Clinicopathological and molecular features between synchronous and metachronous metastases in colorectal cancer.

The molecular difference between synchronous and metachronous metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. Between 2000 and 2010, a total of 492 CRC patients were enrolled, including 280 with synchronous metastasis and 212 with metachronous metastasis. Clinicopathological and molecular features were compared between the two groups. Patients with synchronous metastasis were more likely to have right-sided CRC, poorly differentiated tumors, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pathological tumor (T) and node (N) categories, and liver metastases than those with metachronous metastasis. For right-sided CRC, patients with synchronous metastasis had more lymphovascular invasion and liver metastases than those with metachronous metastasis. For left-sided CRC, patients with synchronous metastasis were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pathological T and N categories, and liver metastases than those with metachronous metastasis. Regarding the genetic mutations, patients with metachronous metastasis had more mutations in TP53, NRAS, and HRAS and fewer mutations in APC than those with synchronous metastasis; for right-sided CRC, synchronous metastasis was associated with more APC mutations than metachronous metastasis, while for left-sided CRC, metachronous metastasis was associated with more TP53 and NRAS mutations than synchronous metastasis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in metachronous metastasis patients than in synchronous metastasis patients, especially those with left-sided CRC. Multivariate analysis showed that age, sex, lymphovascular invasion, pathological N category, metachronous metastasis, and BRAF and NRAS mutations were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. CRC patients with synchronous metastasis had a worse OS than those with metachronous metastasis and exhibited distinct genetic mutations.

Clinicopathological and Molecular Features of Colorectal Cancer Patients With Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial, and the molecular differences between them are unclear. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, a total of 1,483 CRC patients were included. Among them, 73 patients (4.9%) were diagnosed with MAC. The clinicopathological features and genetic alterations were compared between MAC and NMAC. RESULTS: After propensity score matching to balance age and sex between MAC and NMAC patients, 292 CRC patients (73 MAC and 219 NMAC) were enrolled in the analysis at a 1:3 ratio. In right-sided colon cancer, patients with MAC were more likely to have Borrmann types 3 and 4 tumors, poor differentiation, and advanced T category and tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage, chemotherapy, and a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared with patients with NMAC. In left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer, patients with MAC were more likely to have Borrmann types 3 and 4 tumors, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, advanced T and N categories and TNM stages, chemotherapy, and a worse 5-year OS rate than patients with NMAC. Regarding genetic alterations, for NMAC, right-sided colon cancer had more BRAF mutations than left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer. For MAC, right-sided colon cancer was associated with more microsatellite instability-high tumors and more AKT1 mutations than left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The genetic alterations are distinct between MAC and NMAC in CRC. Tumor location may have an impact on genetic alterations and patient prognosis in MAC and NMAC.

Clinicopathological and Molecular Profiles of Sporadic Microsatellite Unstable Colorectal Cancer with or without the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP).

BACKGROUND: The 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is a specific phenotype of colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) tumors. METHODS: In this study, we determined the CIMP status using eight methylation markers in 92 MSI-high CRC patients after excluding five germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The mutation spectra of 22 common CRC-associated genes were analyzed by NGS. RESULTS: Of the 92 sporadic MSI-high tumors, 23 (25%) were considered CIMP-high (expressed more than 5 of 8 markers). CIMP-high tumors showed proximal colon preponderance and female predominance. The mutation profiles of CIMP-high tumors were significantly different from those of CIMP-low or CIMP-0 tumors (i.e., higher frequencies of BRAF, POLD1, MSH3, and SMAD4 mutations but lower frequencies of APC, TP53, and KRAS mutations). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage was the independent prognostic factor affecting overall survival (OS). Among the MSI-high cases, the CIMP status did not impact the outcome of patients with MSI-high tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Only TNM stage was a statistically significant predictor of outcomes independent of CIMP profiles in MSI-high CRC patients. Sporadic MSI-high CRCs with different mechanisms of carcinogenesis have specific mutation profiles and clinicopathological features.