Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face for Nursing Home Residents With Acute Presentations: A Noninferiority Study.

OBJECTIVES: Telemedicine and face-to-face outreach services to nursing homes (NHs) have been used to reduce hospital utilization rates for acute presentations. However, how these modalities compare against each other is unclear. This article examines if the management of acute presentations in NHs with care involving telemedicine is noninferior to care delivered face-to-face. DESIGN: A noninferiority study was conducted on a prospective cohort. Face-to-face intervention involved on-site assessment by a geriatrician and aged care clinical nurse specialist (CNS). Telemedicine intervention involved on-site assessment by an aged care CNS with telemedicine input by a geriatrician. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 438 NH residents with acute presentations from 17 NHs between November 2021 and June 2022. METHODS: Between-group differences in proportion of residents successfully managed on-site and mean number of encounters were evaluated using bootstrapped multiple linear regression; 95% CIs were compared against predefined noninferiority margins with noninferiority P values calculated. RESULTS: In the adjusted models, care involving telemedicine demonstrated noninferiority in the difference in proportion of residents successfully managed on-site (95% CI lower limit -6.2% to -1.4% vs -10% noninferiority margin; P < .001 for noninferiority) but not in the difference in mean number of encounters (95% CI upper limit 1.42 to 1.50 encounters vs 1 encounter noninferiority margin; P = .7 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In our model of care, care that involved telemedicine was noninferior to care delivered face-to-face in managing NH residents with acute presentations on-site. However, additional encounters may be required. Application of telemedicine ought to be tailored to fit the needs and preferences of stakeholders.

Parent-child reading interactions among English and English as a second language speakers in an underserved pediatric clinic in Hawai'i.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare reading patterns between English-speaking and English as a Second Language (ESL) families in a health care setting in Hawai'i. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed at an underserved pediatric primary care clinic in Hawai'i. Caregivers of patients between the ages of 6 months to 5 years were asked questions regarding demographics and parent-child reading interactions. Respondents were categorized into English-speaking or ESL groups based on primary language spoken at home. Pearson chi2 tests and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare demographic differences, reading frequency, and reading attitudes between groups. RESULTS: One-hundred three respondents completed the survey Fifty percent were ESL. All ESL respondents were of Asian-Pacific Islander (API) or mixed Asian ethnicity. All Caucasians in the study (n = 9) were in the English-speaking group. Between the English-speaking (n = 52) and ESL (n = 51) groups, there were no significant statistical differences in age or gender of the child, reading attitudes, or parent's educational status. Parents in the ESL group read to their children significantly fewer days per week than their English-speaking counterparts, had significantly fewer books in the home, and lived significantly fewer years in the United States. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that API immigrant families share similar attitudes about reading as English-speaking families in Hawai'i but have significantly fewer books in their household and read significantly less frequently Physicians working with API populations should be aware that immigrant children may have fewer reading interactions and should counsel parents on the importance of reading daily.