CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES OF INFANTS WITH RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY WHO FAIL ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

PURPOSE: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with retinopathy of prematurity who failed intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 211 eyes (112 patients) treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor as initial therapy for retinopathy of prematurity at a single academic institution between 2011 and 2019 and an additional 6 eyes (3 patients) referred to us for management of failed antivascular endothelial growth factor. RESULTS: Among the 211 eyes receiving initial treatment at our institution, 17 eyes (11%) failed. Of the 23 total eyes managed by us for failure, 3 eyes (13%) failed after 50-week postmenstrual age. Failure manifested as recurrent plus in 14 eyes (58%), recurrent Stage 3 in 13 eyes (54%) and retinal detachment in 5 eyes (21%). Treatment failures were managed with laser (13 eyes), repeat injection (4 eyes), vitrectomy (2 eyes), or a combination of modalities (4 eyes). Follow-up of ≥6 months was available for 18 of the 23 eyes. The retina was fully attached in 17 eyes, and fixation behavior was present in 10 eyes. CONCLUSION: The most common manifestations of treatment failure were recurrent plus and Stage 3. The failure rate at our institution was 11.0%. A significant proportion of failures occurred after 50-week postmenstrual age. Most failed eyes had favorable anatomical outcomes and over half demonstrated fixation behavior.

DISTINCTIVE WHITE FUNDUS LESIONS IN FAMILIAL EXUDATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY: A NEWLY CHARACTERIZED CLINICAL FEATURE.

PURPOSE: To report a novel clinical finding associated with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy in three patients using fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and histopathology. METHODS: Observational case series of three patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, an ophthalmic examination with fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography were used to document clinical findings between January 2007 and January 2015. Surgical specimens from one case were examined using standard histopathologic techniques, as well as transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray analysis. RESULTS: Distinctive white preretinal granules were noted in all cases and were found to be extramacular in location. Histopathology in one case revealed the granules to be crystalline structures with a regular pattern evident on higher magnification. The chemical constitution was found to be carbon, oxygen, and fluorine. CONCLUSION: Our case series represents the first description of white preretinal granules in association with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. The authors have not seen these granules in other forms of retinopathy and their presence may aid in differentiating this disease from other entities.

Lutein/zeaxanthin for the treatment of age-related cataract: AREDS2 randomized trial report no. 4.

IMPORTANCE: Age-related cataract is a leading cause of visual impairment in the United States. The prevalence of age-related cataract is increasing, with an estimated 30.1 million Americans likely to be affected by 2020. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily oral supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin affects the risk for cataract surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), a multicenter, double-masked clinical trial, enrolled 4203 participants, aged 50 to 85 years, at risk for progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to daily placebo; lutein/zeaxanthin, 10mg/2mg; omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, 1 g; or a combination to evaluate the effects on the primary outcome of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cataract surgery was documented at annual study examination with the presence of pseudophakia or aphakia, or reported during telephone calls at 6-month intervals between study visits. Annual best-corrected visual acuity testing was performed. A secondary outcome of AREDS2 was to evaluate the effects of lutein/zeaxanthin on the subsequent need for cataract surgery. RESULTS: A total of 3159 AREDS2 participants were phakic in at least 1 eye and 1389 of 6027 study eyes underwent cataract surgery during the study, with median follow-up of 4.7 years. The 5-year probability of progression to cataract surgery in the no lutein/zeaxanthin group was 24%. For lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratios for progression to cataract surgery was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P = .54). For participants in the lowest quintile of dietary intake of lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratio comparing lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin for progression to cataract surgery was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.48-0.96; P = .03). The hazard ratio for 3 or more lines of vision loss was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P = .61 for lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin had no statistically significant overall effect on rates of cataract surgery or vision loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00345176.