dw and Dm for the targets were less than 2% and the maximum difference was 3.9%. The maximum difference of D2% for the organs at risk (OARs) was 6.7%. The maximum differences between Dw and Dm were as high as 10% in certain high density regions. For bone metastases cases, the mean differences between Dw and Dm for the targets were more than 2.2% and the maximum difference was 7.1%. The differences between Dw and Dm for the OARs were basically negligible. At 3%&3 mm criterion, the gamma passing rate of Dw plan and Dm plan were close (> 94%). CONCLUSION: The differences between Dw and Dm has little clinical impact for most clinical cases. In bony structures the differences may become clinically significant if the target/OAR is receiving doses close to its tolerance limit which can potentially influence the selection or rejection of a particular plan.

Gantry angle-dependent correction of dose detection error due to panel position displacement in IMRT dose verification using EPIDs.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the mechanical position displacement of three types of electronic portal image device (EPID) panels at different gantry angles and evaluate the impact of positional displacement on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification using an EPID. METHODS: Three types of linear accelerators and EPIDs (aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT) were used. The portal images were taken every 10° within 360° range. The position coordinate difference between the panel center and the portal film center at different gantry angles was measured, then the mechanical position displacement of EPIDs dependent on the gantry angles was analyzed. For the three linear accelerators and EPIDs, five IMRT plans were measured using EPIDs at 0° gantry angel and at the actual treatment angles. The Gamma technique was used to evaluate the resulted dose difference before and after the corrections of the position displacement by a in-house software. RESULTS: For aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT, the maximum mechanical position displacement was 2.9 ± 0.1 mm, 0.2 ± 0.1 mm and 0.1 ± 0.3 mm in the lateral direction and -4.2 ± 0.2 mm, -4.2 ± 0.1 mm and -2.2 ± 0.1 mm in the longitudinal direction, respectively. The position displacement in the longitudinal direction of the three EPIDs can be fitted well with a function. For aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT, the 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates were increased by 6.7%, 2.9% and 0.1% after displacement corrections; and while the 2%/2 mm gamma pass rates were increased by 11.2%, 8.1% and 1.6%. After the displacement correction, there was a slight gamma pass rate difference between the fixed zero degree gantry and the actual treatment angles. CONCLUSION: When the EPIDs were used for IMRT dose verification, there was occasionally large EPID mechanical position displacement, which should be corrected.