From the IASLC Early Detection and Screening Committee Terminology Issues in Screening and Early Detection of Lung Cancer - IASLC Early Detection and Screening Committee Expert Group Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: To facilitate global implementation of lung cancer (LC) screening and early detection in a quality assured and consistent manner, common terminology is needed. Researchers and clinicians within different specialties may use the same terms but with different meanings, or different terms for the same intended meanings. METHODS: The Diagnostics Working Group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee has analyzed and discussed relevant terms used on a regular basis and suggests recommendations for consensus definitions of terminology applicable in this setting. We explored how to reach consensus to define relevant and unambiguous terminology for use by health care providers, researchers, patients, screening participants and family. RESULTS: Terms and definitions for epidemiological and health-economical purposes included: Standardized incidence and mortality rates, LC specific survival, long-term survival and cure rates, and overdiagnosis, overtreatment, undertreatment. Terms and definitions for defining screening findings included: Positive, false positive, negative, false negative and indeterminate findings and additional and incidental findings. Terms and definitions for describing parameters in screening programmes included: Opportunistic vs programmatic screening, screening rounds, interval/interim diagnoses, invasive and minimally invasive procedures. Terms and definitions for shared decision making included: LC screening - possible harms and risks and LC risk and modifiers prior and posterior to a measure. CONCLUSIONS: A common set of terminology with standard definitions is recommended for describing clinical LC screening programmes, the discussion about effectiveness and outcomes, or the clinical setting. The use of the terms should be clearly defined and explained.

Resectable non-stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: the surgical perspective.

Surgery remains an essential element of the multimodality radical treatment of patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. In addition, thoracic surgery is one of the key specialties involved in the lung cancer tumour board. The importance of the surgeon in the setting of a multidisciplinary panel is ever-increasing in light of the crucial concept of resectability, which is at the base of patient selection for neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments within trials and in real-world practice. This review covers some of the topics which are relevant in the daily practice of a thoracic oncological surgeon and should also be known by the nonsurgical members of the tumour board. It covers the following topics: the pre-operative selection of the surgical candidate in terms of fitness in light of the ever-improving nonsurgical treatment alternatives unfit patients may benefit from; the definition of resectability, which is so important to include patients into trials and to select the most appropriate radical treatment; the impact of surgical access and surgical extension with the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery, sublobar resections and parenchymal-sparing sleeve resections to avoid pneumonectomy.

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In localized nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) systemic recurrences after surgery are common. Therefore, adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic disease the question is whether ICIs can further improve the outcome. RECENT FINDINGS: In several phase I/II trials, major pathological response (MPR) rates with several ICIs between 7% and 50% were seen. No major additional side effects occurred. In combination with chemotherapy CheckMate-816 randomized additional neoadjuvant nivolumab and achieved a high pathological complete response (pCR) rate and a better event-free survival (EFS) - without negatively influencing surgery. More randomized trials are performed with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and adjuvant treatment after surgery. In Keynote-671, pembrolizumab is used pre and postoperatively with a significantly higher EFS rate at 2 years (62.4% vs. 40.6%). Similar preliminary results are reported in the AEGEAN (durvalumab) and Neotorch (toripalimab) trials. Higher tumour stage and MPR, partly programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumour mutational burden (TMB) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) are correlated with efficacy. SUMMARY: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy improves MPR and EFS rates, especially in more advanced tumours and tumours expressing PD-L1 - without relevantly increasing toxicities. But further and longer evaluation is needed.