RESUMO
Background: Hypertension is the most significant global risk factor for mortality and morbidity, making standardized blood pressure measurement crucial. Objectives: To investigate whether the location of blood pressure monitors and the positioning of cuffs yield differing results in blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang College between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023 were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into four groups. These groups were defined based on the positioning of monitoring equipment as follows: varied placements of cuffs on automatic blood pressure monitors, different heights for mercury column blood pressure monitors, varied heights for automatic blood pressure monitors, and different orientations for the cuff airbag tubes on electrocardiogram monitors. Blood pressure was measured and recorded for each group, followed by an analysis of the variations in readings across the different setups. Results: In the first cohort of 763 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure measured at the standard upper arm site was 128.8 ± 10.5â mmHg, compared to 125.3 ± 10.4â mmHg at the elbow fossa. The corresponding diastolic pressures were 79.2 ± 10.7 and 75.0 ± 10.6â mmHg, respectively. The difference in systolic pressure between these positions was significant at 3.48 ± 3.22â mmHg (t1 = 29.91, p1 < 0.001) and for diastolic pressure at 4.23 ± 1.31â mmHg (t2 = 88.98, p2 < 0.001). For the subsequent groups, involving 253, 312, and 225 individuals, respectively, blood pressure measurements were analyzed and compared across different methods within each group. All p-values exceeded 0.05, indicating no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Blood pressure values measured at the elbow fossa position using an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer were found to be lower than those measured at the upper arm position, with a difference of 3.48â mmHg for systolic and 4.23â mmHg for diastolic pressures. It is therefore essential to position the cuff correctly, specifically 2-3â cm above the elbow fossa, when utilizing an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer for blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, the placement of the mercury column sphygmomanometer and the automated sphygmomanometer at varying heights had no significant effect on blood pressure readings. Similarly, the orientation of the electrocardiogram's cuffed balloon tube, whether facing upward or downward, did not influence blood pressure measurement outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, the implantation of permanent cardiac pacemakers entails mostly subclavian vein puncture, which is relatively simpler and easier to master. However, due to individual differences, some patients carry a narrow space between the clavicle and the first rib. If the range of activity of the upper limb is increased, the friction between the electrode wire and the bone gap leads to the breakage of the electrode wire, which is manifested by poor pacemaker perception and pacing. CASE SUMMARY: A 68-year-old woman underwent permanent pacemaker implantation in our hospital because of third-degree atrioventricular block 6 years ago. At that time, the patient was recommended to have a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation, and finally chose a single-chamber permanent pacemaker because she could not afford the cost. The patient has repeatedly lost consciousness for no obvious reason in the past 3 d, and went to our hospital for treatment. The chest X-ray showed that the pacemaker electrode was broken. After the patient was given a pacemaker electrode replacement, the patient did not continue to lose consciousness. CONCLUSION: Because the electrodes implanted in the subclavian approach are close to the clavicle and the first rib, the pacemaker electrodes may wear out. If the patient loses consciousness again after the pacemaker is implanted, we should consider whether there is a pacemaker. The possibility of electrode breakage, and timely help the patient to replace the new pacemaker electrodes.